RESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: While mild asthma is generally better controlled than more severe disease, patients with mild asthma may experience severe exacerbations. Definite differences between countries in terms of asthma severity and control were described previously. Since SYGMA was a global study, this sub-analysis was conducted in geographic region to investigate potential regional specificities. METHODS: The SYGMA2 trial is double-blind multicenter study involving patients ≥12 years of age with mild asthma (n = 4176), eligible for regular treatment with inhaled corticosteroid (ICS). We conducted an open-label descriptive subanalysis of the baseline characteristics of the Russian population (n = 579) comparing to rest of participants of SYGMA2 trial from other 24 countries. The subanalysis is solely descriptive and will be used for hypothesis generation. RESULTS: The Russian population of patients with mild asthma hardly differs from the population in other countries in terms of baseline demographic and anthropometric characteristics, smoking status, and duration of asthma. At the study entry few patients from Russia received maintenance therapy with ICS and had symptom control, but the majority was uncontrolled on short-acting bronchodilators, thus the uncontrolled/controlled ratio was 52%/48% vs 45%/55% in other countries. More patients with mild asthma in the Russian group had faced at least one severe exacerbation in the previous year (30.1% vs 20.7%). CONCLUSIONS: The subanalysis revealed a delayed prescription of controller (ICS) therapy and overuse of short-acting bronchodilators in the Russian population with mild asthma. These factors can lead to insufficient symptom control and higher risk of severe exacerbation in the Russian population with mild asthma.
Asunto(s)
Antiasmáticos , Asma , Administración por Inhalación , Corticoesteroides/uso terapéutico , Antiasmáticos/uso terapéutico , Asma/tratamiento farmacológico , Asma/epidemiología , Broncodilatadores/uso terapéutico , Budesonida , Combinación Budesonida y Fumarato de Formoterol/uso terapéutico , Humanos , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
The reason for this review based on the results of many meta- analyses is the great assessed difference in the methods of most studies in e-Health, telemedicine and tele-rehabilitation. It consists of different understanding of new terms, using different hard- and software, including criteria, different methodology of patient's treatment and its evaluation. This status suggests that first of all m-Health/e-Health requires a unique ontology of terms using and methodology of studies comparing. In this review we try to describe shortly the most significant points of modern e-Health field of medicine. The basic parts include methodology of review formation, tele-communication implementation results, tele-education, interactive questioning, tele-consultation, telemedicine diagnosis, tele-monitoring, rehabilitation and tele-rehabilitation, gamification, acceptability of mobile electronic devices and software in e-Health and planning studies. At the end of the review the new ontological structure of digital medicine is presented.
Asunto(s)
Neumología/métodos , Telemedicina/organización & administración , Toma de Decisiones Clínicas/métodos , Computadores , Diagnóstico , Humanos , Anamnesis/métodos , Monitoreo Fisiológico/métodos , Educación del Paciente como Asunto/métodos , Satisfacción del Paciente , Derivación y Consulta , Rehabilitación/métodos , Programas InformáticosRESUMEN
Clinical practice guidelines are ubiquitous and are developed to provide recommendations for the management of many diseases, including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. The development of these guidelines is burdensome, demanding a significant investment of time and money. In Europe, the majority of countries develop their own national guidelines, despite the potential for overlap or duplication of effort. A concerted effort and consolidation of resources between countries may alleviate the resource-intensity of maintaining individual national guidelines. Despite significant resource investment into the development and maintenance of clinical practice guidelines, their implementation is suboptimal. Effective strategies of guideline dissemination must be given more consideration, to ensure adequate implementation and improved patient care management in the future.
Asunto(s)
Medicina Basada en la Evidencia/tendencias , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica/epidemiología , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica/terapia , Europa (Continente)/epidemiología , Medicina Basada en la Evidencia/normas , Predicción , Humanos , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto/normas , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica/diagnósticoAsunto(s)
Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica/diagnóstico , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica/epidemiología , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica/prevención & control , Atención a la Salud/normas , Técnicas de Diagnóstico del Sistema Respiratorio/normas , Humanos , Guías de Práctica Clínica como AsuntoRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: The Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) strategy report provides guidance on effective management of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) according to local healthcare systems. However, COPD is a heterogenous disease and certain aspects, including prevalence, disease-time course and phenotype distribution, can differ between countries. Moreover, features of clinical practice and healthcare systems for patients with COPD can vary widely, even in geographically close and economically similar countries. AREAS COVERED: Based on an initial workshop of respiratory physicians from eleven countries across Central and Eastern Europe (CEE) in December 2018 and subsequent discussions, this article offers region-specific insights from clinical practice and healthcare systems in CEE. Taking recommendations from the GOLD 2022 report into account, we suggest approaches to adapt these into national clinical guidelines for COPD management in CEE. EXPERT OPINION: Several factors should be considered when optimizing management of COPD in CEE compared with other regions, including differences in smoking status, vaccination uptake, prevalence of tuberculosis and nontuberculous mycobacteria, and variations in healthcare systems. We provide guidance and algorithms for pharmacologic and non-pharmacologic management of COPD for the following scenarios: initial and follow-up treatment, treatment of patients with frequent exacerbations, and withdrawal of inhaled corticosteroids where appropriate.
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a common disease of the lungs. It causes symptoms such as breathlessness, cough, and production of phlegm. In people with COPD, these symptoms often reduce the quality of their lives. From time to time, symptoms may get worse in people with the disease. This worsening is known as 'exacerbation'. Exacerbations of COPD can be so bad that they lead to hospital admissions. The Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) regularly gives advice to doctors around the world. This can help them to provide their patients with the best possible treatment for COPD. However, people with the disease and healthcare systems vary from country to country. This means that the guidance may need to be adjusted to the needs and available resources of different regions. This review looks at how COPD is treated in Central and Eastern Europe. We suggest how to adapt the GOLD recommendations to best suit the Central and Eastern European region.
Asunto(s)
Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica , Corticoesteroides/uso terapéutico , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Europa (Continente)/epidemiología , Humanos , Fenotipo , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica/diagnóstico , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica/epidemiología , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica/terapiaRESUMEN
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is а highly prevalent, complex and heterogeneous clinical condition which is associated with significant concomitant diseases. COPD and cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) often coexist due to the high prevalence of each of these pathological conditions separately as well as the common risk factors (particularly smoking), mechanisms of interaction and influence of systemic inflammation. In addition, decreased pulmonary function in COPD is closely associated with an increased risk of congestive CVDs. One of the most important pathophysiological markers of COPD-lung hyperinflation-plays a significant role in the appearance of functional limitations of the pumping function of the heart, creating unfavorable conditions by exerting a compression effect on the heart muscle. The latter was confirmed by significant correlation between the COPD severity according to GOLD classification and the basic dimensions of the heart chambers. Several decades ago, the term "microcardia" was commonly used and indicated a radiological sign of emphysema. Some studies demonstrated a close relationship between the chance of occurrence of CVD and the severity of pulmonary dysfunction. Such an association has been demonstrated for the whole spectrum of CVD-including cerebrovascular disease, congestive heart failure (CHF) and rhythm disturbances-and was detected in the early stages of the disease. A large proportion of patients with mild and moderate COPD die due to CVD, which is much more likely than deaths in the same group due to respiratory insufficiency. COPD patients have a higher rate of hospitalization and death, the cause of which are coronary heart disease (CHD), stroke and CHF. Treatment of COPD today is mainly determined by national and international clinical guidelines, which should pay more attention to the problems of the treatment of COPD patients with comorbid conditions.
RESUMEN
Observational studies indicate that overutilization of inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) is common in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Overprescription and the high risk of serious ICS-related adverse events make withdrawal of this treatment necessary in patients for whom the treatment-related risks outweigh the expected benefits. Elaboration of an optimal, universal, user-friendly algorithm for withdrawal of ICS therapy has been identified as an important clinical need. This article reviews the available evidence on the efficacy, risks, and indications of ICS in COPD, as well as the benefits of ICS treatment withdrawal in patients for whom its use is not recommended by current guidelines. After discussing proposed approaches to ICS withdrawal published by professional associations and individual authors, we present a new algorithm developed by consensus of an international group of experts in the field of COPD. This relatively simple algorithm is based on consideration and integrated assessment of the most relevant factors (markers) influencing decision-making, such a history of exacerbations, peripheral blood eosinophil count, presence of infection, and risk of community-acquired pneumonia.
Asunto(s)
Corticoesteroides/administración & dosificación , Algoritmos , Protocolos Clínicos , Pulmón/efectos de los fármacos , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica/tratamiento farmacológico , Administración por Inhalación , Corticoesteroides/efectos adversos , Consenso , Esquema de Medicación , Quimioterapia Combinada , Humanos , Pulmón/fisiopatología , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica/diagnóstico , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica/fisiopatología , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
The high prevalence of COPD together with its high level of misdiagnosis and late diagnosis dictate the necessity for the development and implementation of clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) in order to improve the management of this disease. High-quality, evidence-based international CPGs need to be adapted to the particular situation of each country or region. A new version of the Russian Respiratory Society guidelines released at the end of 2016 was based on the proposal by Global Initiative for Obstructive Lung Disease but adapted to the characteristics of the Russian health system and included an algorithm of pharmacologic treatment of COPD. The proposed algorithm had to comply with the requirements of the Russian Ministry of Health to be included into the unified electronic rubricator, which required a balance between the level of information and the simplicity of the graphic design. This was achieved by: exclusion of the initial diagnostic process, grouping together the common pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic measures for all patients, and the decision not to use the letters A-D for simplicity and clarity. At all stages of the treatment algorithm, efficacy and safety have to be carefully assessed. Escalation and de-escalation is possible in the case of lack of or insufficient efficacy or safety issues. Bronchodilators should not be discontinued except in the case of significant side effects. At the same time, inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) withdrawal is not represented in the algorithm, because it was agreed that there is insufficient evidence to establish clear criteria for ICSs discontinuation. Finally, based on the Global Initiative for Obstructive Lung Disease statement, the proposed algorithm reflects and summarizes different approaches to the pharmacological treatment of COPD taking into account the reality of health care in the Russian Federation.
Asunto(s)
Algoritmos , Broncodilatadores/uso terapéutico , Técnicas de Apoyo para la Decisión , Pulmón/efectos de los fármacos , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto/normas , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica/tratamiento farmacológico , Neumología/normas , Broncodilatadores/efectos adversos , Toma de Decisiones Clínicas , Humanos , Pulmón/fisiopatología , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/normas , Prevalencia , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica/diagnóstico , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica/fisiopatología , Federación de Rusia/epidemiología , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: We used data from the Continuing to Confront COPD International Patient Survey to test the hypothesis that patients with COPD who report less engagement with their disease management are also more likely to report greater impact of the disease. METHODS: This was a population-based, cross-sectional survey of 4,343 subjects aged ≥40 years from 12 countries, fulfilling a case definition of COPD based on self-reported physician diagnosis or symptomatology. The impact of COPD was measured with COPD Assessment Test, modified Medical Research Council Dyspnea Scale, and hospital admissions and emergency department visits for COPD in the prior year. The 13-item Patient Activation Measure (PAM-13) instrument and the 8-item Morisky Medication Adherence Scale (MMAS-8) were used to measure patient disease engagement and medication adherence, respectively. RESULTS: Twenty-eight percent of subjects reported being either disengaged or struggling with their disease (low engagement: PAM-13 levels 1 and 2), and 35% reported poor adherence (MMAS-8 <6). In univariate analyses, lower PAM-13 and MMAS-8 scores were significantly associated with poorer COPD-specific health status, greater breathlessness and lower BMI (PAM-13 only), less satisfaction with their doctor's management of COPD, and more emergency department visits. In multivariate regression models, poor satisfaction with their doctor's management of COPD was significantly associated with both low PAM-13 and MMAS-8 scores; low PAM-13 scores were additionally independently associated with higher COPD Assessment Test and modified Medical Research Council scores and low BMI (underweight). CONCLUSION: Poor patient engagement and medication adherence are frequent and associated with worse COPD-specific health status, higher health care utilization, and lower satisfaction with health care providers. More research will be needed to better understand what factors can be modified to improve medication adherence and patient engagement.
Asunto(s)
Conductas Relacionadas con la Salud , Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , Pulmón/fisiopatología , Participación del Paciente , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica/psicología , Autocuidado , Adulto , Anciano , Brasil , Broncodilatadores/uso terapéutico , Distribución de Chi-Cuadrado , Estudios Transversales , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital , Europa (Continente) , Femenino , Encuestas de Atención de la Salud , Estado de Salud , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Pulmón/efectos de los fármacos , Masculino , Cumplimiento de la Medicación , México , Persona de Mediana Edad , Análisis Multivariante , Oportunidad Relativa , Admisión del Paciente , Satisfacción del Paciente , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica/diagnóstico , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica/fisiopatología , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica/terapia , República de Corea , Factores de Riesgo , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
The main complaint of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is shortness of breath with exercise, that is usually progressive. The principal mechanism that explains this symptom is the development of lung hyperinflation (LH) which is defined by an increase of functional residual capacity (FRC) above predicted values. Patients with COPD may develop static LH (sLH) because of destruction of pulmonary parenchyma and loss of elastic recoil. In addition, dynamic LH (dLH) develops when patients with COPD breathe in before achieving a full exhalation and, as a consequence, air is trapped within the lungs with each further breath. Dynamic LH may also occur at rest but it becomes clinically relevant during exercise and exacerbation. Lung hyperinflation may have an impact beyond the lungs and the effects of LH on cardiovascular function have been extensively analysed. The importance of LH makes its identification and measurement crucial. The demonstration of LH in COPD leads to the adoption of strategies to minimise its impact on the daily activities of patients. Several strategies reduce the impact of LH; the use of long-acting bronchodilators has been shown to reduce LH and improve exercise capacity. Non pharmacologic interventions have also been demonstrated to be useful. This article describes the pathophysiology of LH, its impact on the lungs and beyond and reviews the strategies that improve LH in COPD.
Asunto(s)
Ejercicios Respiratorios/métodos , Pulmón/fisiopatología , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica/terapia , Humanos , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica/fisiopatología , Pruebas de Función RespiratoriaRESUMEN
PURPOSE: Using data from the Continuing to Confront COPD International Physician and Patient Surveys, this paper describes physicians' attitudes and beliefs regarding chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) prognosis, and compares physician and patient perceptions with respect to COPD. METHODS: In 12 countries worldwide, 4,343 patients with COPD were identified through systematic screening of population samples, and 1,307 physicians who regularly saw patients with COPD were sampled from in-country professional databases. Both patients and physicians completed surveys about their COPD knowledge, beliefs, and perceptions; physicians answered further questions about diagnostic methods and treatment choices for COPD. RESULTS: Most physicians (79%) responded that the long-term health outlook for patients with COPD has improved over the past decade, largely attributed to the introduction of better medications. However, patient access to medication remains an issue in many countries, and some physicians (39%) and patients (46%) agreed/strongly agreed with the statement "there are no truly effective treatments for COPD". There was strong concordance between physicians and patients regarding COPD management practices, including the use of spirometry (86% of physicians and 76% of patients reporting they used/had undergone a spirometry test) and smoking cessation counseling (76% of physicians reported they counseled their smoking patients at every clinic visit, and 71% of smoking patients stated that they had received counseling in the past year). However, the groups differed in their perception about the role of smoking in COPD, with 78% of physicians versus 38% of patients strongly agreeing with the statement "smoking is the cause of most cases of COPD". CONCLUSION: The Continuing to Confront COPD International Surveys demonstrate that while physicians and patients largely agreed about COPD management practices and the need for more effective treatments for COPD, a gap exists about the causal role of smoking in COPD.
Asunto(s)
Actitud del Personal de Salud , Adhesión a Directriz/tendencias , Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , Pacientes/psicología , Percepción , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/tendencias , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica/terapia , Brasil , Broncodilatadores/provisión & distribución , Broncodilatadores/uso terapéutico , Europa (Continente) , Femenino , Adhesión a Directriz/normas , Encuestas de Atención de la Salud , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud , Humanos , Japón , Masculino , México , Persona de Mediana Edad , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto/normas , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/normas , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica/diagnóstico , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica/etiología , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica/fisiopatología , República de Corea , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo , Conducta de Reducción del Riesgo , Fumar/efectos adversos , Cese del Hábito de Fumar , Prevención del Hábito de Fumar , Espirometría , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
AIM: Utilizing data from the Continuing to Confront COPD (chronic obstructive pulmonary disease) International Physician Survey, this study aimed to describe physicians' knowledge and application of the GOLD (Global initiative for chronic Obstructive Lung Disease) Global Strategy for the Diagnosis, Management and Prevention of COPD diagnosis and treatment recommendations and compare performance between primary care physicians (PCPs) and respiratory specialists. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Physicians from 12 countries were sampled from in-country professional databases; 1,307 physicians (PCP to respiratory specialist ratio three to one) who regularly consult with COPD, emphysema, or chronic bronchitis patients were interviewed online, by telephone or face to face. Physicians were questioned about COPD risk factors, prognosis, diagnosis, and treatment, including knowledge and application of the GOLD global strategy using patient scenarios. RESULTS: Physicians reported using spirometry routinely (PCPs 82%, respiratory specialists 100%; P<0.001) to diagnose COPD and frequently included validated patient-reported outcome measures (PCPs 67%, respiratory specialists 81%; P<0.001). Respiratory specialists were more likely than PCPs to report awareness of the GOLD global strategy (93% versus 58%, P<0.001); however, when presented with patient scenarios, they did not always perform better than PCPs with regard to recommending GOLD-concordant treatment options. The proportion of PCPs and respiratory specialists providing first- or second-choice treatment options concordant with GOLD strategy for a GOLD B-type patient was 38% versus 67%, respectively. For GOLD C and D-type patients, the concordant proportions for PCPs and respiratory specialists were 40% versus 38%, and 57% versus 58%, respectively. CONCLUSION: This survey of physicians in 12 countries practicing in the primary care and respiratory specialty settings showed high awareness of COPD-management guidelines. Frequent use of guideline-recommended COPD diagnostic practices was reported; however, gaps in the application of COPD-treatment recommendations were observed, warranting further evaluation to understand potential barriers to adopt guideline recommendations.
Asunto(s)
Adhesión a Directriz/tendencias , Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/tendencias , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica/terapia , Actitud del Personal de Salud , Concienciación , Brasil , Europa (Continente) , Femenino , Adhesión a Directriz/normas , Encuestas de Atención de la Salud , Humanos , Japón , Masculino , México , Médicos de Atención Primaria/tendencias , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto/normas , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/normas , Pronóstico , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica/diagnóstico , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica/etiología , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica/fisiopatología , Neumología/tendencias , República de Corea , Factores de Riesgo , Especialización/tendencias , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
PURPOSE: The Continuing to Confront COPD International Patient Survey aimed to estimate the prevalence and burden of COPD globally and to update findings from the Confronting COPD International Survey conducted in 1999-2000. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients in 12 countries worldwide were identified through systematic screening of population samples. Telephone and face-to-face interviews were conducted between November 2012 and May 2013 using a structured survey that incorporated validated patient-reported outcome instruments. Eligible patients were adults aged 40 years and older who were taking regular respiratory medications or suffered with chronic respiratory symptoms and reported either 1) a physician diagnosis of COPD/emphysema, 2) a physician diagnosis of chronic bronchitis, or 3) a symptom-based definition of chronic bronchitis. The burden of COPD was measured with the COPD Assessment Test (CAT) and the modified Medical Research Council (mMRC) Dyspnea Scale. RESULTS: Of 106,876 households with at least one person aged ≥40 years, 4,343 respondents fulfilled the case definition of COPD and completed the full survey. COPD prevalence ranged from 7% to 12%, with most countries falling within the range of 7%-9%. In all countries, prevalence increased with age, and in all countries except the US was greater among men (range 6%-14%) than among women (range 5%-11%). A significant disease burden was observed when considering COPD symptoms or health status, and showed wide variations across countries. Prevalence of moderate-to-severe dyspnea (mMRC scale ≥2) ranged from 27% to 61%, and mean CAT score ranged from 16.0 to 24.8, indicating medium-to-high impairment. CONCLUSION: This survey, representing 12 countries, showed similar rates of estimated COPD prevalence across countries that were higher than those reported a decade ago in the original Confronting COPD International Survey. A significant burden of COPD was demonstrated by symptoms and health care-resource use, similar to that reported in the original survey.
Asunto(s)
Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica/epidemiología , Adulto , Distribución por Edad , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Brasil/epidemiología , Europa (Continente)/epidemiología , Femenino , Encuestas Epidemiológicas , Humanos , Masculino , México/epidemiología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Prevalencia , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica/diagnóstico , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica/terapia , República de Corea/epidemiología , Factores de Riesgo , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Distribución por Sexo , Factores Sexuales , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Factores de Tiempo , Estados Unidos/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a multicomponent disorder that leads to substantial disability, impaired quality of life, and increased mortality. Although the majority of COPD patients are first diagnosed and treated in primary care practices, there is comparatively little information on the management of COPD patients in primary care. A web-based pilot survey was conducted to evaluate the primary care physician's, or general practitioner's (GP's), knowledge, understanding, and management of COPD in twelve territories across the Asia-Pacific region, Africa, eastern Europe, and Latin America, using a 10-minute questionnaire comprising 20 questions and translated into the native language of each participating territory. The questionnaire was administered to a total of 600 GPs (50 from each territory) involved in the management of COPD patients and all data were collated and analyzed by an independent health care research consultant. This survey demonstrated that the GPs' understanding of COPD was variable across the territories, with large numbers of GPs having very limited knowledge of COPD and its management. A consistent finding across all territories was the underutilization of spirometry (median 26%; range 10%-48%) and reliance on X-rays (median 14%; range 5%-22%) for COPD diagnosis, whereas overuse of blood tests (unspecified) was particularly high in Russia and South Africa. Similarly, there was considerable underrecognition of the importance of exacerbation history as an important factor of COPD and its initial management in most territories (median 4%; range 0%-22%). Management of COPD was well below guideline-recommended levels in most of the regions investigated. The findings of this survey suggest there is a need for more ongoing education and information, specifically directed towards GPs outside of Europe and North America, and that global COPD guidelines appear to have limited reach and application in most of the areas studied.