Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
Tipo del documento
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
J Surg Oncol ; 120(8): 1436-1445, 2019 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31721221

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: As most risk factors for anastomotic complications (AC) in rectal cancer patients appear to be noncorrectable, it is needed to find the correctable causes. Additionally, the outcomes of indocyanine-green fluorescence imaging (IFI) and robot-stapled anastomosis have yet been undetermined. METHODS: This study retrospectively analyzed 968 consecutive patients with rectal cancer, who underwent curative robot-assisted anterior resections between 2010 and 2018. IFI parameters and stapling features in the surgical records were reviewed, and reconfirmed. RESULTS: AC occurred in 54 patients (5.6%), 34 (3.5%) with anastomotic leakage (AL) and 24 (2.5%) with anastomotic stenosis (AS). Mechanotechnical faults including defective stapling configurations, including angles lesser than or equal to 150° and outer deviation (more than half from the center of the circle) of linear staples, between the two linear staples were independently associated with AL (P < .001 each). IFI significantly reduced AL rate (2.5% vs 5.3%, P = .029) and AS rate (2% vs 18.8%, P = .006), respectively. Robot linear stapling enabled to maintain the obtuse angle during consecutive staplings and reduced console time. AL and AS were independent risk factors for disease-free survival (P = .02) and local recurrence (P = .03), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: AC were associated with some correctable causes, namely, mechanotechnical errors and lack of use of IFI.


Asunto(s)
Anastomosis Quirúrgica/efectos adversos , Fuga Anastomótica/etiología , Neoplasias del Recto/cirugía , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados , Grapado Quirúrgico/efectos adversos , Adenocarcinoma/mortalidad , Adenocarcinoma/cirugía , Fuga Anastomótica/diagnóstico , Constricción Patológica/diagnóstico , Constricción Patológica/etiología , Medios de Contraste , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Enema , Femenino , Humanos , Verde de Indocianina , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia , Neoplasias del Recto/mortalidad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Sensibilidad y Especificidad , Factores Sexuales , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X
2.
Cureus ; 15(12): e50479, 2023 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38107214

RESUMEN

Objective The incidence of peritonitis secondary to viscus perforation will be examined to determine the most common sites of perforation and associated comorbidities. Methods This is a retrospective observational study based on data collected from the King Fahad Hospital of the University (KFUH). This research targeted patients who had viscus organ perforation and the relation of peritonitis secondary to it. The sample was taken from patients under the care of the General Surgery Department from the first of Feb 2016 to the 12th of Sep 2022. The final sample consisted of 450 patients. The method of diagnosis of peritonitis was mainly clinical, and the surgical approach was either through an exploratory laparotomy or a diagnostic laparoscopy. Incidental findings of viscus organ perforation were noted in addition to certain postoperative complications (e.g., adhesions) and hospital stay. Results Analysis of the results showed a significant relation (p<0.001) between viscus organ perforation and peritonitis. The most common comorbidities associated with secondary peritonitis were hypertension (12, 24.5%), diabetes mellitus (10, 20.4%), any abdominal mass (3, 6.1%), and inflammatory bowel disease (1, 2%). However, a chi-square analysis has shown no significant association between peritonitis and the targeted associated comorbidities. Conclusion Perforation of the small intestine carries the biggest association with peritonitis incidence, in addition to comorbidities such as hypertension and diabetes mellitus. Further study to establish the value of these factors might contribute to decreasing the morbidity and mortality of secondary peritonitis.

3.
Ann Surg Treat Res ; 98(1): 31-43, 2020 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31909048

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: As robotic surgery is increasingly performed in patients with colorectal diseases, understanding proper port placement for robotic colorectal surgery is necessary. This review summarizes current port placement during robotic surgery for colorectal diseases and provides future perspective on port placements. METHODS: PubMed were searched from January 2009 to December 2018 using a combination of the search terms "robotic" [MeSH], "colon" [MeSH], "rectum" [MeSH], "colorectal" [MeSH], and "colorectal surgery" [MeSH]. Studies related to port placement were identified and included in the current study if they used the da Vinci S, Si, or Xi robotic system and if they described port placement. RESULTS: This review included 77 studies including a total of 3,145 operations. Fifty studies described port placement for left-sided and mesorectal excision; 17, 3, and 7 studies assessed port placement for right-sided colectomy, rectopexy, transanal surgery, respectively; and one study assessed surgery with reduced port placement. Recent literatures show that the single-docking technique included mobilization of the second and third robotic arms for the different parts without movement of patient cart and similar to previous dual or triple-docking technique. Besides, use of the da Vinci Xi system allowed a more simplified port configuration. CONCLUSION: Robot-assisted colorectal surgery can be efficiently achieved with successful port placement without movement of patient cart dependent on the type of surgery and the robotic system.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA