Novel Classification of Acromegaly in Accordance with Immunohistochemical Subtypes: Is There Really a Clinical Relevance?

According to the recent studies, immunohistochemical subtypes of growth hormone (GH) secreting adenomas have been considered as a predictive factor in determining the clinical outcomes including biochemical, radiologic, and endocrine remission. In a 20 year-of time period, acromegaly patients who were treated and followed at the Endocrinology Department of our University Hospital were screened for the study. Of total 98 patients, 65 patients who had been operated by transsphenoidal surgery and having postoperative specimens were included. Postoperative specimens of the surgery of the patients were classified into 3 groups based on the histochemical characteristics (densely, sparsely, and mixed). Parasellar extensions of pituitary tumors were classified into the five grades according to Knosp classification. The patients were investigated and evaluated for postoperative clinical progress, remission rates, comorbidities regarding with the histopathological patterns. Of total 65 patients, 31 were classified as densely granulated (group 1), 32 were classified as sparsely granulated (group 2), and 2 patients were assessed as mixed granulated (group 3). There was no difference between groups for age and gender. Pre-treatment of adenoma size in all groups was correlated with each other and the frequency of macroadenoma (1 vs. 2, 77.4 vs. 84.3%) was higher in two groups. Although mean initial GH levels in group 1 was higher than the other groups (p=0.03), IGF1 levels (age and gender matched) were similar in each group. Adenomas in all groups demonstrated noninvasive radiological characteristics (Knosp grade 0-1-2). Ki-67 proliferation index of both groups (64.5 vs. 50%) was predominantly 1%. With a similar follow-up period, the endocrine remission rates (GH<1 µg/l) in groups were 64 vs. 69%, respectively. In conclusion, classification according to immunohistochemical subtypes of growth hormone secreting adenomas may not be a qualified parameter to evaluate patients with patterns of aggressiveness, clinical outcomes, or treatment response.

Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Cirrhotic Versus Noncirrhotic Livers: Clinicomorphologic Findings and Prognostic Factors.

BACKGROUND: Hepatocellular carcinoma mostly develops in a cirrhotic (80%) background. The clinical features of cirrhotic hepatocellular carcinoma and non-cirrhotic hepatocellular carcinoma also differ. We aimed to determine the clinicopathologic features, tumor characteristics, treatment options, and overall survival after diagnosing hepatocellular carcinoma and prognostic factors effective on survival of hepatocellular carcinoma developing in cirrhotic and non-cirrhotic conditions. METHODS: In our study, 220 patients aged over 18 years who were histologically diagnosed as having hepatocellular carcinoma were included. The patients were divided into 2 groups as cirrhotic and non-cirrhotic. RESULTS: When the tumor morphologies were examined in our study, it was observed that they were mostly solitary in both groups. Cirrhotic hepatocellular carcinomas had significantly higher rates of invasion than the non-cirrhotic group (35.3% vs. 20.3%, respectively) (P <.05). The survival rate was found to be better in the non-cirrhotic group (17.5 months vs. 11.5 months) (P <.05). Age, maximal tumor diameter, and morphologically infiltrative tumor character were found to be independent risk factors affecting survival in patients with cirrhosis. Portal vein invasion, alfa-fetoprotein, and the absence of an underlying risk factor in the etiology were observed as independent risk factors affecting survival in patients with non-cirrhosis. CONCLUSION: Cirrhotic hepatocellular carcinoma and non-cirrhotic hepatocellular carcinoma had different clinicopathologic features and risk factors. We analyzed that treatment choice trends were different between the 2 groups. We also observed that the factors that affected survival were different between the 2 groups.