RESUMEN
The data on constrictive pericarditis following heart transplantation are scarce. Herein, the authors present 2 patients who developed a constrictive pericarditis 19, and 55 months after heart transplantation. They underwent several diagnostic procedures and successfully recovered after a radical pericardiectomy. In addition, the authors review the literature and report the incidence, aetiology, diagnostic features, and management of this rare and challenging condition.
Asunto(s)
Trasplante de Corazón , Pericarditis Constrictiva , Humanos , Pericarditis Constrictiva/diagnóstico , Pericarditis Constrictiva/etiología , Pericarditis Constrictiva/cirugía , Trasplante de Corazón/efectos adversos , Pericardiectomía/efectos adversos , Pericardiectomía/métodosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Constrictive pericarditis (CP) is a disease characterized by inflammation, progressive fibrosis, and thickening of the pericardium. Constrictive pericarditis after heart transplantation (HT) is a rare phenomenon, with a reported incidence of 1.4-3.9%. It is an important clinical problem which shares similar clinical features with entities such as restrictive cardiomyopathy. Therefore, it poses diagnostic challenges and therapeutic dilemmas even for experienced clinicians. CASE SUMMARY: A 53-year-old patient developed a zoster infection with pericardial effusion 9 months after HT for idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy. Two months later, he presented with leg oedema and ascites and was treated by diuretics for volume overload. He was readmitted 8 months later with features of right heart failure. Multimodal imaging investigations were suggestive of CP. He successfully recovered after a radical pericardiectomy. DISCUSSION: Constrictive pericarditis is a rare complication in HT. Heart transplant recipients (HTR) with a history of post-operative pericardial effusion, or with rejection episodes are at high risk of developing CP. Differentiating CP from other conditions that cause apparent congestive heart failure in HTR is challenging. Management of CP is mainly surgical pericardiectomy.
RESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Combined total portal vein (PV) and superior mesenteric artery (SMA) resection during pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) is a challenging task that is no longer considered as a contra-indication to achieve R0 in borderline resectable (BR) and locally advanced (LA) pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). PRESENTATION OF CASE: We report a 66-year-old female with BR-PDAC of the head of the pancreas in whom PV and SMA were replaced with a glutaraldehyde-fixed autologous peritoneo-fascial graft (APG) and a splenomesenteric arterial bypass, respectively, during the PD. DISCUSSION: When PV venorraphy or end-to-end anastomosis is not feasible, APG conduit, immediately available without extra-incision, does not need postoperative anticoagulation and is associated with a low risk of infection and thrombosis. If fixed in glutaraldehyde, handling, risk of compression when placed intra-peritoneally and long-term patency of the graft are improved. CONCLUSION: Glutaraldehyde-fixed APG is a strategy that every surgeon should bear in mind for PV replacement during PD and other HBP surgical procedures, especially if a vascular resection is unforeseen.