Disease-free survival does not differ according to fertility preservation technique for young women with breast cancer.

OBJECTIVE: To study whether fertility preservation strategies using ovarian stimulation or without using it impact long-term disease-free survival of patients with breast cancer. DESIGN: Retrospective bicentric cohort study. SETTING: Two university hospitals. PATIENT(S): In this study, 740 women with breast cancer, aged 18-43 years, who received primary fertility preservation between 2013 and 2019 after a diagnosis of localized breast cancer were included. INTERVENTION(S): Overall, 328 patients underwent at least 1 ovarian stimulation cycle (STIM group) and 412 had a technique without hormonal administration (no STIM group). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Disease-free survival and overall survival up to May 2021 were compared between the 2 groups by log-rank test. Cox proportional-hazard regression model was used for multivariable analyses. RESULT(S): Out of the 740 women who underwent fertility preservation, follow-up data were available for 269 women in the STIM group (82%) and 330 (80%) in the no STIM group. Kaplan-Meier estimates of disease-free survival at 4 years were 87.9% (82.8%-92.2%) and 83.1% (78.4%-87.3%) in the STIM and no STIM groups, respectively. After adjustment on prognostic parameters, no significant difference in breast cancer recurrence rate was observed between the STIM and no STIM groups (hazard ratios, 0.83 [0.64-1.08]). Kaplan-Meier estimate of overall survival at 4 years was 97.6% (95.3%-99.2%) and 93.6% (90.9%-95.9%) in the STIM and no STIM groups, respectively. Overall survival was higher in the STIM group than no STIM group (log-rank test). After adjustment on prognostic parameters, the risk of death remained significantly lower in the STIM group (Hazard Ratio, 0.55 [0.35-0.85]). CONCLUSION(S): In our cohort, STIM for fertility preservation in breast cancer did not significantly impact disease-free survival but was associated with higher overall survival. The disease-free survival and overall survival of young patients with breast cancer were not impacted by fertility preservation techniques irrespective of the timing of chemotherapy (neoadjuvant or adjuvant) and the use of ovarian stimulation. Nevertheless, because death and recurrence were rare events, these results should be taken with caution.

Response to Ovarian Stimulation for Urgent Fertility Preservation before Gonadotoxic Treatment in BRCA-Pathogenic-Variant-Positive Breast Cancer Patients.

BRCA 1/2 pathogenic variants increase the risk of developing early and aggressive breast cancers (BC). For these patients, fertility potential can be directly affected by oncologic treatments. In addition, evidence indicates that BRCA-mutated women had a significant reduction in their ovarian reserve. In order to improve their chances of conception after the completion of cancer treatments, fertility preservation should be proposed before the administration of gonadotoxic drugs, ideally by oocyte vitrification after controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH). The present investigation aims to assess the ovarian response to COH in BRCA 1/2-pathogenic-variant carriers diagnosed with BC. Patient characteristics and COH outcomes were compared between BRCA-positive (n = 54) and BRCA-negative (n = 254) patients. The number of oocytes recovered did not differ between the two groups. However, the oocyte maturation rate and the number of mature oocytes obtained (7 (4.5-11.5) vs. 9 (5-14) oocytes, p = 0.05) were significantly lower in the BRCA-mutated patients. Although individualized COH protocols should be discussed, BRCA-mutated patients would benefit from FP before BC occurs, in order to cope with the potential accelerated decline of their ovarian reserve, optimize the success rate of FP by repeating COH cycles, and to preserve the feasibility of PGT-M by collecting a large amount of eggs.

[Prognostic assessment and treatment of early breast cancer]. / Évaluation pronostique et traitement du cancer du sein précoce.

Prognostic assessment and treatment of early breast cancer. Breast cancer is the most common cancer occurring in France and worldwide. In 2017 it has been estimated that 59.000 women in France have been diagnosed with breast cancer. Breast cancer prognosis depends on multiple factors: tumor stage (TNM), histology, molecular sub-type and grade. The treatment of early breast cancer usually involves different strategies, such as surgery, chemotherapy, endocrine therapy, targeted therapies and radiotherapy, on the basis of the different sub-types.

Évaluation pronostique et traitement du cancer du sein précoce. Le cancer du sein est le cancer le plus fréquent chez la femme en France métropolitaine et dans le monde, avec environ 59 000 nouveaux cas estimés en France en 2017. Le pronostic du cancer du sein repose sur plusieurs facteurs : le stade (TNM), le type histologique, le sous-type moléculaire et le grade. La prise en charge du cancer du sein précoce se base sur plusieurs stratégies combinées en fonction des différents sous-types : la chirurgie, la chimiothérapie, l'hormonothérapie, les traitements ciblés et la radiothérapie.