Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
1.
Clin Orthop Relat Res ; 469(10): 2831-7, 2011 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21533527

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Limited experimental research has been performed on the treatment of avascular necrosis (AVN) by vascularized bone grafting. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: A new model simulating carpal AVN was created to investigate surgical revascularization of necrotic bone. METHODS: In seven mongrel dogs, AVN was induced by removal of the radial carpal bones bilaterally, deep-freezing, coating in cyanoacrylate, and reimplantation. A reverse-flow vascularized bone graft from the distal radius was implanted in the avascular radial carpal bone. The contralateral side served as an untreated ischemic control. Bone blood flow, bone volume, radiography, histomorphometry, histology, and MRI were analyzed at 4 weeks. RESULTS: Blood flow was substantially higher in grafted bones when compared with controls (14.68 ± 15.43 versus 0.27 ± 0.28 mL/minute/100 g). Blood flow correlated with increased osteoid formation and higher levels of bone turnover. T1 and T2 signals on MRI did not correlate with quantitative bone blood flow measurements. Necrotic bones with no blood flow had normal T1 and T2 signals, whereas revascularized bones had signal changes when compared with adjacent carpal bones. No major collapse occurred in any radiocarpal bone. CONCLUSION: In a canine experimental model, investigation of carpal AVN shows the ability of vascularized bone grafting to revascularize and remodel avascular bone. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Surgical revascularization of necrotic bone induced by vascularized bone grafting results in increased bone perfusion and bone remodeling as compared with untreated necrotic bone. MRI T1 and T2 signals can be normal in necrotic avascular bone.


Asunto(s)
Trasplante Óseo , Huesos del Carpo/irrigación sanguínea , Huesos del Carpo/cirugía , Osteonecrosis/cirugía , Radio (Anatomía)/irrigación sanguínea , Radio (Anatomía)/trasplante , Animales , Remodelación Ósea , Huesos del Carpo/diagnóstico por imagen , Huesos del Carpo/patología , Modelos Animales de Enfermedad , Perros , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética , Masculino , Tamaño de los Órganos , Osteonecrosis/diagnóstico por imagen , Osteonecrosis/patología , Radiografía , Radio (Anatomía)/diagnóstico por imagen , Flujo Sanguíneo Regional , Factores de Tiempo , Trasplante Autólogo
2.
J Bone Joint Surg Am ; 84(10): 1788-92, 2002 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12377909

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Dislocation is a leading and underemphasized cause of failure in revision total hip arthroplasty. Although this fact is generally well recognized, we are aware of no detailed assessments of this problem to date. Our purpose therefore was to evaluate the risk factors leading to instability after revision as well as the expected outcome of various treatment strategies. METHODS: Data were obtained from 1548 revision arthroplasties in 1405 patients who were followed for a minimum of two years (range, 2.0 to 16.4 years; mean, 8.1 years) or until dislocation occurred. Revisions specifically performed because of instability were excluded from the analysis. Risk factors were recorded along with treatment strategies and their success. The statistical relevance of both sets of variables was calculated. RESULTS: A dislocation occurred after 115 (7.4%) of 1548 revision hip arthroplasties. The use of an elevated rim liner was associated with significant decreases (p < 0.05) in dislocation following revision of femoral and acetabular components. The presence of trochanteric nonunion was a significant risk factor for subsequent dislocation (p < 0.001). Revisions with 32-mm and 28-mm-diameter femoral heads were both more stable than was revision with a 22-mm-diameter head (p < 0.05 for each). Surgery was the initial treatment for twelve of the 115 dislocations. Six of the twelve hips had no further instability. Of the 103 postoperative dislocations initially managed nonoperatively, only thirty-six did not redislocate. Thirty-eight of the sixty-seven hips that had an additional dislocation after closed treatment had repeat surgery for treatment of the instability. Only eleven of the thirty-eight hips were stable at one year after surgery. Overall, at the time of the final assessment, sixty-five (57%) of the 115 hips were stable, forty-one (36%) remained unstable, and the status of nine (8%) was unknown. CONCLUSIONS: The risk factors for instability after a total hip revision are not the same as those after a primary procedure. The extent of the soft-tissue dissection is probably the most important variable since head size and trochanteric nonunion are related to "soft-tissue tension." Modular acetabular components with an elevated rim help to stabilize a hip undergoing a revision procedure.


Asunto(s)
Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Cadera/efectos adversos , Luxación de la Cadera/epidemiología , Articulación de la Cadera , Reoperación/métodos , Distribución por Edad , Anciano , Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Cadera/métodos , Distribución de Chi-Cuadrado , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Luxación de la Cadera/etiología , Humanos , Incidencia , Inestabilidad de la Articulación/epidemiología , Inestabilidad de la Articulación/etiología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Probabilidad , Reoperación/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo , Distribución por Sexo
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA