Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 378
Filtrar
Más filtros

Tipo del documento
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
J Proteome Res ; 2024 Aug 26.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39185811

RESUMEN

PF1 + 2 plasma levels are a crucial indicator for assessing anticoagulant action in individuals receiving anticoagulant treatment. Urine also has PF1 + 2 levels due to its molecular size. Hence, the present study aims to measure urinary prothrombin fragment 1 + 2 (uPF1 + 2) in patients taking anticoagulants in order to divulge a noninvasive surrogate marker of PT-INR of blood coagulopathy. A total of 205 people participated in the study: 104 patients on acenocoumarol (AC) and 101 healthy controls (HC). Clinical parameters, including PT-INR, urinary creatinine, etc., were measured in all subjects. To evaluate uPF1 + 2 in samples, MALDI-TOF-MS, Western blot analysis, and ELISA tests were used. The MALDI-TOF-MS results showed the presence of uPF1 + 2 in both AC and HC urine samples. The Western blot, ELISA experiment, and unpaired t test results displayed that the patients with AC had significantly increased levels of uPF1 + 2 compared to HC. A regression study showed a strong positive relation between blood-based PT-INR and uPF1 + 2. ROC validation also revealed the clinical efficacy of uPF1 + 2. For the goal to monitor anticoagulant medication, the present study highlights PF1 + 2, which describes the overall hemostatic capacity and might be utilized in addition to or instead of PT-INR.

2.
Rheumatology (Oxford) ; 63(9): 2363-2371, 2024 Sep 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38479813

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: Myositis-specific and associated autoantibodies are important biomarkers in routine clinical use. We assessed local testing performance for myositis autoantibodies by comparing line immunoassay (LIA) to protein radio-immunoprecipitation and identifying clinical characteristics associated with each myositis autoantibody in the MyoCite cohort. METHODS: Serum samples from patients within the MyoCite cohort, a well-characterized retro-prospective dataset of adult and juvenile idiopathic inflammatory myopathy (IIM) patients in Lucknow, India (2017-2020), underwent LIA at Sanjay Gandhi Postgraduate Institute of Medical Science (SGPGIMS), Lucknow. Immunoprecipitation of 147 IIM patients' serum samples (125 adult-onset, 22 juvenile-onset) was conducted at the University of Bath, with researchers blind to LIA results. LIA performance was assessed against immunoprecipitation as the reference standard, measuring sensitivity, specificity and inter-rater agreement. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression determined clinical associations for specific myositis-specific autoantibodies. RESULTS: Immunoprecipitation identified myositis autoantibodies in 56.5% (n = 83) of patient samples, with anti-Jo1 (n = 16; 10.9%) as the most common, followed by anti-MDA5 (n = 14, 9.5%). While LIA showed good agreement for anti-Jo1, anti-PL7 and anti-PL12 (Cohen's κ 0.79, 0.83 and 1, respectively), poor agreement was observed in other subgroups, notably anti-TIF1γ (Cohen's κ 0.21). Strongly positive samples, especially in myositis-specific autoantibodies, correlated more with immunoprecipitation results. Overall, 59 (40.1%) samples exhibited non-congruence on LIA and immunoprecipitation, and κ values for LIAs for anti-TIF1γ, anti-Ku, anti-PmScl, anti-Mi2 and anti-SAE ranged between 0.21 and 0.60. CONCLUSION: While LIA reliably detected anti-Jo1, anti-PL7, anti-PL12, anti-MDA5 and anti-NXP-2, it also displayed false positives and negatives. Its effectiveness in detecting other autoantibodies, such as anti-TIF1γ, was poor.


Asunto(s)
Autoanticuerpos , Miositis , Sensibilidad y Especificidad , Humanos , Autoanticuerpos/sangre , Autoanticuerpos/inmunología , Masculino , Femenino , Miositis/inmunología , Miositis/sangre , Miositis/diagnóstico , Adulto , Persona de Mediana Edad , Helicasa Inducida por Interferón IFIH1/inmunología , Inmunoprecipitación , Biomarcadores/sangre , Adolescente , Inmunoensayo/métodos , Niño , Estudios de Cohortes , Adulto Joven , Estudios Prospectivos , Adenosina Trifosfatasas , Proteínas de Unión al ADN , Factores de Transcripción
3.
Rheumatology (Oxford) ; 63(3): 657-664, 2024 Mar 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37228012

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: We aimed to explore current practice and interregional differences in the treatment of idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIMs). We triangulated these observations considering countries' gross national income (GNI), disease subtypes, and symptoms using patient-reported information. METHODS: A cross-sectional ancillary analysis of the 'COVID-19 vaccination in auto-immune disease' (COVAD) e-survey containing demographic characteristics, IIM subtypes (DM, PM, IBM, anti-synthetase syndrome [ASSD], immune-mediated necrotizing myopathy [IMNM], overlap myopathies [OM]), current symptoms (surrogate for organ involvement) and treatments (corticosteroids [CS], immunomodulators [IM], i.e. antimalarials, immunosuppressants [IS], IVIG, biologic treatments and targeted-synthetic small molecules). Treatments were presented descriptively according to continents, GNI, IIM and organ involvement, and associated factors were analysed using multivariable binary logistic regressions. RESULTS: Of 18 851 respondents from 94 countries, 1418 with IIM were analysed (age 61 years, 62.5% females). DM (32.4%), IBM (24.5%) and OM (15.8%) were the most common subtypes. Treatment categories included IS (49.4%), CS (38.5%), IM (13.8%) and IVIG (9.4%). Notably, treatments varied across regions, GNI categories (IS mostly used in higher-middle income, IM in lower-middle income, IVIG and biologics largely limited to high-income countries), IIM subtypes (IS and CS associated with ASSD, IM with OM and DM, IVIG with IMNM, and biologic treatments with OM and ASSD) and disease manifestations (IS and CS with dyspnoea). Most inter-regional treatment disparities persisted after multivariable analysis. CONCLUSION: We identified marked regional treatment disparities in a global cohort of IIM. These observations highlight the need for international consensus-driven management guidelines considering patient-centred care and available resources.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedades Autoinmunes , Miositis , Femenino , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Masculino , Vacunas contra la COVID-19 , Estudios Transversales , Inmunoglobulinas Intravenosas/uso terapéutico , Miositis/tratamiento farmacológico , Inmunosupresores/uso terapéutico , Adyuvantes Inmunológicos
4.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39324556

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: The presence of comorbidities can substantially affect patients' quality of life, but data regarding their impact on idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIMs) are limited. METHODS: We examined the prevalence of comorbidities in IIM patients, other autoimmune rheumatic diseases (oAIRDs), and healthy controls (HCs), using data from the self-reported COVAD-2 survey. We defined Basic Multimorbidity (BM) as the presence of ≥ 2 non-rheumatic chronic conditions and Complex Multimorbidity (CM) as the presence of ≥ 3 non-rheumatic chronic conditions affecting ≥3 organ systems. Hierarchical Clustering on Principal Components was performed for grouping. RESULTS: Among the COVAD respondents, 1558 IIMs, 4591 oAIRDs, and 3652 HCs were analysed. IIMs exhibited a high burden of comorbidities (OR: 1.62 vs oAIRDs and 2.95 vs HCs, p< 0.01), BM (OR 1.66 vs oAIRDs and 3.52 vs HCs, p< 0.01), CM (OR: 1.69 vs AIRDs and 6.23 vs HCs, p< 0.01), and mental health disorders (MHDs) (OR 1.33 vs oAIRDs and 2.63 vs HCs, p< 0.01). Among the IIM patients, those with comorbidities or MHDs had lower PROMIS Global Physical (PGP), PROMIS Global Mental (PGM), and PROMIS Physical Function (SF10) scores, and higher fatigue (F4a) scores (all p< 0.001). PGP, PGM, SF10a and F4a were influenced by age, active disease, BM, and MHDs. Four distinct clusters were identified among the IIMs according to comorbidities and PROMIS scores. CONCLUSION: Patients with IIMs have a higher burden of comorbidities that influence physical and mental health, identifiable as clinical clusters for optimized and holistic management approaches.

5.
J Rheumatol ; 2024 Jun 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38561192

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To describe the incidence, risk factors, and outcomes associated with serious infections in patients with Takayasu arteritis (TA). METHODS: Serious infections, defined as infections resulting in hospitalization or death or unusual infections like tuberculosis, were identified from a cohort of patients with TA. Corticosteroid and disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARD) use at the time of serious infection was noted. Demographic characteristics, clinical presentation, angiography, and disease activity at presentation, and the use of DMARDs during follow-up were compared between patients with TA with or without serious infections. Mortality in patients with TA who developed serious infections was compared to those who did not using hazard ratios (HR; with 95% CI). RESULTS: Of 238 patients with TA, 38 (16%) had developed serious infections (50 episodes, multiple episodes in 8; 3 episodes resulted in death). Among the 38 initial episodes, 11/38 occurred in those not on corticosteroids and 14/38 in those not on DMARDs. Pneumonia (n = 19) was the most common infection, followed by tuberculosis (n = 12). Patients with TA who developed serious infections vs those who did not had higher disease activity at presentation (active disease 97.4% vs 69.5%, mean Indian Takayasu Arteritis Activity Score 2010 12.7 (SD 7.3) vs 10.2 (SD 7.0), mean Disease Extent Index in Takayasu Arteritis 11.2 (SD 6.1) vs 8.8 (SD 6.1) and were more frequently initiated on corticosteroids or DMARDs. HRs calculated using exponential parametric regression survival-time model revealed increased mortality rate in patients with TA who developed serious infections (HR 5.52, 95% CI 1.75-17.39). CONCLUSION: Serious infections, which occurred in the absence of immunosuppressive treatment in approximately one-fifth of patients with TA, were associated with increased mortality in patients with TA.

6.
Rheumatol Int ; 44(9): 1725-1731, 2024 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39003346

RESUMEN

Notwithstanding the wealth of literature on COVID-19, studies focusing on young adults with autoimmune diseases (AD) are lacking. To determine early (within 7 days) and late (after 7 days) anti-SARS-CoV-2 vaccine-related adverse events (AEs), post-vaccine disease flares, COVID-19 severity and breakthrough infections (B-INFs) in young people with rheumatic diseases (RMDs) and non-rheumatic autoimmune diseases (nr-ADs) compared to healthy controls (HC). Data were captured through the international COVID-19 vaccination in autoimmune diseases (COVAD) 1 and 2 questionnaires. Of 20,685 complete responses, we identified 6010 from patients aged 18-35 years (1692 RMD, 400 nrADs, 3918 HC) who received up to 4 vaccine doses. BNT162b2 was the most frequently administered vaccine and prior to vaccination, 7% of people with nrAD were taking immunosuppressants (IS) versus 80% in RMDs. Early mild AEs were more frequent in RMDs (93%) and nr-ADs (92%) compared to HC (85%). The frequency of late mild AEs was < 20% in all groups. Severe AEs were rare. SARS-CoV-2 infection rates were similar across all groups, however, RMD patients reported a single episode of infection more frequently than nrADs and HC, while nrADs reported multiple infections more frequently than RMD. Self-reported disease flares were reported by 10% or RMD and 7% of nrAD patients. Our study reinforces the safety of anti-SARS-CoV-2 vaccine also in young people with ADs, but it also highlights that among young individuals the number and clinical picture of SARS-CoV-2 infections is affected more by the type of AD rather than by coexisting IS therapy.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedades Autoinmunes , Vacunas contra la COVID-19 , COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2 , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Humanos , COVID-19/prevención & control , Adulto Joven , Femenino , Adulto , Masculino , Vacunas contra la COVID-19/efectos adversos , Vacunas contra la COVID-19/administración & dosificación , Adolescente , SARS-CoV-2/inmunología , Enfermedades Reumáticas/tratamiento farmacológico , Vacuna BNT162/efectos adversos , Vacunación/efectos adversos , Infección Irruptiva
7.
Rheumatol Int ; 44(11): 2505-2515, 2024 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39180530

RESUMEN

To look for the spectrum of infections and the factors predisposing to infection in patients with systemic sclerosis (SSc). In this retrospective study, demographic, clinical features, details of infections, immunosuppressive therapy, and outcomes of patients with SSc attending clinics at department of Clinical Immunology and Rheumatology, Sanjay Gandhi Postgraduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow, India from 1990 to 2022 were captured. Multivariable-adjusted logistic regression was applied to identify independent predictors of infection. Data of 880 patients, mean age 35.5 ± 12 years, and female: male ratio 7.7:1, were analyzed. One hundred and fifty-three patients had at least 1 infection with a total of 233 infectious episodes. Infections were most common in lung followed by skin and soft tissue. Tuberculosis was diagnosed in 45 patients (29.4%). Klebsiella was the commonest non-tubercular organism in lung and Escherichia coli in urinary tract infections. In comparison to matched control group, patients with infection had a greater number of admissions due to active disease, odds ratio (OR) 6.27 (CI 3.23-12.18), were receiving immunosuppressive medication OR, 5.05 (CI 2.55-10.00), and had more digital ulcers OR, 2.53 (CI 1.17-5.45). Patients who had infection had more likelihood for death OR, 13.63 (CI 4.75 -39.18). Tuberculosis is the commonest infection and lung remains the major site of infection in patients with SSc. Number of hospital admissions, digital ulcers and immunosuppressive therapy are predictors of serious infection in patients with SSc. Patients with infections had more likelihood of death.


Asunto(s)
Inmunosupresores , Esclerodermia Sistémica , Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Esclerodermia Sistémica/complicaciones , Esclerodermia Sistémica/epidemiología , Esclerodermia Sistémica/microbiología , Adulto , Persona de Mediana Edad , Inmunosupresores/uso terapéutico , India/epidemiología , Tuberculosis/epidemiología , Tuberculosis/tratamiento farmacológico , Factores de Riesgo , Adulto Joven
8.
Rheumatol Int ; 44(1): 73-80, 2024 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38060005

RESUMEN

To investigate the frequency, profile, and severity of COVID-19 breakthrough infections (BI) in patients with type I diabetes mellitus (T1DM) compared to healthy controls (HC) after vaccination. The second COVID-19 Vaccination in Autoimmune Diseases (COVAD-2) survey is a multinational cross-sectional electronic survey which has collected data on patients suffering from various autoimmune diseases including T1DM. We performed a subgroup analysis on this cohort to investigate COVID-19 BI characteristics in patients with T1DM. Logistic regression with propensity score matching analysis was performed. A total of 9595 individuals were included in the analysis, with 100 patients having T1DM. Among the fully vaccinated cohort, 16 (16%) T1DM patients had one BI and 2 (2%) had two BIs. No morbidities or deaths were reported, except for one patient who required hospitalization with oxygen without admission to intensive care. The frequency, clinical features, and severity of BIs were not significantly different between T1DM patients and HCs after adjustment for confounding factors. Our study did not show any statistically significant differences in the frequency, symptoms, duration, or critical care requirements between T1DM and HCs after COVID-19 vaccination. Further research is needed to identify factors associated with inadequate vaccine response in patients with BIs, especially in patients with autoimmune diseases.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedades Autoinmunes , COVID-19 , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1 , Humanos , COVID-19/prevención & control , Vacunas contra la COVID-19 , Estudios Transversales , Enfermedades Autoinmunes/epidemiología , Vacunación
9.
Rheumatol Int ; 44(10): 1923-1933, 2024 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39138675

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To determine the occurrence of breakthrough COVID-19 infections (BIs) in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) compared with patients with other rheumatic autoimmune diseases (rAIDs), patients with non-rheumatic autoimmune diseases (nrAIDs), and healthy controls (HCs). METHODS: The study was based on data from 7035 fully vaccinated respondents to the online COVAD questionnaire with SLE (N = 852), rAIDs (N = 3098), or nrAIDs (N = 414), and HCs (N = 2671). BI was defined as COVID-19 infection occurring in individuals vaccinated with ≥ 2 doses (or 1 dose of J&J) ≥ 14 days after vaccination and not after 6 months since the last vaccine dose. Data were analysed using linear and logistic regression models. RESULTS: A total of 91/852 (10.7%) SLE patients reported at least one BI. The frequency of BIs in SLE patients was comparable to that among HCs (277/2671; p = 0.847) and patients with nrAID (39/414; p = 0.552) but higher than that among patients with other rAIDs (235/3098; p = 0.005). No demographic factors or treatments were associated with BIs in SLE patients (p ≥ 0.05 for all). Joint pain was more frequent in SLE patients than in HCs (odds ratio [OR]: 3.38; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.89-6.04; p < 0.001) or nrAID patients (OR: 2.44; 95% CI: 1.04-5.75; p = 0.041). Patient with SLE did not report a higher frequency of hospitalisation or need for advanced treatment for COVID-19 infection compared with disease controls and HCs, respectively. CONCLUSION: COVID-19 vaccination conferred similar protection against COVID-19 infection in terms of frequency and severity in patients with SLE to that reported by healthy individuals.


Asunto(s)
Vacunas contra la COVID-19 , COVID-19 , Lupus Eritematoso Sistémico , Humanos , Lupus Eritematoso Sistémico/complicaciones , Lupus Eritematoso Sistémico/inmunología , Lupus Eritematoso Sistémico/epidemiología , Femenino , COVID-19/prevención & control , COVID-19/epidemiología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Adulto , Vacunas contra la COVID-19/administración & dosificación , SARS-CoV-2/inmunología , Vacunación , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Anciano , Enfermedades Autoinmunes/epidemiología , Enfermedades Reumáticas/tratamiento farmacológico , Infección Irruptiva
10.
Rheumatol Int ; 44(5): 805-817, 2024 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38470502

RESUMEN

COVID-19 has been suggested as a possible trigger of disease flares in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). However, factors associated with disease flares remain unknown. This study aimed to identify factors associated with breakthrough infection (BIs) and disease flares in patients with RA following COVID-19. We analysed data from RA patients who participated in the COVID-19 vaccination in autoimmune diseases (COVAD) study. Demographic data, patient-reported outcomes, comorbidities, pharmacologic treatment and details regarding disease flares were extracted from the COVAD database. Factors associated with disease flare-ups were determined by multivariate logistic regression analysis. The analysis comprised 1928 patients with RA who participated in the COVAD study. Younger age, Caucasian ethnicity, comorbidities with obstructive chronic pulmonary disease and asthma were associated with COVID-19 breakthrough infection. Moreover, younger age (odds ratio (OR): 0.98, 95% CI 0.96-0.99, p < 0.001), ethnicity other than Asian, past history of tuberculosis (OR: 3.80, 95% CI 1.12-12.94, p = 0.033), treatment with methotrexate (OR: 2.55, 95% CI: 1.56-4.17, p < 0.001), poor global physical health (OR: 1.07, 95% CI 1.00-1.15, p = 0.044) and mental health (OR: 0.91, 95% CI 0.87-0.95, p < 0.001) were independent factors associated disease flares in patients with RA. Our study highlights the impact of socio-demographic factors, clinical characteristics and mental health on disease flares in patients with RA. These insights may help determine relevant strategies to proactively manage RA patients at risk of flares.


Asunto(s)
Artritis Reumatoide , Infección Irruptiva , COVID-19 , Humanos , Brote de los Síntomas , Vacunas contra la COVID-19/uso terapéutico , SARS-CoV-2 , Artritis Reumatoide/tratamiento farmacológico , Artritis Reumatoide/epidemiología
11.
Rheumatol Int ; 44(1): 89-97, 2024 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37668836

RESUMEN

This study aimed to assess the incidence, predictors, and outcomes of breakthrough infection (BI) following coronavirus disease (COVID-19) vaccination in patients with systemic sclerosis (SSc), a risk group associated with an immune-suppressed state and high cardiopulmonary disease burden. Cross-sectional data from fully vaccinated respondents with SSc, non-SSc autoimmune rheumatic diseases (AIRDs), and healthy controls (HCs) were extracted from the COVAD database, an international self-reported online survey. BI was defined according to the Centre for Disease Control definition. Infection-free survival was compared between the groups using Kaplan-Meier curves with log-rank tests. Cox proportional regression was used to assess the association between BI and age, sex, ethnicity, and immunosuppressive drugs at the time of vaccination. The severity of BI in terms of hospitalization and requirement for oxygen supplementation was compared between groups. Of 10,900 respondents, 6836 fulfilled the following inclusion criteria: 427 SSc, 2934 other AIRDs, and 3475 HCs. BI were reported in 6.3% of SSc, 6.9% of non-SSc AIRD, and 16.1% of HCs during a median follow-up of 100 (IQR: 60-137) days. SSc had a lower risk for BI than HC [hazard ratio (HR): 0.56 (95% CI 0.46-0.74)]. BIs were associated with age [HR: 0.98 (0.97-0.98)] but not ethnicity or immunosuppressive drugs at the time of vaccination. Patients with SSc were more likely to have asymptomatic COVID-19, but symptomatic patients reported more breathlessness. Hospitalization [SSc: 4 (14.8%), HCs: 37 (6.6%), non-SSc AIRDs: 32(15.8%)] and the need for oxygenation [SSc: 1 (25%); HC: 17 (45.9%); non-SSc AIRD: 13 (40.6%)] were similar between the groups. The incidence of BI in SSc was lower than that in HCs but comparable to that in non-SSc AIRDs. The severity of BI did not differ between the groups. Advancing age, but not ethnicity or immunosuppressive medication use, was associated with BIs.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Enfermedades Reumáticas , Esclerodermia Sistémica , Humanos , Estudios Transversales , COVID-19/epidemiología , COVID-19/prevención & control , COVID-19/complicaciones , Análisis de Supervivencia , Enfermedades Reumáticas/complicaciones , Esclerodermia Sistémica/complicaciones , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Medición de Resultados Informados por el Paciente
12.
Indian J Crit Care Med ; 28(8): 777-784, 2024 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39239184

RESUMEN

Aim and background: Neutrophil CD64 (nCD64) is evolving as a prognostic biomarker in sepsis. The primary objective of this study was to evaluate whether serial trend of nCD64, procalcitonin (PCT), and C-reactive protein (CRP) predict 28-day mortality in patients with sepsis/septic shock, as per Sepsis-3 criteria. Materials and methods: This prospective, observational single-center cohort study included 60 adult patients (age ≥18 years) with sepsis. Serial biomarker levels with SOFA score were measured at admission (day 0), on day 4, and on day 8. Results: Of the 60 patients, 42 (70%) had septic shock. Biomarker levels at admission did not differ between patients with sepsis and septic shock. Thirty-seven patients survived and 23 were non-survivors by day 28. There was a significant fall in serial trend of all three biomarkers from admission till day 8 (Friedman p < 0.001) in survivors compared to a non-significant change in non-survivors. On multivariate analysis, SOFA score at admission (OR 1.731), more days with vasopressor support (OR 1.077), rise in CD64 from day 0 to day 8 (OR 1.074), and rise in CRP from day 0 to 8 (OR 1.245) were the significant predictors of 28-day mortality (p < 0.05). The highest area under the ROC curve was obtained for more days of vasopressor therapy (0.857), followed by a rise in CD64 from day 0 to day 8 (0.798). Conclusion: Serial trend of biomarkers has prognostic utility. The rise in CD64 from day 0 to day 8 was a good predictor of mortality compared to the trend of other biomarkers. How to cite this article: Patnaik R, Azim A, Singh K, Agarwal V, Mishra P, Poddar B, et al. Serial Trend of Neutrophil CD64, C-reactive Protein, and Procalcitonin as a Prognostic Marker in Critically Ill Patients with Sepsis/Septic Shock: A Prospective Observational Study from a Tertiary Care ICU. Indian J Crit Care Med 2024;28(8):777-784.

13.
Rheumatology (Oxford) ; 62(10): 3427-3432, 2023 10 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37018125

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: The present study validates the 2022 ACR/European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology (EULAR) classification criteria for Takayasu's arteritis (TAK), compared with the 1990 ACR TAK classification criteria. METHODS: The fulfilment of 2022 ACR/EULAR and 1990 ACR TAK criteria from four referral centres was assessed for TAK compared with extracranial giant cell arteritis (EC-GCA) and other controls. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), likelihood ratio of a positive test (LR+) or negative test (LR-), and area under receiver operating characteristics curve (AUC) were calculated. RESULTS: Among 504 patients with TAK (404 females) and 222 controls (151 females, 144 patients with EC-GCA), the 2022 ACR/EULAR criteria had better sensitivity (95.83% vs 82.94%) and NPV, but poorer specificity (63.51% vs 90.54%), PPV, LR+, LR- and AUC at the pre-determined cut-offs than the 1990 ACR criteria. The 2022 ACR/EULAR criteria had greater specificity (76.06% vs 57.62%) and AUC (0.845 vs 0.771), with similar sensitivity (93% vs 96.53%) in males as in females. The 2022 ACR/EULAR criteria performed similarly with only EC-GCA as controls (sensitivity 95.83%, specificity 60.42%, AUC 0.781). Sensitivity remained similar, whereas specificity was higher for 40-60 years vs <40 years. Cut-offs of ≥6 (sensitivity 91.87%, specificity 82.88%) and ≥7 (sensitivity 86.71%, specificity 86.49%), or removing the point for female sex (sensitivity 92.64%, specificity 81.08%) greatly improved the balance between sensitivity and specificity. CONCLUSION: The poor specificity of the 2022 ACR/EULAR TAK criteria in real-life settings was improved by increasing the cut-off to 6 or 7, or removing the point for female sex.


Asunto(s)
Arteritis de Células Gigantes , Reumatología , Arteritis de Takayasu , Masculino , Humanos , Femenino , Estados Unidos , Arteritis de Takayasu/diagnóstico , Sensibilidad y Especificidad , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Arteritis de Células Gigantes/diagnóstico
14.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37934123

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To analyze the risk, causes, and predictors of mortality in Takayasu arteritis (TAK). METHODS: Survival was assessed in a cohort of patients with TAK using Kaplan-Meier curves. Age- and sex-standardized mortality ratio (SMR = observed: expected deaths) for TAK were calculated by applying age- and sex-specific mortality rates for the local population to calculate expected deaths. Hazard ratios (HR with 95%CI) for predictors of mortality based on demographic characteristics, presenting features, baseline angiographic involvement, disease activity, number of immunosuppressive medications used, procedures related to TAK, and any serious infection were calculated using Cox regression or exponential parametric regression models. RESULTS: Among 224 patients with TAK (159 females, mean follow-up duration 44.36 months), survival at 1, 2, 5, and 10 years was 97.34%, 96.05%, 93.93%, and 89.23%, respectively. Twelve deaths were observed, most of which were due to cardiovascular disease (heart failure, myocardial infarction, stroke). Mortality risk was significantly higher with TAK (SMR 17.29, 95%CI 8.95-30.11) than the general population. Earlier age at disease onset (HR 0.90, 95%CI 0.83-0.98; or pediatric-onset vs adult-onset disease, HR 5.51, 95%CI 1.57-19.32), higher disease activity scores (ITAS2010: HR 1.15, 95%CI 1.05-1.25, DEI.TAK: HR 1.18, 95%CI 1.08-1.29), any serious infections (HR 5.43, 95%CI 1.72-17.12), heart failure (HR 7.83, 95%CI 2.17-28.16), or coeliac trunk involvement at baseline (HR 4.01, 95%CI 1.26-12.75) were associated with elevated mortality risk. CONCLUSION: Patients with TAK had an elevated risk of mortality as compared with the general population. Cardiovascular disease was the leading cause of death in TAK.

15.
Rheumatology (Oxford) ; 62(7): 2366-2376, 2023 07 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36315075

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: The COVID-19 vaccination in autoimmune diseases (COVAD) study aimed to assess short-term COVID-19 vaccination-related adverse events (AEs) in RA patients. METHODS: An online self-reported questionnaire (March-December 2021) was used to capture data related to COVID-19 vaccination-related AEs in RA, other autoimmune rheumatic diseases (AIRDs) (excluding RA and inflammatory myositis), non-rheumatic autoimmune diseases (nrAIDs) and healthy controls (HCs). Descriptive and multivariable regression analyses were performed. RESULTS: Of the 9462 complete respondents, 14.2% (n = 1347) had been diagnosed with RA; they had a mean (s.d.) age of 50.7 (13.7) years, 74.2% were women and 49.3% were Caucasian. In total, 76.9% and 4.2% of patients with RA reported minor and major AEs, respectively. Patients with active and inactive RA had similar AE and hospitalization frequencies. Overall, AEs were reported more frequently by BNT162b2 and mRNA-1273 recipients and less frequently by BBV152 recipients compared with the rest. Major AE and hospitalization frequencies were similar across recipients of different vaccines. Patients receiving methotrexate and hydroxychloroquine reported fewer minor AEs than those patients not on them. Compared with HCs and patients with other AIRDs, patients with RA reported similar total AEs, overall minor AEs, and hospitalizations. Compared with nrAIDs, patients with RA reported lower frequencies of overall AEs, minor AEs (both odds ratio [OR] = 0.7; 95% CI: 0.5, 0.9), and injection site pain (OR = 0.6; 95% CI: 0.5, 0.8) with similar major AE and hospitalization frequencies. CONCLUSION: Despite the differences in AE frequency across different COVID-19 vaccines, all were well tolerated in patients with RA and were comparable to HCs, providing reassurance as to the safety of COVID-19 vaccination.


Asunto(s)
Artritis Reumatoide , Enfermedades Autoinmunes , Vacunas contra la COVID-19 , COVID-19 , Enfermedades Reumáticas , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Artritis Reumatoide/tratamiento farmacológico , Enfermedades Autoinmunes/epidemiología , Vacuna BNT162 , COVID-19/prevención & control , Vacunas contra la COVID-19/efectos adversos , Vacunación/efectos adversos
16.
Rheumatology (Oxford) ; 62(7): 2453-2463, 2023 07 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36413073

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To determine COVID-19 vaccine-related adverse events (AEs) in the seven-day post-vaccination period in patients with SLE vs autoimmune rheumatic diseases (AIRDs), non-rheumatic autoimmune diseases (nrAIDs), and healthy controls (HC). METHODS: Data were captured through the COVID-19 Vaccination in Autoimmune Diseases (COVAD) questionnaire (March-December 2021). Multivariable regression models accounted for age, gender, ethnicity, vaccine type and background treatment. RESULTS: Among 9462 complete respondents, 583 (6.2%) were SLE patients (mean age: 40.1 years; 94.5% females; 40.5% Asian; 42.9% Pfizer-recipients). Minor AEs were reported by 83.0% of SLE patients, major by 2.6%, hospitalization by 0.2%. AE and hospitalization frequencies were similar between patients with active and inactive SLE. Rashes were more frequent in SLE patients vs HC (OR; 95% CI: 1.2; 1.0, 1.5), chills less frequent in SLE vs AIRDs (0.6; 0.4, 0.8) and nrAIDs (0.5; 0.3, 0.8), and fatigue less frequent in SLE vs nrAIDs (0.6; 0.4, 0.9). Pfizer-recipients reported higher overall AE (2.2; 1.1, 4.2) and injection site pain (2.9; 1.6, 5.0) frequencies than recipients of other vaccines, Oxford/AstraZeneca-recipients more body ache, fever, chills (OR: 2.5, 3.0), Moderna-recipients more body ache, fever, chills, rashes (OR: 2.6, 4.3). Hospitalization frequencies were similar across vaccine types. AE frequencies were similar across treatment groups, although chills were less frequent in antimalarial users vs non-users (0.5; 0.3, 0.9). CONCLUSION: While COVID-19 vaccination-related AEs were reported by four-fifths of SLE patients, those were mostly minor and comparable to AEs reported by healthy individuals, providing reassurance regarding COVID-19 vaccination safety in SLE.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedades Autoinmunes , Vacunas contra la COVID-19 , COVID-19 , Exantema , Lupus Eritematoso Sistémico , Vacunas , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Escalofríos , COVID-19/prevención & control , Vacunas contra la COVID-19/efectos adversos , SARS-CoV-2 , Vacunación/efectos adversos
17.
Rheumatology (Oxford) ; 62(3): 1204-1215, 2023 03 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35920795

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: The assessment of physical function is fundamental in the management of patients with idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIMs). We aimed to investigate the physical function of patients with IIMs compared with those with non-IIM autoimmune rheumatic diseases (AIRDs) utilizing Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Physical Function (PF) data obtained in the COVAD study, an international self-reported e-survey assessing the safety of COVID-19 vaccines in AIRDs. METHODS: Demographics, AIRD diagnosis, disease activity, and PROMIS PF short form-10a data were extracted from the COVAD database. PROMIS PF-10a scores were compared between disease categories and stratified by disease activity. Factors affecting PROMIS PF-10a scores other than disease activity were identified by multivariable regression analysis in patients with inactive disease. RESULTS: A total of 1057 IIM patients, 3635 non-IIM AIRD patients and 3981 healthy controls (HCs) responded to the COVAD e-survey from April to August 2021. Using a binomial regression model, the predicted mean of PROMIS PF-10a scores was significantly lower in IIM patients compared with non-IIM AIRD patients or HCs [36.3 (95% CI 35.5, 37.1) vs 41.3 (95% CI 40.2, 42.5) vs 46.2 (95% CI 45.8, 46.6), P < 0.001], irrespective of disease activity. The independent factors for lower PROMIS PF-10a scores in patients with inactive disease were older age, female, longer disease duration, and a diagnosis of inclusion body myositis or polymyositis. CONCLUSION: Physical function is significantly impaired in IIMs compared with non-IIM AIRDs or HCs, even in patients with inactive disease. Our study highlights a critical need for better strategies to minimize functional disability in patients with IIMs.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Miositis , Enfermedades Reumáticas , Humanos , Femenino , Vacunas contra la COVID-19 , Miositis/diagnóstico , Medición de Resultados Informados por el Paciente
18.
Metabolomics ; 19(11): 92, 2023 Nov 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37940751

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Pulmonary sarcoidosis (SAR) and tuberculosis (TB) are two granulomatous lung-diseases and often pose a diagnostic challenge to a treating physicians. OBJECTIVE: The present study aims to explore the diagnostic potential of NMR based serum metabolomics approach to differentiate SAR from TB. MATERIALS AND METHOD: The blood samples were obtained from three study groups: SAR (N = 35), TB (N = 28) and healthy normal subjects (NC, N = 56) and their serum metabolic profiles were measured using 1D 1H CPMG (Carr-Purcell-Meiboom-Gill) NMR spectra recorded at 800 MHz NMR spectrometer. The quantitative metabolic profiles were compared employing a combination of univariate and multivariate statistical analysis methods and evaluated for their diagnostic potential using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. RESULTS: Compared to SAR, the sera of TB patients were characterized by (a) elevated levels of lactate, acetate, 3-hydroxybutyrate (3HB), glutamate and succinate (b) decreased levels of glucose, citrate, pyruvate, glutamine, and several lipid and membrane metabolites (such as very-low/low density lipoproteins (VLDL/LDL), polyunsaturated fatty acids, etc.). CONCLUSION: The metabolic disturbances not only found to be well in concordance with various previous reports, these further demonstrated very high sensitivity and specificity to distinguish SAR from TB patients suggesting serum metabolomics analysis can serve as surrogate method in the diagnosis and clinical management of SAR.


Asunto(s)
Sarcoidosis , Tuberculosis , Humanos , Metabolómica/métodos , Espectroscopía de Resonancia Magnética , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética , Sarcoidosis/diagnóstico
19.
Lupus ; 32(10): 1164-1172, 2023 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37487596

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Neurological involvement can occur in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) due to co-existing neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD). The symptoms can mimic those of neuropsychiatric manifestations of SLE. Pathogenic anti-aquaporin-4 (AQP4) antibodies, commonly found in NMOSD, are responsible for the neuroinflammatory response and secondary demyelinating lesions. These anti-AQP4 antibodies can be the drivers of neuroinflammatory process in SLE patients, which is distinct from the immunopathogenesis seen in traditional neuropsychiatric SLE. The clinical course is often a relapsing one and is managed differently. In this review, we describe and outline the clinical course and outcomes of AQP4+ NMOSD/SLE overlap cases. METHODS: To investigate the co-existence of SLE with AQP4+NMOSD, we conducted a systematic review of individual patient data from case reports and case series reported in major databases. The study extracted clinic-demographic features, imaging and laboratory profiles, treatment approaches, and outcomes of these patients. Inclusion criteria for the review required patients to have positivity for AQP4 or NMO in the blood and/or cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and exhibit at least one manifestation of both NMOSD and SLE. RESULTS: In this overlap between SLE and AQP4+NMOSD, a high female preponderance was observed, with 42 out of 46 patients (91.3%) being female. Nearly half of the NMOSD cases (47.8%) had onset after lupus, with a median of 5 years between the two diagnoses. Hematological manifestations were seen in the majority of patients (63%), as well as longitudinally extensive transverse myelitis (87%), and brainstem involvement on imaging (29.6%). Cerebrospinal fluid analysis showed a dominantly lymphocytic pleocytosis, with oligoclonal bands being reported scarcely. Although cyclophosphamide was the most common steroid sparing agent used for maintenance, robust evidence for both efficacy and safety in AQP4+NMOSD is available for mycophenolate mofetil, azathioprine, and rituximab. The majority of reported cases showed a relapsing course, while one patient had a monophasic course. CONCLUSION: AQP4+NMOSD in SLE patients is a relapsing and neurologically disabling disorder that can mimic neuropsychiatric manifestations, frequently occurs after the onset of lupus or may predate, responds to immunosuppressants, and necessitates indefinite treatment.


Asunto(s)
Lupus Eritematoso Sistémico , Neuromielitis Óptica , Humanos , Femenino , Masculino , Neuromielitis Óptica/diagnóstico , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/complicaciones , Acuaporina 4 , Síndrome , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Autoanticuerpos
20.
Clin Exp Rheumatol ; 2023 Aug 16.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37584395

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: A subset of Takayasu's arteritis (TAK) begins in the paediatric age group (≤18 years). Differences in prognosis between paediatric-onset and adult-onset TAK are unclear. We compared the differences in the presentation and survival between paediatric-onset and adult-onset TAK in our cohort of TAK. METHODS: From a retrospective cohort of TAK, clinical presentation, angiographic features, treatments received, disease activity, and survival were compared between paediatric-onset and adult-onset TAK. Multivariable-adjusted logistic regression models were used to compute adjusted odds ratio (aOR) with 95% confidence intervals (95%CI) for paediatric-onset vs. adult-onset TAK. Hazard ratios (HR, with 95%CI) for mortality with paediatric-onset vs adult-onset TAK (crude, adjusted for prognostic covariates or differences in presentation) and propensity score-matched survival analyses were estimated. RESULTS: Among 56 paediatric-onset and 135 adult-onset TAK, chest pain (aOR 3.21, 95%CI 1.06-9.74), heart failure (aOR 3.16, 95%CI 1.05-9.53), headache (aOR 2.60, 95%CI 1.01-6.74), ascending aorta (aOR 3.02, 95%CI 1.04-8.80) and left renal artery involvement (aOR 2.45, 95%CI 1.04-5.80) were more frequent in paediatric-onset TAK. Despite similar longitudinal patterns of disease activity and glucocorticoid or disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARD) use, mortality was higher for paediatric-onset TAK (HR, unadjusted 6.13, 95%CI 1.51-24.91; adjusted for prognostic covariates gender, diagnostic delay, baseline disease activity, number of conventional and biologic/targeted synthetic DMARDs used, 4.97, 95%CI 1.20-20.58; adjusted for differences between groups 5.54, 95%CI 1.22-25.09; after propensity-score matching for prognostic covariates, 54 pairs, log-rank p-value 0.026). CONCLUSIONS: Considering the greater mortality risk, greater vigilance is required while managing paediatric-onset TAK.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA