Medication Errors in Pediatric Emergency Departments: A Systematic Review and Recommendations for Enhancing Medication Safety.

OBJECTIVE: This systematic review aims to investigate the prevalence, preventability, and severity of medication errors in pediatric emergency departments (P-EDs). It also aims to identify common types of medication errors, implicated medications, risk factors, and evaluate the effectiveness of interventions in preventing these errors. METHODS: A systematic review analyzed 6 primary studies with sample sizes ranging from 96 to 5000 pediatric patients in P-EDs. The review followed Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines and included observational studies and randomized controlled trials involving patients aged 18 years and younger. Comprehensive searches in biomedical databases were conducted, and conflicts in record screening were resolved by a third reviewer using systematic review software. RESULTS: Medication errors in P-EDs are prevalent, ranging from 10% to 15%, with dosing errors being the most common, accounting for 39% to 49% of reported errors. These errors primarily stem from inaccurate weight estimations or dosage miscalculations. Inadequate dosing frequency and documentation also contribute significantly to medication errors. Commonly implicated medications include acetaminophen, analgesics, corticosteroids, antibiotics, bronchodilators, and intravenous fluids. Most errors are categorized as insignificant/mild (51.7% to 94.5%) or moderate (47.5%). Risk factors associated with medication errors in P-EDs include less experienced physicians, severely ill patients, and weekend/specific-hour ordering. Human factors such as noncompliance with procedures and communication failures further contribute to medication errors. Interventions such as health information technology solutions like ParentLink and electronic medical alert systems, as well as structured ordering systems, have shown promise in reducing these errors, although their effectiveness varies. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, this systematic review provides valuable insights into the complexity of medication errors in the P-ED, emphasizes the need for targeted interventions, and offers recommendations to enhance medication safety and reduce preventable errors in this critical health care setting.

Complementary and alternative medicine for children with sickle cell disease: A systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) is a popular alternative to opioid and other analgesics in sickle cell disease (SCD). We review the effectiveness, prevalence, and factors associated with CAM use in the pediatric SCD population. METHODS: The review protocol was created based on Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. A literature search was conducted in MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library, PubMed, and Web of Science. RESULTS: Twenty-four studies were examined. The prevalence of CAM use in pediatric patients with SCD ranged from 36 to 84.5%. Common inpatient CAM interventions were yoga, virtual reality, and acupuncture, which decreased pain scale scores. Outpatient CAMs were consisted of cognitive behavioral therapy, massage therapy, and guided-imagery, which increased pain tolerability and decreased pain scale scores. CONCLUSIONS: CAM modalities can decrease pain scale scores. However, the impact of specific CAM modalities on emergency department visits, hospitalizations, and school absences were inconclusive.