Registry-based trials: a potential model for cost savings?

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Registry-based trials have emerged as a potentially cost-saving study methodology. Early estimates of cost savings, however, conflated the benefits associated with registry utilisation and those associated with other aspects of pragmatic trial designs, which might not all be as broadly applicable. In this study, we sought to build a practical tool that investigators could use across disciplines to estimate the ranges of potential cost differences associated with implementing registry-based trials versus standard clinical trials. METHODS: We built simulation Markov models to compare unique costs associated with data acquisition, cleaning, and linkage under a registry-based trial design versus a standard clinical trial. We conducted one-way, two-way, and probabilistic sensitivity analyses, varying study characteristics over broad ranges, to determine thresholds at which investigators might optimally select each trial design. RESULTS: Registry-based trials were more cost effective than standard clinical trials 98.6% of the time. Data-related cost savings ranged from $4300 to $600,000 with variation in study characteristics. Cost differences were most reactive to the number of patients in a study, the number of data elements per patient available in a registry, and the speed with which research coordinators could manually abstract data. Registry incorporation resulted in cost savings when as few as 3768 independent data elements were available and when manual data abstraction took as little as 3.4 seconds per data field. CONCLUSIONS: Registries offer important resources for investigators. When available, their broad incorporation may help the scientific community reduce the costs of clinical investigation. We offer here a practical tool for investigators to assess potential costs savings.

Risks and outcomes of direct current cardioversion in children and young adults with congenital heart disease.

OBJECTIVES: Evaluate the efficacy, outcomes, and complications associated with direct current cardioversion (DCCV) in the treatment of arrhythmias in pediatric and adult congenital heart disease (CHD) populations and identify patient and procedural characteristics associated with adverse events. BACKGROUND: Pediatric and adult patients with CHD are at risk of atrial arrhythmias. DCCV is effective but is associated with potential complications. METHODS: In this single-center retrospective series, patients who underwent DCCV between January 2010 and May 2015 were identified and categorized as pediatric (<18 years) or adult (> 18 years). Records were reviewed for demographic, arrhythmic, and CHD-specific characteristics; acute efficacy; and 3-month arrhythmia recurrence. Complications were categorized as life-threatening (LT) or non-life-threatening (NLT). Univariate followed by multiple variable and logistic regression (LR) analyses were used to identify characteristics associated with complications. RESULTS: We identified 104 patients with 152 discrete DCCV events with median age 17.4 years (0.15-62.2). DCCV efficacy was 89% with 3-month recurrence of 46%. There were 52 complications among 24 patients, median age 17.7 years (0.15-49). Risks associated with NLT complications are as follows: moderate-severe systolic dysfunction (8/152 encounters, P = < 0.01) and more than one shock per DCCV encounter (P = < 0.01). Six of eight encounters with moderate-severe systolic dysfunction were <18 years (P = 0.1). Risks for LT complications included age >18 years and associated NLT complication. Adults had more frequent arrhythmia recurrence within 3 months than children (P = < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: DCCV is effective for arrhythmias but is associated with frequent recurrence, particularly in adult patients. Complications associated with DCCV may be greater than previously reported. Additional support and precautions should be in place for those at greatest risk.

Optimizing patient care and outcomes through the congenital heart center of the 21st century.

Pediatric cardiovascular services are responding to the dynamic changes in the medical environment, including the business of medicine. The opportunity to advance our pediatric cardiology field through collaboration is now realized, permitting us to define meaningful quality metrics and establish national benchmarks through multicenter efforts. In March 2016, the American College of Cardiology hosted the first Adult Congenital/Pediatric Cardiology Section Congenital Heart Community Day. This was an open participation meeting for clinicians, administrators, patients/parents to propose metrics that optimize patient care and outcomes for a state-of-the-art congenital heart center of the 21st century. Care center collaboration helps overcome the barrier of relative small volumes at any given program. Patients and families have become active collaborative partners with care centers in the definition of acute and longitudinal outcomes and our quality metrics. Understanding programmatic metrics that create an environment to provide outstanding congenital heart care will allow centers to improve their structure, processes and ultimately outcomes, leading to an increasing number of centers that provide excellent care. This manuscript provides background, as well listing of proposed specialty domain quality metrics for centers, and thus serves as an updated baseline for the ongoing dynamic process of optimizing care and realizing patient value.