Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Rev Cardiovasc Med ; 24(1): 29, 2023 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39076879

RESUMEN

Background: Aerobic exercise, either continuous or high intensity interval training (HIIT), induces important benefits in chronic heart failure (CHF) patients. Resistance training has been also shown to be beneficial in CHF. However, data regarding combined aerobic exercise and muscle strength training is still limited. The aim of this study was to investigate whether adding strength training to a HIIT protocol within a cardiac rehabilitation (CR) program has a cumulative beneficial effect on the functional capacity (FC) and quality of life (QoL) in patients with CHF. Methods: Forty-four consecutive patients [35 males, ejection fraction (EF) < 50%] with CHF under medication enrolled in a 36-session CR program and were randomized in two exercise groups; HIIT (HIIT group) or HIIT combined with strength training (high intensity interval training combined with strength training (COM) group). All patients underwent baseline and endpoint outcome measures of a symptom-limited maximal cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET), 1 repetition maximum (1RM) test, muscular endurance test, echocardiography, and Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire (MLWHFQ). Results: Most of the CPET indices, EF, 1RM test, muscular endurance and QoL were improved after the CR program in each exercise training group (p < 0.05). However, COM group demonstrated a further improvement in chest muscle testing and workload at anaerobic threshold (AT) compared to HIIT group. Conclusions: An exercise-based CR program, consisted of either HIIT or HIIT combined with strength training, improves FC and QoL of patients with CHF. However, the addition of strength training to HIIT seems to have further beneficial effects on chest muscle strength and endurance, as well as workload at AT. Clinical Trial Registration: The study was registered in ClinicalTrials.gov with number NCT02387411.

2.
Acta Cardiol Sin ; 38(4): 516-520, 2022 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35873120

RESUMEN

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of a cardiac rehabilitation program on the acute response on endothelial progenitor cells and circulating endothelial cells after maximal exercise in patients with chronic heart failure of different severity. Methods: Forty-four chronic heart failure patients were enrolled in a 36-session cardiac rehabilitation program. All patients underwent an initial maximal cardiopulmonary exercise test before and a final maximal cardiopulmonary exercise test after the cardiac rehabilitation program. The patients were divided in two groups of severity according to the median value of peak VO2. Blood was collected at 4 time points; 2 time points at rest, and 2 time points after each cardiopulmonary exercise test. Five endothelial cellular populations were quantified by flow cytometry. Results: Although there was a higher increase in the mobilization of subgroups of endothelial progenitor cells and circulating endothelial cells after the final cardiopulmonary exercise test compared to the initial test within each severity group (p < 0.05), no significant differences between severity groups were observed (p > 0.05). Conclusions: A 36-session cardiac rehabilitation program had similar beneficial effects on the acute response of endothelial progenitor cells and circulating endothelial cells after maximal exercise in patients with chronic heart failure of different severity.

3.
Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc ; 32: 100702, 2021 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33392386

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Vascular endothelial dysfunction is an underlying pathophysiological feature of chronic heart failure (CHF). Endothelial progenitor cells (EPCs) are also impaired. The purpose of the study was to assess the effect of a cardiac rehabilitation (CR) program on the increase of EPCs at rest and on the acute response after maximal exercise in patients with CHF and investigate whether there were differences between two exercise training protocols and patients of NYHA II and III classes. METHODS: Forty-four patients with stable CHF enrolled in a 36-session CR program and were randomized in one training protocol; either high-intensity interval training (HIIT) or HIIT combined with muscle strength (COM). All patients underwent maximum cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) before and after the CR program and venous blood was drawn before and after each CPET. Five endothelial cellular populations, expressed as cells/106 enucleated cells, were quantified by flow cytometry. RESULTS: An increase in all endothelial cellular populations at rest was observed after the CR program (p < 0.01). The acute response after maximum exercise increased in 4 out of 5 endothelial cellular populations after rehabilitation. Although there was increase in EPCs at rest and the acute response after rehabilitation in each exercise training group and each NYHA class, there were no differences between HIIT and COM groups or NYHA II and NYHA III classes (p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: A 36-session CR program increases the acute response after maximum CPET and stimulates the long-term mobilization of EPCs at rest in patients with CHF. These benefits seem to be similar between HIIT and COM exercise training protocols and between patients of different functional classes.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA