Impact of thoracic radiotherapy timing in limited-stage small-cell lung cancer: usefulness of the individual patient data meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Chemotherapy (CT) combined with radiotherapy is the standard treatment of 'limited-stage' small-cell lung cancer. However, controversy persists over the optimal timing of thoracic radiotherapy and CT. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We carried out a meta-analysis of individual patient data in randomized trials comparing earlier versus later radiotherapy, or shorter versus longer radiotherapy duration, as defined in each trial. We combined the results from trials using the stratified log-rank test to calculate pooled hazard ratios (HRs). The primary outcome was overall survival. RESULTS: Twelve trials with 2668 patients were eligible. Data from nine trials comprising 2305 patients were available for analysis. The median follow-up was 10 years. When all trials were analysed together, 'earlier or shorter' versus 'later or longer' thoracic radiotherapy did not affect overall survival. However, the HR for overall survival was significantly in favour of 'earlier or shorter' radiotherapy among trials with a similar proportion of patients who were compliant with CT (defined as having received 100% or more of the planned CT cycles) in both arms (HR 0.79, 95% CI 0.69-0.91), and in favour of 'later or longer' radiotherapy among trials with different rates of CT compliance (HR 1.19, 1.05-1.34, interaction test, P < 0.0001). The absolute gain between 'earlier or shorter' versus 'later or longer' thoracic radiotherapy in 5-year overall survival for similar and for different CT compliance trials was 7.7% (95% CI 2.6-12.8%) and -2.2% (-5.8% to 1.4%), respectively. However, 'earlier or shorter' thoracic radiotherapy was associated with a higher incidence of severe acute oesophagitis than 'later or longer' radiotherapy. CONCLUSION: 'Earlier or shorter' delivery of thoracic radiotherapy with planned CT significantly improves 5-year overall survival at the expense of more acute toxicity, especially oesophagitis.

Adjuvant cisplatin-based chemotherapy in nonsmall-cell lung cancer: new insights into the effect on failure type via a multistate approach.

BACKGROUND: Adjuvant cisplatin-based chemotherapy has become the standard therapy against resected nonsmall-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Because of variable results on its late effect, we reanalyze the long-term data of the International Adjuvant Lung Cancer Trial (IALT) to describe in details the role of adjuvant chemotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In the IALT, 1867 patients were randomized between adjuvant cisplatin-based chemotherapy and control, who were followed up for a median of 7.5 years. Of these, 1687 patients were enrolled from 132 centers accepting to report the times to cancer events. We used event history methodology to estimate the effects of adjuvant chemotherapy on the risks of local relapse, distant metastasis, and death. RESULTS: Adjuvant chemotherapy was highly effective against local relapses [HR = 0.73; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.60-0.90; P = 0.003] and nonbrain metastases (HR = 0.79; 95% CI 0.66-0.94; P = 0.008) but not against brain metastases (HR = 1.1; 95% CI 0.82-1.4; P = 0.61). The effect on noncancer mortality was nonsignificant during the first 5 years (HR = 1.1; 95% CI 0.81-1.5; P = 0.29), whereas the risk of noncancer mortality was subsequently higher with treatment (HR = 3.6; 95% CI 2.2-5.9; P < 0.001). This harmful effect, however, potentially concerned only about 2% of the patients at 8 years. CONCLUSION: Adjuvant cisplatin-based chemotherapy reduced the risk of local relapse and of nonbrain metastasis, thereby improving survival. This treatment exerted no residual effect on mortality during the first 5 years, but a higher risk of noncancer mortality was found thereafter. Detailed long-term follow-up is strongly recommended for all patients in randomized trials evaluating adjuvant treatments in NSCLC.

Effect of radiotherapy after breast-conserving surgery on 10-year recurrence and 15-year breast cancer death: meta-analysis of individual patient data for 10,801 women in 17 randomised trials.

BACKGROUND: After breast-conserving surgery, radiotherapy reduces recurrence and breast cancer death, but it may do so more for some groups of women than for others. We describe the absolute magnitude of these reductions according to various prognostic and other patient characteristics, and relate the absolute reduction in 15-year risk of breast cancer death to the absolute reduction in 10-year recurrence risk. METHODS: We undertook a meta-analysis of individual patient data for 10,801 women in 17 randomised trials of radiotherapy versus no radiotherapy after breast-conserving surgery, 8337 of whom had pathologically confirmed node-negative (pN0) or node-positive (pN+) disease. FINDINGS: Overall, radiotherapy reduced the 10-year risk of any (ie, locoregional or distant) first recurrence from 35·0% to 19·3% (absolute reduction 15·7%, 95% CI 13·7-17·7, 2p<0·00001) and reduced the 15-year risk of breast cancer death from 25·2% to 21·4% (absolute reduction 3·8%, 1·6-6·0, 2p=0·00005). In women with pN0 disease (n=7287), radiotherapy reduced these risks from 31·0% to 15·6% (absolute recurrence reduction 15·4%, 13·2-17·6, 2p<0·00001) and from 20·5% to 17·2% (absolute mortality reduction 3·3%, 0·8-5·8, 2p=0·005), respectively. In these women with pN0 disease, the absolute recurrence reduction varied according to age, grade, oestrogen-receptor status, tamoxifen use, and extent of surgery, and these characteristics were used to predict large (≥20%), intermediate (10-19%), or lower (<10%) absolute reductions in the 10-year recurrence risk. Absolute reductions in 15-year risk of breast cancer death in these three prediction categories were 7·8% (95% CI 3·1-12·5), 1·1% (-2·0 to 4·2), and 0·1% (-7·5 to 7·7) respectively (trend in absolute mortality reduction 2p=0·03). In the few women with pN+ disease (n=1050), radiotherapy reduced the 10-year recurrence risk from 63·7% to 42·5% (absolute reduction 21·2%, 95% CI 14·5-27·9, 2p<0·00001) and the 15-year risk of breast cancer death from 51·3% to 42·8% (absolute reduction 8·5%, 1·8-15·2, 2p=0·01). Overall, about one breast cancer death was avoided by year 15 for every four recurrences avoided by year 10, and the mortality reduction did not differ significantly from this overall relationship in any of the three prediction categories for pN0 disease or for pN+ disease. INTERPRETATION: After breast-conserving surgery, radiotherapy to the conserved breast halves the rate at which the disease recurs and reduces the breast cancer death rate by about a sixth. These proportional benefits vary little between different groups of women. By contrast, the absolute benefits from radiotherapy vary substantially according to the characteristics of the patient and they can be predicted at the time when treatment decisions need to be made. FUNDING: Cancer Research UK, British Heart Foundation, and UK Medical Research Council.

Adjuvant chemotherapy, with or without postoperative radiotherapy, in operable non-small-cell lung cancer: two meta-analyses of individual patient data.

BACKGROUND: Many randomised controlled trials have investigated the effect of adjuvant chemotherapy in operable non-small-cell lung cancer. We undertook two comprehensive systematic reviews and meta-analyses to establish the effects of adding adjuvant chemotherapy to surgery, or to surgery plus radiotherapy. METHODS: We included randomised trials, not confounded by additional therapeutic differences between the two groups and that started randomisation on or after Jan 1, 1965, which compared surgery plus adjuvant chemotherapy versus surgery alone, or surgery plus adjuvant radiotherapy and chemotherapy versus surgery plus adjuvant radiotherapy. Updated individual patient data were collected, checked, and included in meta-analyses stratified by trial. The primary endpoint was overall survival, defined as time from randomisation until death by any cause. All analyses were by intention to treat. FINDINGS: The first meta-analysis of surgery plus chemotherapy versus surgery alone was based on 34 trial comparisons and 8447 patients (3323 deaths). We recorded a benefit of adding chemotherapy after surgery (hazard ratio [HR] 0.86, 95% CI 0.81-0.92, p<0.0001), with an absolute increase in survival of 4% (95% CI 3-6) at 5 years (from 60% to 64%). The second meta-analysis of surgery plus radiotherapy and chemotherapy versus surgery plus radiotherapy was based on 13 trial comparisons and 2660 patients (1909 deaths). We recorded a benefit of adding chemotherapy to surgery plus radiotherapy (HR 0.88, 95% CI 0.81-0.97, p=0.009), representing an absolute improvement in survival of 4% (95% CI 1-8) at 5 years (from 29% to 33%). In both meta-analyses we noted little variation in effect according to the type of chemotherapy, other trial characteristics, or patient subgroup. INTERPRETATION: The addition of adjuvant chemotherapy after surgery for patients with operable non-small-cell lung cancer improves survival, irrespective of whether chemotherapy was adjuvant to surgery alone or adjuvant to surgery plus radiotherapy. FUNDING: UK Medical Research Council, Institut Gustave-Roussy, Programme Hospitalier de Recherche Clinique (AOM 05 209), Ligue Nationale Contre le Cancer, and Sanofi-Aventis.

Clinical neurological outcome and quality of life among patients with limited small-cell cancer treated with two different doses of prophylactic cranial irradiation in the intergroup phase III trial (PCI99-01, EORTC 22003-08004, RTOG 0212 and IFCT 99-01).

BACKGROUND: We recently published the results of the PCI99 randomised trial comparing the effect of a prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI) at 25 or 36 Gy on the incidence of brain metastases (BM) in 720 patients with limited small-cell lung cancer (SCLC). As concerns about neurotoxicity were a major issue surrounding PCI, we report here midterm and long-term repeated evaluation of neurocognitive functions and quality of life (QoL). PATIENTS AND METHODS: At predetermined intervals, the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QLQ-C30 and brain module were used for self-reported patient data, whereas the EORTC-Radiation Therapy Oncology Group Late Effects Normal Tissue-Subjective, Objective, Management, Analytic scale was used for clinicians' assessment. For each scale, the unfavourable status was analysed with a logistic model including age, grade at baseline, time and PCI dose. RESULTS: Over the 3 years studied, there was no significant difference between the two groups in any of the 17 selected items assessing QoL and neurological and cognitive functions. We observed in both groups a mild deterioration across time of communication deficit, weakness of legs, intellectual deficit and memory (all P < 0.005). CONCLUSION: Patients should be informed of these potential adverse effects, as well as the benefit of PCI on survival and BM. PCI with a total dose of 25 Gy remains the standard of care in limited-stage SCLC.

Reconciling livestock production and wild herbivore conservation: challenges and opportunities.

Increasing food security and preventing further loss of biodiversity are two of humanity's most pressing challenges. Yet, efforts to address these challenges often lead to situations of conflict between the interests of agricultural production and those of biodiversity conservation. Here, we focus on conflicts between livestock production and the conservation of wild herbivores, which have received little attention in the scientific literature. We identify four key socio-ecological challenges underlying such conflicts, which we illustrate using a range of case studies. We argue that addressing these challenges will require the implementation of co-management approaches that promote the participation of relevant stakeholders in processes of ecological monitoring, impact assessment, decision-making, and active knowledge sharing.

Relation of risk of contralateral breast cancer to the interval since the first primary tumour.

BACKGROUND: There is no consensus on how to separate contralateral breast cancer (CBC) occurring as distant spread of the primary breast cancer (BC) from an independent CBC. METHODS: We used standardised incidence ratios (SIRs) to analyse the variations in the risk of CBC over time among 6629 women with BC diagnosed between 1954 and 1983. To explore the most appropriate cutoff to separate the two types of CBC, we analysed the deviance between models including different cutoff points as compared with the basal model with no cutoff date. We also performed a prognostic study through a Cox model. RESULTS: The SIR was much higher during the first 2 years of follow-up than afterwards. The best cutoff appeared to be 2 years. The risk of early CBC was linked to tumour spread and the risk of late CBC was linked to age and to the size of the tumour. Radiotherapy was not selected by the model either for early or late CBC risk. CONCLUSION: A clearer pattern of CBC risk might appear if studies used a similar cutoff time after the initial BC.

Impact of tumour size on axillary involvement and distant dissemination in breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: Tumour size and nodal involvement are the two main prognostic factors in breast cancer (BC). Their impact on the natural history of BC is not fully captured by analyses that ignore their quantitative nature. METHOD: Data pertaining to 18 159 patients treated with primary surgery: 3661 at the Institut Gustave-Roussy (IGR, France) between 1954 and 1983, and 14 498 in the breast cancer registry in the Stockholm-Gotland Health Care region (SG, Sweden) between 1976 and 1999, were collected. The risks of distant metastases (DMs) and of nodal involvement were analysed according to tumour size with parametric models. RESULTS: Using SG 1976-1990 as the reference group, relative risks (RRs) for DM were equal to 1.42 (95% CI: 1.29-1.56; P<10(-10)) in IGR and 0.61 (95% CI: 0.55-0.67; P<10(-10)) in SG 1991-1999. Differences in tumour size explained the increased risk in IGR (RR adjusted for tumour size 1.09; 95% CI: 0.99-1.20; P=0.07), but not the decreased risk in SG 1991-1999 (adjusted RR: 0.63; 95% CI: 0.57-0.69; P<10(-10)). The relationship between tumour size and DM risk changed significantly during the 1990s. CONCLUSION: Early diagnosis is sufficient to explain differences in the prognosis before 1990. After 1990, the use of adjuvant systemic therapies is the main reason for the reduction in DM.

Preoperative radiotherapy in breast cancer patients: 32 years of follow-up.

This study evaluates the long-term outcomes of a retrospective cohort of breast cancer (BC) patients who had received curatively intended premastectomy radiation therapy (RT). We analysed locoregional control, disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS), pathological complete remission (pCR), predictors thereof, and immediate safety. The series consisted of 187 patients with a median age of 49 years [43-60] and T2-T4 or N2 tumours. Between 1970 and 1984, they had received slightly hypofractionated RT to the whole breast, ipsilateral supraclavicular fossa and axilla ± the internal mammary chain (45-55 Gy/18 fractions of 2.5 Gy/34 days) systematically followed by a modified radical mastectomy with an axillary dissection. No other preoperative treatment was given. Among the 166 centrally reviewed tumour biopsy specimens, 22% had a triple-negative (TN) phenotype, 17% were HER2 3 + or amplified and 61% were ER+. The median follow-up was 32 years [23-35]. The 25-year locoregional control rate was 89% [93%-82%] and the 25-year DFS and OS rates were identical, 30% [24%-37%]. A pCR in the tumour and lymph nodes had been achieved in 18 among all patients (10%), but in 26% with TN disease. In the multivariate analysis, the TN status was the only predictive factor of pCR (OR = 5.49, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.87-16.1, p = 0.002). Also, the pN status (HR = 1.69, [1.28-2.22], p = 0.0002) and TN subtype (HR = 1.80, [1.00-3.26], p = 0.05) exerted a significant prognostic impact on OS. The postoperative complication rate (grade >2) was 19% with 4.3% of localized skin necrosis. Preoperative RT followed by radical surgery is feasible and associated with good long-term locoregional control.

Radiotherapy alone versus combined chemotherapy and radiotherapy in nonresectable non-small-cell lung cancer: first analysis of a randomized trial in 353 patients.

We report the results observed in a large, randomized study that compared the effects of radiotherapy alone (the standard therapy) with those of a combination of radiotherapy and chemotherapy in nonresectable squamous cell and large-cell lung carcinoma. The radiation dose was 65 Gy in each group, and chemotherapy included vindesine, cyclophosphamide, cisplatin, and lomustine. In this study, 177 patients received radiotherapy alone (group A), and 176 patients received the combined treatment (group B). The 2-year survival rate was 14% in group A and 21% in group B (P = .08). The distant metastasis rate was significantly lower in group B (P less than .001). Local control was poor in both groups (17% and 15%, respectively) and remained the major problem.

Prophylactic cranial irradiation for patients with small-cell lung cancer in complete remission.

BACKGROUND: Prophylactic cranial irradiation in patients with small-cell lung cancer decreases the overall rate of brain metastases without an effect on overall survival. It has been suggested that this treatment may increase neuropsychological syndromes and brain abnormalities indicated by computed tomography scans. However, other retrospective data suggested a beneficial effect on overall survival for patients in complete remission. PURPOSE: Our purpose was to evaluate the effects of prophylactic cranial irradiation on brain metastasis, overall survival, and late-occurring toxic effects in patients with small-cell lung cancer in complete remission. METHODS: We conducted a prospective study of 300 patients who had small-cell lung cancer that was in complete remission. The patients were randomly assigned to receive either prophylactic cranial irradiation delivering 24 Gy in eight fractions during 12 days (treatment group) or no prophylactic cranial irradiation (control group). A neuropsychological examination and a computed tomography scan of the brain were performed at the time of random assignment and repeatedly assessed at 6, 18, 30, and 48 months. Patterns of failure were analyzed according to total event rates and also according to an isolated first site of relapse, using a competing-risk approach. RESULTS: Two hundred ninety-four patients who did not have brain metastases at the time of random assignment were analyzed. The 2-year cumulative rate of brain metastasis as an isolated first site of relapse was 45% in the control group and 19% in the treatment group (P < 10(-6)). The total 2-year rate of brain metastasis was 67% and 40%, respectively (relative risk = 0.35; P < 10(-13)). The 2-year overall survival rate was 21.5% in the control group and 29% in the treatment group (relative risk = 0.83; P = .14). There were no significant differences between the two groups in terms of neuropsychological function or abnormalities indicated by computed tomography brain scans. CONCLUSIONS: Prophylactic cranial irradiation given to patients with small-cell lung cancer in complete remission decreases the risk of brain metastasis threefold without a significant increase in complications. A possible beneficial effect on overall survival should be tested with a higher statistical power. IMPLICATIONS: The results of the trial favor, at present, the indication of prophylactic cranial irradiation for patients who are in complete remission. A longer follow-up and confirmatory trials are needed to fully assess late-occurring toxic effects. The possible effect on overall survival needs to be evaluated with a larger number of patients in complete remission, and a meta-analysis of similar trials is recommended.

Response of small-cell lung cancer xenografts to chemotherapy: multidrug resistance and direct clinical correlates.

BACKGROUND: Patients with small-cell lung carcinomas (SCLCs) initially respond to combination chemotherapy. Only a few benefit in terms of long-term survival because most relapse. Such outcome may be attributable to development of multidrug resistance. PURPOSE: The response of SCLC to chemotherapy was examined in terms of (a) patient survival, (b) drug sensitivity of tumors in patients and of tumor xenografts in nude mice, and (c) expression of multidrug resistance gene MDR1 and GST-pi gene. METHODS: Tumor samples obtained from seven untreated patients and from one patient both before and after chemotherapy were transplanted into nude mice. The patients were treated with a combination of cyclophosphamide (C'), cisplatin (C), doxorubicin (A), and etoposide (V) (C'CAV) or C'AV and radiotherapy. Drug sensitivity of SCLCs was tested in nude mice that had received tumor xenografts from these seven patients. The expression of MDR1 and GST-pi genes was assessed in the mRNA extracted from xenografts by Northern blot analysis. P-glycoprotein was quantified by enzyme immunoassay. RESULTS: The patients' responses to C'CAV closely correlated with those of the corresponding xenografts. The tumors of the two patients who showed long-term survival after C'CAV completely regressed when they were transplanted into nude mice and subsequently treated with C'CAV. Despite initial complete response, the remaining five patients died during year 1. A high percentage of mice receiving the tumor grafts from these five patients showed only partial tumor regression after C'CAV treatment. The MDR1 transcript was detected in all five of these xenografts. Four of five xenografts were from untreated patients, and the fifth was from a treated patient. MDR1 mRNA expression was absent in the tumor of this fifth patient before chemotherapy, but both the mice receiving the corresponding xenograft and the patient showed expression of MDR1 after C'CAV treatment. MDR1 mRNA expression was absent in the tumor xenografts obtained from two patients with long-term survival. Expression of P-glycoprotein correlated with MDR1 mRNA expression. All xenografts except one expressed the GST-pi gene. CONCLUSIONS: The absence of MDR1 gene expression during chemotherapy for SCLC indicates a favorable prognosis, gene expression is often coincident with ineffective chemotherapy, and tumor xenografts can be appropriately used to predict response to chemotherapy. IMPLICATIONS: Failure of chemotherapy to control SCLC seems to be related to an acquired multidrug resistance involving the MDR1-mediated mechanism. Therapeutic benefit could therefore be expected from chemotherapy combined with inhibitors of MDR1.

Competing events determining relapse-free survival in limited small-cell lung carcinoma. The French Cancer Centers' Lung Group.

PURPOSE: We report results in terms of relapse-free survival (RFS), obtained in patients with limited small-cell lung carcinoma (SCLC) treated by four consecutive alternating protocols, using a competing risk approach with local recurrences, distant metastases, and death unrelated to cancer as competing events. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Two hundred two patients with limited SCLC were included in four consecutive protocols alternating radiotherapy and chemotherapy (CT). The alternating schedule consisted of six cycles of CT (doxorubicin, etoposide [VP16213], and cyclophosphamide [CAVP16], plus methotrexate in the first protocol; cisplatin replaced methotrexate in the other three protocols) and three courses of thoracic radiotherapy at a total dose of 45, 55, 65, and 61 Gy in the four consecutive protocols, respectively (accelerated hyperfractionation was used in the first course of the fourth protocol). A 1-week rest followed each CT cycle and each course of radiotherapy. Seventy-six percent of patients were in complete remission at the end of the induction treatment. RFS variables were determined according to a model assuming competing risks to define the first cause of failure (local disease, distant metastasis, or intercurrent death). RESULTS: No significant differences were observed between the four treatment groups. Overall results showed a 2-year cumulative incidence rate of failure of 75%. When analyzed, the first cause of failure was local recurrence only, 33%; distant only, 25%; distant and local simultaneously, 9%; and intercurrent death, 8%. CONCLUSIONS: The methodology of competing risks allowed an unequivocal description of first events in limited SCLC. The extent of the local problem has been relatively overshadowed by the use of conventional descriptive methods.

Adequate locoregional treatment for early breast cancer may prevent secondary dissemination.

PURPOSE: To analyze different events that determine event-free survival (EFS) in a randomized trial on adjuvant radiotherapy in early breast cancer patients with more than 15 years of follow-up evaluation. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The trial included 960 patients with a unilateral, operable breast cancer. Surgery consisted of a modified radical mastectomy. The trial compared three arms, as follows: preoperative radiotherapy, postoperative radiotherapy, and no adjuvant treatment. Events were analyzed by a competing-risk approach. A proportional hazards multiple regression model was used to analyze the effects of radiotherapy on the risk of distant metastasis. Similar analyses were performed separately for node-negative [N(-)] and node-positive [N(+)] patients in the two groups that did not include preoperative radiotherapy. RESULTS: Radiotherapy produced a fivefold decrease of the risk of local recurrence (P < .0001). In N(+) patients, postoperative radiotherapy decreased the risk of distant dissemination (relative risk, 0.63). When local recurrence was introduced in the model as a time-dependent covariate, this factor was predictive of distant dissemination (P < .0001) and nullified the effect of postoperative radiotherapy. This finding suggests that the decrease of distant metastases was related to the prevention of local recurrence. A similar effect was found in models that used overall survival as an end point. CONCLUSION: This study shows that postmastectomy radiotherapy in N(+) breast cancer patients may decrease the distant metastasis rate by preventing local recurrences and thus avoiding secondary dissemination.

Conservative treatment versus mastectomy in early breast cancer: patterns of failure with 15 years of follow-up data. Institut Gustave-Roussy Breast Cancer Group.

PURPOSES: A randomized trial was conducted to compare tumorectomy and breast irradiation with modified radical mastectomy. We have analyzed the patterns of failure in each arm of the trial and the prognostic factors that have an independent effect on treatment failures and overall survival. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The trial included 179 patients with breast cancer of up to 20 mm in diameter at macroscopic examination. Eighty-eight patients had conservative management and 91 a mastectomy. All patients had axillary dissection with frozen-section examination. For patients with positive axillary nodes (N+), a second randomization was performed: lymph node irradiation versus no further regional treatment. Patterns of failure were determined by a competing-risk approach and multivariate analysis. A prognostic-score was determined by multivariate analysis. RESULTS: Overall survival, distant metastasis, contralateral breast cancer, new primary malignancy, and locoregional recurrence rates were not significantly different between the two surgical groups, or between lymph node irradiation groups. Most recurrences appeared during the first 10 years. Three distinct prognostic groups were determined taking into account age, tumor size, histologic grading, and number of positive axillary nodes. CONCLUSION: Long-term results support conservative treatment with limited surgery and systematic breast irradiation as a safe procedure for the management of small breast cancers. Four easily obtainable clinical and histologic factors may be combined in a prognostic score that is highly predictive of overall and event-free survival.

Primary chemotherapy in the treatment of inflammatory breast carcinoma: a study of 230 cases from the Institut Gustave-Roussy.

We report the largest series of induction chemotherapy for inflammatory breast carcinoma (IBC). Results of two chemotherapy protocols with radiation therapy (RT) (170 patients) are compared with results with radiation alone (60 patients) in the treatment of this disease. From 1973 to 1975, 60 patients (control, group C) received RT (45 Gy and 20 to 30 Gy boost) and hormonal manipulation. From 1976 to 1980, 91 patients (group A) were treated with induction chemotherapy: Adriamycin (Adria Laboratories, Columbus, Ohio), vincristine, and methotrexate (AVM) and RT on a cyclical schedule; and maintenance chemotherapy: vincristine, cyclophosphamide, and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) (VCF). From 1980 to 1982, 79 patients (group B) received induction chemotherapy, Adriamycin, vincristine, cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and 5-FU (AVCMF) and RT on a cyclical schedule and VCF maintenance. Hormonal manipulation was performed in all groups. Disease-free survival at 4 years was 15% for group C, 32% for group A, and 54% for group B (P less than .005 group C v group A, less than .00001 group C v group B, and less than .01 group A v group B). Total survival at 4 years was 42% for group C, 53% for group A, and 74% for group B (P = .17 group C v group A, less than .00001 group C v group B, and less than .001 group A v group B). Clinical assessment of tumor aggressiveness, nodal status, type of chemotherapy administered, and early response to chemotherapy (by third course) were all prognostic factors. There is an important, highly statistically significant benefit in terms of both disease-free survival and total survival observed in patients treated with the addition of chemotherapy compared with radiation alone in IBC.

Do Payments Pay Off? Evidence from Participation in Costa Rica's PES Program.

Payments for environmental services (PES) are often viewed as a way to simultaneously improve conservation outcomes and the wellbeing of rural households who receive the payments. However, evidence for such win-win outcomes has been elusive. We add to the growing literature on conservation program impacts by using primary household survey data to evaluate the socioeconomic impacts of participation in Costa Rica's PES program. Despite the substantial cash transfers to voluntary participants in this program, we do not detect any evidence of impacts on their wealth or self-reported well-being using a quasi-experimental design. These results are consistent with the common claim that voluntary PES do not harm participants, but they beg the question of why landowners participate if they do not benefit. Landowners in our sample voluntarily renewed their contracts after five years in the program and thus are unlikely to have underestimated their costs of participation. They apparently did not invest additional income from the program in farm inputs such as cattle or hired labor, since both decreased as a result of participation. Nor do we find evidence that participation encouraged moves off-farm. Instead, semi-structured interviews suggest that participants joined the program to secure their property rights and contribute to the public good of forest conservation. Thus, in order to understand the social impacts of PES, we need to look beyond simple economic rationales and material outcomes.

Postmastectomy radiotherapy: randomized trials.

Postmastectomy radiotherapy decreases threefold the risk of locoregional recurrences according to the results of many randomized trials and overviews. This risk is mainly related to the number of involved axillary nodes (ie, about 25%, 35%, and 55% at 10 years when 1 to 3, 4 to 9, and 10 or more nodes are involved). In contrast, at 10 years, fewer than 15% of patients with negative axillary nodes relapse locally. The effect of postmastectomy radiotherapy on distant metastases and overall survival is a controversial issue. On the one hand, results are compatible with the existence of a mechanism of secondary dissemination generated from locoregional tumor nests. The beneficial effect of radiotherapy may be observed in the absence or presence of adjuvant systemic treatment. On the other hand, a deleterious late toxic, mainly cardiac, effect of radiation has also been shown. This point emphasizes the importance of radiation technique and quality to obtain a positive balance in terms of overall survival.

Post-mastectomy megavoltage radiotherapy: the Oslo and Stockholm trials.

The ability of adjuvant radiotherapy to prevent distant metastasis and to prolong survival in patients with early breast cancer is much debated. The paper presents a joint analysis of long-term results (13-16 years' follow-up) from the Oslo and Stockholm randomised trials of post-operative megavoltage radiotherapy versus surgery alone. Among node-positive patients there was a significant 37% relative reduction of distant metastases with radiation (P less than 0.01) and an overall survival difference in favor of the irradiated patients which corresponded with a 22% relative reduction of deaths of borderline significance (P less than 0.06). No significant benefit with radiation in terms of distant metastasis-free survival or overall survival was observed among node-negative patients. The results show that effective local treatment can prevent distant dissemination in some patients and contradict the contention that node-positive breast cancer invariably is a systemic disease already at primary diagnosis.

Phase I-II study of vinorelbine (Navelbine) plus cisplatin in advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

32 patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer previously untreated by chemotherapy were included in a phase I-II study in order to determine the feasibility of the combination of vinorelbine and cisplatin, each administered at its optimal dose, i.e. 30 mg/m2 weekly and 120 mg/m2 every 4-6 weeks, respectively. There were 27 males and 5 females with a mean age of 55 years and a median performance status of 80%. 13 had locally advanced disease and 19 had distant metastases at the time of inclusion. Our study demonstrated the feasibility of this protocol. Dose intensities could be maximised by adapting vinorelbine doses rather than by postponing treatment in the event of neutropenia. Both response rate (33%) and overall survival of the population (median 11 months) justify further studies.