RESUMEN
Necrotizing soft-tissue infection (NSTI) is a life-threatening pathology that often requires management in intensive care unit (ICU). Therapies consist of early diagnosis, adequate surgical source control, and antimicrobial therapy. Whereas guidelines underline the need for appropriate routine microbiological cultures before starting antimicrobial therapy in patients with suspected sepsis or septic shock, delaying adequate therapy also strongly increases mortality. The aim of the present study was to compare the characteristics and outcomes of patients hospitalized in ICU for NSTI according to their antimicrobial therapy exposure > 24 h before surgery (called the exposed group) or not (called the unexposed group) before surgical microbiological sampling. We retrospectively included 100 consecutive patients admitted for severe NSTI. The exposed group consisted of 23(23%) patients, while 77(77%) patients belonged to the unexposed group. The demographic and underlying disease conditions were similar between the two groups. Microbiological cultures of surgical samples were positive in 84 patients and negative in 16 patients, including 3/23 (13%) patients and 13/77 (17%) patients in the exposed and unexposed groups, respectively (p = 0.70). The distribution of microorganisms was comparable between the two groups. The main antimicrobial regimens for empiric therapy were also similar, and the proportions of adequacy were comparable (n = 60 (84.5%) in the unexposed group vs. n = 19 (86.4%) in the exposed group, p = 0.482). ICU and hospital lengths of stay and mortality rates were similar between the two groups. In conclusion, in a population of severe ICU NSTI patients, antibiotic exposure before sampling did not impact either culture sample positivity or microbiological findings.
Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Infecciones de los Tejidos Blandos/tratamiento farmacológico , Anciano , Bacterias/clasificación , Bacterias/efectos de los fármacos , Bacterias/genética , Bacterias/aislamiento & purificación , Femenino , Francia , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Humanos , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos/estadística & datos numéricos , Tiempo de Internación , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Infecciones de los Tejidos Blandos/microbiología , Infecciones de los Tejidos Blandos/mortalidad , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Airway complications are frequent after lung transplantation (LT), as they affect up to 23% of recipients. The implication of perioperative extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) support and haemodynamic instability has never been specifically assessed. The first aim of this study was to explore the impact of perioperative ECMO support on bronchial anastomotic dehiscence (BAD) at Day 90 after LT. METHODS: This prospective observational monocentric study analysed BAD in all consecutive patients who underwent LT in the Bichat Claude Bernard Hospital, Paris, France, between January 2016 and May 2019. BAD visible on bronchial endoscopy and/or tomodensitometry was recorded. A univariate analysis was performed (Fisher's exacts and Mann-Whitney tests), followed by a multivariate analysis to assess independent risk factors for BAD during the first 90 days after LT (p < 0.05 as significant). The Paris North Hospitals Institutional Review Board approved the study. RESULTS: A total of 156 patients were analysed. BAD was observed in the first 90 days in 42 (27%) patients and was the main cause of death in 22 (14%) patients. BAD occurred during the first month after surgery in 34/42 (81%) patients. ECMO support was used as a bridge to LT, during and after surgery in 9 (6%), 117 (75%) and 40 (27%) patients, respectively. On multivariate analysis, ECMO as a bridge to LT (p = 0.04) and septic shock (p = 0.01) were independent risk factors for BAD. CONCLUSION: ECMO as a bridge to LT is an independent risk factor for BAD during the first 90 days after surgery. Close monitoring of bronchial conditions must be performed in these high-risk recipients.
Asunto(s)
Oxigenación por Membrana Extracorpórea , Trasplante de Pulmón , Humanos , Oxigenación por Membrana Extracorpórea/efectos adversos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Estudios Retrospectivos , Trasplante de Pulmón/efectos adversos , Factores de RiesgoRESUMEN
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Timely and adequate management are the key priorities in the care of peritonitis. This review focuses on the cornerstones of the medical support: source control and antiinfective therapies. RECENT FINDINGS: Peritonitis from community-acquired or healthcare-associated origins remains a frequent cause of admission to the ICU. Each minute counts for initiating the proper management. Late diagnosis and delayed medical care are associated to dramatically increased mortality rates. The diagnosis of peritonitis can be difficult in these ICU cases. The signs of organ failures are more relevant than biological surrogates. A delayed source control and a late anti-infective therapy are of critical importance. The quality of source control and medical management are other key elements of the prognosis. The conventional rules applied for sepsis are applicable for peritonitis, including hemodynamic support and anti-infective therapy. Growing proportions of multidrug resistant pathogens are reported from surgical samples, mainly related to Gram-negative bacteria. The increasing complexity in the care of these critically ill patients is a strong incentive for a multidisciplinary approach. SUMMARY: Early clinical diagnosis, timely and adequate source control and antiinfective therapy are the essential pillars of the management of peritonitis in ICU patients.
Asunto(s)
Peritonitis , Sepsis , Enfermedad Crítica , Humanos , Peritonitis/diagnóstico , Peritonitis/tratamiento farmacológico , PronósticoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Early pneumonia is an independent risk factor for 1-y mortality after lung transplantation (LTx). Pseudomonas aeruginosa is the most common isolate in early pneumonia and is also associated with an increased risk of chronic lung allograft dysfunction. The aim of our study was to evaluate the efficacy of secondary prophylaxis with inhaled colistin (IC) in preventing the recurrence of P aeruginosa or extended-spectrum ß-lactamase-producing Enterobacterales (ESBL-PE) pneumonia in the postoperative period in the intensive care unit after LTx. METHODS: We conducted a before-and-after retrospective cohort study by including all patients who underwent LTx between January 2015 and December 2020 in our center. Secondary prophylaxis with IC was instituted in January 2018 (observation period from January 2015 to December 2017, intervention period from January 2018 to December 2020). RESULTS: A total of 271 lung transplants were included (125 in the observation period and 146 in the intervention period). The patients were predominately male (64.2%) with a median age of 57 y and received double LTx (67.9%) for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease/emphysema (36.2%) or interstitial lung disease (48.3%). The proportion of patients who experienced at least 1 recurrence of P aeruginosa or ESBL-PE pneumonia was significantly lower in the intervention period than in the observation period (0.7% versus 7.2%, P = 0.007). CONCLUSIONS: Our study suggests a potential benefit of secondary prophylaxis with IC to prevent the recurrence of P aeruginosa or ESBL-PE pneumonia in the intensive care unit after LTx.
Asunto(s)
Trasplante de Pulmón , Neumonía , Humanos , Masculino , Pseudomonas aeruginosa , Colistina/uso terapéutico , Estudios Retrospectivos , beta-Lactamasas , Neumonía/prevención & control , Trasplante de Pulmón/efectos adversos , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos , Antibacterianos/uso terapéuticoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Tracheostomy has been proposed as an option to help organize the healthcare system to face the unprecedented number of patients hospitalized for a COVID-19-related acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) in intensive care units (ICU). It is, however, considered a particularly high-risk procedure for contamination. This paper aims to provide our experience in performing tracheostomies on COVID-19 critically ill patients during the pandemic and its long-term local complications. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data of patients tracheostomized for a COVID-19-related ARDS in two university hospitals in the Paris region between January 27th (date of first COVID-19 admission) and May 18th, 2020 (date of last tracheostomy performed). We focused on tracheostomy technique (percutaneous versus surgical), timing (early versus late) and late complications. RESULTS: Forty-eight tracheostomies were performed with an equal division between surgical and percutaneous techniques. There was no difference in patients' characteristics between surgical and percutaneous groups. Tracheostomy was performed after a median of 17 [12-22] days of mechanical ventilation (MV), with 10 patients in the "early" group (≤ day 10) and 38 patients in the "late" group (> day 10). Survivors required MV for a median of 32 [22-41] days and were ultimately decannulated with a median of 21 [15-34] days spent on cannula. Patients in the early group had shorter ICU and hospital stays (respectively 15 [12-19] versus 35 [25-47] days; p = 0.002, and 21 [16-28] versus 54 [35-72] days; p = 0.002) and spent less time on MV (respectively 17 [14-20] and 35 [27-43] days; p<0.001). Interestingly, patients in the percutaneous group had shorter hospital and rehabilitation center stays (respectively 44 [34-81] versus 92 [61-118] days; p = 0.012, and 24 [11-38] versus 45 [22-71] days; p = 0.045). Of the 30 (67%) patients examined by a head and neck surgeon, 17 (57%) had complications with unilateral laryngeal palsy (n = 5) being the most prevalent. CONCLUSIONS: Tracheostomy seems to be a safe procedure that could help ICU organization by delegating work to a separate team and favoring patient turnover by allowing faster transfer to step-down units. Following guidelines alone was found sufficient to prevent the risk of aerosolization and contamination of healthcare professionals.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19/cirugía , Traqueostomía/métodos , Anciano , COVID-19/mortalidad , COVID-19/terapia , Cuidados Críticos/métodos , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Hospitales Universitarios , Humanos , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos , Tiempo de Internación , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Paris , Personal de Hospital , Respiración Artificial , Estudios Retrospectivos , Traqueostomía/efectos adversos , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus2 has caused a global pandemic of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). High-density lipoproteins (HDLs), particles chiefly known for their reverse cholesterol transport function, also display pleiotropic properties, including anti-inflammatory or antioxidant functions. HDLs and low-density lipoproteins (LDLs) can neutralize lipopolysaccharides and increase bacterial clearance. HDL cholesterol (HDL-C) and LDL cholesterol (LDL-C) decrease during bacterial sepsis, and an association has been reported between low lipoprotein levels and poor patient outcomes. The goal of this study was to characterize the lipoprotein profiles of severe ICU patients hospitalized for COVID-19 pneumonia and to assess their changes during bacterial ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) superinfection. METHODS: A prospective study was conducted in a university hospital ICU. All consecutive patients admitted for COVID-19 pneumonia were included. Lipoprotein levels were assessed at admission and daily thereafter. The assessed outcomes were survival at 28 days and the incidence of VAP. RESULTS: A total of 48 patients were included. Upon admission, lipoprotein concentrations were low, typically under the reference values ([HDL-C] = 0.7[0.5-0.9] mmol/L; [LDL-C] = 1.8[1.3-2.3] mmol/L). A statistically significant increase in HDL-C and LDL-C over time during the ICU stay was found. There was no relationship between HDL-C and LDL-C concentrations and mortality on day 28 (log-rank p = 0.554 and p = 0.083, respectively). A comparison of alive and dead patients on day 28 did not reveal any differences in HDL-C and LDL-C concentrations over time. Bacterial VAP was frequent (64%). An association was observed between HDL-C and LDL-C concentrations on the day of the first VAP diagnosis and mortality ([HDL-C] = 0.6[0.5-0.9] mmol/L in survivors vs. [HDL-C] = 0.5[0.3-0.6] mmol/L in nonsurvivors, p = 0.036; [LDL-C] = 2.2[1.9-3.0] mmol/L in survivors vs. [LDL-C] = 1.3[0.9-2.0] mmol/L in nonsurvivors, p = 0.006). CONCLUSION: HDL-C and LDL-C concentrations upon ICU admission are low in severe COVID-19 pneumonia patients but are not associated with poor outcomes. However, low lipoprotein concentrations in the case of bacterial superinfection during ICU hospitalization are associated with mortality, which reinforces the potential role of these particles during bacterial sepsis.
Asunto(s)
HDL-Colesterol/sangre , LDL-Colesterol/sangre , Infecciones por Coronavirus/sangre , Neumonía Bacteriana/sangre , Neumonía Asociada al Ventilador/sangre , Neumonía Viral/sangre , Sobreinfección/sangre , Anciano , Betacoronavirus , COVID-19 , Infecciones por Coronavirus/mortalidad , Femenino , Francia , Hospitales Universitarios , Humanos , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pandemias , Neumonía Bacteriana/mortalidad , Neumonía Asociada al Ventilador/mortalidad , Neumonía Viral/mortalidad , Estudios Prospectivos , SARS-CoV-2RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: CD31 is a key transmembrane neutrophil immunoregulatory receptor. Mesenteric ischemia/reperfusion-induced neutrophil activation leads to a massive cleavage and shedding of the most extracellular domains of CD31 into plasma, enhancing the deleterious effect of neutrophil activation. We have evaluated the preventive therapeutic potential of an engineered synthetic octapeptide (P8RI), which restores the inhibitory intracellular signaling of cleaved CD31, in an experimental model of acute mesenteric ischemia/reperfusion. METHODS: In a randomized, controlled, and experimenter-blinded preclinical study, mesenteric ischemia/reperfusion (I/R) was induced in Wistar rats by superior mesenteric artery occlusion for 30 min followed by 4 h of reperfusion. Three groups of rats were compared: I/R + saline perfusion (I/R controls group, n = 7), I/R + preventive P8RI perfusion (P8RI group, n = 7), and sham-operated rats + saline perfusion (sham group, n = 7). RESULTS: Compared with I/R controls, P8RI perfusion significantly decreased intestinal ischemia/reperfusion injury (Chiu's score, P = 0.01; epithelial area, P = 0.001) and bacterial translocation (plasma Escherichia coli DNA, P = 0.04) and could limit intestinal bleeding (P = 0.09). P8RI decreased neutrophil activation assessed by matrix metalloproteinase-9 release in plasma (P < 0.001) and in the intestinal wall, albeit without statistical significance (P = 0.06 and P = 0.058 for myeloperoxydase). Inhibition of CD31 cleavage from neutrophils could play a major role in the protective effects of P8RI (P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Preventive administration of P8RI, a CD31-agonist peptide, could decrease I/R-induced intestinal injury by potentially limiting neutrophil activation.