Association of early mobility with the incidence of deep-vein thrombosis and mortality among critically ill patients: a post hoc analysis of PREVENT trial.

BACKGROUND: This study assessed the mobility levels among critically ill patients and the association of early mobility with incident proximal lower-limb deep-vein thrombosis and 90-day mortality. METHODS: This was a post hoc analysis of the multicenter PREVENT trial, which evaluated adjunctive intermittent pneumatic compression in critically ill patients receiving pharmacologic thromboprophylaxis with an expected ICU stay ≥ 72 h and found no effect on the primary outcome of incident proximal lower-limb deep-vein thrombosis. Mobility levels were documented daily up to day 28 in the ICU using a tool with an 8-point ordinal scale. We categorized patients according to mobility levels within the first 3 ICU days into three groups: early mobility level 4-7 (at least active standing), 1-3 (passive transfer from bed to chair or active sitting), and 0 (passive range of motion). We evaluated the association of early mobility and incident lower-limb deep-vein thrombosis and 90-day mortality by Cox proportional models adjusting for randomization and other co-variables. RESULTS: Of 1708 patients, only 85 (5.0%) had early mobility level 4-7 and 356 (20.8%) level 1-3, while 1267 (74.2%) had early mobility level 0. Patients with early mobility levels 4-7 and 1-3 had less illness severity, femoral central venous catheters, and organ support compared to patients with mobility level 0. Incident proximal lower-limb deep-vein thrombosis occurred in 1/85 (1.3%) patients in the early mobility 4-7 group, 7/348 (2.0%) patients in mobility 1-3 group, and 50/1230 (4.1%) patients in mobility 0 group. Compared with early mobility group 0, mobility groups 4-7 and 1-3 were not associated with differences in incident proximal lower-limb deep-vein thrombosis (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 1.19, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.16, 8.90; p = 0.87 and 0.91, 95% CI 0.39, 2.12; p = 0.83, respectively). However, early mobility groups 4-7 and 1-3 had lower 90-day mortality (aHR 0.47, 95% CI 0.22, 1.01; p = 0.052, and 0.43, 95% CI 0.30, 0.62; p < 0.0001, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Only a small proportion of critically ill patients with an expected ICU stay ≥ 72 h were mobilized early. Early mobility was associated with reduced mortality, but not with different incidence of deep-vein thrombosis. This association does not establish causality, and randomized controlled trials are required to assess whether and to what extent this association is modifiable. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The PREVENT trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, ID: NCT02040103 (registered on 3 November 2013) and Current controlled trials, ID: ISRCTN44653506 (registered on 30 October 2013).

Adjunctive Intermittent Pneumatic Compression for Venous Thromboprophylaxis.

BACKGROUND: Whether adjunctive intermittent pneumatic compression in critically ill patients receiving pharmacologic thromboprophylaxis would result in a lower incidence of deep-vein thrombosis than pharmacologic thromboprophylaxis alone is uncertain. METHODS: We randomly assigned patients who were considered adults according to the local standards at the participating sites (≥14, ≥16, or ≥18 years of age) within 48 hours after admission to an intensive care unit (ICU) to receive either intermittent pneumatic compression for at least 18 hours each day in addition to pharmacologic thromboprophylaxis with unfractionated or low-molecular-weight heparin (pneumatic compression group) or pharmacologic thromboprophylaxis alone (control group). The primary outcome was incident (i.e., new) proximal lower-limb deep-vein thrombosis, as detected on twice-weekly lower-limb ultrasonography after the third calendar day since randomization until ICU discharge, death, attainment of full mobility, or trial day 28, whichever occurred first. RESULTS: A total of 2003 patients underwent randomization - 991 were assigned to the pneumatic compression group and 1012 to the control group. Intermittent pneumatic compression was applied for a median of 22 hours (interquartile range, 21 to 23) daily for a median of 7 days (interquartile range, 4 to 13). The primary outcome occurred in 37 of 957 patients (3.9%) in the pneumatic compression group and in 41 of 985 patients (4.2%) in the control group (relative risk, 0.93; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.60 to 1.44; P = 0.74). Venous thromboembolism (pulmonary embolism or any lower-limb deep-vein thrombosis) occurred in 103 of 991 patients (10.4%) in the pneumatic compression group and in 95 of 1012 patients (9.4%) in the control group (relative risk, 1.11; 95% CI, 0.85 to 1.44), and death from any cause at 90 days occurred in 258 of 990 patients (26.1%) and 270 of 1011 patients (26.7%), respectively (relative risk, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.84 to 1.13). CONCLUSIONS: Among critically ill patients who were receiving pharmacologic thromboprophylaxis, adjunctive intermittent pneumatic compression did not result in a significantly lower incidence of proximal lower-limb deep-vein thrombosis than pharmacologic thromboprophylaxis alone. (Funded by King Abdulaziz City for Science and Technology and King Abdullah International Medical Research Center; PREVENT ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02040103; Current Controlled Trials number, ISRCTN44653506.).

Post-spinal Anesthesia Low Back Pain in Obese Female Patients: Comparison of the Median Versus Paramedian Approach.

BACKGROUND: A side effect of spinal anesthesia is post-dural puncture backache (PDPB), which is characterized by ongoing discomfort at the location of the spinal puncture without any radicular pain. This study aims to compare the incidence and severity of post-dural puncture back pain following spinal anesthesia by median versus paramedian technique in obese female patients. METHODS:  A prospective randomized comparative study on 120 female patients, aged 20-50 years with a BMI of 30-40 kg/m2 and American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status II, scheduled for elective surgery under spinal anesthesia, was included in the study. Patients were randomly divided into two groups, with 60 patients in each group. Group P uses the paramedian approach for spinal anesthesia, and group M uses the midline approach for spinal anesthesia. RESULTS: Low back pain incidence was lower in group P than in group M at seven days, but at one month and after, its incidence remained the same in both groups. No difference in the severity of pain was observed. CONCLUSIONS: The occurrence of back pain in the first seven days of surgery was significantly more frequent with the median approach. The pain severity decreased as the time passed from day seven to three months of follow-up. There is no difference in the severity of pain with either approach at different intervals.

A Randomized Comparison of Intravenous Versus Nebulized Routes for Administering Dexmedetomidine and Ketamine Combination to Facilitate Awake Fibreoptic Intubation.

Introduction Awake fibreoptic intubation is a technique used to secure the airway of patients who are having predicted difficult intubation. We compared two routes, intravenous and nebulized, for administering a combination of ketamine and dexmedetomidine to patients requiring sedation for fibreoptic intubation. Methods and materials After approval of the institutional ethics committee, 64 patients between 18 and 60 years belonging to the American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I or II and having predicted difficult airway were randomized to receive study medications through either intravenous (group I, n = 32) or nebulized (group N, n = 32) routes. Group I patients were given a combination of ketamine and dexmedetomidine through intravenous route. Group N patients were nebulized with a combination of ketamine and dexmedetomidine. The time required for awake fiberoptic intubation was the primary outcome variable. In addition, sedation score, cough severity, patient tolerance, intubating condition, hemodynamic changes, recall of events and discomfort during intubation, and any adverse events in the perioperative period were also compared. Results Compared to group N, the time needed to intubate the patients was significantly less in group I (75.69 ± 10.83 versus 49.19 ± 3.60 seconds, p < 0.001). Observer assessment sedation/alertness score (p < 0.001), cough severity (p < 0.001), patient tolerance (p < 0.001), and intubating condition (p = 0.001) were statistically significant, all conditions being better in group I. Patient discomfort and recall of the procedure were statistically similar between the groups. Conclusions The efficacy of a combination of dexmedetomidine and ketamine through the intravenous route is better than the nebulized route for patients undergoing awake fibreoptic intubation.

Neuropsychiatric Outcomes in Intensive Care Unit Survivors.

BACKGROUND: Over the last two decades, there has been phenomenal advancement in critical care medicine and patient management. Many patients recover from life-threatening illnesses that they might not have survived a decade ago. Despite a decrease in mortality, these survivors endure long-lasting sequelae like physical, mental, and emotional symptoms. METHODS: Patients after intensive care unit (ICU) discharge were assessed in a follow-up outpatient department (OPD) clinic for anxiety, stress, and depression. Patients were asked to fill out the questionnaires Depression, Anxiety and Stress Scale-21 (DASS-21) and Short Form-36 (SF-36) for assessment of health-related quality of life (HRQOL) at 4th, 6th, and 8th months after discharge. ICU data were recorded, including patients' demographics, severity of illness and length of stay, and duration of mechanical ventilation. Patients who failed to follow-up in OPD on designated dates were assessed telephonically. RESULTS: Depression showed a positive, strong, and moderate correlation between length of stay and mechanical ventilation duration. A positive correlation was found between stress and length of stay and duration of mechanical ventilation. A positive strong correlation was found between anxiety and length of ICU stay, and a moderate positive correlation was found between anxiety and duration of mechanical ventilation. A weak correlation was found between age and neuropsychiatric outcomes. CONCLUSION: The severity of depression, anxiety, and stress was significantly higher at four months compared to six months. Severity decreased with time. Prolonged ICU stay increased levels of anxiety, depression, and stress. HRQOL improved from four to six months.

High-Flow Nasal Cannula as an Alternate Weaning Strategy: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Background Extubation failure is associated with increased morbidity and poor outcomes. This study aimed to ascertain the effectiveness of a high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) as a weaning method compared to conventional weaning. Methodology A total of 60 mechanically ventilated patients, aged 18-65 years, who were ventilated for 48 hours and whose underlying pathology had either resolved or was improving, were enrolled in this study. They were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to participate in the HFNC weaning method or receive conventional weaning. Patients in Group A were extubated and oxygen was provided via HFNC. Group B patients were given a spontaneous breathing trial (SBT) per the standard protocol and extubated after a successful SBT. Results Weaning failure was found in five patients and was higher in the conventional group (three patients in the conventional group and two patients in the HFNC group). The duration of stay of patients in intensive care units was significantly higher in the conventional group than in the HFNC group. Conclusions HFNC is a better alternative to conventional weaning through SBT.

Effect of Carbohydrate Loading in Diabetic Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

INTRODUCTION: Investigations of preoperative oral carbohydrate (CHO) loading have primarily examined benefits among patients without diabetes. Preoperative CHO-rich beverages in general populations have resulted in reductions in insulin resistance after surgery, protein loss, metabolic derangements, and immune dysfunction. The aim of this study was to assess the effect of CHO loading in diabetic patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy. METHODS: Diabetic patients controlled on oral hypoglycemic agent were randomly divided into two groups: (1) Group T - this group will be given 50 g of maltodextrin before two hours of surgery; (2) Group C - this group will be kept nil per oral as per standard protocol. Blood sugar, serum insulin, serum cortisol, and insulin requirement were compared in both groups. RESULTS: Blood sugar levels of Group C were found to be significantly higher than that of Group T at six hours and 24 hours. In Group T, a rise in baseline serum insulin (8.94 ± 3.43 mIU/l) was observed at 24 hours (13.23 ± 5.71 mIU/l). A change of 4.29 ± 3.00 mIU/l in serum insulin level was observed. The change in baseline serum insulin levels was 47.99%. In Group C too, a rise in baseline serum insulin (6.27 ± 1.74 mIU/l) was observed at 24 hours (18.00 ± 5.34 mIU/l). A change of 11.73 ± 4.97 mIU/l in serum insulin level was observed. The change in baseline HOMA-IR (homeostatic model assessment for insulin resistance) levels in Group T was 53.66%. A rise (4.39 ± 1.63) in baseline HOMA-IR of Group C (1.65 ± 0.45) was observed at 24 hours (6.04 ± 1.76). The change in baseline HOMA-IR levels in Group C was 266.06%. CONCLUSIONS: CHO loading is observed to be beneficial in diabetic patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy. No adverse effects or an increased risk of aspiration were observed in the intervention group during the study period.

Efficacy of Oral Care Protocols in the Prevention of Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia in Mechanically Ventilated Patients.

BACKGROUND: Ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) is one of the most common infections in intubated intensive care unit (ICU) patients. Oral care with chlorhexidine is a conventional method for maintaining hygiene. Recently, adjuvant methods have been introduced into routine oral care, including teeth brushing and the application of moisturizing lotion. The objective of this study was to compare the incidence of VAP in critical care patients receiving oral care with and without manual teeth brushing and the application of moisturizers to the mouth. METHODS: We conducted a prospective randomized control study comprised of 220 ICU patients between 18 and 65 years of age, and of either sex. The patients were divided into two groups of 110 each. Care for the study group (group S) consisted of chlorhexidine wash, tooth brushing, and moisturizing gel over gums, buccal mucosa, and lips. The control group (group C) was treated with chlorhexidine wash only. The oral assessment was done at 4, 6, 8, and 12 hours using the Beck Oral Assessment Scale (BOAS). Pneumonia was assessed based on abnormal chest x-rays, fever, chest auscultation, endotracheal culture report, and the incidence of VAP, and mortality was observed Results: Abnormal chest x-rays, positive auscultatory findings, fevers, and positive culture reports were significantly reduced in group S compared to these measurements in group C. The incidences of VAP and mortality were also significantly lower in group S compared with the incidences in group C. CONCLUSIONS: Oral care with chlorhexidine mouth wash and the adjuvant measures reduced VAP and, consequently mortality and hospital stays. Tooth brushing along with standard oral care provides an additional advantage in the prevention of VAP in mechanically ventilated patients. Compulsory tooth brushing, if included in regular oral care yields better results in terms of decreased incidence of VAP, length of ICU stay, and mortality.

Sepsis in Critically Ill Patients: Epidemiology, Risk Factors, and Role of Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption/Ionization-Time of Flight Mass Spectrometry for Identification of Sepsis-Causing Organisms.

Background Matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) is a rapid mass spectrometry technology for species identification. It is a useful, fast, and accurate tool for routine laboratory analysis. This study aimed to investigate the epidemiology of sepsis-causing organisms in patients admitted to tertiary-level intensive care units (ICU), the role of MALDI-TOF MS in species identification, and patients' clinical outcomes. Methodology A prospective observational study was performed in a tertiary-level ICU for one year. The first blood, urine, and endotracheal (ET) aspirate samples were sent before starting antibiotics. We received the antibiotic sensitivity report within 48 hours or earlier using MALDI-TOF MS. Treatment was modified based on MALDI-TOF MS reports. Response to treatment was monitored, and clinical outcomes were noted based on ICU stay. Patients were followed up until discharge, shifting to referring parent unit, or death. Results This study included 200 patients admitted to ICUs who at the time of admission did not have a fever. The most common organisms were Acinetobacter baumannii , Klebsiella pneumonia, and Escherichia coli in ET aspirates; Candida albicans and Enterococcus faecium in urine; and Pseudomonas aeruginosa , K. pneumonia, and A. baumaniiin blood. Of the 200 patients, 130 (65%) shifted to the parent unit ward, and 70 (35%) patients died, with an ICU stay of 12.89 ± 6.51 days. There was no significant difference in mortality when organisms grew from either ET or urine compared with sterile samples. If organisms resistant to all primary antibiotics grew from ET, mortality was 60.6%. Mortality was 56.8% if isolates were in the blood. Conclusions Early MALDI-TOF MS-based species identification and appropriate antibiotics initiation play a key role in the treatment and care for critically ill patients with sepsis. MALDI-TOF MS has the potential to significantly aid sepsis management.

The effect of intermittent pneumatic compression on deep-vein thrombosis and ventilation-free days in critically ill patients with heart failure.

There are contradictory data regarding the effect of intermittent pneumatic compression (IPC) on the incidence of deep-vein thrombosis (DVT) and heart failure (HF) decompensation in critically ill patients. This study evaluated the effect of adjunctive use of IPC on the rate of incident DVT and ventilation-free days among critically ill patients with HF. In this pre-specified secondary analysis of the PREVENT trial (N = 2003), we compared the effect of adjunctive IPC added to pharmacologic thromboprophylaxis (IPC group), with pharmacologic thromboprophylaxis alone (control group) in critically ill patients with HF. The presence of HF was determined by the treating teams according to local practices. Patients were stratified according to preserved (≥ 40%) versus reduced (< 40%) left ventricular ejection fraction, and by the New York Heart Association (NYHA) classification. The primary outcome was incident proximal lower-limb DVT, determined with twice weekly venous Doppler ultrasonography. As a co-primary outcome, we evaluated ventilation-free days as a surrogate for clinically important HF decompensation. Among 275 patients with HF, 18 (6.5%) patients had prevalent proximal lower-limb DVT (detected on trial day 1 to 3). Of 257 patients with no prevalent DVT, 11/125 (8.8%) patients in the IPC group developed incident proximal lower-limb DVT compared to 6/132 (4.5%) patients in the control group (relative risk, 1.94; 95% confidence interval, 0.74-5.08, p = 0.17). There was no significant difference in ventilator-free days between the IPC and control groups (median 21 days versus 25 days respectively, p = 0.17). The incidence of DVT with IPC versus control was not different across NYHA classes (p value for interaction = 0.18), nor across patients with reduced and preserved ejection fraction (p value for interaction = 0.15). Ventilator-free days with IPC versus control were also not different across NYHA classes nor across patients with reduced or preserved ejection fraction. In conclsuion, the use of adjunctive IPC compared with control was associated with similar rate of incident proximal lower-limb DVT and ventilator-free days in critically ill patients with HF.Trial registration: The PREVENT trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, ID: NCT02040103 (registered on 3 November 2013, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/study/NCT02040103 ) and Current controlled trials, ID: ISRCTN44653506 (registered on 30 October 2013).

Emergence of blaNDM-1 and blaVIM producing Gram-negative bacilli in ventilator-associated pneumonia at AMR Surveillance Regional Reference Laboratory in India.

INTRODUCTION: Ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) may be a life threatening nosocomial infection encountered in intensive care units. Currently the emergence of carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative pathogens has become worrisome threat worldwide. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Endotracheal aspirates samples were collected from patients who were under mechanical ventilation for > 48 h. The bacterial isolates were identified by MALDI-TOF-MS and antibiotic susceptibility testing performed. All carbapenem resistant isolates were tested by Modified Hodge test (MHT), modified carbapenem inactivation method (mCIM), and EDTA-CIM (eCIM) and PCR were performed to detect blaIMP, blaVIM and blaNDM producing MBL genes. RESULTS: VAP occurred in 172/353(48.7%), 23.3% had early-onset VAP and 76.7% had late-onset VAP. Males (69.2%) were found to suffer more from VAP. Prior antibiotic therapy, CPI>6, prior surgery and tracheostomy were associated with VAP. The mortality in VAP (58.1%) contrasted with non-VAP (40%). 99/169 (58.6%) Gram-negative isolates were resistant to carbapenems. Acinetobacter baumannii, Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Klebsiella pneumoniae were common pathogens found in late onset VAP, whereas K. pneumoniae, A. baumannii and Staphylococcus aureus were common in early onset VAP. The PCR results detected blaNDM in 37/172(21.5%) and blaVIM in 30/172(17.4%); 15/172(8.7%) isolates carried both genes. CONCLUSION: The blaNDM-1 and blaVIM genes are the main antibiotic-resistance genes that induce resistance patterns to carbapenems in VAP, highlighting CRE strains of potential public health concern and therapeutic challenge. Diagnostic laboratories in India must get on high caution for early MBL detection as it may limit the wide dispersal of MBL genes.

Surveillance or no surveillance ultrasonography for deep vein thrombosis and outcomes of critically ill patients: a pre-planned sub-study of the PREVENT trial.

PURPOSE: We examined the association between surveillance for deep vein thrombosis (DVT) among medical-surgical critically ill patients by twice-weekly ultrasonography and 90-day all-cause mortality. METHODS: This was a pre-planned sub-study of the Pneumatic Compression for Preventing Venous Thromboembolism (PREVENT) trial (Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT02040103) that compared addition of intermittent pneumatic compression (IPC) to pharmacologic prophylaxis versus pharmacologic prophylaxis alone. The surveillance group included enrolled patients in the trial, while the non-surveillance group included eligible non-enrolled patients. Using logistic regression and Cox proportional hazards models, we examined the association of surveillance with the primary outcome of 90-day mortality. Secondary outcomes were DVT and pulmonary embolism (PE). RESULTS: The surveillance group consisted of 1682 patients and the non-surveillance group included 383 patients. Using Cox proportional hazards model with bootstrapping, surveillance was associated with a decrease in 90-day mortality (adjusted HR 0.75; 95% CI 0.57, 0.98). Surveillance was associated with earlier diagnosis of DVT [(median 4 days (IQR 2, 10) vs. 20 days (IQR 16, 22)] and PE [median 4 days (IQR 2.5, 5) vs. 7.5 days (IQR 6.1, 28.9)]. There was an increase in diagnosis of DVT (adjusted HR 5.49; 95% CI 2.92, 13.02) with no change in frequency in diagnosis of PE (adjusted HR 0.56; 95% CI 0.19, 1.91). CONCLUSIONS: Twice-weekly surveillance ultrasonography was associated with an increase in DVT detection, reduction in diagnostic testing for non-lower limb DVT and PE, earlier diagnosis of DVT and PE, and lower 90-day mortality. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The PREVENT trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, ID: NCT02040103. Registered on 3 November 2013; Current controlled trials, ID: ISRCTN44653506. Registered on 30 October 2013.

Surveillance or no surveillance for deep venous thrombosis and outcomes of critically ill patients: A study protocol and statistical analysis plan.

OBJECTIVE: Surveillance ultrasounds in critically ill patients detect many deep venous thrombi (DVTs) that would otherwise go unnoticed. However, the impact of surveillance for DVT on mortality among critically ill patients remains unclear. DESIGN: We are conducting a multicenter, multinational randomized controlled trial that examines the effectiveness of adjunct intermittent pneumatic compression use with pharmacologic thromboprophylaxis compared to pharmacologic thromboprophylaxis alone on the incidence of proximal lower extremity DVT in critically ill patients (the PREVENT trial). Enrolled patients undergo twice weekly surveillance ultrasounds of the lower extremities as part of the study procedures. We plan to compare enrolled patients who have surveillance ultrasounds to patients who meet the eligibility criteria but are not enrolled (eligible non-enrolled patients) and only who will have ultrasounds performed at the clinical team's discretion. We hypothesize that twice-weekly ultrasound surveillance for DVT in critically ill patients who are receiving thromboprophylaxis will have more DVTs detected, and consequently, fewer pulmonary emboli and lower all-cause 90-day mortality. DISCUSSION: We developed a detailed a priori plan to guide the analysis of the proposed study and enhance the validity of its results.

Statistical analysis plan for the Pneumatic CompREssion for PreVENting Venous Thromboembolism (PREVENT) trial: a study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: The Pneumatic CompREssion for Preventing VENous Thromboembolism (PREVENT) trial evaluates the effect of adjunctive intermittent pneumatic compression (IPC) with pharmacologic thromboprophylaxis compared to pharmacologic thromboprophylaxis alone on venous thromboembolism (VTE) in critically ill adults. METHODS/DESIGN: In this multicenter randomized trial, critically ill patients receiving pharmacologic thromboprophylaxis will be randomized to an IPC or a no IPC (control) group. The primary outcome is "incident" proximal lower-extremity deep vein thrombosis (DVT) within 28 days after randomization. Radiologists interpreting the lower-extremity ultrasonography will be blinded to intervention allocation, whereas the patients and treating team will be unblinded. The trial has 80% power to detect a 3% absolute risk reduction in the rate of proximal DVT from 7% to 4%. DISCUSSION: Consistent with international guidelines, we have developed a detailed plan to guide the analysis of the PREVENT trial. This plan specifies the statistical methods for the evaluation of primary and secondary outcomes, and defines covariates for adjusted analyses a priori. Application of this statistical analysis plan to the PREVENT trial will facilitate unbiased analyses of clinical data. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov , ID: NCT02040103 . Registered on 3 November 2013; Current controlled trials, ID: ISRCTN44653506 . Registered on 30 October 2013.

Ventilating Patient with Refractory Hypercarbia: Use of APRV Mode.

A 70-year-old patient referred to our critical care unit with the diagnosis of type II respiratory failure with shock. Patient was a known case of COPD for last 20 years. His chest radiology revealed bilateral infiltrates. Patient was managed conservatively in the form of antibiotics, vasopressor and ventilatory support with SIMV/VC mode. After ventilation with SIMV/VC mode for half an hour his blood gases revealed increasing PaCO2 levels. The same result was obtained with PC mode and ASV and his PaCO2 level reached above 170 mmHg. Then APRV mode was tried with modified settings. The results obtained were satisfactory and in next 24 hours PaCO2 decreased to <66mmHg along with an increasing P/F ratio. APRV is the not recommended as primary mode of ventilation in COPD but in resistant cases it can be helpful as it improves alveolar recruitment and pressure support is added to reduce hypercapnia.

Comparison between Transdermal Buprenorphine and Transdermal Fentanyl for Postoperative Pain Relief after Major Abdominal Surgeries.

INTRODUCTION: Opioid is generally regarded as an important part of multimodal, perioperative analgesia, especially for moderate to severe pain. Amongst the various modes of delivery transdermal route has several potential benefits over oral and parentral administration. These include noninvasive dosing, better absorption and lack of first-pass metabolism. A transdermal drug delivery system provides steady and continuous drug delivery resulting in steady plasma concentration. Bolus dosing of systemic analgesic results in supra and sub therapeutic plasma resulting in toxic and sub analgesic plasma drug concentration. It also improves patient compliance. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty patients undergoing major abdominal surgery under GA were randomly divided in two groups (n=30). Group A received buprenorphine 10 mcg/h TDS and group B received 25 mcg/h fentanyl TDS, 6 hours prior to surgery. Patients were followed for three days for postoperative pain relief and adverse effects. RESULTS: Baseline and demographic variables are comparable in both groups. The mean level of VAS was significantly lower in group B as compared to group A at Day 1, 2 and 3. The mean level of sedation score was significantly lower in Group B than Group A. Haemodynamic variables in both groups (SBP, DBP and HR), shows comparable values in both groups and no significant difference was observed. Five out of 30 (16.7%) patients in group A required single dose of rescue analgesic while 0 out of 30 patients (0.00%) in group B required rescue analgesic. This difference in rescue analgesic requirement in not quiet statistically significant (p-value 0.0522). Twenty percent patient in fentanyl group and 16.7% patients in buprenorphine group experienced some adverse effects. Nausea and vomiting were main side effects of the drugs. The incidence of nausea and vomiting were 6.7% and 10% in buprenorphine and fentanyl group respectively. CONCLUSION: Fentanyl and buprenorphine TDS were effective and safe in controlling postoperative pain. Fentanyl is better than buprenorphine in this respect.

Pycnodysostosis: an anaesthetic approach to this rare genetic disorder.

Pycnodysostosis (the Toulouse-Lautrec syndrome) is a rare autosomal-recessive disorder of osteoclast dysfunction. This disorder was first described by Maroteaux and Lamy in 1962. We describe anaesthetic management of a 35-year-old female having pyknodysostosis with fracture shaft left femur with anticipated difficult intubation. Therefore, spinal anesthesia was planned for her fracture fixation. The intra- and postoperative period remains uneventful.