RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate literature describing medication adherence surveys/scales to gauge patient behaviors at the point of care. DATA SOURCES: Literature was identified via PubMed and Ovid (1950 to June 2009) using the search terms medication adherence, medication compliance, and medication persistence and combined with the terms questionnaire, survey, scale, or self-report. STUDY SELECTION: All articles in English with adherence scales validated in two or more diseases and containing 30 or fewer questions were selected. DATA SYNTHESIS: Five adherence scales were identified and reviewed by evaluating positive characteristics (short length, internal consistency, reliability, barriers to adherence, literacy appropriate, and self-efficacy), sensitivity, specificity, and diseases in which they have been validated. The Medication Adherence Questionnaire (MAQ) is the shortest scale and easiest to score. MAQ identifies barriers to nonadherence but not self-efficacy. The Self-efficacy for Appropriate Medication Use Scale (SEAMS) is a 13-question scale, and the Brief Medication Questionnaire (BMQ) has three main question headings and multiple subquestions. Both assess barriers and self-efficacy; however, scoring is difficult. The Hill-Bone Compliance Scale and Medication Adherence Rating Scale (MARS) address barriers and self-efficacy but are limited in their generalizability. The Hill-Bone Compliance Scale focuses on hypertensive patients, while MARS is specific to psychiatric populations. CONCLUSION: No gold-standard medication adherence scale exists. MAQ is most adaptable at the point of care and across populations. MAQ is the quickest to administer and score and has been validated in the broadest range of diseases. SEAMS, BMQ, and the Hill-Bone Compliance Scale allow self-efficacy to be assessed and therefore may be useful in medication management clinics. MARS is specific to psychiatric populations.
Asunto(s)
Cumplimiento de la Medicación , Humanos , Encuestas y CuestionariosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: Our objective was to determine if use of intravenous immune globulin (IVIG) decreases the incidence of mortality, colectomies, and length of stay in the hospital in patients presenting with severe Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea (CDAD). METHODS: A retrospective analysis was undertaken of 79 patients who had a positive C. difficile toxin titer and severe disease admitted to the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center Presbyterian between July 2001 and July 2003. Standard therapy for severe CDAD including intravenous metronidazole, oral vancomycin, or vancomycin enema was administered to all patients. Eighteen patients also received IVIG treatment (200-300 mg/kg); these were pair matched by propensity scoring with 18 patients who had the most similar characteristics and severity of CDAD from the available pool of 61 subjects who did not receive IVIG treatment. RESULTS: No significant difference was observed in the baseline characteristics between the two groups. There were no statistical differences in clinical outcomes as measured by all cause mortality, colectomies, and length of stay. CONCLUSIONS: These data demonstrate that the use of IVIG in severe CDAD remains unsubstantiated. This study, although limited by a small sample size, does not support the use of IVIG at this dose for severe CDAD outside of a controlled trial.
Asunto(s)
Clostridioides difficile , Colectomía/estadística & datos numéricos , Enterocolitis Seudomembranosa/mortalidad , Inmunoglobulinas Intravenosas/uso terapéutico , Factores Inmunológicos/uso terapéutico , Tiempo de Internación , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Enterocolitis Seudomembranosa/microbiología , Enterocolitis Seudomembranosa/fisiopatología , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
PURPOSE: The quality and reliability of Internet-based arthritis information were studied. METHODS: The search terms "arthritis," "osteoarthritis," and 'rheumatoid arthritis" were entered into the AOL, MSN, Yahoo, Google, and Lycos search engines. The Web sites for the first 40 matches generated by each search engine were grouped by URL suffix and evaluated on the basis of four categories of criteria: disease and medication information content, Web-site navigability, required literacy level, and currentness of information. Ratings were assigned by using an assessment tool derived from published literature (maximum score of 15 points). RESULTS: Of the 600 arthritis Web sites identified, only 69 were unique and included in the analysis. Fifty-seven percent were .com sites, 20% .org sites, 7% .gov sites, 6% .edu sites, and 10% other sites. Total scores for individual sites reviewed ranged from 3 to 14. Eighty percent of .gov sites, 75% of .edu sites, 29% of other sites, 36% of .com sites, and 21% of .org sites were within the top tertile of scores. No Web site met the criterion for being understandable to people with no more than a sixth-grade reading ability. .Gov sites scored significantly higher overall than .com sites, .org sites, and other sites. .Edu sites also scored relatively well. CONCLUSION: The quality of arthritis information on the Internet varied widely. Sites with URLs having suffixes of .gov and .edu were ranked higher than other types of sites.
Asunto(s)
Artritis , Difusión de la Información , Servicios de Información/normas , Internet/normas , Educación del Paciente como Asunto/métodos , Comprensión , Humanos , LenguajeRESUMEN
The prevalence and content of herbal policies and herbal formularies in the hospital setting were studied. Drug information centers affiliated with hospital pharmacies were surveyed by telephone. Hospitals with policies on herbal products were asked to provide detailed information about the policies. Of 70 hospitals included in the analysis, 53 (76%) had policies and procedures on the use of herbal products. Three hospitals (4%) reported having an herbal formulary. A majority of the existing policies required a physician order for an herbal product to be used inhouse. Many of the policies also required pharmacists to verify labeled product ingredients. Product administration, patient consent, and drug interaction screenings were addressed by some hospitals. Most hospitals reported having policies on the use of herbal products, but herbal formularies were rare.
Asunto(s)
Formularios de Hospitales como Asunto , Política Organizacional , Servicio de Farmacia en Hospital/organización & administración , Fitoterapia , Recolección de Datos , Humanos , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
The current standards for meeting drug information (DI) requirements in American Society of Health-System Pharmacists (ASHP)-accredited pharmacy practice residency (PPR) programs and the impact of changes in ASHP standards for the DI requirements were studied. In September 2002 a nine-question survey was e-mailed to the directors of all ASHP-accredited PPR programs listed with an available e-mail address on ASHP's residency directory Web page as of August 2002. The program directors were asked to provide information on the demographics of their practice settings, the current methods of completing the DI requirements of their programs, whether the DI requirements had changed between the 2001-02 and 2002-03 residency years, and whether any changes in the DI requirements were anticipated. A total of 178 (49%) of 365 PPR programs responded. Of the respondents, 87% were located in a hospital setting, 33% were affiliated with a school of pharmacy, and 40% had a formal onsite DI center. Half of the respondents fulfilled DI requirements through a longitudinal rotation, 20% through a block rotation, and 27% through both. Eighty-two percent of the respondents were familiar with the revised ASHP DI requirements, and 26% had modified their DI requirements between the 2001-02 and 2002-03 residency years. Seventeen percent anticipated changing their DI requirements in the future. Influences for modifications to the programs' DI requirements were mainly ASHP revisions and feedback from preceptors and residents. A national survey suggested that DI requirements in PPR programs are primarily achieved through a longitudinal rotation design.
Asunto(s)
Servicios de Información sobre Medicamentos/normas , Farmacia/normas , Sociedades Farmacéuticas/normas , Educación en Farmacia , Humanos , Internado y Residencia , Práctica ProfesionalAsunto(s)
Artritis Reumatoide , Internet , Osteoartritis , Educación del Paciente como Asunto , Antirreumáticos/uso terapéutico , Artritis Reumatoide/tratamiento farmacológico , Estudios Transversales , Recolección de Datos , Servicios de Información sobre Medicamentos , Humanos , Osteoartritis/tratamiento farmacológico , Pacientes Ambulatorios , Satisfacción del PacienteRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the role of inhaled nitric oxide (iNO) in adult heart or lung transplant recipients. DATA SOURCES: Pertinent literature was identified via a MEDLINE search (1966-July 2004). DATA SYNTHESIS: Pulmonary hypertension leading to right ventricular failure and ischemic reperfusion injury are complications following heart or lung transplant, respectively. A study of 16 heart transplant patients showed improvement in hemodynamic parameters and preservation of right ventricular function, but no improvement in mortality using iNO. Studies of lung transplant patients showed no benefit of iNO on mechanical ventilation duration, hospital length of stay, or mortality, but some studies indicate an improvement in hemodynamic parameters. CONCLUSIONS: iNO shows hemodynamic benefits in early postoperative heart transplant patients with preexisting pulmonary hypertension, and variable hemodynamic benefits in lung transplant recipients. Currently, morbidity and mortality data are not favorable for either indication; use of iNO is supportive and requires further study.
Asunto(s)
Broncodilatadores/uso terapéutico , Trasplante de Corazón , Hemodinámica/efectos de los fármacos , Hipertensión Pulmonar/tratamiento farmacológico , Trasplante de Pulmón , Óxido Nítrico/uso terapéutico , Administración por Inhalación , Adulto , Broncodilatadores/administración & dosificación , Ensayos Clínicos como Asunto , Humanos , Hipertensión Pulmonar/etiología , Óxido Nítrico/administración & dosificación , Periodo PosoperatorioRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To examine the evidence of a pharmacodynamic interaction between aspirin and nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAIDs); specifically, to determine whether a deleterious relationship exists with respect to the cardioprotective effects of aspirin. DATA SOURCES: Primary articles were identified by a MEDLINE search (1966-May 2004). Search terms included aspirin, nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drug, drug interaction, mortality, myocardial infarction, and stroke. STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION: All prospective and retrospective studies conducted in human subjects and investigating the potential interaction between aspirin and NSAIDs were included. DATA SYNTHESIS: Several controlled pharmacodynamic studies indicate that the sustained inhibition of cyclooxygenase activity by aspirin is blunted in the presence of some NSAIDs. While these data are fairly consistent, they are limited in that they rely on surrogate markers and not clinical outcomes. Observational studies have shown conflicting results regarding the effect of combination NSAID and aspirin therapy on mortality risk and incidence of myocardial infarction. CONCLUSIONS: Pharmacodynamic data indicating an interaction between aspirin and NSAIDs have not translated to a consistent clinical effect in observational studies. In the absence of a randomized, controlled, clinical outcomes study, there is insufficient evidence to dictate a change in therapy.
Asunto(s)
Antiinflamatorios no Esteroideos/uso terapéutico , Aspirina/uso terapéutico , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/tratamiento farmacológico , Inhibidores de la Ciclooxigenasa/uso terapéutico , Antiinflamatorios no Esteroideos/farmacología , Aspirina/farmacología , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/mortalidad , Inhibidores de la Ciclooxigenasa/farmacología , Interacciones Farmacológicas , Humanos , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Tasa de Supervivencia , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To review the literature evaluating venlafaxine for the treatment of hot flashes. DATA SOURCES: Clinical literature accessed through MEDLINE (1966-August 2002), PubMed, Harrison's Online, and references of reviewed articles. Key terms used were venlafaxine, Effexor, hot flashes, and vasomotor symptoms. DATA SYNTHESIS: Not all patients experiencing hot flashes are candidates for traditional hormonal therapy. Nonhormonal alternatives have long been explored, but conflicting evidence of efficacy exists. CONCLUSIONS: Venlafaxine is an effective nonhormonal alternative for relief from uncontrolled hot flashes.
Asunto(s)
Ciclohexanoles/uso terapéutico , Sofocos/tratamiento farmacológico , Inhibidores Selectivos de la Recaptación de Serotonina/uso terapéutico , Ensayos Clínicos como Asunto , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Clorhidrato de VenlafaxinaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To review seizure risk of concomitant medication administration and nonionic, water-soluble radiographic contrast media agents for myelography. DATA SOURCES: Clinical literature was identified through MEDLINE (1966-May 2003). Key search terms included metrizamide, iohexol, myelogram, myelography, seizure, and contraindications. DATA SYNTHESIS: Administration of myelography contrast media can produce rare serious adverse events, including meningeal irritation, seizures, or psychological disturbances. An evaluation of case reports and clinical trials concerning seizure risks of nonionic, water-soluble radiographic myelography contrast media and concomitant medications with potential to lower the seizure threshold was performed. CONCLUSIONS: Available data supporting the incidence of increased seizure risk with nonionic, water-soluble contrast media agents and concomitant medication administration that lowers the seizure threshold are anecdotal. However, because of product labeling and additive potential to decrease the seizure threshold, discontinuation of such medications should be considered to avoid the presumed increased risk of seizures.
Asunto(s)
Medios de Contraste/efectos adversos , Interacciones Farmacológicas , Convulsiones/inducido químicamente , Convulsiones/complicaciones , Etiquetado de Medicamentos , Quimioterapia , Humanos , Metaanálisis como AsuntoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the use of low-dose granisetron in postoperative nausea and vomiting prophylaxis. DATA SOURCES: Clinical trials available through PubMed and OVID (1966-July 2003), as well as information supplied by the drug manufacturer, were accessed. DATA SYNTHESIS: Safety concerns associated with droperidol and limited availability of other agents have created a need to restructure prophylaxis guidelines for postoperative nausea and vomiting. It has recently been proposed that granisetron may be effective at a dose that is one-tenth of the Food and Drug Administration-approved dose. Conflicting evidence for this regimen is evaluated. CONCLUSIONS: Based on the scarcity of supporting data, this regimen is not recommended for prophylaxis in patients at risk for postoperative nausea and vomiting.
Asunto(s)
Antieméticos/uso terapéutico , Granisetrón/uso terapéutico , Náusea y Vómito Posoperatorios/prevención & control , Antieméticos/administración & dosificación , Ensayos Clínicos como Asunto , Relación Dosis-Respuesta a Droga , Granisetrón/administración & dosificación , HumanosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To describe the types and severity of adverse drug-related events (ADEs) observed in patients receiving cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) inhibitors and to increase the awareness of risk factors that predispose patients to ADEs associated with COX-2 inhibitors. METHODS: A review of ADEs reported at the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center Presbyterian Hospital (UPMC-P) revealed significant events related to use of celecoxib or rofecoxib. A query of the internal ADE database was performed to identify ADEs involving COX-2 inhibitors from January 1999 to June 2002. A similar query was performed to identify ADEs involving nonselective nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) reported during this same time period. Utilization data were also collected. RESULTS: Forty-eight ADEs involving 24 patients receiving COX-2 inhibitors were reported and validated via the UPMC-P ADE review process compared with 38 events in 33 patients receiving nonselective NSAIDs. The types of ADEs reported as related to COX-2 inhibitors were similar to those reported in association with nonselective NSAIDs. Forty-two percent of ADEs (n = 20) involving COX-2 inhibitors and 45% of events (n = 17) involving nonselective NSAIDs were classified as severe. All patients receiving COX-2 inhibitors and 91% of patients receiving nonselective NSAIDs exhibited risk factors that increased their risk to experience an ADE; all but 1 of these patients were receiving outpatient COX-2 inhibitor therapy. CONCLUSIONS: The observed ADEs involving COX-2 inhibitors were similar to those associated with nonselective NSAIDs. Most events may have been preventable, highlighting the need for education regarding the appropriate use of COX-2 inhibitors.