Prostate cancer-specific mortality burden by risk group among men with localized disease: Implications for research and clinical trial priorities.

OBJECTIVE: To estimate contemporary population-based patterns of the relative burden of prostate cancer-specific mortality (PCSM) attributable to each N0M0 prostate cancer risk-group, that may guide prioritization in research, trial design, and clinical practice. METHODS: We categorized 2004-2015 Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database patients by risk group (low, favorable intermediate, unfavorable intermediate, high, and very highrisk). Using the Fine-Gray method, we calculated the relative burden of 10-year PCSM attributable to each risk group. RESULTS: Among N = 337 162 men (6.8-year median follow-up; median age 65 years), the relative proportion of low-, favorable intermediate-, unfavorable intermediate-, high-, and very high-risk diagnoses were 29.9% (N = 100 969), 31.1% (N = 104 696), 17.9% (N = 60 360), 18.1% (N = 61 023), and 3.0% (N = 10 114). Within 10 years of diagnosis, among patients who died of prostate cancer (N = 15 064), 5.0% (N = 746) had low-risk, 13.7% (N = 2060) had favorable intermediate-risk, 16.1% (N = 2429) had unfavorable intermediate-risk, 47.8% (N = 7196) had high-risk, and 17.5% (N = 2633) had very high-risk disease at diagnosis. Patients aged 65 and older accounted for 51.9% of all diagnoses and 72.3% of 10-year PCSM. Although black patients accounted for 15.0% of low-risk diagnoses, they accounted for 20.6% of 10-year PCSM. White patients accounted for 80.3% of low-risk diagnoses and 75.7% of 10-year PCSM. CONCLUSION: Although high-risk and very high-risk disease account for one-fifth of diagnoses, they account for two-thirds of 10-year PCSM. Older patients and black patients with low-risk disease accounted for a disproportionately large proportion of deaths. These findings support targeting research toward high-risk disease and ensuring adequate representation of older and black men in clinical trials.

Financial Worry and Psychological Distress Among Immigrants in the United States, 2013-2018.

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has highlighted links among economic stability, health outcomes, and migration. The facets of financial worry and their associated psychological burden have been understudied among the immigrant population. The goal of this study was to determine the specific facets of financial worry and associated psychological burden in immigrants. This cross-sectional study, which used data from the 2013 to 2018 National Health Interview Survey (NHIS), examined patient-reported measures of worry regarding financial strain. The NHIS is a household survey of noninstitutionalized, nonmilitary adults in the United States. Multivariable ordinal logistic regressions were used to define adjusted odds ratios (AORs) for financial worry and psychological distress, adjusting for various sociodemographic variables. Among 131,669 US-born and 26,155 non-US-born participants who responded to all 6 questions on the 6-item Kessler Psychological Distress Scale (K6), the overall prevalence of participants reporting any serious psychological distress (K6 score ≥13) was 3.0% and 2.25%, respectively. Despite these overall prevalence data, there were specific areas of financial worries that were higher in non-US-born participants than in US-born participants. Compared with US-born participants, non-US-born participants had higher rates of financial worries regarding retirement [75.78% vs. 69.08%, AOR=1.37, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.29-1.45, P<0.001], medical costs due to illness (worry about not being able to pay medical costs of a serious illness or accident) (74.94% vs. 65.27%, AOR=1.37, 95% CI: 1.29-1.45, P<0.001), standard of living (74.25% vs. 65.29%, AOR=1.42, 95% CI: 1.34-1.51, P<0.001), and medical cost of health care (worry about not having enough to pay medical costs for normal health care) (66.52% vs. 52.67%, AOR=1.51, 95% CI: 1.43-1.60, P<0.001), among other costs. Notably, serious psychological distress in non-US-born individuals was associated with increased financial worry relative to US-born individuals with a similar level of psychological distress. Further research is needed to evaluate the role physicians can play in mitigating psychological distress in patients with increased financial worry.

Trends in frequency of e-cigarette use among cancer patients and survivors in the United States, 2014-2018.

INTRODUCTION: Electronic cigarettes (e-cigarettes) have become increasingly popular in the United States, including among cancer survivors; however, the majority of prior studies do not report frequency of active e-cigarette usage. METHODS: Using data from the National Health Interview Survey (2014-2018), frequency of active e-cigarette usage was estimated among cancer survivors reporting history of e-cigarette usage. Multivariable logistic regression analyses defined adjusted odds of active e-cigarette usage (either every day and some days vs. not at all) by year of survey and baseline demographic characteristics. RESULTS: Among 1529 cancer survivors who reported ever using e-cigarettes, 1172 (76.7%) were not active users, while 145 (9.5%) and 212 (13.9%) actively used e-cigarettes every day or some days, respectively. Later year of survey was negatively associated with active e-cigarette usage (p < 0.001) as was Black race (as compared to white race, AOR 0.47, p = 0.02). Age 45-54 was positively associated with active usage (as compared to 18-34 years, AOR 1.58, p = 0.02). Notably, individuals who were former or current traditional cigarette smokers had greater odds of reporting active e-cigarette use (27.0%, AOR 4.39, p < 0.001, 23.4%, AOR 3.28, p = 0.002, respectively) as compared to never traditional cigarette smokers (7.6%). CONCLUSIONS: The majority of cancer survivors who have ever used e-cigarettes do not appear to be actively using them. Rather, our findings suggest that the reported increasing popularity of e-cigarettes may be driven by a growing absolute proportion of individuals trying e-cigarettes over time. Those who were current or former traditional cigarette smokers were more likely to actively use e-cigarettes. Our findings can help inform current policies on e-cigarettes and contextualize studies on long-term effects of e-cigarettes among survivors of cancer.

Association Between Travel Distance and Use of Postoperative Radiation Therapy Among Men With Organ-Confined Prostate Cancer: Does Geography Influence Treatment Decisions?

PURPOSE: After radical prostatectomy, men with adverse pathologic features or a persistent postoperative detectable prostate-specific antigen (PSA) are candidates for postoperative radiation therapy (PORT). Previous data have suggested disparities in receipt of adjuvant radiation therapy for adverse pathologic features according to travel distance. Among patients without adverse pathologic features (pT2 disease and negative margins), the main indication for PORT is a persistent postoperative detectable PSA. However, it remains unknown whether the rate of receipt of PORT in this cohort of men with persistently detectable PSA is related to travel distance from the treating facility. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Using the National Cancer Database, we identified 170,379 men with prostate cancer diagnosed from 2004 to 2015 managed with upfront surgery who were found to have pT2 disease with negative surgical margins. Multivariable logistic regression defined adjusted odds ratios (AORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of receiving PORT as the primary dependent variable and distance (<5, 5-10, 10-20, ≥20 miles from the treatment facility) as the primary independent variable. RESULTS: Within our cohort, progressively farther distance from the treatment facility was associated with lower rates of PORT. In patients living <5 miles, 5 to 10 miles, 10 to 20 miles, and >20 miles from the treating facility, rates of PORT of were 1.37% (referent), 1.16% (AOR, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.79-1.04; P = .158), 0.98% (AOR, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.70-0.93; P = .003), and 0.64% (AOR, 0.47; 95% CI, 0.41-0.54; P < .001), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: For men with localized prostate cancer without adverse pathologic features managed with surgery, increasing distance from treatment facility was associated with lower receipt of PORT. Given that the rate of a persistent postoperative detectable PSA is unlikely to depend on the distance to the treatment facility, these findings raise the possibility that the geographic availability of radiation treatment facilities influences the decision to undergo PORT for patients with persistent postoperative detectable PSA.

Disparities in Refusal of Locoregional Treatment for Prostate Adenocarcinoma.

PURPOSE: We assessed sociodemographic factors associated with and survival implications of refusal of potentially survival-prolonging locoregional treatment (LT, including radiotherapy and surgery) despite provider recommendation among men with localized prostate adenocarcinoma. METHODS: The National Cancer Database (2004-2015) identified men with TxN0M0 prostate cancer who either received or refused LT despite provider recommendation. Multivariable logistic regression defined adjusted odds ratios (AORs) with 95% CI of refusing LT, with sociodemographic and clinical covariates. Models were stratified by low-risk and intermediate- or high-risk (IR or HR) disease, with a separate interaction analysis between race and risk group. Multivariable Cox proportional hazard ratios compared overall survival (OS) among men who received versus refused LT. RESULTS: Of 887,839 men (median age 64 years, median follow-up 6.14 years), 2,487 (0.28%) refused LT. Among men with IR or HR disease (n = 651,345), Black and Asian patients were more likely to refuse LT than White patients (0.35% v 0.29% v 0.17%; Black v White AOR, 1.75; 95% CI, 1.52 to 2.01; P < .001; Asian v White AOR, 1.47; 95% CI, 1.05 to 2.06; P = .027, race * risk group interaction P < .001). Later year of diagnosis, community facility type, noninsurance or Medicaid, and older age were also associated with increased odds of LT refusal, overall and when stratifying by risk group. For men with IR or HR disease, LT refusal was associated with worse OS (5-year OS 80.1% v 91.5%, HR, 1.65, P < .001). CONCLUSION: LT refusal has increased over time; racial disparities were greater in higher-risk disease. Refusal despite provider recommendation highlights populations that may benefit from efforts to assess and reduce barriers to care.

Factors Influencing Noncompletion of Radiation Therapy Among Men With Localized Prostate Cancer.

PURPOSE: Treatment noncompletion may occur with radiation therapy (RT), especially with protracted treatment courses such as RT for prostate cancer, and may affect the efficacy of RT. For men with localized prostate cancer managed with primary RT, we evaluated associations between rates of treatment noncompletion and RT fractionation schedules. METHODS AND MATERIALS: The National Cancer Database identified men diagnosed from 2004 to 2014 treated with primary RT. Patients receiving 180 cGy/fraction or 200 cGy/fraction were defined as having completed radiation therapy if they received ≥41 fractions of 180 cGy/fraction or ≥37 fractions of 200 cGy/fraction. Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) was defined as 5 to 8 fractions of 600 to 800 cGy/fraction. Odds ratios compared rates of treatment noncompletion, adjusting for sociodemographic covariates. A propensity-adjusted multivariable Cox regression assessed the association between treatment completion and overall survival. RESULTS: Of 157,657 patients, 95.7% (n = 150,847) received conventional fractionation and 4.3% (n = 6810) received SBRT. Rates of noncompletion were 12.5% (n = 18,803) among patients who received conventional fractionation and 1.9% (n = 131) among patients who received SBRT (odds ratio [OR] versus conventional, 0.21; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.18-0.26; P < .001). The rate of noncompletion among 25,727 African American patients was 12.8%, compared with 11.8% among 126,199 white patients (OR, 1.14; 95% CI, 1.09-1.19; P < .001). In a subgroup analysis, the disparity in noncompletion persisted for conventional fractionation (13.2% vs 12.3%, respectively; OR, 1.09; 95% CI, 1.05-1.13; P < .001), but not for SBRT (2.2% vs 1.8%, respectively; OR, 1.26; 95% CI, 0.79-2.00; P = .34). Noncompletion was associated with worse survival in a propensity-adjusted multivariable analysis (hazard ratio, 1.25; 95% CI, 1.22-1.29; P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: SBRT was associated with lower rates of RT noncompletion among men with localized prostate cancer. African American race was associated with greater rates of treatment noncompletion, although the disparity may be decreased among men receiving SBRT.