Infections and their prognostic significance before diagnosis of chronic lymphocytic leukemia, non-Hodgkin lymphoma, or multiple myeloma.

BACKGROUND: Immunodeficiency is a shared feature of B cell malignancies. The risk of infections and their prognostic significance after diagnosis are well characterized, but, conversely, less is known about prediagnostic infections in these domains. METHODS: In matched case-control analyzes, using Danish nationwide registers, we assessed the rate of prediagnostic infections in chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL), multiple myeloma (MM), follicular lymphoma (FL), marginal zone lymphoma (MZL), and lymphoplasmacytic lymphoma (LPL). Survival analyzes of data from clinical registers were then used to determine the effect of infections in the year preceding diagnosis on overall survival. To yield results for as many patients as possible, antimicrobial prescriptions were used as surrogates for infections. RESULTS: The nationwide and clinical registers comprised 30,389 patients, accumulating 213,649 antimicrobial prescriptions, and 18,560 patients accumulating 107,268 prescriptions, respectively. The relative risk of infections was increased up to 15 years prior to diagnosis of malignancy and markedly increased in the year just prior to diagnosis. More than two antimicrobials within one year prior to diagnosis were associated with significantly shorter overall survival, independently of known prognostic factors. CONCLUSION: Patients with B cell-derived malignancies exhibit marked immunodeficiency several years prior to diagnosis such that different disease subtypes demonstrate both overlapping and distinct trends in infection risk preceding diagnosis. Moreover, multiple infections within the year preceding diagnosis are independently associated with shorter overall survival for all the examined malignancies.

Opioids and personalized analgesia in the perioperative setting: A protocol for five systematic reviews.

BACKGROUND: Treatment with opioids is a mainstay in perioperative pain management. While the leading treatment paradigm has been procedure-specific pain management, efforts regarding personalized pain treatment are increasing. The OPI•AID project aims to develop personalized algorithms for perioperative pain management, taking demographic, surgical, and anaesthesiologic factors into account. We will undertake five parallel reviews to illuminate current evidence on different aspects of individual responses to perioperative opioid treatment. METHODS: Inclusion of adult populations in English-written studies. Review-specific searches are developed for the following databases: CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, clinicaltrials.gov, and clinicaltrial.eu. Two authors will independently screen citations, extract data, and assess the risks of bias in each review (QUIPS, PROBAST and RoB2, as relevant). CONCLUSION: These reviews will evaluate various aspects of perioperative opioid treatment, including individualized treatment strategies, selection of specific opioids, and individual patient responses. These will guide future development of a personalized perioperative opioid treatment algorithm (OPI•AID) that will be validated and tested clinically against standard of care.

Real-world outcomes upon second-line treatment in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukaemia.

For chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (CLL), targeted drugs have become the standard of care, in particular for second-line treatment. In this study, overall survival (OS), treatment-free survival (TFS) and adverse events (AE) were registered retrospectively in a Danish population-based cohort upon second-line treatment for CLL. Data were collected from medical records and the Danish National CLL register. For 286 patients receiving second-line treatment, three-year TFS was higher upon targeted treatment (ibrutinib/venetoclax/idelalisib) [63%, 95% confidence interval (CI) 50%-76%] compared with fludarabine, cyclophosphamide and rituximab or bendamustine and rituximab (FCR/BR) (37%, CI: 26%-48%) and chlorambucil+/-CD20-antibody (CD20Clb/Clb) (22%, CI: 10%-33%). Upon targeted treatment, three-year OS estimates were higher for targeted treatment (79%, CI: 68%-91%) compared with FCR/BR (70%, CI: 60%-81%) or CD20Clb/Clb (60%, CI: 47%-74%). The most common AEs were infections and haematological AEs; 92% of patients treated with targeted drugs had AEs, 53% of which were severe. Upon FCR/BR and CD20Clb/Clb, AEs were present for 75% and 53% respectively, of which 63% and 31% were severe. These real-world data demonstrate higher TFS and a tendency towards higher OS following targeted second-line treatment for CLL compared to chemoimmunotherapy, also for patients who may be frailer and more comorbid.

Impact of type 2 diabetes on mortality, cause of death, and treatment in chronic lymphocytic leukemia.

Age-related comorbid conditions are exceedingly common in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). As the prevalence of type 2 diabetes (T2D) is predicted to double during the next two decades, a better understanding of the interplay between CLL and T2D is of increasing importance. In this study, analyses were performed in parallel in two separate cohorts, based on Danish national registers and the Mayo Clinic CLL Resource. The primary outcomes were overall survival (OS) from time of CLL diagnosis, OS from time of treatment, and time to first treatment (TTFT), studied using Cox proportional hazard regression analysis and Fine-Gray regression analysis. In the Danish CLL cohort, the prevalence of T2D was 11%, in the Mayo CLL cohort, it was 12%. Patients with CLL and T2D had shorter OS both from time of diagnosis and from first-line treatment for were less likely to receive treatment for CLL compared with patients with CLL and without T2D. The increased mortality was largely driven by an increased risk of death due to infections, especially in the Danish cohort. The findings of this study emphasize a substantial subgroup of CLL patients with co-occurring T2D with an inferior prognosis and a possible unmet treatment need requiring additional interventions and further research.

Increased incidence rates of positive blood cultures shortly after chemotherapy compared to radiotherapy among individuals treated for solid malignant tumours.

BACKGROUND: Cancer treatments suppress immune function and are associated with increased risk of infections, but the overall burden of serious infectious diseases in treated patients has not been clearly elucidated. METHODS: All patients treated for solid malignant tumours with radiotherapy (RT) and/or standard first-line chemotherapy (C) at the Department of Oncology at Rigshospitalet between 01/1/2010 and 31/12/2016 were included. Patients were followed from treatment initiation until the first of new cancer treatment, 1 year after treatment initiation, end of follow-up or death. Incidence rates (IR) of positive blood culture (PBC) per 1000 person-years follow-up (PYFU) were calculated. FINDINGS: 12,433 individuals were included, 3582 (29%), 6349 (51%), and 2502 (20%) treated with RT, C, or both RT & C, respectively, contributing 8182 PYFU. 429 (3%) individuals experienced 502 unique episodes of PBC, incidence rate (95% CI) 52.43 (47.7, 57.6) per 1000 PYFU. The 30-day mortality rate after PBC was 24% independent of treatment modality. Adjusted incidence rate ratios in the first 3 months (95% CI) after PBC significantly varied by treatment: 2.89 (1.83, 4.55) and 2.52 (1.53, 4.14) for C and RT & C compared to RT. Escherichia coli (n = 127, 25%) was the top microorganism identified. INTERPRETATION: PBCs are not common, but when they occur, mortality is high.

Vaccine effectiveness against SARS-CoV-2 reinfection during periods of Alpha, Delta, or Omicron dominance: A Danish nationwide study.

BACKGROUND: Individuals with a prior Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection have a moderate to high degree of protection against reinfection, though seemingly less so when the Omicron variant of SARS-CoV-2 started to circulate. The aim of this study was to evaluate the vaccine effectiveness (VE) against SARS-CoV-2 reinfection, Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19)-related hospitalization, and COVID-19-related death, in individuals with prior SARS-CoV-2 infection, and to assess the effect of time since vaccination during periods with different dominant SARS-CoV-2 variants. METHODS AND FINDINGS: This study used a nationwide cohort design including all individuals with a confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection, who were alive, and residing in Denmark between 1 January 2020 and 31 January 2022. Using Danish nationwide registries, we obtained information on SARS-CoV-2 infections, COVID-19 vaccination, age, sex, comorbidity, staying at hospital, and country of origin. The study population included were individuals with prior SARS-CoV-2 infection. Estimates of VE against SARS-CoV-2 reinfection with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using a Poisson regression model and adjusted for age, sex, country of origin, comorbidity, staying at hospital, calendar time, and test incidence using a Cox regression model. The VE estimates were calculated separately for three periods with different dominant SARS-CoV-2 variants (Alpha (B.1.1.7), Delta (B.1.617.2), or Omicron (B.1.1.529)) and by time since vaccination using unvaccinated as the reference. In total, 148,527 person-years and 44,192 SARS-CoV-2 infections were included for the analysis regarding reinfections. The study population comprised of 209,814 individuals infected before or during the Alpha period, 292,978 before or during the Delta period, and 245,530 before or during the Omicron period. Of these, 40,281 individuals had completed their primary vaccination series during the Alpha period (19.2%), 190,026 during the Delta period (64.9%), and 158,563 during the Omicron period (64.6%). VE against reinfection following any COVID-19 vaccine type administered in Denmark, peaked at 71% (95% CI: -Inf to 100%) at 104 days or more after vaccination during the Alpha period, 94% (95% CI: 92% to 96%) 14 to 43 days after vaccination during the Delta period, and 60% (95% CI: 58% to 62%) 14 to 43 days after vaccination during the Omicron period. Waning immunity following vaccination was observed and was most pronounced during the Omicron period. Due to too few events, it was not possible to estimate VE for hospitalization and death. Study limitations include potentially undetected reinfections, differences in health-seeking behavior, or risk behavior between the compared groups. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that in previously infected individuals, completing a primary vaccination series was associated with a significant protection against SARS-CoV-2 reinfection compared with no vaccination. Even though vaccination seems to protect to a lesser degree against reinfection with the Omicron variant, these findings are of public health relevance as they show that previously infected individuals still benefit from COVID-19 vaccination in all three variant periods.

Differences and Temporal Changes in Risk of Invasive Pneumococcal Disease in Adults with Hematological Malignancies: Results from a Nationwide 16-Year Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: Patients with hematological malignancies (HM) are known to carry an increased risk of invasive pneumococcal disease (IPD). However, temporal variations in IPD risks following a cancer diagnosis remain poorly characterized. To inform vaccine guidelines and patient management, we assessed the IPD incidence among patients with HM and other malignancies. METHODS: The study population included all individuals aged ≥15 years during 2000-2016 in Denmark. Variations in incidences of IPD over time and between different types of hematological malignancies and diagnoses were assessed by Poisson regression. RESULTS: During 85 002 224 person-years of observation, 13 332 episodes of a first IPD were observed, of which 765 (5.7%) occurred among individuals with HM. Among HM patients, the IPD incidence rate decreased continuously during the study period (rate ratio per year, 0.91; 95% confidence interval, .90-.92). The risk of IPD in patients with HM was up to 39 times higher when compared to the background population and was highest for multiple myeloma, acute lymphoblastic leukemia, and chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Unlike other malignancies, the increased IPD risk did not wane with the time since HM diagnosis. We found a vaccination uptake of only ≤2% in patients with HM and ≤1% for those with other types of malignancies. CONCLUSIONS: Adults with HM in general and patients with lymphoid malignancies in particular have an increased risk for IPD, compared with patients with other types of cancer and with individuals free of cancer. The pneumococcal vaccination uptake is extremely low in this at risk-population. Efforts to prevent IPD in HM patients are continuously warranted.

Twenty-five years of triptans - a nationwide population study.

BACKGROUND: The efficacy of triptans as the main acute treatment strategy for migraine headache at the population-wide level needs to be understood to inform clinical decision-making. We summarise key trends in triptan use using more than 25 years of Danish nationwide data. METHODS: We conducted a nationwide register-based cohort study based on all Danish residents with access to public healthcare between 1 January 1994 and 31 October 2019 and summarise informative trends of all purchases of triptans in Denmark in the same period. Complete purchase records of Sumatriptan, Naratriptan, Zolmitriptan, Rizatriptan, Almotriptan, Eletriptan, and Frovatriptan were used. FINDINGS: Over a 25-year period, triptan use increased from 345 to 945 defined daily doses (DDD) per 1000 inhabitants per year and the yearly prevalence of triptan use increased from 5.17 to 14.57 per 1000 inhabitants. Between 2014 and 2019, 12.3% of the Danish migraine population purchased a triptan. Following their initial purchase, 43% of patients had not repurchased triptans within 5 years. At most, 10% of patients indicating triptan discontinuation tried more than one triptan. The prevalence of triptan overuse, defined as having purchased at least 20 DDDs of triptans per month for 3 consecutive months, increased in parallel with the prevalence of triptan use, prevalent in 56 of every 1000 triptan users every year between 2014 and 2019. INTERPRETATION: In a cohort with access to free clinical consultations and low medication costs, we observed low rates of triptan adherence, likely due to disappointing efficacy and/or unpleasant side effects rather than economic considerations. Triptan success continues to be hindered by poor implementation of clinical guidelines and high rates of treatment discontinuance.

Real-world outcomes for 205 patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia treated with ibrutinib.

Ibrutinib has now been approved for treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) in both front-line setting and as later-line treatment. However, knowledge about the outcomes and adverse events (AE) among patients at a population-based level is still limited. OBJECTIVES: To report outcomes and AEs in a population-based cohort treated with ibrutinib outside clinical trials. METHODS: We conducted a multicenter, retrospective cohort study including all patients with CLL treated with ibrutinib. RESULTS: In total, 205 patients were included of whom 39 (19%) were treatment-naïve. The median follow-up was 21.4 months (interquartile range (IQR), 11.9,32.8), the estimated overall survival at 12 months was 88.8% (95% confidence interval (CI); 84.3%, 93.3%), and the estimated progression-free survival at 12 months was 86.3% (95% CI; 81.3%, 91.2%). During follow-up, 200 (97.6%) patients had at least one AE and 100 (48.8%) patients had at least one grade ≥3 AE. Eighty-six patients (42.0%) discontinued ibrutinib, hereof 47 (54.7%) due to AEs and 19 (22.1%) had progression of CLL or Richter transformation. CONCLUSIONS: In our study, we find comparable, though slightly inferior, overall, and progression-free survival, and discontinuation due to toxicity was higher compared with clinical trials. Patient training and information may improve treatment adherence outside clinical trials.

Long-term clinical outcomes of patients with hematologically unexplained cytopenia after routine assessment: A single center study.

OBJECTIVE: We investigated mortality and long-term development of malignant hematological disease, cancer, liver-, renal-, and rheumatic disease in patients with unexplained cytopenia (UC). METHODS: We screened all patients referred to the outpatient clinic at the Department of Hematology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, with a suspected myeloid neoplasm from June 2009 to the end of 2012. Through registry linkage, we obtained information on hospital-based ICD-10 diagnoses and survival. We estimated cumulative incidences of disease and hazard ratios of all-cause mortality using the Aalen-Johansen estimator and Cox regression. We compared incidences and mortality with a control cohort. RESULTS: Among 1820 referrals, 221 had UC. The UC group had a 5-year cumulative incidence of malignant hematological disease of 8.91% (CI 95%: 4.98-12.84) compared to 0.93(CI 95%: 0.32-1.55) in the matched controls. In addition, UC patients had higher incidences of cancer, liver, and rheumatic disease. Mortality was higher in UC patients compared to the matched controls with a HR of 1.43 [P = 0.038, CI 95%: 1.02-2.00] adjusted for comorbidity, sex, and age. Most of the mortality and morbidity were ascribed to patients 50 years or older. CONCLUSIONS: Unexplained cytopenia patients had a higher incidence of malignant hematological-, cancer-, liver-, and rheumatic disease and increased mortality compared to the general population.

Myeloproliferative Neoplasms in Danish Twins.

OBJECTIVE: Myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs) are a heterogeneous group of diseases characterized by clonal hyperproliferation of immature and mature cells of the myeloid lineage. Genetic differences have been proposed to play a role in the development of MPNs. Monozygotic twin pairs with MPNs have been reported in a few case reports, but the MPN concordance pattern in twins remains unknown. METHOD: All twin pairs born in the period 1900-2010 were identified in the nationwide Danish Twin Registry. Only pairs with both twins alive on January 1, 1977, and those born thereafter were included to allow identification in the Danish National Patient Registry. RESULTS: A total of 158 twin pairs were registered with an MPN diagnosis: 36 monozygotic, 104 dizygotic, and 18 pairs with unknown zygosity. MPNs were diagnosed in both twins in 4 pairs. The probandwise concordance rates for monozygotic twin pairs were higher than for dizygotic twin pairs (15 vs. 0%; p = 0.016). CONCLUSION: An estimated concordance rate of 15% (95% CI 0.059-0.31) is modest, but given the rarity of MPNs this finding is clinically relevant and provides further support for the role of genetic predisposition in the development of MPNs.

Should high-dose N-acetylcysteine be given in cases of massive paracetamol overdoses: A narrative review.

N-acetylcysteine (NAC) is regarded as an effective treatment of paracetamol overdoses. However, in cases of "massive" paracetamol overdoses, recent studies indicate that patients may not be sufficiently treated with the standard dose of NAC (300 mg/kg over 20-21 h). The subject is further complicated because "massive overdoses" and "high-risk" are defined differently; some studies use the ingested amount (e.g., >40 g), and some studies use blood concentrations of paracetamol and transaminases. This narrative review investigates whether high-dose NAC significantly decreases the risk of hepatotoxicity in patients with massive paracetamol overdoses. Three observational studies were analysed; one study with 373 patients found no significant difference (odds ratio [OR]: 1.27, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.49-3.29). One study with 79 patients found a significant difference (OR: 0.27, 95% CI: 0.08-0.94). The third study with 89 patients found a significant difference in hepatoxicity between the groups (p = 0.043). There are no solid evidence to support that treatment with high-dose NAC significantly reduces the rate of hepatotoxicity in patients presenting with massive paracetamol overdoses. Differences in inclusion criteria in the included studies make the studies incomparable. This paper shows that standardized inclusion is needed to determine whether a high-dose NAC regimen should be included in clinical practice.

A register-based cohort study on the effectiveness and Safety of anti-PCSK9 treatment in persons with hyperlipidemia.

BACKGROUND: Dyslipidemia is a known risk factor for cardiovascular disease. While statins are the primary treatment, some individuals require additional lipid-lowering therapies, such as proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) inhibitors. Alirocumab and evolocumab have shown efficacy in reducing low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels and reduce the risk of major cardiovascular events (MACE) but have not been directly compared in clinical trials. This study aims to assess the effects of PCSK9 inhibitors on LDL-C levels and evaluate the impact of a mandated switch from alirocumab to evolocumab. METHODS: Taking advantage of the mandated switch in PCSK9 treatment in Denmark, we conducted a register-based cohort study of 907 individuals with dyslipidemia treated with PCSK9 inhibitors in the Capital Region of Denmark from 2016 to 2022. We analyzed LDL-C levels, treatment retention, and MACE, adjusting for variables such as age, sex, dose, and concurrent lipid-lowering medications. RESULTS: We show that PCSK9 inhibitors treatment resulted in a 49% reduction in LDL-C levels. Following a mandated switch from alirocumab to evolocumab, no significant difference was observed in LDL-C levels or adverse clinical outcomes, including MACE. Treatment discontinuation was most likely within the first 100 days, and no significant difference in discontinuation rates was found between the two drugs. CONCLUSIONS: Our study demonstrates that both alirocumab and evolocumab are effective in significantly reducing LDL-C levels in individuals with dyslipidemia. The mandated switch from alirocumab to evolocumab did not result in significant changes in LDL-C or clinical outcomes, suggesting that these treatments can be used interchangeably. These findings support the clinical equivalence of the two PCSK9 inhibitors and may guide therapeutic decisions in lipid management.

Dyslipidemia is a condition where there are unhealthy levels of fats, i.e. cholesterol (LDL-C and HDL-C), in the blood, which can increase the risk of heart disease. To help manage this, certain drugs called PCSK9 inhibitors, like alirocumab and evolocumab, can be used to lower cholesterol levels. Here, we studied 907 people in Denmark who were treated with these drugs between 2016 and 2022. We found that these drugs reduced LDL-C by almost half. During the study, some people were required to switch from one drug (alirocumab) to another (evolocumab), and this switch did not lead to any changes in cholesterol levels or increase the risk of heart problems or death. Our findings suggest that both alirocumab and evolocumab are safe and effective options for lowering cholesterol, and they can be used interchangeably, which might help doctors make treatment decisions.

Association Between First-time Neurologic Events and Metronidazole Treatment: A Case-time Control Study.

PURPOSE: Metronidazole, a widely used antimicrobial medication, has been linked to neurologic adverse drug reactions. This study investigates the association between metronidazole use and first-time neurologic events. METHODS: We conducted a case-time-control study using data from the Danish National Patient Register and the National Prescription Register in years 2013 to 2021. Patients with a first-time diagnosis of encephalopathy, cerebellar dysfunction, or peripheral neuropathy were included. Conditional logistic regression analyses were performed to estimate the risk of neurologic events associated with metronidazole use. FINDINGS: Out of 476,066 first-time metronidazole prescriptions, the 100-day cumulative incidence of peripheral neuropathy was 0.016%, and 0.002% for cerebellar dysfunction or encephalopathy. In the case-time control study, we identified 17,667 persons with a first-time neurologic event and were included for the analysis. The estimated odds ratio for the combined neurologic events was 0.98 (95% CI, 0.59-1.64, P = 0.95) with no statistically significant association across different subgroups and time windows. IMPLICATIONS: Our findings suggest that metronidazole-induced neurologic events may be rarer than previously described, and we did not find any consistent or statistically significant association between metronidazole exposure. Nonetheless, clinicians should remain vigilant to potential neurologic risks in patients receiving metronidazole, to ensure its safe and effective use.

Erratum: Author Correction: Early stimulated immune responses predict clinical disease severity in hospitalized COVID-19 patients.

[This corrects the article DOI: 10.1038/s43856-022-00178-5.].