Prevention of ulceration, amputation, and reduction of hospitalization: outcomes of a prospective multicenter trial of tibial neurolysis in patients with diabetic neuropathy.

This is the first multicenter prospective study of outcomes of tibial neurolysis in diabetics with neuropathy and chronic compression of the tibial nerve in the tarsal tunnels. A total of 38 surgeons enrolled 628 patients using the same technique for diagnosis of compression, neurolysis of four medial ankle tunnels, and objective outcomes: ulceration, amputation, and hospitalization for foot infection. Contralateral limb tibial neurolysis occurred in 211 patients for a total of 839 operated limbs. Kaplan-Meier proportional hazards were used for analysis. New ulcerations occurred in 2 (0.2%) of 782 patients with no previous ulceration history, recurrent ulcerations in 2 (3.8%) of 57 patients with a previous ulcer history, and amputations in 1 (0.2%) of 839 at risk limbs. Admission to the hospital for foot infections was 0.6%. In patients with diabetic neuropathy and chronic tibial nerve compression, neurolysis can result in prevention of ulceration and amputation, and decrease in hospitalization for foot infection.

A positive Tinel sign as predictor of pain relief or sensory recovery after decompression of chronic tibial nerve compression in patients with diabetic neuropathy.

Predictive ability of a positive Tinel sign over the tibial nerve in the tarsal was evaluated as a prognostic sign in determining sensory outcomes after distal tibial neurolysis in diabetics with chronic nerve compression at this location. Outcomes were evaluated with a visual analog score (VAS) for pain and measurements of the cutaneous pressure threshold/two-point discrimination. A multicenter prospective study enrolled 628 patients who had a positive Tinel sign. Of these patients, 465 (74%) had VAS >5. Each patient had a release of the tarsal tunnel and a neurolysis of the medial and lateral plantar and calcaneal tunnels. Subsequent, contralateral, identical surgery was done in 211 of the patients (152 of which had a VAS >5). Mean VAS score decreased from 8.5 to 2.0 (p <0.001) at 6 months, and remained at this level for 3.5 years. Sensibility improved from a loss of protective sensation to recovery of some two-point discrimination during this same time period. It is concluded that a positive Tinel sign over the tibial nerve at the tarsal tunnel in a diabetic patient with chronic nerve compression at this location predicts significant relief of pain and improvement in plantar sensibility.

Tibial intraneural ganglia in the tarsal tunnel: Is there a joint connection?

Intraneural ganglia are rare entities, and, as such, their pathogenesis has been extremely controversial. Recent evidence from intraneural ganglia occurring at more proximal sites-the peroneal nerve at the fibular neck (the most common site) and the tibial nerve at the knee-has suggested an articular origin rather than de novo formation. To our knowledge, of the 10 previous reports of tibial intraneural ganglia within the tarsal tunnel by others, a joint connection to the ankle joint was only identified in 2 cases. To support a hypothesis that tibial intraneural ganglia occurring within the tarsal tunnel region arise from neighboring joints, we analyzed 3 patients retrospectively, all of whom had magnetic resonance (MR) imaging and operative intervention. One of these patients was treated by a peripheral nerve surgeon specializing in foot and ankle surgery. The other 2 patients were the only ones previously published in the literature who had MR images available for reinterpretation. In none of these cases was a joint communication appreciated by radiologists interpreting the MR images preoperatively or by surgeons intraoperatively. Our review of these same cases demonstrated radiographic evidence of joint communications with the subtalar joints. Based on our findings in this article and our knowledge of intraneural ganglia occurring at more proximal sites, we believe that tibial intraneural ganglia within the tarsal tunnel originate from neighboring joints and that their connections to the joints (pedicles) are through articular branches. The importance of these connections is 2-fold: first, for their role in the pathogenesis of this entity, and second, for their potential therapeutic implications. As is highlighted by the clinical and radiographic follow-up in the 1 patient in this article and in many previously reported at other sites, intraneural cyst recurrence can occur if surgeons do not specifically address the articular connection.