Acute appendicitis during the COVID-19 pandemic-changes in incidence and clinical presentation but not in patients' outcome.

BACKGROUND: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic is an ongoing severe issue. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare the incidence, severity and treatment of acute appendicitis (AA) before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: A retrospective cohort analysis was conducted between January 2019 and April 2020 in one high-volume center. A comparison was performed between two groups (Group A: patients admitted with AA before the COVID-19 pandemic; Group B: patients admitted with AA at the beginning of the pandemic) in terms of the incidence of AA and clinical and pathological outcomes. The incidence of AA was also analyzed in six surrounding peripheral hospitals. RESULTS: A total of 94 patients were identified, 54 in Group A and 40 in Group B (57% vs. 43%). Demographic data were comparable between groups. AA in Group B showed a significant higher rate of histological advanced cases (10 (18.5%) Group A vs. 20 (50%) Group B, P = 0.001) and the need for postoperative antibiotic treatment (6 (11.1%) Group A vs. 11 (27.5%) Group B, P = 0.045). During the pandemic, a higher percentage of patients were treated at peripheral hospitals (Group A: 54/111 vs. 40/126). CONCLUSION: During the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic there was a significant decrease of patients with AA in a high-volume center, which showed more advanced disease of AA. This significant decrease in the high-volume center correlates with an increase in patients with AA in peripheral hospitals and represents a change in patient flow during the onset of the pandemic.

Outcomes and risks in palliative pancreatic surgery: an analysis of the German StuDoQ|Pancreas registry.

BACKGROUND: Non-resectability is common in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) due to local invasion or distant metastases. Then, biliary or gastroenteric bypasses or both are often established despite associated morbidity and mortality. The current study explores outcomes after palliative bypass surgery in patients with non-resectable PDAC. METHODS: From the prospectively maintained German StuDoQ|Pancreas registry, all patients with histopathologically confirmed PDAC who underwent non-resective pancreatic surgery between 2013 and 2018 were retrospectively identified, and the influence of the surgical procedure on morbidity and mortality was analyzed. RESULTS: Of 389 included patients, 127 (32.6%) underwent explorative surgery only, and a biliary, gastroenteric or double bypass was established in 92 (23.7%), 65 (16.7%) and 105 (27.0%). After exploration only, patients had a significantly shorter stay in the intensive care unit (mean 0.5 days [SD 1.7] vs. 1.9 [3.6], 2.0 [2.8] or 2.1 [2.8]; P < 0.0001) and in the hospital (median 7 days [IQR 4-11] vs. 12 [10-18], 12 [8-19] or 12 [9-17]; P < 0.0001), and complications occurred less frequently (22/127 [17.3%] vs. 37/92 [40.2%], 29/65 [44.6%] or 48/105 [45.7%]; P < 0.0001). In multivariable logistic regression, biliary stents were associated with less major (Clavien-Dindo grade ≥ IIIa) complications (OR 0.49 [95% CI 0.25-0.96], P = 0.037), whereas-compared to exploration only-biliary, gastroenteric, and double bypass were associated with more major complications (OR 3.58 [1.48-8.64], P = 0.005; 3.50 [1.39-8.81], P = 0.008; 4.96 [2.15-11.43], P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with non-resectable PDAC, biliary, gastroenteric or double bypass surgery is associated with relevant morbidity and mortality. Although surgical palliation is indicated if interventional alternatives are inapplicable, or life expectancy is high, less invasive options should be considered.

Classification of acute appendicitis (CAA): treatment directed new classification based on imaging (ultrasound, computed tomography) and pathology.

PURPOSE: Acute appendicitis (AA) is amongst the most common causes of acute abdominal pain. In spite of progress based on risk stratifications, "negative" appendectomies are performed in up to 30% of patients whilst the appendix perforates in others. Preoperative classification of AA based on imaging is therefore recommended. The aim was to classify AA based on imaging (ultrasound/US, computed tomography/CT), surgical pathology, and/or histopathology in order to differentiate between complicated and uncomplicated AA. A new classification of acute appendicitis (CAA) shall be illustrated by typical US and CT images and be employed in a diagnostic and therapeutic algorithm. METHODS: Medline, Embase, and the Cochrane Library were searched. Any study after 1970, which investigated clinical scores, pathology, US, CT, magnetic resonance imaging, and treatment of AA, was included. Typical images were taken from the author's image database. RESULTS: Five main types of AA are defined, normal appendix (type 0), nonvisualised appendix (type X), uncomplicated AA (type 1), complicated AA without perforation (type 2), and complicated AA with perforation (type 3). The imaging modality is indicated by an additional letter, e.g., type p3b for free perforation on pathology. Standardised reporting of the appendix evaluation by US and CT is presented, as well as algorithms for AA management. Imaging features indicating imminent perforation, as well as likely recurrence, were both classified as complicated AA. CONCLUSION: Imaging is mandatory in suspected AA. The CAA clearly separates uncomplicated from complicated forms of AA allowing nonoperative management in selected patients with uncomplicated forms of AA.

Intraoperative endoluminal pyloromyotomy as a novel approach to reduce delayed gastric emptying after pylorus-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy-a retrospective study.

BACKGROUND: Delayed gastric emptying (DGE) is one of the most common complications after pylorus-preserving partial pancreaticoduodenectomy (ppPD). The aim of this retrospective study was to assess whether an intraoperative pyloromyotomy during ppPD prior to the creation of duodenojejunostomy reduces DGE. METHODS: Patients who underwent pylorus-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy between January 2015 and December 2017 were divided into two groups on the basis of whether an intraoperative pyloromyotomy was performed (pyloromyotomy (PM) group) or not (no pyloromyotomy (NP) group). The primary endpoint was DGE according to the ISGPS definition. The confirmatory analysis of the primary endpoint was performed with multivariate analysis. RESULTS: One hundred and ten patients were included in the statistical analysis. Pyloromyotomy was performed in 44 of 110 (40%) cases. DGE of any grade was present in 62 patients (56.4%). The DGE rate was lower in the PM group (40.9%) compared with the NP group (66.7%), and pyloromyotomy was associated with a reduced risk for DGE in univariate (OR 0.35, 95% CI 0.16-0.76; P = 0.008) and multivariate analyses (OR 0.32, 95% CI 0.13-0.77; P = 0.011). The presence of an intra-abdominal complication was an independent risk factor for DGE in the multivariate analysis (OR 5.54, 95% CI 2.00-15.36; P = 0.001). CONCLUSION: Intraoperative endoluminal pyloromyotomy during ppPD was associated with a reduced risk for DGE in this retrospective study. Pyloromyotomy should be considered a simple technique that can potentially reduce DGE rates after ppPD.

Complication risk despite preventive endoscopic measures in patients undergoing endoscopic mucosal resection of large duodenal adenomas.

BACKGROUND : Endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) is the standard treatment of ampullary and nonampullary duodenal adenomas. EMR of large (10-29 mm) and giant (≥ 30 mm) lesions carries a risk of complications such as delayed bleeding and perforation. Prospective data on duodenal EMR are scarce. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of endoscopic procedures (clipping and coagulation of visible vessels) to prevent complications after EMR of large and giant lesions. METHODS : 110 patients with 118 adenomas (29 ampullary and 89 nonampullary) were included prospectively. RESULTS : 15 lesions were small (12.7 %), 68 were large (57.6 %), and 35 were giant (29.7 %). Endoscopic prevention of delayed complications was performed in 81.4 % (n = 96) of all lesions and 94.3 % (n = 33) of giant lesions. Complete resection was achieved in 111 lesions (94.1 %). Complications were 22 delayed bleedings (18.6 %), 3 intraprocedural perforations (2.5 %), 2 delayed perforations (1.7 %), and 1 stricture (0.8 %). Major complications were associated with lesions size ≥ 30 mm (28.6 % vs. 9.6 %; P = 0.02) and ampullary adenomas (27.6 % vs. 11.2 %; P = 0.07). All minor bleeding and 75 % of major bleeding episodes were treated endoscopically; 25 % of major bleedings needed radiologic embolization. Two fatal courses were observed when delayed perforation occurred after EMR of giant lesions. Residual adenoma was detected in 20.4 % at first follow-up. CONCLUSIONS : EMR of giant duodenal neoplasia carries a substantial risk of major complications and recurrences. Resection technique and prevention of delayed complications need to be improved. Further measures should be evaluated in randomized studies.

Implementation of Current ENETS Guidelines for Surgery of Small (≤2 cm) Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Neoplasms in the German Surgical Community: An Analysis of the Prospective DGAV StuDoQ|Pancreas Registry.

BACKGROUND: ENETS guidelines recommend parenchyma-sparing procedures without formal lymphadenectomy, ideally with a minimally invasive laparoscopic approach for sporadic small pNENs (≤2 cm). Non-functioning (NF) small pNENs can also be observed. The aim of the study was to evaluate how these recommendations are implemented in the German surgical community. METHODS: Data from the prospective StuDoQ|Pancreas registry of the German Society of General and Visceral Surgery were analyzed regarding patient's demographics, tumor characteristics, surgical procedures, histology and perioperative outcomes. RESULTS: Eighty-four (29.2%) of 287 patients had sporadic pNENs ≤2 cm. Forty-three (51.2%) patients were male, and the mean age at diagnosis was 58.8 ± 15.6 years. Twenty-five (29.8%) pNENs were located in the pancreatic head. The diagnosis pNEN was preoperatively established in 53 (65%) of 84 patients. Sixty-two (73.8%) patients had formal pancreatic resections, including partial pancreaticoduodenectomy or total pancreatectomy (21.4%). Only 22 (26.2%) patients underwent parenchyma-sparing resections and 23 (27.4%) patients had minimally invasive procedures. A lymphadenectomy was performed in 63 (75.4%) patients, and lymph node metastases were diagnosed in 6 (7.2%) patients. Eighty-two (97.7%) patients had an R0 resection. Sixty (72%) tumors were classified G1, 24 (28%) tumors G2. Twenty-seven (32.2%) of 84 patients had postoperative relevant Clavien-Dindo grade ≥3 complications. Thirty- and 90-day mortalities were 2.4% and 3.6%. CONCLUSIONS: ENETS guidelines for surgery of small pNENs are yet not well accepted in the German surgical community, since the rate of formal resections with standard lymphadenectomy is high and the minimally invasive approach is underused. The attitude to operate small NF tumors seems to be rather aggressive.

Indications for resection and perioperative outcomes of surgery for pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms in Germany: an analysis of the prospective DGAV StuDoQ|Pancreas registry.

PURPOSE: Pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (pNENs) are rare, and their surgical management is complex. This study evaluated the current practice of pNEN surgery across Germany, including its adherence with guidelines and its perioperative outcomes. METHODS: Patients who underwent surgery for pNENs (April 2013-June 2017) were retrieved from the prospective StuDoQ|Pancreas registry of the German Society of General and Visceral Surgery and retrospectively analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 287 patients (53.7% male) with a mean age of 59.2 ± 14.2 years old underwent pancreatic resection for pNENs. Tumors were localized in the pancreatic head (40.4%), body (23%), or tail (36.6%). A total of 239 (83.3%) patients underwent formal resection with lymphadenectomy, 40 (14%) parenchyma-sparing resection, and 8 (2.8%) only exploration. Fifty (17.4%) patients underwent a minimally invasive approach. Among the 245 patients with complete pathological information, 42 (17.1%) had distant metastases, 78 (31.8%) had stage I tumors, 74 (30.2%) stage II, and 51 (20.8%) stage III. A total of 112 (45.7%) patients had G1 tumors, 101 (41.2%) G2, and 24 (9.8%) G3. Nodal involvement on imaging was an independent predictor of lymph node metastasis according to the multivariable analysis (odds ratio: 0.057; 95% confidence interval: 0.016-0.209; p < 0.01). R0 resection was reported in 240 (83.6%) patients. The 30- and 90-day mortality rates were 2.8% and 4.2%, respectively. CONCLUSION: In Germany the rate of potential curative resection for pNEN is high. However, formal pancreatic resection seems to be overrepresented, while minimally invasive resection is underrepresented.

Level of interobserver variability estimation as a valuable tool: assessment of tumour budding in colon cancer.

AIMS: Tumour budding is considered to be a good marker for progression and prognosis in colorectal carcinomas. A uniform classification system has been established recently. The natural element of uncertainty in the practice of human medicine is also exhibited in the assessment of tumour budding. We tested the hypothesis that interobserver variability can be estimated during the assessment process and investigated its potential clinical implication. METHODS AND RESULTS: Six investigators with different levels of experience could perceive different levels of difficulty (LOD) and estimated different levels of interobserver variability (LOIV) (Li1, lower than average; Li2, average; Li3, higher than average) during the assessment of tumour budding in 244 cases of colon cancer (pT3/4). In total, the LOIV showed following distribution: Li1: 36.1%, Li2: 43.9% and Li3: 20.0%. The LOIV was correlated significantly with the LOD given by the investigator. In total, the agreement rates with the final consensus classification were: Li1: 93.4%, Li2: 78.5% and Li3: 58.4%. The relative risk of disagreement with the final consensus classification was more than six times higher when a case was estimated to have a high rather than a low interobserver variability. CONCLUSION: Our data show that the investigator can estimate the interobserver variability during the ongoing rating process in pT3/4 colon cancer. The LOIV/LOD seems to be a valuable parameter of the assessment quality. For Li3 cases further measures seem mandatory.

Endoscopic submucosal dissection for early gastric cancer: are expanded resection criteria safe for Western patients?

Background and study aims Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is the standard treatment for early gastric cancer (EGC) fulfilling guideline resection criteria or the expanded resection criteria in Asia. It is unclear whether the expanded criteria can be transferred to European patients, and long-term follow-up data are lacking. The aim of this study was to evaluate long-term follow-up data after ESD of EGCs in Europe. Patients and methods Patients with EGC who underwent ESD were included in this single-center study at a German referral center. Patient and lesion characteristics, procedure characteristics, and follow-up data were recorded prospectively. Results A total of 179 patients with 191 EGCs were included over a period of 141 months, with 29.6 % of lesions meeting guideline criteria and 48.6 % meeting expanded criteria. The en bloc resection rate was 98.4 % for guideline criteria and 89.0 % for expanded criteria lesions (P = 0.09), and the R0 resection rate was 90.2 % and 73.6 %, respectively (P = 0.02). The main reason for the expanded criteria was a lesion diameter > 20 mm (81.6 %). COMPLICATIONS: perforation 1 %, delayed bleeding 6.3 %, stricture 2.1 %, procedure-related mortality 1.1 %. Local recurrence rate was 0 % for guideline criteria and 4.8 % for expanded criteria lesions (P = 0.06), and the rate of metachronous neoplasia was 15.1 % and 7.1 %, respectively (median follow-up 51 and 56 months, respectively); 92.9 % of metachronous neoplasia were treated curatively with repeat ESD. One patient developed lymph node metastasis after ESD of a submucosal invasive expanded criteria lesion. Long-term-survival was comparable between the two criteria (P = 0.58). No gastric cancer-related death was observed in either group. Conclusions ESD can achieve high rates of long-term curative treatment using the expanded criteria in EGCs in Western countries. We recommend ESD as treatment of choice not only for guideline criteria EGCs but also for intramucosal nonulcerated EGCs regardless of their diameter.

Endoscopic submucosal dissection for early rectal neoplasia: experience from a European center.

Background and study aims Endoscopic resection is a curative treatment option for large nonpedunculated colorectal polyps (LNPCPs). Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) allows en bloc resection but ESD experience is still limited outside Asia. The aim of our study was to evaluate the role of ESD in the treatment of early rectal neoplasia in a European center. Patients and methods 330 patients referred for endoscopic resection of rectal LNPCPs were included prospectively. Results ESD was performed for 302 LNPCPs (median diameter 40 mm). Submucosal invasive cancer (SMIC) was present in 17.2 % (n = 52). SMIC was associated with Paris type (54.5 % among type 0-Is lesions, 100 % of 0-Is-IIc type, 0 % of 0-IIa, 14.9 % of 0-IIa-Is, and 59.3 % of 0-IIa-IIc type; P < 0.001) and with surface pattern (71.4 % among nongranular plus mixed surface lesions, 17.9 % of lesions with granular surface and nodule ≥ 10 mm). For SMICs, resection rates were en bloc 81.4 %, R0 65.1 %, and curative 30.2 %. Curative resection rate improved from 13.6 % to 47.6 % over the study period (P = 0.036). The reason for 83.3 % (25/30) of noncurative resections was submucosal invasion exceeding 1000 µm. For benign lesions (n = 250, 82.8 %), the R0 resection increased from 55.2 % to 84.8 % over the study period (P < 0.001). Recurrence rate was 4.8 %, bleeding rate 5.2 %, and perforation rate 0.8 % (all complications managed conservatively). Median follow-up was 35 months. Conclusions The majority of rectal LNPCPs are benign lesions. ESD offers high R0 resection and low recurrence rates but EMR may be appropriate. In lesions with a risk for SMIC, ESD should be offered to achieve R0 resection. Despite high rates of R0 resection the curative resection rate of ESD for rectal SMIC is < 50 %. Pretherapeutic lesion selection needs improvement.

Laparoscopic versus open distal pancreatectomy-a propensity score-matched analysis from the German StuDoQ|Pancreas registry.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to assess intraoperative, postoperative, and oncologic outcome in patients undergoing laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy (LDP) versus open distal pancreatectomy (ODP) for benign and malignant lesions of the pancreas. METHODS: Data from patients undergoing distal pancreatic resection were extracted from the StuDoQ|Pancreas registry of the German Society for General and Visceral Surgery. After propensity score case matching, groups of LDP and ODP were compared regarding demography, comorbidities, operative details, histopathology, and perioperative outcome. RESULTS: At the time of data extraction, the StuDoQ|Pancreas registry included over 3000 pancreatic resections from over 50 surgical departments in Germany. Data from 353 patients undergoing ODP (n = 254) or LDP (n = 99) from September 2013 to February 2016 at 29 institutions were included in the analysis. Baseline data showed a strong selection bias in LDP patients, which disappeared after 1:1 propensity score matching. A comparison of the matched groups disclosed a significantly longer operation time, higher rate of spleen preservation, more grade A pancreatic fistula, shorter hospital stay, and increased readmissions for LDP. In the small group of patients operated for pancreatic cancer, a lower lymph node yield with a lower lymph node ratio was apparent in LDP. CONCLUSIONS: LDP needed more time but potential advantages include increased spleen preservation and shorter hospital stay, as well as a trend for less transfusion, ventilation, and mortality. LDP for pancreatic cancer was performed rarely and will need critical evaluation in the future. Data from a prospective randomized registry trial is needed to confirm these results.

Clinical Significance of International Union Against Cancer pN Staging and Lymph Node Ratio in Node-Positive Colorectal Cancer after Advanced Lymph Node Dissection.

BACKGROUND: Lymph node retrieval in colorectal cancer can be improved by using advanced histopathological techniques like methylene blue-assisted lymph node dissection, which results in a doubling or even tripling of the lymph node count in comparison with conventional lymph node dissection techniques. However, it is not clear whether the established lymph node staging systems are suitable for predicting patients' prognoses under these circumstances. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine whether the current lymph node staging systems are suitable when advanced dissection methods are used. DESIGN: This is a retrospective cohort study. SETTING AND PATIENTS: We formed a study group (methylene blue-assisted lymph node dissection) of 293 patients and a control group (conventional lymph node dissection) of 232 patients, each with node-positive cases. Conventional pN staging according to the International Union Against Cancer, seventh edition, and lymph node ratio were applied. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Overall survival was compared by using the different staging systems in a uni- and multivariable fashion. RESULTS: The lymph node ratio values were reduced in the advanced methylene blue-assisted lymph node dissection group in comparison with the conventional lymph node dissection group (0.1 vs 0.3, p < 0.001). Although pN staging proved to be reliable, the cutoff values for lymph node ratio staging had to be adapted. The new cutoffs (0.07, 0.15, and 0.34) were prognostic. However, multivariable analysis revealed pN staging and vascular invasion, but not lymph node ratio, as independently prognostic in the methylene blue-assisted lymph node dissection group. LIMITATIONS: The study group and historical control group are not perfectly balanced because the case number in the stage III subgroup of the control group is small. CONCLUSIONS: pN staging proved to be a robust prognostic marker in colorectal cancer under the circumstances of improved lymph node harvest. After adaptation of the cutoff values, lymph node ratio is also prognostic but not superior to pN staging.

Lymph node hypoplasia is associated with adverse outcomes in node-negative colon cancer using advanced lymph node dissection methods.

PURPOSE: Lymph node size as a prognostic parameter has not been investigated well in the past. Recent data, however, have indicated that this parameter could be even more important than the lymph node count. METHODS: Based on the results of earlier studies, we analyzed the lymph node size and number of node-negative colon cancer patients with regard to survival. Data from 115 node-negative cases of colon cancer were analyzed. Lymph nodes with diameters ≤5 mm were defined as small, and all other lymph nodes were classified as intermediate/large in size and labeled LN5. All of the cases were categorized according to the number of LN5s. The LN5 very low (LN5vl) group included cases with less than two LN5s. All of the other cases were assigned to the LN5 low/high (LN5l/h) group. RESULTS: The overall survival analysis revealed significantly worse outcomes for the LN5vl group, with a mean survival of 34 months compared to the LN5l/h group, with a mean survival of 40 months (P = 0.022). After adjusting for the pT1/2 and pT3/4 stages, we still found a significant outcome difference (P = 0.012). Multivariate analysis identified LN5vl and T-stage as being independently correlated with the outcome. The vast majority of LN5vl cases (91 %) were located in the left colon. The location itself, however, was not prognostic (P = 0.478). CONCLUSION: LN5 count, as a marker of immune response, could be shown as being prognostic in node-negative colon cancer. Patients with low LN5 counts showed poor outcomes. These patients could perhaps profit from adjuvant chemotherapy.

Local recurrence in the neck and survival after thyroidectomy for metastatic renal cell carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Most investigations of thyroidectomy for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC) are case studies or small series. This study was conducted to determine the contribution of clinical and histopathologic variables to local recurrence in the neck and overall survival after thyroidectomy for RCC metastases. METHODS: The medical records of 140 patients with thyroidectomy for metastatic RCC performed between 1979 and 2012 at 25 institutions in Germany and Austria were analyzed. RESULTS: The median interval between nephrectomy and thyroidectomy was 120 months. Concurrence of thyroid and pancreatic metastases was present in 23 % of the patients and concurrence of thyroid and adrenal metastases in 13 % of the patients. Clinical outcome data were available for 130 patients with a median follow-up period of 34 months. The 5-year overall survival rate was 46 %, and 28 % of patients developed a local neck recurrence at a median of 12 months after thyroidectomy. Multivariate analysis showed that invasion of adjacent cervical structures (hazard ratio [HR] 3.2; p = 0.001), patient age exceeding 70 years (HR 2.5; p = 0.004), and current or past evidence of metastases to nonendocrine organs (HR 2.4; p = 0.003) were independent determinants of inferior overall survival. Conversely, invasion of adjacent cervical structures (HR 12.1; p < 0.0001) and year of thyroidectomy (HR 5.7 before 2000; p < 0.0001) were shown to be independently associated with local recurrence in the neck by multivariate analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Although significant improvement of local disease control in patients with thyroid metastases of RCC has been achieved during the last decade, overall outcome continues to be poor for patients with locally invasive thyroid metastases.

Early esophageal cancer in Europe: endoscopic treatment by endoscopic submucosal dissection.

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: Endoscopic resection is the standard treatment for superficial esophageal cancer. Data on early adenocarcinoma (EAC) are widely restricted to endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR), whereas large studies have been published on endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for early squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). ESD has potential advantages regarding en bloc and R0 resection rates, which have been demonstrated for ESCC. However, studies have failed to confirm these advantages in EAC. The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy of ESD in early esophageal cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 111 early esophageal cancers (87 EACs and 24 ESCCs) were resected by ESD at a German tertiary referral center. A total of 60 EACs were resected within Barrett's segments ≤ M3. Resection rates, complications, and follow-up data were recorded prospectively. RESULTS: En bloc resection rates were 95.4 % for EAC and 100 % for ESCC (P = 0.575), and R0 resection rates were 83.9 % and 91.7 %, respectively (P = 0.515). The R0 resection rate was higher in Barrett's ≤ M3 vs. > M3 (90 % vs. 70.4 %; P = 0.029). The curative resection rate was 72.4 % for EAC vs. 45.8 % for ESCC (P = 0.026). Endoluminal recurrence was observed in 2.4 % of EACs (8 % in Barrett's > M3, 0 % in Barrett's ≤ M3), and 0 % of ESCCs. Complications included strictures (11.7 %) and bleedings (0.9 %), but no perforation. Disease-specific survival was 97.7 % (EAC) and 95.8 % (ESCC), and overall survival was 96.6 % (EAC) and 66.7 % (ESCC) over a mean follow-up period of 24.3 months and 38.0 months, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: ESD was shown to be a safe resection method, achieving high R0 resection rates in both EAC and ESCC. Recurrence rates were low. To improve R0 resection within long Barrett's segments, diagnosis of the lateral extension of the lesion needs to be improved.

Evidence-based medicine in daily surgical decision making: a survey-based comparison between the UK and Germany.

BACKGROUND: Evidence-based medicine (EbM) is a vital part of reasonable and conclusive decision making for clinicians in daily clinical work. To analyze the knowledge and the attitude of surgeons towards EbM, a survey was performed in the UK and Germany. METHODS: A web-based questionnaire was distributed via mailing lists from the Royal College of Surgeons of England (RCSE) and the Berufsverband Deutscher Chirurgen (BDC). Our primary aim was to get information about knowledge of EbM amongst German and British surgeons. RESULTS: A total of 549 individuals opened the questionnaire, but only 198 questionnaires were complete and valid for analysis. In total, 40,000 recipients were approached via the mailing lists of the BDC and RCSE. The response rate was equally low in both countries. On a scale from 1 (unimportant) to 10 (very important), all participants rated EbM as very important for daily clinical decision making (7.3 ± 1.9) as well as for patients (7.8 ± 1.9) and the national health system (7.8 ± 1.9). On a scale from 1 (unimportant) to 5 (very important), systematic reviews (4.6 ± 0.6) and randomized controlled trials (4.6 ± 0.6) were identified as the highest levels of study designs to enhance evidence in medicine. British surgeons considered EbM to be more important in daily clinical work when compared to data from German surgeons (7.9 ± 1.6 vs. 6.7 ± 2.1, p < 0.001). Subgroup analysis showed different results in some categories; however, a pattern to explain the differences was not evident. Personal requirements expressed in a free text field emphasized the results and reflected concerns such as broad unwillingness and lack of interdisciplinary approaches for patients (n = 59: 25 in the UK and 34 in Germany). CONCLUSION: The overall results show that EbM is believed to be important by surgeons in the UK and Germany. However, perception of EbM in the respective health system (UK vs. Germany) may be different. Nonetheless, EbM is an important tool to navigate through daily clinical problems although a discrepancy between the knowledge of theoretical abstract terms and difficulties in implementing EbM in daily clinical work has been detected. The provision of infrastructure, courses and structured education as a permanent instrument will advance the knowledge, application and improvement of EbM in the future.

Long-term oncologic outcome after laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer.

BACKGROUND: Recent studies demonstrated favorable short- and mid-term results after laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer. However, long-term results from large series are lacking. The present study analyses long-term results of laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery from a large-volume center. METHODS: From January 1998 until March 2005, 225 patients underwent laparoscopic rectal resection due to carcinoma at the Medical Centre of the University of Regensburg. From 224 patients, a follow-up over 10 years was performed using the data of the Tumour Centre of the University of Regensburg. The data were analysed using oncological data (tumour recurrence) as well as overall survival. In addition, the effect of conversion to open resection on overall survival was analysed. RESULTS: With a median of 10 years at follow-up, the overall and disease-free survival was 50.5 and 50.1 %, respectively. Local recurrence of all patients was 5.8 % and none of the converted patients was within this group. The median time interval for the development of local recurrence was 30 months. Six of the 13 patients with local recurrence (46.1 %) had received neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy before surgery. Patients with a conversion to open surgery had primarily a significantly worse outcome than patients resected completely laparoscopically (p = 0.003). However, this difference was no longer apparent using a multivariant analysis (hazard ratio 1.221; p = 0.478). CONCLUSIONS: Overall survival and local recurrence rate of patients undergoing laparoscopic resection of rectal cancer are comparable to open surgery. However, in our analysis, patients undergoing laparoscopic anterior resection had a higher survival rate compared with patients with abdominoperineal resection.

Methylene blue-assisted lymph node dissection technique is not associated with an increased detection of lymph node metastases in colorectal cancer.

Lymph node staging is of paramount importance for prognosis estimation and therapy stratification in colorectal cancer. A high number of harvested lymph nodes is associated with an improved outcome. Methylene blue-assisted lymph node dissection effectively improves the lymph node harvest and ensures sufficient staging. Now, the effect on node positivity rate and stage-related outcome was investigated. The study cohort with advanced lymph node dissection consisted of 669 colorectal cancer cases of all stages, which were collected between 2007 and 2012. A historical collection of 663 cases investigated with conventional techniques between 2002 and 2004 served as control. Lymph node harvest was dramatically improved in the study group with mean lymph node numbers of 34 ± 17 vs 13 ± 5 (P<0.001) and sufficient staging rates of 98% vs 62% (P<0.001). However, neither the rate of nodal positive cases (37% vs 37%; P = 0.98) nor the rate of N2 cases differed between the two groups (14% vs 13%; P = 0.80). Furthermore, no differences were found concerning the outcome in both groups. The advanced lymph node dissection technique guarantees adequate histopathological lymph node staging in virtually all cases of colorectal cancer and is therefore extremely helpful. The hypothesis that it also provides a higher sensitivity in detecting metastases, however, could be not proved.

Immersive Virtual Reality Fitness Games to Improve Recovery After Colorectal Surgery: A Randomized Single Blind Controlled Pilot Trial.

Introduction: Early mobilization after surgery is crucial for reducing postoperative complications and restoring patients' fitness and ability to care for themselves. Immersive, activity-promoting fitness games in virtual reality (VR) can be used as a low-cost motivational adjunct to standard physiotherapy to promote recovery after surgery. In addition, they have potentially positive effects on mood and well-being, which are often compromised after colorectal surgery. The purpose of this pilot study was to evaluate the feasibility and clinical outcomes of a VR-based intervention that provides additional mobilization. Methods: Patients undergoing curative surgery for colorectal cancer were randomly assigned to an intervention group or a control group. Participants in the intervention group (VR group) received daily bedside fitness exercises using immersive, activity-promoting, virtual reality fitness games in addition to standard care during their postoperative hospital stay. Results: A total of 62 patients were randomized. The feasibility outcomes were in line with the predefined goals. In the VR group, an improvement in overall mood (+0.76 points; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.39 to 1.12; P < 0.001) and a shift toward positive feelings were observed. The median length of hospital stay was 7.0 days in the VR group compared with 9.0 days in the control group, but the difference (2.0 days) did not reach statistical significance (95% CI -0.0001 to 3.00; P = 0.076). Surgical outcomes, health status, and measures of distress did not differ between groups. Conclusions: The study demonstrated the feasibility of a VR intervention that improved overall mood and showed a desirable effect on feelings and length of hospital stay after colorectal surgery. The results should stimulate further research investigating the potential of VR as an adjunct to physiotherapy to enhance mobilization after surgery.