RESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: Normal binaural hearing facilitates spatial hearing and therefore many everyday listening tasks, such as understanding speech against a backdrop of competing sounds originating from various locations, and localization of sounds. For stimulation with bone conduction hearing devices (BCD), used to alleviate conductive hearing losses, limited transcranial attenuation results in cross-stimulation so that both cochleae are stimulated from the position of the bone conduction transducer. As such, interaural time and level differences, hallmarks of binaural hearing, are unpredictable at the level of the inner ears. The aim of this study was to compare spatial hearing by unilateral and bilateral BCD stimulation in normal-hearing listeners with simulated bilateral conductive hearing loss. DESIGN: Bilateral conductive hearing loss was reversibly induced in 25 subjects (mean age = 28.5 years) with air conduction and bone conduction (BC) pure-tone averages across 0.5, 1, 2, and 4 kHz (PTA 4 ) <5 dB HL. The mean (SD) PTA 4 for the simulated conductive hearing loss was 48.2 dB (3.8 dB). Subjects participated in a speech-in-speech task and a horizontal sound localization task in a within-subject repeated measures design (unilateral and bilateral bone conduction stimulation) using Baha 5 clinical sound processors on a softband. For the speech-in-speech task, the main outcome measure was the threshold for 40% correct speech recognition when masking speech and target speech were both colocated (0°) and spatially and symmetrically separated (target 0°, maskers ±30° and ±150°). Spatial release from masking was quantified as the difference between colocated and separated masking and target speech thresholds. For the localization task, the main outcome measure was the overall variance in localization accuracy quantified as an error index (0.0 = perfect performance; 1.0 = random performance). Four stimuli providing various spatial cues were used in the sound localization task. RESULTS: The bilateral BCD benefit for recognition thresholds of speech in competing speech was statistically significant but small regardless if the masking speech signals were colocated with, or spatially and symmetrically separated from, the target speech. Spatial release from masking was identical for unilateral and bilateral conditions, and significantly different from zero. A distinct bilateral BCD sound localization benefit existed but varied in magnitude across stimuli. The smallest benefit occurred for a low-frequency stimulus (octave-filtered noise, CF = 0.5 kHz), and the largest benefit occurred for unmodulated broadband and narrowband (octave-filtered noise, CF = 4.0 kHz) stimuli. Sound localization by unilateral BCD was poor across stimuli. CONCLUSIONS: Results suggest that the well-known transcranial transmission of BC sound affects bilateral BCD benefits for spatial processing of sound in differing ways. Results further suggest that patients with bilateral conductive hearing loss and BC thresholds within the normal range may benefit from a bilateral fitting of BCD, particularly for horizontal localization of sounds.
Asunto(s)
Audífonos , Localización de Sonidos , Percepción del Habla , Humanos , Adulto , Localización de Sonidos/fisiología , Conducción Ósea/fisiología , Pérdida Auditiva ConductivaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Incomplete partition type 3 (IP3) malformation deafness is a rare hereditary cause of congenital or rapid progressive hearing loss. The children present with a severe to profound mixed hearing loss and temporal bone imaging show a typical inner ear malformation classified as IP3. Cochlear implantation is one option of hearing restoration in severe cases. Little is known about other specific difficulties these children might exhibit, for instance possible neurodevelopmental symptoms. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Ten 2; 0 to 9; 6-year-old children with IP3 malformation deafness (nine boys and one girl) with cochlear implants were evaluated with a retrospective chart review in combination with an additional extensive multidisciplinary assessment day. Hearing, language, cognition, and mental ill-health were compared with a control group of ten 1; 6 to 14; 5-year-old children with cochlear implants (seven boys and three girls) with another genetic cause of deafness, mutations in the GJB2 gene. RESULTS: Mutations in POU3F4 were found in nine of the 10 children with IP3 malformation. Children with IP3 malformation deafness had an atypical outcome with low level of speech recognition (especially in noise), executive functioning deficits, delayed or impaired speech as well as atypical lexical-semantic and pragmatic abilities, and exhibited mental ill-health issues. Parents of children with IP3 malformation were more likely to report that they were worried about their child's psychosocial wellbeing. Controls, however, had more age-typical results in all these domains. Eight of 10 children in the experimental group had high nonverbal cognitive ability despite their broad range of neurodevelopmental symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: While cochlear implantation is a feasible alternative for children with IP3 malformation deafness, co-occurring neurodevelopmental anomalies, such as attention deficit hyperactivity or developmental language disorder, and mental ill-health issues require an extensive and consistent multidisciplinary team approach during childhood to support their overall habilitation.
Asunto(s)
Implantación Coclear , Implantes Cocleares , Sordera , Adolescente , Niño , Preescolar , Implantación Coclear/métodos , Sordera/cirugía , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Mutación , Factores del Dominio POU/genética , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: Unilateral hearing loss (UHL) is a condition as common as bilateral hearing loss in adults. Because of the unilaterally reduced audibility associated with UHL, binaural processing of sounds may be disrupted. As a consequence, daily tasks such as listening to speech in a background of spatially distinct competing sounds may be challenging. A growing body of subjective and objective data suggests that spatial hearing is negatively affected by UHL. However, the type and degree of UHL vary considerably in previous studies. The aim here was to determine the effect of a profound sensorineural UHL, and of a simulated UHL, on recognition of speech in competing speech, and the binaural and monaural contributions to spatial release from masking, in a demanding multisource listening environment. DESIGN: Nine subjects (25 to 61 years) with profound sensorineural UHL [mean pure-tone average (PTA) across 0.5, 1, 2, and 4 kHz = 105 dB HL] and normal contralateral hearing (mean PTA = 7.2 dB HL) were included based on the criterion that the target and competing speech were inaudible in the ear with hearing loss. Thirteen subjects with normal hearing (19 to 60 years; mean left PTA = 4.1 dB HL; mean right PTA = 5.5 dB HL) contributed data in normal and simulated "mild-to-moderate" UHL conditions (PTA = 38.6 dB HL). The main outcome measure was the threshold for 40% correct speech recognition in colocated (0°) and spatially and symmetrically separated (±30° and ±150°) competing speech conditions. Spatial release from masking was quantified as the threshold difference between colocated and separated conditions. RESULTS: Thresholds in profound UHL were higher (worse) than normal hearing in separated and colocated conditions, and comparable to simulated UHL. Monaural spatial release from masking, that is, the spatial release achieved by subjects with profound UHL, was significantly different from zero and 49% of the magnitude of the spatial release from masking achieved by subjects with normal hearing. There were subjects with profound UHL who showed negative spatial release, whereas subjects with normal hearing consistently showed positive spatial release from masking in the normal condition. The simulated UHL had a larger effect on the speech recognition threshold for separated than for colocated conditions, resulting in decreased spatial release from masking. The difference in spatial release between normal-hearing and simulated UHL conditions increased with age. CONCLUSIONS: The results demonstrate that while recognition of speech in colocated and separated competing speech is impaired for profound sensorineural UHL, spatial release from masking may be possible when competing speech is symmetrically distributed around the listener. A "mild-to-moderate" simulated UHL decreases spatial release from masking compared with normal-hearing conditions and interacts with age, indicating that small amounts of residual hearing in the UHL ear may be more beneficial for separated than for colocated interferer conditions for young listeners.
Asunto(s)
Pérdida Auditiva Sensorineural , Pérdida Auditiva Unilateral , Percepción del Habla , Adulto , Humanos , Enmascaramiento Perceptual , HablaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: Although children with unilateral hearing loss (uHL) have high risk of experiencing academic difficulties, speech-language delays, poor sound localization, and speech recognition in noise, studies on hearing aid (HA) outcomes are few. Consequently, it is unknown when and how amplification is optimally provided. The aim was to study whether children with mild-to-moderate congenital unilateral sensorineural hearing loss (uSNHL) benefit from HAs. DESIGN: All 6- to 11-year-old children with nonsyndromic congenital uSNHL and at least 6 months of HA use were invited (born in Stockholm county council, n = 7). Participants were 6 children (9.7- to 10.8-years-old) with late HA fittings (>4.8 years of age). Unaided and aided hearing was studied with a comprehensive test battery in a within-subject design. Questionnaires were used to study overall hearing performance and disability. Sound localization accuracy (SLA) and speech recognition thresholds (SRTs) in competing speech were measured in sound field to study hearing under demanding listening conditions. SLA was measured by recording eye-gaze in response to auditory-visual stimuli presented from 12 loudspeaker-video display pairs arranged equidistantly within ±55° in the frontal horizontal plane. The SRTs were measured for target sentences at 0° in spatially separated (±30° and ±150°) continuous speech. Auditory brainstem responses (ABRs) were obtained in both ears separately to study auditory nerve function at the brainstem level. RESULTS: The mean ± SD pure-tone average (0.5, 1, 2, and 4 kHz) was 45 ± 8 dB HL and 6 ± 4 dB HL in the impaired and normal hearing ear, respectively (n = 6). Horizontal SLA was significantly poorer in the aided compared with unaided condition. A significant relationship was found between aided SLA (quantified by an error index) and the impaired ear's ABR I to V interval, suggesting a relationship between the two. Results from questionnaires revealed aided benefit in one-to-one communication, whereas no significant benefit was found for communication in background noise or reverberation. No aided benefit was found for the SRTs in competing speech. CONCLUSIONS: Children with congenital uSNHL benefit from late HA intervention in one-to-one communication but not in demanding listening situations, and there is a risk of degraded SLA. The results indicate that neural transmission time from the impaired cochlea to the upper brainstem may have an important role in unilaterally aided spatial hearing, warranting further study in children with uHL receiving early HA intervention.
Asunto(s)
Audífonos , Pérdida Auditiva Sensorineural , Pérdida Auditiva Unilateral , Localización de Sonidos , Percepción del Habla , Niño , Humanos , Proyectos PilotoRESUMEN
AIM: Evidence suggests that cochlear implants are beneficial for language development, but there is no consensus about the ideal age for surgery. We investigated how language development and surgical safety were affected by patients' ages. METHODS: This study comprised 103 children (52 boys) aged 4.3-16 years who received cochlear implants at 5-29 months at the Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden, between 2002 and 2013. All showed typical development and were from monolingual homes. Bilateral implants were common (95%). The children were regularly assessed on language understanding, vocabulary and speech recognition by a multi-disciplinary team for 10.0 ± 3.7 (4.7-16.0) years. RESULTS: There were no associations between complications after surgery and the age when children had their first implant. Children implanted at 5-11 months reached an age-equivalent level of language understanding and better vocabulary outcome sooner than subgroups implanted later. Children who had surgery at 12-29 months demonstrated more atypical and delayed language abilities over time. Early implantation, preferably before 9 months, may lead to a more typical trajectory of spoken language development. CONCLUSION: Our findings showed that cochlear implantation before 9 months was safe. Early implantation may reduce the negative effects of auditory deprivation and promotes more natural and synchronised language development.
Asunto(s)
Implantación Coclear , Implantes Cocleares , Sordera , Percepción del Habla , Adolescente , Factores de Edad , Niño , Preescolar , Sordera/cirugía , Humanos , Desarrollo del Lenguaje , Masculino , Habla , SueciaRESUMEN
Objective: The aim was to quantify the effect of the experimental active transcutaneous Bone Conduction Implant (BCI) on spatial release from masking (SRM) in subjects with bilateral or unilateral conductive and mixed hearing loss.Design: Measurements were performed in a sound booth with five loudspeakers at 0°, +/-30° and +/-150° azimuth. Target speech was presented frontally, and interfering speech from either the front (co-located) or surrounding (separated) loudspeakers. SRM was calculated as the difference between the separated and the co-located speech recognition threshold (SRT).Study Sample: Twelve patients (aged 22-76 years) unilaterally implanted with the BCI were included.Results: A positive SRM, reflecting a benefit of spatially separating interferers from target speech, existed for all subjects in unaided condition, and for nine subjects (75%) in aided condition. Aided SRM was lower compared to unaided in nine of the subjects. There was no difference in SRM between patients with bilateral and unilateral hearing loss. In aided situation, SRT improved only for patients with bilateral hearing loss.Conclusions: The BCI fitted unilaterally in patients with bilateral or unilateral conductive/mixed hearing loss seems to reduce SRM. However, data indicates that SRT is improved or maintained for patients with bilateral and unilateral hearing loss, respectively.
Asunto(s)
Conducción Ósea/fisiología , Audífonos , Pérdida Auditiva Conductiva/rehabilitación , Prótesis Neurales , Enmascaramiento Perceptual/fisiología , Adulto , Anciano , Umbral Auditivo , Femenino , Pérdida Auditiva Bilateral/fisiopatología , Pérdida Auditiva Bilateral/rehabilitación , Pérdida Auditiva Conductiva/fisiopatología , Pérdida Auditiva Unilateral/fisiopatología , Pérdida Auditiva Unilateral/rehabilitación , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Prueba del Umbral de Recepción del Habla , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Precurved cochlear implant (CI) electrode arrays were developed in an attempt to improve the auditory outcome of cochlear implantation, which varies greatly. The recent CI532 (Cochlear Corp., Sydney, Australia) may offer further advantages as its electrode array is thinner than previous precurved CI electrode arrays. The aims here were to investigate 1-year postoperative speech recognition, intraoperative electrically evoked compound action potentials (ECAPs), and their possible relation in patients implanted with a CI532 or its predecessor CI512. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of data from 63 patients subjected to cochlear implantation at the Karolinska University Hospital, Sweden, was performed. Speech recognition of the implanted ear was evaluated using phonemically balanced monosyllabic Swedish words at 65 dB SPL. ECAPs were evaluated using the intraoperative ECAP threshold across ≥8 electrodes generated by the automated neural response telemetry of the CI. RESULTS: The median aided speech recognition score (SRS) 1 year after implantation was 52% (quartile 1 = 40%, quartile 3 = 60%, n = 63) and did not differ statistically significantly between patients with CI512 (n = 38) and CI532 (n = 25). The mean ECAP threshold was 188 CL (current level; SD = 15 CL, n = 54) intraoperatively and did not differ statistically significantly between patients with CI512 (n = 32) and CI532 (n = 22), but the threshold for each electrode varied more between patients with a CI512 (p < 0.0001). A higher mean ECAP threshold was associated with a worse SRS (Spearman's ρ = -0.46, p = 0.0004, n = 54). The association remained among those with a CI512 (Spearman's ρ = -0.62, p = 0.0001, n = 32) when stratified by CI electrode array. CONCLUSION: No statistically significant difference in speech recognition 1 year after cochlear implantation or in mean threshold of ECAP intraoperatively was found between patients with a CI512 and the more recent, slim CI532, but the ECAP thresholds varied more between those with a CI512. A statistically significant association between SRS and mean ECAP threshold was found, but stratified analysis suggests that the association may be true only for patients with a CI512.
Asunto(s)
Potenciales de Acción/fisiología , Implantación Coclear , Implantes Cocleares , Potenciales Evocados Auditivos/fisiología , Pérdida Auditiva Sensorineural/rehabilitación , Percepción del Habla , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Umbral Auditivo/fisiología , Electrodos Implantados , Femenino , Pérdida Auditiva Sensorineural/fisiopatología , Humanos , Periodo Intraoperatorio , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Periodo Posoperatorio , Estudios Retrospectivos , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , TelemetríaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study is to quantify the effect of the Bone Conduction Implant (BCI) on sound localisation accuracy in subjects with conductive hearing loss (CHL). DESIGN: The subjects were tested in a horizontal sound localisation task in which localisation responses were objectively obtained by eye-tracking, in a prospective, cross-sectional design. The tests were performed unaided and unilaterally aided. The stimulus used had a spectrum similar to female speech and was presented at 63 and 73 dB SPL. The main outcome measure was the error index (EI), ranging from 0 to 1 (perfect to random performance). STUDY SAMPLE: Eleven subjects (aged 21-75 years, five females) with BCI participated in the study. Their mixed/conductive hearing loss was either unilateral (n = 5) or bilateral (n = 6). RESULTS: Three of five subjects (60%) with unilateral CHL, and four of six subjects (67%) with bilateral CHL showed significantly improved sound localisation when using a unilateral BCI (p < .05). For the subjects with bilateral CHL, a distinct linear relation between aided sound localisation and hearing thresholds in the non-implant ear existed at 73 dB SPL (18% decrease in the EI per 10 dB decrease in pure-tone average, r = 0.98, p < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Individuals with mixed/conductive hearing loss may benefit from a unilateral BCI in sound localisation.
Asunto(s)
Conducción Ósea , Audífonos , Pérdida Auditiva Conductiva/rehabilitación , Personas con Deficiencia Auditiva/rehabilitación , Implantación de Prótesis/instrumentación , Localización de Sonidos , Estimulación Acústica , Adulto , Anciano , Audiometría de Tonos Puros , Percepción Auditiva , Umbral Auditivo , Estudios Transversales , Movimientos Oculares , Femenino , Pérdida Auditiva Conductiva/diagnóstico , Pérdida Auditiva Conductiva/fisiopatología , Pérdida Auditiva Conductiva/psicología , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Personas con Deficiencia Auditiva/psicología , Estimulación Luminosa , Estudios Prospectivos , Diseño de Prótesis , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: The evaluation of sound localization accuracy (SLA) requires precise behavioral responses from the listener. Such responses are not always possible to elicit in infants and young children, and procedures for the assessment of SLA are time consuming. The aim of this study was to develop a fast, valid, and objective method for the assessment of SLA from 6 months of age. To this end, pupil positions toward spatially distributed continuous auditory and visual stimuli were recorded. DESIGN: Twelve children (29 to 157 weeks of age) who passed the universal newborn hearing screening and eight adults (18 to 40 years of age) who had pure-tone thresholds ≤20 dB HL in both ears participated in this study. Horizontal SLA was measured in a sound field with 12 loudspeaker/display (LD)-pairs placed in an audiological test room at 10 degrees intervals in the frontal horizontal plane (±55 degrees azimuth). An ongoing auditory-visual stimulus was presented at 63 dB SPL(A) and shifted to randomized loudspeakers simultaneously with pauses of the visual stimulus. The visual stimulus was automatically reintroduced at the azimuth of the sounding loudspeaker after a sound-only period of 1.6 sec. A corneal-reflection eye-tracking technique allowed the acquisition of the subjects' pupil positions relative to the LD-pairs. The perceived azimuth was defined as the median of the intersections between gaze and LD-pairs during the final 500 msec of the sound-only period. Overall SLA was quantified by an Error Index (EI), where EI = 0 corresponded to perfect match between perceived and presented azimuths, whereas EI = 1 corresponded to chance. RESULTS: SLA was rapidly measured in children (mean = 168 sec, n = 12) and adults (mean = 162 sec, n = 8). Visual inspection of gaze data indicated that gaze shifts occurred in sound-only periods. The medians of the perceived sound-source azimuths either coincided with the presenting sound-source azimuth or were offset by a maximum of 20 degrees in children. In contrast, adults revealed a perfect match from -55 to 55 degrees, except at 15 degrees azimuth (median = 20 degrees), with 9/12 of the quartile ranges = 0 degrees. Children showed a mean (SD) EI of 0.42 (0.17), which was significantly higher than that in adults (p < 0.0001). However, children revealed a distinct age-related EI improvement of 16 percentage points per year (r = -0.68, p = 0.015, n = 12), suggesting an ongoing maturation of SLA in the studied age range (29 to 157 weeks). The eight adults showed high SLA and high reliability as demonstrated by the low mean (SD) EI (0.054 [0.021]) and the low variability in test-retest differences (95% confidence interval = -0.020 to 0.046). CONCLUSIONS: Corneal-reflection eye-tracking provides an objective and fast assessment of horizontal SLA from about 6 months of age and may enable gaze to be used as an objective measure for sound localization in this age group. Infant SLA is immature and improvements are related to increasing age. Adults show high overall SLA and low intra- and intersubject variability in SLA. The technique may be used as a clinical tool for the evaluation of very early intervention in a young, preverbal population and throughout the life span.
Asunto(s)
Desarrollo Infantil , Medidas del Movimiento Ocular , Fijación Ocular , Localización de Sonidos , Estimulación Acústica , Adolescente , Adulto , Preescolar , Córnea , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Masculino , Estimulación Luminosa , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To study the development of the bilateral benefit in children using bilateral cochlear implants by measurements of speech recognition and sound localization. DESIGN: Bilateral and unilateral speech recognition in quiet, in multi-source noise, and horizontal sound localization was measured at three occasions during a two-year period, without controlling for age or implant experience. Longitudinal and cross-sectional analyses were performed. Results were compared to cross-sectional data from children with normal hearing. STUDY SAMPLE: Seventy-eight children aged 5.1-11.9 years, with a mean bilateral cochlear implant experience of 3.3 years and a mean age of 7.8 years, at inclusion in the study. Thirty children with normal hearing aged 4.8-9.0 years provided normative data. RESULTS: For children with cochlear implants, bilateral and unilateral speech recognition in quiet was comparable whereas a bilateral benefit for speech recognition in noise and sound localization was found at all three test occasions. Absolute performance was lower than in children with normal hearing. Early bilateral implantation facilitated sound localization. CONCLUSIONS: A bilateral benefit for speech recognition in noise and sound localization continues to exist over time for children with bilateral cochlear implants, but no relative improvement is found after three years of bilateral cochlear implant experience.
Asunto(s)
Implantes Cocleares , Sordera/terapia , Localización de Sonidos , Percepción del Habla , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Niño , Preescolar , Estudios Transversales , Sordera/cirugía , Femenino , Humanos , Estudios Longitudinales , Masculino , Ruido , Relación Señal-Ruido , Prueba del Umbral de Recepción del HablaRESUMEN
HYPOTHESIS: Unilateral congenital conductive hearing impairment in ear canal atresia leads to atrophy of the gray matter of the contralateral primary auditory cortex or changes in asymmetry pattern if left untreated in childhood. BACKGROUND: Unilateral ear canal atresia with associated severe conductive hearing loss results in deteriorated sound localization and difficulties in understanding of speech in a noisy environment. Cortical atrophy in the Heschl's gyrus has been reported in acquired sensorineural hearing loss but has not been studied in unilateral conductive hearing loss. METHODS: We obtained T1w and T2w FLAIR MRI data from 17 subjects with unilateral congenital ear canal atresia and 17 matched controls. Gray matter volume and thickness were measured in the Heschl's gyrus using Freesurfer. RESULTS: In unilateral congenital ear canal atresia, Heschl's gyrus exhibited cortical thickness asymmetry (right thicker than left, corrected p = 0.0012, mean difference 0.25 mm), while controls had symmetric findings. Gray matter volume and total thickness did not differ from controls with normal hearing. CONCLUSION: We observed cortical thickness asymmetry in congenital unilateral ear canal atresia but no evidence of contralateral cortex atrophy. Further research is needed to understand the implications of this asymmetry on central auditory processing deficits.
Asunto(s)
Corteza Auditiva , Humanos , Corteza Auditiva/patología , Pérdida Auditiva Conductiva/patología , Conducto Auditivo Externo , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética/métodos , Atrofia/patologíaRESUMEN
Children with unilateral sensorineural hearing loss (uSNHL) have a high risk of speech-language delays and academic difficulties. Still, challenges remain in the diagnosis of uSNHL. With a prospective cross-sectional design, 20 infants were consecutively recruited from a universal newborn hearing screening program and invited to genetic testing. Eighteen of the subjects agreed to genetic testing, 15 subjects with OtoSCOPE® v.9 screening 224 genes, and four subjects underwent targeted testing, screening for chromosomal abnormalities or 105-137 gene mutations. The genetic results were described together with the 20 infants' previously published auditory profiles and imaging results. Genetic causes for the uSNHL were found in 28% of subjects (5/18) including CHARGE syndrome (CHD7), autosomal recessive non-syndromic hearing loss (GJB2), Townes-Brocks syndrome (SALL1), Pendred Syndrome (SLC26A4) and Chromosome 8P inverted duplication and deletion syndrome. In subjects with comorbidities (malformation of fingers, anus, brain, and heart), 100% were diagnosed with a genetic cause for uSNHL (3/3 subjects), while 13% (2/15 subjects) were diagnosed without comorbidities observed at birth (p = 0.002). Genetic testing for congenital uSNHL is currently efficient for alleged syndromes, whereas genetic variants for non-syndromic congenital uSNHL need further research.
RESUMEN
Despite normal hearing in one ear, individuals with congenital unilateral aural atresia may perceive difficulties in everyday listening conditions typically containing multiple sound sources. While previous work shows that intervention with bone conduction devices may aid spatial hearing for some children, testing conditions are often arranged to maximize any benefit and are not very similar to daily life. The benefit from amplification on spatial tasks has been found to vary between individuals, for reasons not entirely clear. This study has sought to expand on the limited knowledge on how children with unilateral aural atresia recognize speech masked by competing speech, and how horizontal sound localization accuracy is affected by the degree of unilateral hearing loss and by amplification using unilateral bone conduction devices when fitted before 3 years of age. In a within-subject, repeated measures design, including 11 children (mean age = 7.9 years), bone conduction hearing device (BCD) amplification did not negatively affect horizontal sound localization accuracy. The effect on speech recognition scores showed greater inter-individual variability. No benefit from amplification on a group level was found. There was no association between age at fitting and the benefit of the BCD. For children with poor unaided sound localization accuracy, there was a greater BCD benefit. Unaided localization accuracy increased as a function of decreasing hearing thresholds in the atretic ear. While it is possible that low sound levels in the atretic ear provided access to interaural localization cues for the children with the lowest hearing thresholds, the association has to be further investigated in a larger sample of children.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Infants and young children with vestibulocochlear nerve (VCN) hypoplasia/aplasia present with severe hearing loss and are candidates for cochlear implantation (CI). It is unknown whether vestibular function is related to CI outcome and if vestibular tests can guide the operation decision. AIMS/OBJECTIVES: Our aim was to describe the vestibular function in patients with VCN hypoplasia/aplasia before a possible CI. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty-two ears in 23 patients were tested between 2019 and 2022 with bone-conducted cervical vestibular evoked myogenic potentials (BCcVEMP), video head impulse test (vHIT) and miniice-water caloric test (mIWC). RESULTS: All ears could be tested with at least one vestibular test and 83% could be tested with more than one method. Twenty-nine ears (61%) showed normal function with at least one method. The presence of a normal response to any test doubled the likelihood of a measured hearing threshold after CI, the best predictors being the BCcVEMP and vHIT (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Canal function may represent a predictor of auditive pathway integrity with a possible favourable audiological outcome after CI operation. SIGNIFICANCE: Our results demonstrate high vestibular response rates suggesting a functioning pathway despite the radiological diagnosis.
Asunto(s)
Implantación Coclear , Pérdida Auditiva , Potenciales Vestibulares Miogénicos Evocados , Vestíbulo del Laberinto , Niño , Lactante , Humanos , Preescolar , Nervio Coclear/anomalías , Prueba de Impulso Cefálico/métodos , Potenciales Vestibulares Miogénicos Evocados/fisiología , Nervio VestibularRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To compare bilateral and unilateral speech recognition in quiet and in multi-source noise, and horizontal sound localization of low and high frequency sounds in children with bilateral cochlear implants. DESIGN: Bilateral performance was compared to performance of the implanted side with the best monaural speech recognition in quiet result. Parental reports were collected in a questionnaire. Results from the CI children were compared to binaural and monaural performance of normal-hearing peers. STUDY SAMPLE: Sixty-four children aged 5.1-11.9 years who were daily users of bilateral cochlear implants. Thirty normal-hearing children aged 4.8-9.0 years were recruited as controls. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: Group data showed a statistically significant bilateral speech recognition and sound localization benefit, both behaviorally and in parental reports. The bilateral speech recognition benefit was smaller in quiet than in noise. The majority of subjects localized high and low frequency sounds significantly better than chance using bilateral implants, while localization accuracy was close to chance using unilateral implants. Binaural normal-hearing performance was better than bilateral performance in implanted children across tests, while bilaterally implanted children showed better localization than normal-hearing children under acute monaural conditions.
Asunto(s)
Implantes Cocleares , Padres , Localización de Sonidos , Percepción del Habla , Estimulación Acústica , Umbral Auditivo , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Niño , Preescolar , Sordera/cirugía , Humanos , Modelos Lineales , Ruido , Encuestas y CuestionariosRESUMEN
With the advances in eye tracking, saccadic reflexes towards auditory stimuli have become an easily accessible behavioral response. The present study investigated the development of horizontal sound localization latency quantified by saccadic reflexes in infants and young children with normal hearing (0.55 to 5.6 years, n = 22). The subject was seated in front of an array of 12 loudspeaker/display-pairs arranged equidistantly in an arc from -55 to + 55° azimuth. An ongoing auditory-visual stimulus was presented at 63â dB SPL and shifted to another randomly selected pair at 24 occasions. At each shift, the visual part of the stimulus was blanked for 1.6â s providing auditory-only localization cues. A sigmoid model was fitted to the gaze samples following the azimuthal sound shifts. The overall sound localization latency (SLL) for a subject was defined as the mean of the latencies for all trials included by objective criteria. The SLL was assessed in 21 of 22 children with a mean of 6.1 valid trials. The SLL ranged 400 to 1400â ms (mean = 860â ms). An inverse model demonstrated a significant relationship between SLL and age (R2 = 0.79, p < 0.001), reflecting a distinct reduction of latency with increasing age. No partial correlation between SLL and sound localization accuracy was found when controlling for age (p = 0.5), suggesting that localization latency may provide diagnostic value beyond accuracy.
Asunto(s)
Localización de Sonidos , Estimulación Acústica , Niño , Preescolar , Señales (Psicología) , Audición/fisiología , Pruebas Auditivas , Humanos , Lactante , Localización de Sonidos/fisiologíaRESUMEN
Cochlear implantation as a treatment for severe-to-profound hearing loss allows children to develop hearing, speech, and language in many cases. However, cochlear implants are generally provided beyond the infant period and outcomes are assessed after years of implant use, making comparison with normal development difficult. The aim was to study whether the rate of improvement of horizontal localization accuracy in children with bilateral implants is similar to children with normal hearing. A convenience sample of 20 children with a median age at simultaneous bilateral implantation = 0.58 years (0.42−2.3 years) participated in this cohort study. Longitudinal follow-up of sound localization accuracy for an average of ≈1 year generated 42 observations at a mean age = 1.5 years (0.58−3.6 years). The rate of development was compared to historical control groups including children with normal hearing and with relatively late bilateral implantation (≈4 years of age). There was a significant main effect of time with bilateral implants on localization accuracy (slope = 0.21/year, R2 = 0.25, F = 13.6, p < 0.001, n = 42). No differences between slopes (F = 0.30, p = 0.58) or correlation coefficients (Cohen's q = 0.28, p = 0.45) existed when comparing children with implants and normal hearing (slope = 0.16/year since birth, p = 0.015, n = 12). The rate of development was identical to children implanted late. Results suggest that early bilateral implantation in children with severe-to-profound hearing loss allows development of sound localization at a similar age to children with normal hearing. Similar rates in children with early and late implantation and normal hearing suggest an intrinsic mechanism for the development of horizontal sound localization abilities.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Individuals with unilateral hearing loss show poor spatial hearing, but individual variability is high. AIMS/OBJECTIVES: To investigate if the degree of hearing loss in unilateral ear canal atresia affects horizontal sound localization and speech recognition. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twelve subjects with unilateral ear canal atresia without childhood hearing intervention. Previously published data from eight normal-hearing subjects in normal binaural as well as experimentally induced unilateral hearing loss served as a reference. Horizontal sound localization and recognition of speech in spatially separate competing speech were assessed. RESULTS: Linear regression analysis demonstrated a relationship between sound localization accuracy (SLA) and the air conduction pure tone average of the atretic ear (r = 0.85, p=.007). The large proportion of variability in SLA (72%) explained by the degree of hearing loss of the atretic ear indicates that binaural processing is possible. SLA was worse than for normal hearing individuals (p<.0001), and comparable to moderate simulated unilateral hearing loss (p=.13). Speech discrimination was significantly worse than normal (p<.0001) and not dependent on degree of hearing loss of the atretic ear. CONCLUSIONS AND SIGNIFICANCE: Individuals with congenital unilateral ear canal atresia show impaired horizontal SLA and recognition of speech in competing speech.
Asunto(s)
Conducto Auditivo Externo/anomalías , Pérdida Auditiva Unilateral/fisiopatología , Localización de Sonidos , Percepción del Habla , Adolescente , Adulto , Femenino , Pérdida Auditiva Unilateral/etiología , Humanos , Modelos Lineales , Masculino , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
Directing gaze towards auditory events is a natural behavior. In addition to the well-known accuracy of auditory elicited gaze responses for normal binaural listening, their latency is a measure of possible clinical interest and methodological importance. The aim was to develop a clinically feasible method to assess sound localization latency (SLL), and to study SLL as a function of simulated unilateral hearing loss (SUHL) and the relationship with accuracy. Eight healthy and normal-hearing adults (18-40 years) participated in this study. Horizontal gaze responses, recorded by non-invasive corneal reflection eye-tracking, were obtained during azimuthal shifts (24 trials) of a 3-min continuous auditory stimulus. In each trial, a sigmoid function was fitted to gaze samples. Latency was estimated by the abscissa corresponding to 50% of the arctangent amplitude. SLL was defined as the mean latency across trials. SLL was measured in normal-hearing and simulated SUHL conditions (SUHL30 and SUHL43: mean threshold of 30 dB HL and 43 dB HL across 0.5, 1, 2, and 4 kHz). In the normal-hearing condition, the mean ± SD SLL was 280 ± 40 ms (n = 8) with a test-retest SD = 20 ms. A linear mixed model showed a statistically significant effect of listening condition on SLL. The SUHL30 and SUHL43 conditions revealed a mean SLL of 370 ± 49 ms and 540 ± 120 ms, respectively. Repeated measures correlation analysis showed a clear relationship between SLL and the average sound localization accuracy (R2 = 0.94). The rapid and reliable method to obtain SLL may be an important clinical tool for evaluation of binaural processing. Future studies in clinical cohorts are needed to assess whether SLL may reveal information about binaural processing abilities beyond that afforded by sound localization accuracy.
Asunto(s)
Pérdida Auditiva Unilateral , Audición , Localización de Sonidos , Adolescente , Adulto , Percepción Auditiva , Pruebas Auditivas , Humanos , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
Unilateral hearing loss (UHL) occurs in 25% of cases of congenital sensorineural hearing loss. Due to the unilaterally reduced audibility associated with UHL, everyday demanding listening situations may be disrupted despite normal hearing in one ear. The aim of this study was to quantify acute changes in recognition of speech in spatially separate competing speech and sound localization accuracy, and relate those changes to two levels of temporary induced UHL (UHL30 and UHL43; suffixes denote the average hearing threshold across 0.5, 1, 2, and 4 kHz) for 8 normal-hearing adults. A within-subject repeated-measures design was used (normal binaural conditions, UHL30 and UHL43). The main outcome measures were the threshold for 40% correct speech recognition and the overall variance in sound localization accuracy quantified by an Error Index (0 = perfect performance, 1.0 = random performance). Distinct and statistically significant deterioration in speech recognition (2.0 dB increase in threshold, p < 0.01) and sound localization (Error Index increase of 0.16, p < 0.001) occurred in the UHL30 condition. Speech recognition did not significantly deteriorate further in the UHL43 condition (1.0 dB increase in speech recognition threshold, p > 0.05), while sound localization was additionally impaired (Error Index increase of 0.33, p < 0.01) with an associated large increase in individual variability. Qualitative analyses on a subject-by-subject basis showed that high-frequency audibility was important for speech recognition, while low-frequency audibility was important for horizontal sound localization accuracy. While the data might not be entirely applicable to individuals with long-standing UHL, the results suggest a need for intervention for mild-to-moderate UHL.