Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
Asunto de la revista
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
J Am Pharm Assoc (2003) ; 62(1): 95-103.e2, 2022.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34764037

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Adult immunization rates in the United States remain low. More convenient access to immunization information systems (IIS) may improve vaccination rates. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this multilevel, clustered, randomized controlled study was to measure the impact of providing pharmacists with software and training to query IIS for patient vaccine history/recommendations on adult influenza, pneumococcal, herpes zoster, and Td/Tdap vaccination rates. METHODS: California Rite Aid pharmacy districts were randomized into intervention/control groups using stratified randomization based on baseline influenza vaccination rates. Store demographic characteristics were collected at baseline (January 1-December 31, 2018). During follow-up (April 1, 2019-March 31, 2020), intervention group stores received access to ImmsLink, software that allows health care providers to review immunization records from IIS and identify a patient's recommended vaccinations. The difference-in-difference between intervention and control groups compared the changes in vaccination rates from baseline to follow-up by calculating adjusted ratios of risk ratios (RRRs). Analysis was performed at the store level. RESULTS: Thirty-six districts comprising 501 Rite Aid stores (intervention: n = 244 stores; control: n = 257) were included. We found no significant differences in vaccination rates between groups: influenza, 19-64 years (adjusted RRR 0.99 [95% CI 0.83-1.17]); influenza, ≥65 years (1.02 [0.86-1.22]); herpes zoster (1.07 [0.90-1.28]); pneumococcal (0.95, 0.80-1.14); and Td/Tdap (0.88, 0.73-1.05). Reasons that recommended vaccines were not given in the intervention group included patient being deferred to future visit, patient declining, patient having already received the vaccination, patient declining because of cost, or vaccine being unavailable. Overall, pharmacist engagement with ImmsLink was low. CONCLUSION: Providing pharmacists with software and training to query IIS did not improve vaccination rates compared with control pharmacies in this study. Factors such as an inconvenient interface or inadequate training or motivation may have caused low engagement with the software and should be considered in future interventions.


Asunto(s)
Servicios Comunitarios de Farmacia , Vacunas contra la Influenza , Farmacias , Adulto , Humanos , Inmunización , Programas de Inmunización , Sistemas de Información , Farmacéuticos , Estados Unidos , Vacunación
2.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27752295

RESUMEN

The Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health (HITECH) Act encourages health information exchange between clinical care and public health through Meaningful Use measures. Meaningful Use specifically identifies objectives to support a number of public health programs including immunizations, cancer registries, syndromic surveillance, and disease case reports. The objective is to improve public and population health. Stage 2 of Meaningful Use focused on compliance to sending of information to public health. The next phase focuses on bi-directional information exchange to support immunization intelligence and to empower providers, pharmacists, and the consumer. The HITECH Act Stage 2 initiative provided incentive and motivation for healthcare providers to encourage their Electronic Medical Record (EMR) vendors to implement data exchanges with public health, with the expected result being timely awareness of health risks. The empowerment nugget in the HITECH Act is not in the compliance reporting to public health. The nugget is the ability for a provider to receive relevant information on the patient or consumer currently in front of them or to those they will connect to through their outreach efforts. The ability for public health to retain current immunization records of individuals from a variety of providers supports their program goals to increase immunization rates and mitigate the risk of vaccine-preventable disease (VPD). The ability for providers to receive at the point of service more complete immunization histories integrated with decision support enhances their delivery of care, thereby reducing the risk of VPD to their patients. Indirectly payers benefit through healthcare cost savings and when the focus is expanded from a health model to a business model, there are significant return on investment (ROI) opportunities that exponentially increase the value of a bi-directional immunization data exchange. This paper will provide descriptions of case examples to demonstrate the value of electronic data exchanges when pharmacy immunization providers and public health work together.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA