One- and 2-Year American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Scores Do Not Vary Significantly After Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair: A Prospective Multicenter Analysis of 1,567 Patients.

PURPOSE: To evaluate whether there are clinically significant changes in patient-reported outcomes between 1 and 2 years' postoperatively after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (RCR). METHODS: A retrospective analysis of prospective, multicenter registry was queried for all patients who underwent RCR. Patients with preoperative, 6-month, 1-year, and 2-year postoperative American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) scores were included. We evaluated mean postoperative ASES scores, Δ (change from preoperative) ASES, and the %MOI (% maximum outcome improvement). We also evaluated achievement of clinically significant outcomes (CSOs) for the ASES score, including the minimal clinically important difference (MCID), substantial clinical benefit, and patient-acceptable symptom state. RESULTS: There were 1,567 patients with complete data through 2-year follow-up. There were small differences in achievement of CSOs from 1 to 2 years: 88% to 91% for MCID, 81% to 83% for substantial clinical benefit, and 65% to 71% for patient-acceptable symptom state. There were statistically significant differences from 1 to 2 years in mean ASES (87 to 88, P < .001), Δ ASES (37 to 39, P < .001), and %MOI (72% to 76%, P < .001); however, these changes were well below the MCID of 11.1. From 1 to 2 years, the mean ASES improved only 1.7 points (P < .001). At 1 year, patients achieved, on average, 97% of their 2-year ASES. CONCLUSIONS: Both patient-reported outcomes and achievement of CSOs show small differences at 1 and 2 years after RCR. Given the large sample size, there were statistical differences, but these are unlikely to be clinically relevant. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, case series.

Editorial Commentary: Repair Is Efficacious for Acute Rotator Cuff Tears in Patients Over 65 Despite Advanced Age, and Early Repair Is Better.

Although indications for rotator cuff repair are still controversial, common practice is to be more aggressive with surgery as a first-line treatment in patients with acute rotator cuff tears. Both functional outcomes and healing are better with earlier repair, and a healed tendon limits the progression of permanent degenerative changes, including tear progression, fatty infiltration, and progression to cuff tear arthropathy. But what about elderly patients? For those that are physically and medically fit for surgery, there may still be benefit to earlier surgical repair. For those not physically or medically fit for surgery, or those who decline, a short trial of conservative care and repair for those who fail with conservative treatment is still efficacious.

Preoperative Patient Reported Outcomes Predict Postoperative Clinical Outcomes Following Rotator Cuff Repair.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to determine whether preoperative patient-reported outcomes (PROs) predict postoperative PROs and satisfaction following rotator cuff repair. METHODS: We retrospectively identified patients who underwent a primary rotator cuff repair at a single institution. A receiver operating characteristics (ROC) analysis was used to reach a preoperative American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score threshold predictive of postoperative ASES and satisfaction scores. We evaluated patients above and below the ROC threshold by comparing their final ASES scores, ASES change (Δ) from baseline, percent maximum outcome improvement (%MOI), and achievement of minimum clinically important differences (MCID), substantial clinical benefit (SCB), and patient-acceptable symptom state (PASS). Fischer exact tests were used to analyze categorical data, while continuous data were analyzed using t-test. RESULTS: A total of 348 patients who underwent rotator cuff repair were included in this study. The preop ASES value predictive of achieving SCB was 63 (area under the curve [AUC], 0.75; 95% confidence interval: 58-67; P < .001). Patients with preoperative ASES less than 63 were significantly more likely to achieve MCID (odds ratio [OR]: 4.7, P < .001) and SCB (OR:6.1, P < .001) and had significantly higher %MOI (63% vs 41%; P = 0.003) and Δ ASES scores (36 vs 12; P < .001). However, patients with preop ASES scores above 63 had significantly higher final ASES scores (86 vs 79; P = .003), were more likely to achieve PASS (59% vs 48%; P = .045), and had higher satisfaction scores (7.4 vs 6.7; P = .024). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with high preop ASES scores achieve less relative improvement; however, these patients may be more likely to achieve PASS and may have higher satisfaction scores postoperatively. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, retrospective comparative prognostic trial.

Acute, Traumatic Rotator Cuff Tears Have Smaller Critical Shoulder Angles Than Degenerative Tears.

PURPOSE: To determine whether the critical shoulder angle (CSA) in acute, traumatic rotator cuff tears (RCTs) is consistent with the previously described CSA in chronic degenerative RCTs. METHODS: We performed a multicenter retrospective analysis of 134 patients presenting to 5 surgeons fellowship trained in shoulder and elbow or sports. Preoperative imaging was used to measure the CSA and tear characteristics. Patients were included if they had acute, traumatic full-thickness RCTs documented on advanced imaging and had preoperative Grashey radiographs. Patients were excluded if they had any history of shoulder pain, injury, surgery, or treatment prior to the current episode; were overhead athletes; or had fatty infiltration greater than Goutallier grade 1 on imaging. RESULTS: The mean CSA was 33.5° (standard deviation, 4.1°), and 60% of tears had a CSA of less than 35°, much below the mean of 38.0° and the threshold of greater than 35° in degenerative RCTs. The mean age was 58 years, and 70% of patients were men. Overall, 60% of tears involved the subscapularis, 49% of tears occurred in patients aged 60 years or older, and 18% of patients sustained a dislocation. Older age (ß = 0.316, P = .003) and male sex (ß = 5.532, P = .025) were predictive of tear size, and older age (ß = 0.229, P = .011) and biceps avulsion (ß = 8.822, P = .012) were predictive of tear retraction. CONCLUSIONS: Acute, traumatic RCTs have CSAs that are 5° smaller than those of degenerative tears, and the majority (60%) have CSAs that are below the threshold consistent with degenerative RCTs. The majority of traumatic tears (60%) involve the subscapularis. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The study findings suggest that a traumatic tear is not simply the acute failure of a degenerative tendon and that it represents a distinct pathologic entity. These findings support current practice of treating traumatic RCTs differently than degenerative RCTs.

Inferior tilt of the glenoid leads to medialization and increases impingement on the scapular neck in reverse shoulder arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: In reverse shoulder arthroplasty, Inferior tilt was originally promoted to decrease rates of baseplate failure. However, the literature is conflicting regarding the effect of tilt on scapular neck impingement, which has been associated with an increased risk of notching, increased risk of impingement-related instability, and decreased range of motion. We hypothesized that inferior tilt of -10° would lead to increased medialization and increased scapular neck impingement compared with 0° of tilt. METHODS: Twenty patients without glenoid bone loss undergoing reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) at a single institution underwent computed tomography scans of the entire scapula and proximal humerus for preoperative planning. For each patient, we digitally implanted a 25-mm glenoid baseplate flush with the inferior rim of the glenoid. We then simulated impingement-free range of motion with 16 different implant configurations: glenoid tilt (0° vs. -10°), baseplate lateralization (0 mm vs. +6 mm), glenosphere size (36 mm vs. 42 mm), and neck-shaft angle (135° vs. 145°). The primary endpoint was external rotation with the arm at the side (ERS), which is the primary mode of both notching and impingement-related instability, and the secondary endpoint was adduction (ADD). We recorded the RSA angle, preoperative scapular neck length (SNL), and postoperative SNL. Data were compared by paired t tests and a multivariable regression analysis. RESULTS: In every simulation, inferior tilt led to more impingement on the scapular neck. Inferior tilt of the glenoid component was associated with a mean 27% decrease in impingement-free external rotation (P < .01 in all cases) and a mean 32% decrease in impingement-free ADD (P < .01 in all cases). Inferior tilt removed 3.2 mm of additional SNL (P < .001). Multivariable regression analysis showed that lateralization had the most impact on impingement-free external rotation and ADD (P < .001), followed by glenosphere size (P < .001), neck-shaft angle (P < .001), postoperative SNL (P < .001), glenoid tilt (P = .001), inclination (P < .001), and RSA angle (P = .023 for ERS and P = .025 for ADD). CONCLUSION: Relative to 0° of tilt of the baseplate, inferior tilt of -10° was associated with increased scapular neck impingement in ERS and ADD, likely a result of the increased medialization necessary to seat an inferiorly tilted implant, which shortens the scapular neck and brings the humerus closer to the scapula. This scapular neck impingement increases the risk of notching and impingement-related instability.

The 2019 Arthroscopy Association of North America Traveling Fellowship-Los Gallos: New Friends on an Old Town Road.

We came in with high expectations, yet the Arthroscopy Association of North America (AANA) Traveling Fellowship far exceeded them. The 4 traveling fellows came from different backgrounds, different parts of North America, and different practice settings, including an independent private practice, a hybrid private-academic practice, the military, and academia. We were lucky to have been ushered along the way by our godfather, the distinguished John Richmond, M.D., Past-President of AANA and Associate Editor Emeritus of Arthroscopy, who was gracious enough to give his time to the expedition. Over the course of the journey, this gang came together quickly and forged relationships that will last a lifetime. We are extremely grateful to AANA for the privilege and will cherish the memories for years to come.

Comparison of radiographic and clinical outcomes of revision reverse total shoulder arthroplasty with structural versus nonstructural bone graft.

BACKGROUND: Revision shoulder arthroplasty in the setting of glenoid bone loss poses substantial surgical challenges. This study's purpose was to compare radiographic and clinical results of patients requiring structural iliac crest bone autograft (ICBA) for severe bone loss versus patients with less severe bone loss treated with nonstructural bone allograft (NSBA) in the setting of revision reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RSA). METHODS: A retrospective cohort of 30 patients (70% of the 43 patients who met the inclusion criteria) undergoing revision RSA with ICBA (n = 15) or NSBA (n = 15) between 2007 and 2015 were analyzed at a minimum 2-year follow-up. Radiographic assessment included bone graft integration, bone graft resorption, glenosphere tilt, glenosphere version, and the presence of scapular notching. Clinical assessment included active range of motion, Penn Shoulder Score, Veterans RAND 12-item health survey, and need for revision surgery. RESULTS: No radiographic difference was found between the ICBA and NSBA groups with regard to implant position, graft integration, scapular notching, implant shift, or failure of fixation (P > .05). Of 15 patients with ICBA, 14 (93%) had at least partial integration of the bone graft. Some degree of resorption of the bone graft was noted in 6 of 15 patients (40%). There was no significant difference in postoperative active range of motion, Penn Shoulder Score, or Veterans RAND 12-item health survey score (P > .05 for all comparisons). One patient in the ICBA group underwent revision surgery for glenoid baseplate failure. CONCLUSION: Revision RSA with glenoid bone grafting resulted in good clinical and radiographic outcomes at short-term follow-up. Patients requiring structural ICBA were not at increased risk of component failure, radiographic or clinical complications, or inferior clinical outcomes.

Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty with combined deltoid reconstruction in patients with anterior and/or middle deltoid tears.

BACKGROUND AND HYPOTHESIS: Deltoid disruption has traditionally been an absolute contraindication to performing a reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA), and options available to patients have been limited. We present a series of patients with deltoid tears that underwent concomitant RTSA with deltoid reconstruction. We hypothesize that this combined procedure provides an acceptable, functional alternative for this complex patient population. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively identified all patients who were treated by a single surgeon with a concomitant RTSA and deltoid reconstruction from 2004 to 2012 with minimum 24-month follow-up. Six shoulders in 5 patients met these criteria. The mean age was 69 years (range, 61-79 years), and the mean follow-up period was 76.8 months (range, 24-133 months). We compared preoperative and postoperative range of motion and Penn Shoulder Scores, including subscores, using paired t tests. RESULTS: Mean forward elevation and external rotation increased from 48° and 12°, respectively, to 120° and 22°, respectively. Penn scores increased from 45.2 to 77.8 postoperatively (P = .03). The Penn satisfaction subscore, in particular, improved from 1.1 (of 10) to 9.0 (P = .005). There was a low rate of recurrent deltoid failure (1 of 6 shoulders), and there were no infections or revisions. DISCUSSION: Deltoid reconstruction at the same time as RTSA is a viable treatment option as a salvage procedure for patients with deltoid deficiency who otherwise need RTSA for treatment of massive rotator cuff deficiency. In this small series, simultaneous RTSA and deltoid reconstruction resulted in a functional shoulder with a high level of satisfaction and good motion. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV; Case Series; Treatment Study.

Reliability testing of two classification systems for osteoarthritis and post-traumatic arthritis of the elbow.

HYPOTHESIS AND BACKGROUND: The severity of elbow arthritis is one of many factors that surgeons must evaluate when considering treatment options for a given patient. Elbow surgeons have historically used the Broberg and Morrey (BM) and Hastings and Rettig (HR) classification systems to radiographically stage the severity of post-traumatic arthritis (PTA) and primary osteoarthritis (OA). We proposed to compare the intraobserver and interobserver reliability between systems for patients with either PTA or OA. METHODS: The radiographs of 45 patients were evaluated at least 2 weeks apart by 6 evaluators of different levels of training. Intraobserver and interobserver reliability were calculated by Spearman correlation coefficients with 95% confidence intervals. Agreement was considered almost perfect for coefficients >0.80 and substantial for coefficients of 0.61 to 0.80. RESULTS: In patients with both PTA and OA, intraobserver reliability and interobserver reliability were substantial, with no difference between classification systems. There were no significant differences in intraobserver or interobserver reliability between attending physicians and trainees for either classification system (all P > .10). The presence of fracture implants did not affect reliability in the BM system but did substantially worsen reliability in the HR system (intraobserver P = .04 and interobserver P = .001). CONCLUSIONS: The BM and HR classifications both showed substantial intraobserver and interobserver reliability for PTA and OA. Training level differences did not affect reliability for either system. Both trainees and fellowship-trained surgeons may easily and reliably apply each classification system to the evaluation of primary elbow OA and PTA, although the HR system was less reliable in the presence of fracture implants.

Infectious spondylodiscitis: diagnosis and treatment.

Infectious spondylodiscitis presents a diagnostic conundrum, and establishing the diagnosis often requires expensive testing and workup. But because of the potentially irreversible neurologic consequences and the great expense and time required to adequately treat this rare infection, establishing a diagnosis is paramount. Below, we present a representative case from clinical practice and examine the prevalence of certain signs and symptoms and the utility of various diagnostic modalities health care providers can use to accurately diagnose afflicted patients and avoid disastrous complications.

Management of Acute Rotator Cuff Tears.

Acute, traumatic rotator cuff tears typically occur in younger patients with a fall on an outstretched hand, grabbing an object to catch oneself when falling, or a glenohumeral dislocation. These tears are best evaluated with MRI. Partial-thickness tears may be managed nonoperatively with physical therapy, NSAIDs, and injections. Full-thickness tears in most patients should be managed with surgical repair as soon as possible, with better outcomes shown when repaired within 4 months of injury.

Using the Greater Tuberosity as a Reference for Placement of Proximal Humerus Plates Leads to a High Rate of Calcar Screw Malposition.

OBJECTIVES: Achieving calcar fixation is critical to minimize the failure of proximal humerus fractures repaired with proximal humeral locking plates (PHLPs). Many operative technique manuals reference the greater tuberosity (GT) for plate placement. The objective of this study was to examine the accuracy of calcar screw placement when PHLPs were placed based on distance from the GT. METHODS: Twenty cadaveric specimens were acquired representing a height distribution across the US population. Thirteen different PHLPs were applied. A drill bit was placed through the designated calcar screw hole and measured on radiographs, with the inferior 25% of the head representing an ideal placement. RESULTS: Three hundred fifty constructs were studied. In 28% of the specimens, the calcar screw was misplaced. In 20% of the specimens, it was too low, whereas in 8%, it was too high. The calcar screw missed low in 30% of patients shorter than 5 feet, 5.5 inches versus 8% of taller patients ( P = 0.007). It missed high in 13% of taller patients versus 2% of shorter patients ( P = 0.056). Calcar screws in variable-angle plates missed 0% of the time, whereas those in fixed-angle plates missed 36% of the time ( P = 0.003). CONCLUSIONS: Placement of PHLPs based on distance from the GT results in unacceptable position of the calcar screw 28% of the time and up to 36% in fixed-angle plates. This could be further compounded if the GT is malreduced. Current technique guide recommendations result in an unacceptably high rate of calcar screw malposition.

Two-Incision Distal Biceps Repair with Cortical Button: A Technique to Improve Supination Strength.

Tears of the distal biceps are common, and nonoperative treatment results in significant loss of supination strength. Surgery is indicated for most patients to restore this supination strength. Both 1- and 2-incision techniques are successful, but each has its own advantages and disadvantages. We believe the 2-incision technique better restores the anatomic attachment site of the tendon, which leads to better supination strength and has a lower rate of neurologic injury. Although it does have a slightly higher risk of synostis, this can be mitigated by routine prophylaxis with NSAIDs. Augmenting the repair with a cortical button has been shown to increase the load-to-failure better than the traditional 2-incision technique that employs transosseous fixation. Here we present our technique of 2-incision distal biceps repair with cortical button, a technique intended to maximize supination strength.

Triceps-Sparing Total Elbow Arthroplasty for Distal Humerus Fracture: The Lateral Paraolecranon Approach.

Distal humerus fractures in the elderly are a difficult problem to treat. Open reduction internal fixation has a high rate of complications, particularly because osteopenia compromises what is already tenuous fixation in a metaphyseal fracture. Total elbow arthroplasty is a more predictable outcome and easier recovery for these patients. However, most surgeons perform a low volume of total elbow arthroplasty. In addition, traditional exposure requires detachment of the triceps tendon. The lateral paraolecranon approach maintains the central tendon attachment to the olecranon while still facilitating relative ease of the procedure. Patients are allowed full active use of the triceps postoperatively, which is very helpful for polytrauma patients and those who are already dependent on assistive devices for ambulation.

KAToB: Knotless All-Arthroscopic Intraarticular Tenodesis of the Biceps, An Efficient, Simple, Reproducible Technique.

Biceps tenodesis is a commonly performed procedure. It can be done using a multitude of fixation methods, at multiple locations, and either open or arthroscopic, with little if any clinical differences in the literature. Yet, many techniques have drawbacks in the risk of complications or in the technical ease. Here we present what we have found to be an efficient, simple, reproducible technique: KAToB, Knotless All-arthroscopic intraarticular Tenodesis of the Biceps using a knotless anchor at the articular margin. This technique minimizes the risk of nerve injury, infection, and fracture; has good clinical outcomes; and has a low rate of failure.

Managing the Endosteal Fibula During Arthroplasty for Proximal Humeral Fracture Sequelae.

Augmentation of proximal humeral fracture fixation with an endosteal fibular allograft has increased in popularity because it biomechanically improves construct stability and potentially may lead to a lower rate of humeral head collapse. However, the potential need for arthroplasty after proximal humeral fracture fixation may still arise. Placing a humeral stem in the presence of an existing intramedullary fibular graft is challenging because the fibula is dense cortical bone and is typically well-integrated by the time an arthroplasty would be performed. Some have proposed burring the proximal humerus open to receive a stem, or using cannulated intramedullary reamers until a humeral stem can be placed. These steps are tedious and inefficient. We have found the most efficient technique as treating the fibula as if it were a well-fixed humeral stem: freeing it up from the native bone and removing it in its entirety.

Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes of a Posteriorly Augmented Glenoid Component in Anatomic Total Shoulder Arthroplasty for Primary Osteoarthritis with Posterior Glenoid Bone Loss.

BACKGROUND: The primary objectives of this study were to evaluate the ability of a posteriorly stepped augmented glenoid component, used in patients with primary glenohumeral osteoarthritis with B2 or B3 glenoid morphology, to correct preoperative retroversion and humeral head subluxation and to identify factors associated with radiographic radiolucency and patient-reported clinical outcomes. METHODS: We identified 71 shoulders with B2 or B3 glenoid morphology that underwent anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty with use of a posteriorly stepped augmented glenoid component and with a preoperative 3-dimensional computed tomography (3D-CT) scan and a minimum of 2 years of clinical and radiographic follow-up. The Penn Shoulder Score (PSS), shoulder range of motion, glenoid center-peg osteolysis, and postoperative version and humeral head subluxation were the main outcome variables of interest. RESULTS: Follow-up was a median of 2.4 years (range, 1.9 to 5.7 years); the mean patient age at treatment was 65 ± 7 years (range, 51 to 80 years). PSS, range of motion, humeral head centering, and glenoid version were significantly improved among all patients (p < 0.0001). Patients with persistent posterior subluxation of the humeral head postoperatively had worse preoperative fatty infiltration of the teres minor and greater postoperative component retroversion (p < 0.05). Patients with center-peg osteolysis had more preoperative joint-line medialization and posterior glenoid bone loss (p < 0.05). Patients with more preoperative humeral head posterior subluxation had a lower PSS, adjusting for confounders (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Posteriorly stepped augmented glenoid components can improve pathologic retroversion and posterior subluxation of the humeral head in B2 and B3 glenoids, with significant improvements found in clinical outcome scores at a minimum of 2 years of follow-up in the vast majority of patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Quadriceps Tendon Repair Using Knotless Anchors and Suture Tape.

Repair of a torn quadriceps tendon is necessary to restore the extensor mechanism of the knee. Traditional repair involves transosseous sutures tied over bone bridges on the inferior pole of the patella. Suture anchor repair has been shown to be stronger than transosseous repair and facilitates a smaller incision. Suture tape can improve the strength of the suture-tendon interface, and when combined with knotless anchors, leads to a stronger repair construct than even traditional suture anchors and surgeon-tied knots. Here we describe our technique of quadriceps tendon repair using suture tape and knotless anchors.