Surgical outcomes of phakic, pseudophakic and combined phaco-trabeculectomy in a tertiary care centre in Saudi Arabia.

PURPOSE: To compare the outcomes of phakic, pseudophakic and combined phaco-trabeculectomy in eyes of Saudi patients. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study. Eyes of patients with primary open angle glaucoma, primary angle closure glaucoma or secondary exfoliation glaucoma (XFG) that underwent phakic (n = 152), pseudophakic (n = 40) or combined phaco-trabeculectomy (n = 45) at the King Khaled Eye Specialist Hospital, Riyadh from January 2012 to December 2017 were included. The primary outcome measure was the success at 3 years after surgery. Complete success was defined as achieving an intraocular pressure (IOP) of ≥ 6 and ≤ 21 mmHg without topical antiglaucoma medications; qualified success as achieving the same IOP criteria with or without the use of glaucoma medications. Cumulative probabilities of failure were computed using Kaplan-Meier survival analysis. We used Cox regression analysis to identify factors associated with treatment failure. Reduction in mean IOP and AGM over time was estimated using mixed-effects linear models. RESULTS: The mean decrease in IOP at 3 years from baseline in the phakic, pseudophakic and combined groups was 12.0 (95% CI, 9.9, 14.1) mmHg, 10.1 (95% 6.3, 13.9) mmHg, and 6.4 (95% CI, 1.9, 11.0) mmHg, respectively, and was not significantly different from each other. The values for qualified success were also comparable: 95.2% (95% CI: 86.7-99.0), 95.3% (95% CI: 76.2-99.9), 92.3% (95% CI: 64.0-99.8). Failure was significantly associated with postoperative suturelysis (p = 0.004), XFG (p = 0.018) and AGM (p = 0.038). CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study to provide relative surgical outcomes of trabeculectomy, phaco-trabeculectomy and pseudophakic trabeculectomy in Saudi Arabia and did not show any significant difference in terms of overall success.

Tube Revision Outcomes for Exposure with Different Repair Techniques.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to report our experience with eyes that presented with an initial GDD exposure and their subsequent outcome in terms of re-exposure. METHODS: A retrospective review of charts of 42 patients (43 eyes) who presented with a GDD exposure during the period 2008-2015 in a tertiary eye care center was performed. Demographic data, past ocular history, pre-operative and post-operative information including the surgical technique of GDD surgery and exposure repair were recorded. The patients were followed for further exposure to the date of the last follow-up clinic visit. For each type of repair technique, details were collected on risk and timing of GDD exposure. The baseline features of eyes that had further exposure after initial exposure were compared to eyes without further exposure. RESULTS: Forty-three eyes were identified which had repair after an initial exposure. The mean ± SD age was 54 ± 27 years. Of the GDDs, Ahmed FP7 was performed in 31 eyes, Ahmed FP8 in two eyes, Ahmed S2 in five eyes, Krupin valve in two eyes and Baerveldt 350 GDD in three eyes. The methods of repair and the relative risk [95% CI] of re-exposure were: conjunctival closure only (n=4; RR=2.10 [0.84-5.23]); repair with patch graft and conjunctival repair (n=18), RR=1.24 [0.51-3.01]; tube repositioning, use of patch graft and conjunctival repair (n=14), RR=1.0; tube removal with replacement in a different quadrant, patch graft and conjunctival repair (n=3), RR=1.87 [0.64-5.48]. After the first exposure, 18 eyes had a second re-exposure, four eyes had a third re-exposure, and 1 eye had a fourth exposure. CONCLUSIONS: The GDD exposure rates at our institution are consistent with other reports. Lack of a patch graft for repair is associated with a two-fold risk of subsequent re-exposure.

Glaucoma Patch Graft Surgery Utilizing Corneas Augmented with Collagen Cross-linking.

PURPOSE: Glaucoma drainage device surgery (GDDS) has gained popularity, with outcomes equivalent to trabeculectomy. Erosion of the tube through the overlying conjunctiva may occur in 5%-10% of eyes. Donor corneal tissue has been used as a patch graft for GDDS. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a prospective proof of concept study in 10 patients undergoing GDDS. From patients undergoing endothelial keratoplasty, the donor tissue (approximately 300 µ in thickness) was placed epithelial side down in a well and was allowed to soak in riboflavin solution (VibeX, Avedro, Waltham, MA, USA) for 15 min. This anterior corneal lenticule received 8 mW/cm2 ultraviolet (UV) irradiation applied for 15 min (total energy of 7.2 J/cm2). Each lenticule was then bisected and utilized for the two study participants. The tissue was sutured over the tube during the GDDS and then was covered with recipient conjunctiva as per the usual technique. Representative graft tissues were fixed and examined to determine the depth of cross-linking effect. The patients were followed for 1 year. RESULTS: Histology revealed no apparent demarcation line in the cross-linked grafts; this supported a full-thickness cross-linking treatment effect. There were no intra- or postoperative complications attributed to the graft tissue. No patient developed erosion or exposure of the tube during the 1-year follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: UV-riboflavin cross-linking of the corneal tissue patch graft material appears to be a safe modification when used in GDDS and warrants ongoing study. This method of patch graft can replace other costy methods used with GDD.