Embracing ethical research: Implementing the 3R principles into fracture healing research for sustainable scientific progress.

As scientific advancements continue to reshape the world, it becomes increasingly crucial to uphold ethical standards and minimize the potentially adverse impact of research activities. In this context, the implementation of the 3R principles-Replacement, Reduction, and Refinement-has emerged as a prominent framework for promoting ethical research practices in the use of animals. This article aims to explore recent advances in integrating the 3R principles into fracture healing research, highlighting their potential to enhance animal welfare, scientific validity, and societal trust. The review focuses on in vitro, in silico, ex vivo, and refined in vivo methods, which have the potential to replace, reduce, and refine animal experiments in musculoskeletal, bone, and fracture healing research. Here, we review material that was presented at the workshop "Implementing 3R Principles into Fracture Healing Research" at the 2023 Orthopedic Research Society (ORS) Annual Meeting in Dallas, Texas.

Direct Integration of 3D Printing and Cryogel Scaffolds for Bone Tissue Engineering.

Cryogels, known for their biocompatibility and porous structure, lack mechanical strength, while 3D-printed scaffolds have excellent mechanical properties but limited porosity resolution. By combining a 3D-printed plastic gyroid lattice scaffold with a chitosan-gelatin cryogel scaffold, a scaffold can be created that balances the advantages of both fabrication methods. This study compared the pore diameter, swelling potential, mechanical characteristics, and cellular infiltration capability of combined scaffolds and control cryogels. The incorporation of the 3D-printed lattice demonstrated patient-specific geometry capabilities and significantly improved mechanical strength compared to the control cryogel. The combined scaffolds exhibited similar porosity and relative swelling ratio to the control cryogels. However, they had reduced elasticity, reduced absolute swelling capacity, and are potentially cytotoxic, which may affect their performance. This paper presents a novel approach to combine two scaffold types to retain the advantages of each scaffold type while mitigating their shortcomings.

Current Concepts and Methods in Tissue Interface Scaffold Fabrication.

Damage caused by disease or trauma often leads to multi-tissue damage which is both painful and expensive for the patient. Despite the common occurrence of such injuries, reconstruction can be incredibly challenging and often may focus on a single tissue, which has been damaged to a greater extent, rather than the environment as a whole. Tissue engineering offers an approach to encourage repair, replacement, and regeneration using scaffolds, biomaterials and bioactive factors. However, there are many advantages to creating a combined scaffold fabrication method approach that incorporates the treatment and regeneration of multiple tissue types simultaneously. This review provides a guide to combining multiple tissue-engineered scaffold fabrication methods to span several tissue types concurrently. Briefly, a background in the healing and composition of typical tissues targeted in scaffold fabrication is provided. Then, common tissue-engineered scaffold fabrication methods are highlighted, specifically focusing on porosity, mechanical integrity, and practicality for clinical application. Finally, an overview of commonly used scaffold biomaterials and additives is provided, and current research in combining multiple scaffold fabrication techniques is discussed. Overall, this review will serve to bridge the critical gap in knowledge pertaining to combining different fabrication methods for tissue regeneration without disrupting structural integrity and biomaterial properties.