RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: In April 2020, a community-based active case search surveillance system of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) was developed by the emergency outbreak committee in Lagos State. This followed the evidence of community transmission of coronavirus disease in the twenty Local Government Areas in Lagos State. This study assessed the value of respiratory and other symptoms in predicting positive SARS-CoV-2 using reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). It is hoped that if symptoms are predictive, they can be used in screening before testing. METHODS: Communities were included based on the alerts from community members through the rumour alert system set up by the state. All members of the households of the communities from where the alert came were eligible. Household members who declined to participate were excluded from the study. A standardised interviewer-administered electronic investigation form was used to collect sociodemographic information, clinical details and history for each possible case. Data was analysed to see the extent of agreement or correlation between reported symptoms and the results of PCR testing for SARS-COV-2. RESULTS: A total of 12,739 persons were interviewed. The most common symptoms were fever, general weakness, cough and difficulty in breathing. Different symptoms recorded different levels of sensitivity as follows: fever, 28.9%; cough, 21.7%; general body weakness, 10.9%; and sore throat, 10.9%. Sensitivity and specificity for fever, the most common symptom, were 28.3% and 50.2%, respectively, while similar parameters for general body weakness, the next most common symptom, were 10.9% and 73.2%, respectively. CONCLUSION: From these findings, the predictive ability of symptoms for COVID-19 diagnosis was extremely weak. It is unlikely that symptoms alone will suffice to predict COVID-19 in a patient. An additional measure, such as confirmatory test by RT-PCR testing, is necessary to confirm the disease.
Asunto(s)
Infecciones por Coronavirus/diagnóstico , Neumonía Viral/diagnóstico , Evaluación de Síntomas , Betacoronavirus , COVID-19 , Prueba de COVID-19 , Técnicas de Laboratorio Clínico , Humanos , Nigeria/epidemiología , Pandemias , SARS-CoV-2RESUMEN
Filtered-sunlight phototherapy (FSPT) that blocks ultraviolet light and reduces infrared radiation is safe and non-inferior to intensive electric phototherapy (IEPT) for treating mild-to-severe neonatal hyperbilirubinemia. In this randomized non-inferiority trial, the safety, efficacy, exchange transfusion (ET), and mortality rates of FSPT versus IEPT among Nigerian neonates with severe-to-hazardous hyperbilirubinemia were investigated. Safety was defined as the absence of hyperthermia, hypothermia, dehydration, or sunburn; efficacy by the proportion of assessable treatment days during which total serum or plasma bilirubin (TSB) increased by < 0.2 mg/dL/hr for newborns aged ≤ 72 h-old or decreased for newborns > 72 h-old. A treatment day was deemed assessable if a neonate received phototherapy for ≥ 4 h, and non-inferiority was inferred for differences within a 10% margin. We enrolled 192 newborns (admission TSB ≤ 62 mg/dL), assigned to FSPT (n = 98) or IEPT (n = 94). FSPT was effective on 94.2% of the assessable treatment days compared with 97.1% for IEPT. The mean difference in efficacy between FSPT and IEPT was -2.9%, 95% CI: -7.6, 1.9). 2.6% of newborns who received FSPT developed controlled hyperthermia, and no baby met the criteria for withdrawal for safety reasons. Overall, 50.6% (39/77) of newborns who received FSPT and 53.7% (51/95) of newborns who received IEPT had ET (p = 0.89) and 7 in each group (9.1% vs 7.4%; p = 0.86) died. In conclusion, FSPT is safe and non-inferior to IEPT for treating neonates with severe-to-hazardous hyperbilirubinemia, it is not associated with significantly higher rates of ET and mortality and should be considered where practicable when IEPT cannot be assured. Clinical Trials.gov Number: NCT02612727 (24/11/2015).
Asunto(s)
Helioterapia , Hiperbilirrubinemia Neonatal , Humanos , Recién Nacido , Hiperbilirrubinemia Neonatal/terapia , Masculino , Femenino , Helioterapia/métodos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Bilirrubina/sangre , Fototerapia/métodosRESUMEN
The efficacy of 3-day regimens of artemether-lumefantrine and artesunate-amodiaquine were evaluated in 747 children < 5 years of age with uncomplicated malaria from six geographical areas of Nigeria. Fever clearance was significantly faster (P = 0.006) and the proportion of children with parasitemia 1 day after treatment began was significantly lower (P = 0.016) in artesunate-amodiaquine-compared with artemether-lumefantrine-treated children. Parasite clearance times were similar with both treatments. Overall efficacy was 96.3% (95% confidence interval [CI] 94.5-97.6%), and was similar for both regimens. Polymerase chain reaction-corrected parasitologic cure rates on Day 28 were 96.9% (95% CI 93.9-98.2%) and 98.3% (95% CI 96.1-99.3%) for artemether-lumefantrine and artesunate-amodiaquine, respectively. Gametocyte carriage post treatment was significantly lower than pretreatment (P < 0.0001). In anemic children, mean time to recovery from anemia was 10 days (95% CI 9.04-10.9) and was similar for both regimens. Both treatments were well tolerated and are safe and efficacious treatments of uncomplicated falciparum malaria in young Nigerian children.