Management of Lennox-Gastaut syndrome with deep brain stimulation: A systematic literature review.

OBJECTIVES: To review the current literature regarding the efficacy and safety of deep brain stimulation (DBS) in Lennox-Gastaut syndrome (LGS). METHODS: The authors conducted a systematic review of PubMed databases using keywords relevant to the objective of this research. Titles and abstracts were reviewed, after which studies that met the inclusion criteria were selected. Findings were reported according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. RESULTS: Thirteen studies were identified, and only 3 studies that reported 50 patients (age range from 3 to 65 years) met the inclusion criteria of DBS for LGS. Radiological imaging findings and neurophysiological findings were described in all studies. The thalamus nuclei, particularly the centromedian thalamic nucleus (CMN), were found to be highly active in LGS. By targeting this brain region, patients showed favorable outcomes. Overall, the mean seizure reduction was more than 50% in all patients (among whom 2 were seizure free) at a mean follow-up of 15 (12-18) months. CONCLUSION: According to this systemic review, DBS for LGS showed satisfactory outcomes, indicating that DBS should be considered a valid treatment option. However, more studies are needed to ensure the role of DBS in LGS by establishing accurate targeting of the CMN using proper lead positioning and radiological imaging, a standard DBS intervention, and long-term outcomes.

Diffuse calvarial cavernoma: case report and review of the literature.

INTRODUCTION: Cavernous hemangiomas of the skull are very infrequent lesions. They arise from intrinsic vasculature of skull bones and manifest at the fourth to fifth decades of life. Calvarial cavernomas are very rare among lesions of the skull. These lesions are usually focal and confined to one calvarial bone. DISCUSSION: In this report, we are describing a child with diffuse calvarial cavernoma, a very rare lesion with distinctive clinical and radiological manifestations. This is the first case of such morphology described in the literature.

Subependymoma of the spine.

Subependymoma is a rare benign CNS tumor (WHO grade I). The common sites of origin for this type of tumor are the lateral and the fourth ventricles. A spinal intramedullary location is rare. Radiological features of intramedullary subependymoma can mimic more common and more aggressive tumor types. We report a case of a 61-year-old male who presented with a 3-year history of low back pain, associated with right lower limb progressive weakness and sensory numbness. An MRI of the lumbar spine revealed an intradural intramedullary lesion extending from the level of T10-L1. Clinical presentation, radiological, and pathological studies of this case of subependymoma are presented. The incidence of spinal subependymoma was also discussed in light of a literature review.

The longitudinal impact of COVID-19 pandemic on neurosurgical practice.

OBJECTIVE: This observational cross-sectional multicenter study aimed to evaluate the longitudinal impact of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic on neurosurgical practice. METHODS: We included 29 participating neurosurgeons in centers from all geographical regions in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. The study period, which was between March 5, 2020 and May 20, 2020, was divided into three equal periods to determine the longitudinal effect of COVID-19 measures on neurosurgical practice over time. RESULTS: During the 11-week study period, 474 neurosurgical interventions were performed. The median number of neurosurgical procedures per day was 5.5 (interquartile range [IQR]: 3.5-8). The number of cases declined from 72 in the first week and plateaued at the 30's range in subsequent weeks. The most and least number of performed procedures were oncology (129 [27.2 %]) and functional procedures (6 [1.3 %]), respectively. Emergency (Priority 1) cases were more frequent than non-urgent (Priority 4) cases (178 [37.6 %] vs. 74 [15.6 %], respectively). In our series, there were three positive COVID-19 cases. There was a significant among-period difference in the length of hospital stay, which dropped from a median stay of 7 days (IQR: 4-18) to 6 (IQR: 3-13) to 5 days (IQR: 2-8). There was no significant among-period difference with respect to institution type, complications, or mortality. CONCLUSION: Our study demonstrated that the COVID-19 pandemic decreased the number of procedures performed in neurosurgery practice. The load of emergency neurosurgery procedures did not change throughout the three periods, which reflects the need to designate ample resources to cover emergencies. Notably, with strict screening for COVID -19 infections, neurosurgical procedures could be safely performed during the early pandemic phase. We recommend to restart performing neurosurgical procedures once the pandemic gets stabilized to avoid possible post pandemic health-care system intolerable overload.

Neurosurgical Procedures and Safety During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Case-Control Multicenter Study.

OBJECTIVE: Quantitative documentation of the effects of outbreaks, including the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, is limited in neurosurgery. Our study aimed to evaluate the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on neurosurgical practice and to determine whether surgical procedures are associated with increased morbidity and mortality. METHODS: A multicenter case-control study was conducted, involving patients who underwent neurosurgical intervention in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia during 2 periods: pre-COVID-19 and during the COVID-19 pandemic. The surgical intervention data evaluated included diagnostic category, case priority, complications, length of hospital stay, and 30-day mortality. RESULTS: A total of 850 procedures were included, 36% during COVID-19. The median number of procedures per day was significantly lower during the COVID-19 period (5.5 cases) than during the pre-COVID-19 period (12 cases; P < 0.0001). Complications, length of hospital stay, and 30-day mortality did not differ during the pandemic. In a multivariate analysis comparing both periods, case priority levels 1 (immediate) (odds ratio [OR], 1.82; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.24-2.67), 1 (1-24 h) (OR, 1.63; 95% CI, 1.10-2.41), and 4 (OR, 0.28; 95% CI, 0.19-0.42) showed significant differences. CONCLUSIONS: During the early phase of the COVID-19 pandemic, the overall number of neurosurgical procedures declined, but the load of emergency procedures remained the same, thus highlighting the need to allocate sufficient resources for emergencies. More importantly, performing neurosurgical procedures during the pandemic in regions with limited effects of the outbreak on the health care system was safe. Our findings may aid in developing guidelines for acute and long-term care during pandemics in surgical subspecialties.

Diagnostic yield of stereotactic brain biopsy.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the diagnostic yield, accuracy, and safety of frame-based stereotactic brain biopsy procedures. METHODS: A retrospective study of all pathologically diagnosed intracranial lesions, using frame-based stereotactic guided brain biopsy procedures performed at King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Centre (KFSH&RC), Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia between 1993 and 2005 was conducted. Medical charts, radiological studies, and pathological slides were reviewed. RESULTS: A total of 120 consecutive patients who had frame-based stereotactic diagnostic biopsy procedures were identified. Data regarding procedural techniques, lesion locations, pathological diagnosis, and postoperative complications were collected. Patients` ages ranged from 3-72 years (mean +/- standard deviation: 39.4 +/- 20.3), 67 males and 53 females. Sites of biopsied lesions included: 49 thalamic, 29 deep frontal, 23 parietal, 9 temporal, and 10 others. Targeting accuracy was 99.2%. General anesthesia was used in 103 patients (85.8%). The rest was carried out under local anesthesia. Diagnostic yield was estimated at 96%. Most frequently encountered pathological diagnosis includes gliomas (63%), infections (16%), and lymphomas (7%). One mortality (0.8%), and 5 (4%) morbidities were encountered. CONCLUSION: Stereotactic brain biopsy is a relatively safe technique to obtain a tissue biopsy that represents the pathology of the lesion. Recent advances in stereotactic neurosurgical techniques have helped to improve the safety and diagnostic yield of such procedures.

Multiple spinal ring-enhancing schwannomas.

We present a case of intradural multiple ring-enhancing lesions in a 20-year-old male with symptoms and signs of progressive spastic paraparesis. An MRI of the thoracolumbar area showed 2 peculiar ring-enhancing lesions, at the level of T12 and L1. The differential diagnosis includes inflammatory or infectious lesions in addition to rare cystic tumors. The patient underwent surgical resection of the 2 lesions with an uneventful perioperative course. Histologically, the diagnosis was consistent with cystic schwannomas.

Use of methylprednisolone in acute spinal injury.

OBJECTIVE: To obtain an appraisal for the use of methylprednisolone (MP) in the early management of acute spinal cord injury (SCI) in our health system and the attitude to its use. METHODS: A printed questionnaire on MP in acute SCI was distributed to all major spinal and neurosurgical centers in Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia between October and November 2001. RESULTS: A total of 31 replies were collected for statistical analysis. There were 23 replies from doctors (74%) who see 5 or more cases of acute SCI per year. Sixteen doctors (53%) use MP in acute SCI (National Acute Spinal Cord Injury Studies [NASCIS] protocol) regularly, 11 (37%) use it occasionally and 3 (10%) never use it. The use of MP in acute SCI was suggested as a standard of care by 16%, recommended only by 48% and considered optional by 35%. In addition, a review of the literature on the results of the NASCIS I, II and III was conducted. CONCLUSION: Our results confirm the diversities in clinical practice regarding the use of MP in acute SCI. They also raise the issue of the need for specialized centers in spinal trauma with a unified protocol for treatment throughout the Kingdom.