Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
South Med J ; 109(7): 427-33, 2016 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27364029

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: Health information exchanges (HIEs) make possible the construction of databases to characterize patients as multisystem users (MSUs), those visiting emergency departments (EDs) of more than one hospital system within a region during a 1-year period. HIE data can inform an algorithm highlighting patients for whom information is more likely to be present in the HIE, leading to a higher yield HIE experience for ED clinicians and incentivizing their adoption of HIE. Our objective was to describe patient characteristics that determine which ED patients are likely to be MSUs and therefore have information in an HIE, thereby improving the efficacy of HIE use and increasing ED clinician perception of HIE benefit. METHODS: Data were extracted from a regional HIE involving four hospital systems (11 EDs) in the Charleston, South Carolina area. We used univariate and multivariable regression analyses to develop a predictive model for MSU status. RESULTS: Factors associated with MSUs included younger age groups, dual-payer insurance status, living in counties that are more rural, and one of at least six specific diagnoses: mental disorders; symptoms, signs, and ill-defined conditions; complications of pregnancy, childbirth, and puerperium; diseases of the musculoskeletal system; injury and poisoning; and diseases of the blood and blood-forming organs. For patients with multiple ED visits during 1 year, 43.8% of MSUs had ≥4 visits, compared with 18.0% of non-MSUs (P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: This predictive model accurately identified patients cared for at multiple hospital systems and can be used to increase the likelihood that time spent logging on to the HIE will be a value-added effort for emergency physicians.


Asunto(s)
Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital , Intercambio de Información en Salud , Uso Excesivo de los Servicios de Salud/prevención & control , Registro Médico Coordinado/métodos , Adulto , Ahorro de Costo , Registros Electrónicos de Salud/normas , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/economía , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Intercambio de Información en Salud/normas , Intercambio de Información en Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Mejoramiento de la Calidad , South Carolina
2.
South Med J ; 109(7): 434-9, 2016 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27364030

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: A small but significant number of patients make frequent emergency department (ED) visits to multiple EDs within a region. We have a unique health information exchange (HIE) that includes every ED encounter in all hospital systems in our region. Using our HIE we were able to characterize all frequent ED users in our region, regardless of hospital visited or payer class. The objective of our study was to use data from an HIE to characterize patients in a region who are frequent ED users (FEDUs). METHODS: We constructed a database from a cohort of adult patients (18 years old or older) with information in a regional HIE for a 1-year period beginning in April 2012. Patients were defined as FEDUs (those who made four or more visits during the study period) and non-FEDUs (those who made fewer than four ED visits during the study period). Predictor variables included age, race, sex, payer class, county of residence, and International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision codes. Bivariate (χ(2)) and multivariate (logistic regression) analyses were performed to determine associations between predictor variables and the outcome of being a FEDU. RESULTS: The database contained 127,672 patients, 12,293 (9.6%) of whom were FEDUs. Logistic regression showed the following patient characteristics to be significantly associated with the outcome of being a FEDU: age 35 to 44 years; African American race; Medicaid, Medicare, and dual-pay payer class; and International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision codes 630 to 679 (complications of pregnancy, childbirth, and puerperium), 780 to 799 (ill-defined conditions), 280 to 289 (diseases of the blood), 290-319 (mental disorders), 680 to 709 (diseases of the skin and subcutaneous tissue), 710 to 739 (musculoskeletal and connective tissue disease), 460 to 519 (respiratory disease), and 520 to 579 (digestive disease). No significant differences were noted between men and women. CONCLUSIONS: Data from an HIE can be used to describe all of the patients within a region who are FEDUs, regardless of the hospital system they visited. This information can be used to focus care coordination efforts and link appropriate patients to a medical home. Future studies can be designed to learn the reasons why patients become FEDUs, and interventions can be developed to address deficiencies in health care that result in frequent ED visits.


Asunto(s)
Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Intercambio de Información en Salud , Uso Excesivo de los Servicios de Salud/prevención & control , Registro Médico Coordinado/métodos , Adulto , Factores de Edad , Etnicidad , Femenino , Intercambio de Información en Salud/normas , Intercambio de Información en Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Clasificación Internacional de Enfermedades , Masculino , Trastornos Mentales/epidemiología , Sistemas de Identificación de Pacientes/métodos , Embarazo , Complicaciones del Embarazo/epidemiología , South Carolina/epidemiología
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA