Long-Term Air Pollution Exposure and COVID-19 Mortality: A Patient-Level Analysis from New York City.

Rationale: Risk factors for coronavirus disease (COVID-19) mortality may include environmental exposures such as air pollution. Objectives: To determine whether, among adults hospitalized with PCR-confirmed severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), long-term air pollution exposure is associated with the risk of mortality, ICU admission, or intubation. Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of SARS-CoV-2 PCR-positive patients admitted to seven New York City hospitals from March 8, 2020, to August 30, 2020. The primary outcome was mortality; secondary outcomes were ICU admission and intubation. We estimated the annual average fine particulate matter (particulate matter ⩽2.5 µm in aerodynamic diameter [PM2.5]), nitrogen dioxide (NO2), and black carbon (BC) concentrations at patients' residential address. We employed double robust Poisson regression to analyze associations between the annual average PM2.5, NO2, and BC exposure level and COVID-19 outcomes, adjusting for age, sex, race or ethnicity, hospital, insurance, and the time from the onset of the pandemic. Results: Among the 6,542 patients, 41% were female and the median age was 65 (interquartile range, 53-77) years. Over 50% self-identified as a person of color (n = 1,687 [26%] Hispanic patients; n = 1,659 [25%] Black patients). Air pollution exposure levels were generally low. Overall, 31% (n = 2,044) of the cohort died, 19% (n = 1,237) were admitted to the ICU, and 16% (n = 1,051) were intubated. In multivariable models, a higher level of long-term exposure to PM2.5 was associated with an increased risk of mortality (risk ratio, 1.11 [95% confidence interval, 1.02-1.21] per 1-µg/m3 increase in PM2.5) and ICU admission (risk ratio, 1.13 [95% confidence interval, 1.00-1.28] per 1-µg/m3 increase in PM2.5). In multivariable models, neither NO2 nor BC exposure was associated with COVID-19 mortality, ICU admission, or intubation. Conclusions: Among patients hospitalized with COVID-19, a higher long-term PM2.5 exposure level was associated with an increased risk of mortality and ICU admission.

Post-discharge Healthcare Usage and Costs From March 2020 Through the Omicron Surge for Individuals Hospitalized With COVID-19.

INTRODUCTION: Despite the rise of post-COVID care centers, few studies exist that quantify the burden of patient healthcare usage and hospital costs after COVID-19 hospitalization. It is essential to target post-COVID follow-up care to the individuals who need it most, such that costs and emergencies are minimized and health and appointment attendance are optimized. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort comparison among four groups of 50 patients (200 total). Post-discharge healthcare utilization metrics were collected for individuals hospitalized with COVID-19 during the first four surges of the pandemic to compare how patients receive and seek care in the year after they contract COVID-19. A brief cost analysis was done to identify high-usage groups that could be targeted for intervention to decrease post-COVID hospitalization emergencies and burden. RESULTS: Patients hospitalized during the Omicron surge were scheduled for the most specialist visits on average, significantly higher than average specialist visits in the Delta surge (p<0.05). The Delta surge had significantly less specialty care and missed visits than all other surges (p<0.05) and less primary care than the first two surges of the pandemic (p<0.05). Patients with type 2 diabetes and asthma had the highest overall costs (p<0.05). Females and Hispanic patients had the highest specialty and ED costs (p<0.05). CONCLUSION: Each surge reflects a different approach to post-COVID care, with the Omicron surge demonstrating the heaviest usage overall, particularly with specialty visits. Increased specialty referrals may exacerbate rates of missed appointments, while primary care may lower emergency visits. Future approaches to post-COVID care design should identify patients at risk for emergencies and reinstate them with primary care.

Changes in health-related quality of life and factors predicting long-term outcomes in older adults admitted to intensive care units.

OBJECTIVES: The aims of this study were to determine predictors of survival after hospital discharge and to describe the impact of intensive care unit admission on health-related quality of life at 6 months after hospital discharge in older adults admitted to intensive care units. DESIGN: Prospective longitudinal observational study with administered questionnaire. SETTINGS AND PATIENTS: Patients 65 yrs of age and older who were admitted to the medical, surgical, and coronary intensive care units for >24 hrs in a large urban teaching hospital system from August 2007 to May 2008 with a follow-up period ending April 2009. INTERVENTIONS: Administered questionnaire to patients or proxies. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Four hundred eighty-four patients 65 yrs old and older were enrolled. Data were collected on demographics, comorbidities, intensive care unit admission diagnoses, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II and Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score, Glasgow Coma Scale score at intensive care unit admission, intensive care unit interventions, and disposition after hospital discharge. A health-related quality of life survey was administered to patients, their proxies, or caregivers at intensive care unit admission, and to hospital survivors at 6 months after hospital discharge. Three hundred sixty-seven (75.8%) and 318 (65.7%) of enrolled patients were alive at hospital discharge and at 6 months, respectively. Mean age of survivors was 77.8 ± 8.5. Independent predictors of death at 6 months were: number of days during the 30 days before hospitalization that the patient felt their "physical health was not good" on the health-related quality of life survey [odds ratio = 1.08; confidence interval 1.04-1.12], a higher Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score [odds ratio = 1.09; 95% confidence interval 1.06-1.12], and chronic pulmonary disease as a comorbidity [odds ratio = 2.22; 95% confidence interval 1.04-4.78]. Of the 318 survivors at 6 months after hospital discharge, 297 (93.4%) completed the health-related quality of life questionnaire. When assessing whether changes in health-related quality of life over time were affected by age in our study cohort of 65 yrs old and older, we found that the oldest survivors, age 86.3 yrs old and older, had worse health-related quality of life over time, including more days spent with poor physical health (p < .004) and mental health (p < .001), while the youngest survivors, age 65-69.3 yrs old, showed improvement in health-related quality of life with fewer days spent with poor physical health (p < .004) and mental health (p < .001) at follow-up compared to baseline. These differences remained after adjusting for severity of illness and other potential confounders. CONCLUSIONS: One-third of adults 65 yrs old and older admitted to the intensive care unit die within 6 months of hospital discharge. Among survivors at 6 months, health-related quality of life has significantly worsened over time in the oldest patients but improved in the youngest. Our study in a large cohort of mixed intensive care unit patients identifies additional prognostic factors and significant quality of life information in intensive care unit survivors well after hospital discharge. This additional information may guide clinicians in their discussions with patients, families, and other providers as they decide on what treatments and interventions to pursue.

Utilization of Ocular Ultrasound in the Evaluation of Posterior Reversible Encephalopathy Syndrome: A Case Report.

Posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome (PRES) is an infrequently encountered cause of altered mental status and seizure activity in the emergency setting. Diagnosis is often delayed by extensive testing and failure to consider PRES in the differential. Though MRI remains the gold standard for diagnosis, ultrasound-guided measurement of intra-ocular pressure is a safe, effective alternative that can expedite the diagnosis. The treatment of PRES involves the rapid reversal of offending agents and aggressive blood pressure management. The prognosis of PRES is favorable and neurologic sequelae are uncommon. This clinical case highlights the importance of the emergency physicians' consideration of this pathology and the utilization of ultrasound as a non-invasive means of assessing intra-ocular pressure.