[A Case of Bilateral Trigeminal Neuralgia and the Possible Onset Mechanisms Based on the Operative Findings].

Several cases of bilateral trigeminal neuralgia(TN)have been reported;however, the possible onset mechanism has rarely been discussed. We encountered a case of bilateral TN occurring in two stages. A 64-year-old woman presented with left TN. Magnetic resonance imaging showed the transverse pontine vein adhering to the left trigeminal root and superior cerebellar artery adhering to the right trigeminal root;however, no symptoms were noted. Immediately after microvascular decompression(MVD)on the left side, TN disappeared completely. However, 2 years postoperatively, the patient presented with right TN. The second MVD surgery revealed that the right cerebellar surface severely adhered to the dura mater, particularly under the surface of the tentorium. The arachnoid membrane at the cerebellopontine angle was slightly adhered. The patient was completely free from pain after the second MVD. The intraoperative findings suggested that the brain stem may have shifted and the cerebellopontine cistern may have narrowed because of cerebellar adhesion to the surrounding structures and arachnoid adhesion. We speculate that such structural changes in the posterior fossa after the first operation may have caused the asymptomatic vascular adhesion to change into the symptomatic offending adhesion over time.

Comparison of Rates of Growth between Unruptured and Ruptured Aneurysms Using Magnetic Resonance Angiography.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Growth is a key risk factor for rupture of unruptured cerebral aneurysms. There are few reports of investigations into the actual growth of ruptured intracranial aneurysms. The aim of the present study was to ascertain the risk of rupture of aneurysms based on the growth of unruptured and ruptured aneurysms. METHODS: Changes in size on magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) were examined in 50 patients with ruptured cerebral aneurysms. Images obtained before and after subarachnoid hemorrhage were used. Moreover, changes in aneurysm size were retrospectively examined in 73 patients with 100 unruptured cerebral aneurysms that were followed serially with MRA that was performed using a 1.5-T or 3-T system. The size of the aneurysm was determined by measuring the maximum diameter on maximum intensity projection MRA images. Based on these data, the annual growth rates (mm growth/year) of unruptured and ruptured aneurysms were calculated and compared. RESULTS: The median annual growth rate of ruptured aneurysms was significantly greater than that of unruptured aneurysms (.69 versus .077 mm/year, P < .01). The annual growth rates of ruptured aneurysms showed a negative correlation between the duration from initial MRA to the time of rupture. CONCLUSION: A high annual growth rate is a key risk factor for aneurysm rupture. This finding provides strong evidence for the treatment of unruptured cerebral aneurysms.

Atlantoaxial Stabilization Using C1 Lateral Mass and C2 Pedicle/Translaminar Screw Fixation by Intraoperative C1- and C2-Direct-Captured Navigation with Preoperative Computed Tomography Images.

In C1-C2 posterior fixation, the C1 lateral mass and C2 pedicle/translaminar screw insertion under spine navigation have been used frequently. To avoid the risk of neurovascular damage in atlantoaxial stabilization, we assessed the safety and effectiveness of a preoperative computed tomography (CT) image-based navigation system with intraoperative independent C1 and C2 vertebral registration. It is ideal when a reference frame can be linked directly to the C1 posterior arch for C1-direct-captured navigation, but there is a mechanical challenge. A new spine clamp-tracker system was implemented recently, which allows reliable C1- and C2- direct-captured navigation in nine patients with traumatic C2 fractures. In this way, there was no misalignment of C1-C2 screws. C1 lateral mass screws were used except for one case, and translaminar screws were primarily used as an anchor for C2. The C1 lateral mass screw locations, which are 19 mm laterally from the C1 posterior arch's center, are taken to be constant. However, there is one unusual circumstance in which using a C1 laminar hook instead of a C1 lateral mass screw appears to be a beneficial substitute. The increase of surgical accuracy for posterior C1-C2 screw fixation without cost constraints is significantly facilitated by intraoperative C1- and C2-direct-captured navigation with preoperative computed CT images.