RESUMEN
Dravet syndrome, a developmental and epileptic encephalopathy, manifests with varying degrees of cognitive and communication impairment, postural and movement disorders (such as ataxia, coordination issues, and crouch gait) and behavioural challenges (including attention deficit/hyperactivity, oppositional/defiant behaviour, and autistic traits). Rehabilitation is a valuable tool for most patients, typically prescribed to address the most pressing issues. However, current practices often fall short in proactively preventing and treating known challenges associated with the syndrome, as indicated by the latest literature, at different life stages. Furthermore, there is a notable lack of evidence regarding treatment types and efficacy specific to people with Dravet Syndrome. Conducted in collaboration with one of the Italian Patient associations, this national survey provides a comprehensive view of the rehabilitation landscape in Dravet Syndrome, as perceived by caregivers. It outlines the types of treatments for 51 patients, based on age and relevant clinical features. The findings reveal a heterogenous rehabilitation approach, only partly tailored to the presence of specific comorbidities, and underline numerous unmet needs. Compared to the past there is indirect evidence that more patients are offered early rehabilitation. Nonetheless, while nowadays speech therapy and neuropsychomotor therapy are nearly universal for children up to the age of 10, some begin physiotherapy and psychotherapy thereafter, with a majority discontinuing treatments. Therefore, families of adolescent and adult patients often face a lack of comprehensive support, predominantly offered when epilepsy is more challenging to control affecting rehabilitation adherence and effectiveness. Finally, a negligible minority is offered treatments such as neurovisual training, augmentative and alternative communication, and occupational therapy. Many of these considerations could apply to other developmental and epileptic encephalopathy with lifelong disability. This survey calls for more data collection on this important topic for more efficient allocation of rehabilitation resources.
Asunto(s)
Epilepsias Mioclónicas , Humanos , Epilepsias Mioclónicas/rehabilitación , Italia , Adolescente , Niño , Adulto , Femenino , Preescolar , Masculino , Adulto Joven , Lactante , Encuestas y CuestionariosRESUMEN
Physical exercise is known to have beneficial effects on psychosocial well-being and cognitive performance. Children with cerebral palsy (CP) showed lower levels of physical activity (PA) than healthy children; this fact, in addition to the basic clinical condition, increased the sedentary habit with a psychological impact and motor impairment of these children. Furthermore, children and adolescents with CP are less committed to sports activities than typically developing children of the same age. The aim of the present narrative review was to increase the amount of knowledge regarding the effectiveness and importance of specific and individualized sports in children with CP. A comprehensive search of MED-LINE and EMBASE databases was performed, including specific search terms such as "cerebral palsy" combined with "sport", "physical activity", and the names of different sports. No publication date limits were set. We included studies with an age range of 0-18 years. The main results pointed out that most of the sports improved motor function, quality of life, and coordination in children and adolescents with CP. Physicians, therapists, and parents should become aware of the benefits of sports activities for this population of patients. Specific sports activities could be included as a usual indication in clinical practice in addition to rehabilitation treatment.
Asunto(s)
Parálisis Cerebral , Deportes , Humanos , Parálisis Cerebral/psicología , Parálisis Cerebral/fisiopatología , Parálisis Cerebral/rehabilitación , Niño , Deportes/psicología , Adolescente , Calidad de Vida/psicología , Preescolar , Ejercicio Físico/psicología , Ejercicio Físico/fisiología , Masculino , Femenino , LactanteRESUMEN
This study aims to evaluate in extremely premature infants the severity of brain structural injury causing total absence or near-total absence of cerebellar hemispheres by using MRI visual and volumetric scoring systems. It also aims to assess the role of the score systems in predicting motor outcome. We developed qualitative and quantitative MRI scoring systems to grade the overall brain damage severity in 16 infants with total absence or near-total absence of cerebellar hemispheres. The qualitative scoring system assessed the severity of macrostructural abnormalities of cerebellum, brainstem, supratentorial gray and white matters, ventricles while the quantitative scoring system weighted the loss of brain tissue volumes, and gross motor function classification system (GMFCS) was used to assess motor function at 1- and 5-year follow-ups.Positive correlations between both MRI scores and GMFCS scales were detected at follow-ups (p > 0.05), but only the volumetric score could identify those infants developing higher levels of motor impairment.Brain volumetric MRI offers an unbiassed assessment of prenatal brain damage. The quantitative scoring system, performed at term equivalent age, can be a helpful tool for predicting the long-term motor outcome in extremely preterm infants with a near-total absence of cerebellum.
RESUMEN
Sleep disorders are particularly important in the development of children, affecting the emotional, behavioural, and cognitive spheres. The incidence of these disorders has been assessed in different types of populations, including patients with a history of premature birth, who, from the literature data, would seem to have an increased incidence of sleep disorders at school age. The aims of the present study are: (i.) to assess the presence of sleep disorders in a population of very preterm infants at 6-36 months who are at low risk of neurological impairments using the Italian version of the Sleep Disturbance Scale for Children (SDSC) adapted for this age group, and (ii.) to identify possible differences from a control group of term-born infants. A total of 217 low-risk preterm and 129 typically developing infants and toddlers were included in the study. We found no differences in the SDSC total and the factor scores between these two populations of infants. Low-risk preterm infants and toddlers showed similar incidences of sleep disorders to their term-born peers. Further clinical assessments will be needed to confirm these data at school age.