Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Alzheimers Dement ; 12(2): 154-163, 2016 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26368321

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Lumbar puncture (LP) is increasingly performed in memory clinics. We investigated patient-acceptance of LP, incidence of and risk factors for post-LP complications in memory clinic populations. METHODS: We prospectively enrolled 3868 patients (50% women, age 66 ± 11 years, mini mental state examination 25 ± 5) at 23 memory clinics. We used logistic regression analysis using generalized estimated equations to investigate risk factors for post-LP complications, such as typical postlumbar puncture headache (PLPH) and back pain. RESULTS: A total of 1065 patients (31%) reported post-LP complaints; 589 patients (17%) reported back pain, 649 (19%) headache, of which 296 (9%) reported typical PLPH. Only few patients needed medical intervention: 11 (0.3%) received a blood patch, 23 (0.7%) were hospitalized. The most important risk factor for PLPH was medical history of headache. An atraumatic needle and age >65 years were preventive. Gender, rest after LP, or volume of cerebrospinal fluid had no effect. DISCUSSIONS: The overall risk of complications is relatively low. If risk factors shown in this study are taken into account, LPs can be safely performed in memory clinics.


Asunto(s)
Instituciones de Atención Ambulatoria , Memoria/fisiología , Punción Espinal/efectos adversos , Anciano , Trastornos del Conocimiento/líquido cefalorraquídeo , Demencia/líquido cefalorraquídeo , Estudios de Factibilidad , Femenino , Humanos , Incidencia , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Cefalea Pospunción de la Duramadre/epidemiología , Cefalea Pospunción de la Duramadre/etiología , Estudios Prospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Punción Espinal/métodos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA