Developmental and/or epileptic encephalopathy with spike-and-wave activation in sleep in Saudi Arabia: Electroclinical, etiologic, genetic, and outcome multicenter study.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the clinical features of developmental and/or epileptic encephalopathy with spike-and-wave activation in sleep (D/EE-SWAS), its electrographic characteristics, and etiology and to compare the effects of different treatment strategies on the outcomes using a Saudi Arabian database. METHODS: This multicenter study included children with D/EE-SWAS who were evaluated between 2010 and 2020 at 11 tertiary centers. Data were collected on their baseline clinical features, etiologies, and treatment modalities. Seizure reduction, spike-wave index, and cognitive state were examined as potential therapeutic outcomes. RESULTS: Ninety-one children were diagnosed with D/EE-SWAS, with a median age of 7 years (IQR: 3-5) and an almost equal sex distribution. The average age at which epilepsy was diagnosed was 3 years (IQR: 5-2). A genetic/metabolic etiology was found in 35.1% of the patients, and a structural etiology was found in 27.4%. Children with underlying genetic/metabolic diseases exhibited an earlier seizure onset (P = 0.001) than children with other etiologies. Benzodiazepines (76.6%) were the most common treatment, followed by steroids (51.9%). Sodium valproate (75%) was the most frequently used antiseizure medication, followed by levetiracetam (64.9%). Children with a later seizure onset were more likely to have better clinical responses (P = 0.046), EEG responses (P = 0.012), and cognitive outcomes (P = 0.006) than children with an earlier onset. Moreover, better seizure response and electrographic response were seen in patients with bilateral interictal discharges on the EEG than otherwise. Children had a higher likelihood of both clinical and electrographic improvement with combination therapy of benzodiazepines (P = 0.001) and steroids (P = 0.001) than with other therapies. SIGNIFICANCE: This study shows a higher prevalence of genetic/metabolic causes and suggests the superior efficacy of combination therapy with steroids and benzodiazepines in D/EE-SWAS. Prospective studies that strictly assess the treatment protocols and outcomes are needed.

Hereditary Hyperekplexia in Saudi Arabia.

BACKGROUND: Hyperekplexia is a rare disorder characterized by exaggerated startle responses to unexpected sensory stimuli, recurrent apneas, and stiffness. Only few studies have been published on this disorder in populations with high rates of consanguinity. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed Saudi patients with genetically confirmed hereditary hyperekplexia using a standard questionnaire that was sent to nine major referral hospitals in Saudi Arabia. RESULTS: A total of 22 Saudi patients (11 males, 11 females) from 20 unrelated families who had hereditary hyperekplexia were included. Based on molecular studies, they were classified into different subtypes: SLC6A5 variant (12 patients, 54.5%), GLRB variant (seven patients, 31.8%), and GLRA1 variant (three patients, 13.7%). All patients were homozygous for the respective causal variant. The combined carrier frequency of hereditary hyperekplexia for the encountered founder mutations in the Saudi population is 10.9 per 10,000, which translates to a minimum disease burden of 13 patients per 1,000,000. CONCLUSION: Our study provides comprehensive epidemiologic information, prevalence figures, and clinical characteristics of a large cohort of patients with hereditary hyperekplexia.

Treatment of biotin-responsive basal ganglia disease: Open comparative study between the combination of biotin plus thiamine versus thiamine alone.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the combination of biotin plus thiamine to thiamine alone in treating patients with biotin-responsive basal ganglia disease in an open-label prospective, comparative study. METHODS: twenty patients with genetically proven biotin-responsive basal ganglia disease were enrolled, and received for at least 30 months a combination of biotin plus thiamine or thiamine alone. The outcome measures included duration of the crisis, number of recurrence/admissions, the last neurological examination, the severity of dystonia using the Burke-Fahn-Marsden Dystonia Rating Scale (BFMDRS), and the brain MRI findings during the crisis and after 30 months of follow-up. RESULTS: Ten children with a mean age of 6 years(1/2) were recruited in the biotin plus thiamine group (group 1) and ten children (6 females and 4 males) with a mean age of 6 years and 2 months were recruited in the thiamine group (group 2). After 2 years of follow-up treatment, 6 of 20 children achieved complete remission, 10 had minimal sequelae in the form of mild dystonia and dysarthria (improvement of the BFMDRS, mean: 80%), and 4 had severe neurologic sequelae. All these 4 patients had delayed diagnosis and management. Regarding outcome measures, both groups have a similar outcome regarding the number of recurrences, the neurologic sequelae (mean BFMDS score between the groups, p = 0.84), and the brain MRI findings. The only difference was the duration of the acute crisis: group 1 had faster recovery (2 days), versus 3 days in group 2 (p = 0.005). CONCLUSION: Our study suggests that over 30 months of treatment, the combination of biotin plus thiamine is not superior to thiamine alone in the treatment of biotin-responsive basal ganglia disease.