Outcomes for ulnar collateral ligament reconstruction: a retrospective review using the KJOC assessment score with two-year follow-up in an overhead throwing population.

BACKGROUND: Injury to the ulnar collateral ligament (UCL) often results in valgus elbow instability requiring reconstruction. No standardized and validated outcome measure has compared outcomes between surgical techniques and institutions in the overhead throwing athlete. The aim of this study was to use the Kerlan-Jobe Orthopaedic Clinic shoulder and elbow score (KJOC score) to report functional outcomes in overhead throwing athletes undergoing UCL reconstruction. We predict that the KJOC score in our general throwing population will provide an accurate assessment of postoperative outcomes consistent with previously published reports. METHODS: A retrospective review of 33 patients undergoing UCL reconstruction was carried out during a 5-year period between 2004 and 2009. Minimum follow-up was 2.2 years with an average of 3.7 years. All surgeries were performed by fellowship-trained surgeons using either the docking (n = 12) or modified Jobe technique (n = 21). Age, sport, position, and return to play status were obtained. The KJOC score was administered to assess final functional outcome. RESULTS: A total of 33 athletes underwent UCL reconstruction-30 baseball players and 3 javelin throwers. Of these, 27 (82%) returned to their sport at their previous level in an average of 12.25 months. The overall average KJOC score was 76. Athletes who returned to their previous level of play had a mean KJOC score of 77. Those who were unable to return to play had a mean score of 69. CONCLUSION: Our study demonstrates consistent outcomes for UCL reconstruction using the KJOC shoulder and elbow score compared with previously reported data.

A Telemedicine Solution to Minimize Unnecessary Emergency Department Transfers for Low-acuity Pediatric Orthopaedic Patients: A Model for Cost Minimization.

INTRODUCTION: Unnecessary emergency department (ED) transfers represent a notable source of excess costs and misutilization of healthcare resources, particularly with management of acute pediatric musculoskeletal injuries. This study used institutional data to create a model investigating the expected costs of a formal peer-to-peer telemedicine intervention designed to triage pediatric orthopaedic transfers, which we hypothesized would decrease healthcare costs by minimizing unwarranted ED-to-ED transfers. METHODS: In this retrospective modeling analysis, 350 pediatric orthopaedic trauma patients transferred to two in-network referral hospitals from outside facilities were identified and stratified into three groups representing how patients theoretically optimally could have been treated. Group 1 patients required ambulance transfer, group 2 patients required ED-level care but no ambulance transfer, and group 3 patients did not require ED-level care. Base case estimates for the proportions of patients in each group, probability of ambulance transport, and direct costs of care for each patient were derived from the database. A decision tree was developed to evaluate the expected costs of two triaging strategies: (1) transfer everyone or (2) triage first using e-consultation. Probabilistic sensitivity analyses were used to determine how the results of the decision analysis varied across ranges of cost and probability estimates. RESULTS: In the base case analysis, the telemedicine triage strategy was cheaper than the transfer-all strategy ($4,858 versus $6,610). In a 2-way sensitivity analysis comparing cost of a telemedicine visit and proportion of telemedicine triaged patients requiring ambulance transport, the telemedicine triage strategy remained cheaper than the transfer-all strategy across almost all possibilities for both variables. Additional potential benefits of triage before transfer, such as decreased length of time to completion of ED visit, cost to the family, and patient comfort and satisfaction, were not incorporated into this analysis. The potential for misdiagnosis related to telehealth and its potential costs were not included. DISCUSSION: We revealed substantial cost savings for the healthcare system from implementing a telehealth platform for peer-to-peer consultation when considering patient transfer for musculoskeletal trauma. Initial peer-to-peer e-consultations cost less than reflexive ambulance transfer in most situations. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Economic Level II.

Incidence of Delayed Diagnosis of Orthopaedic Injury in Pediatric Trauma Patients.

OBJECTIVE: Determine the incidence of the delayed diagnosis of orthopaedic injuries in pediatric trauma patients. DESIGN: Cross-sectional retrospective analysis. SETTING: Level I pediatric trauma center. PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS: All patients with an orthopaedic consultation after a trauma activation with a diagnosis of fracture, dislocation, traumatic arthrotomy, neurovascular injury, amputation, and tendon or ligament injury requiring intervention. A total of 1009 trauma codes and alerts occurred during the study period, of which 196 patients were diagnosed with an orthopaedic injury. INTERVENTION: Charts were reviewed to obtain demographic information, time of presentation, Glasgow Coma Score (GCS) on presentation, injury severity score (ISS), mechanism of injury, intubation status, length of intensive care unit and hospital stay, primary and secondary survey diagnoses, discharge diagnoses, time of additional diagnoses, and reason for delayed diagnosis. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Incidence of delayed diagnosis of injury (DDI). RESULTS: There were 196 patients with a confirmed orthopaedic injury, of which, 18 were classified as a delayed diagnosis (9.18%). The mean time to detection of injury was 77.46 hours and the mean patient age was 132.22 months. One of the 18 patients required surgical intervention while the rest were treated conservatively. The mean GCS score of patients with a DDI were significantly lower than patients without a missed injury, 12 versus 14.19 (P = 0.0009). The median ISS, 21 versus 9 (P = 0.0021), and median hospital length of stay, 4 days versus 3 days (P = 0.0369) were significantly higher for patients with a missed injury compared with those without a missed injury. The intensive care unit length of stay approached significance with a median of 2 days for patients with a missed injury versus 1 day for patients without a missed injury (P = 0.057). CONCLUSIONS: In our study, factors that were associated with a DDI included lower GCS, higher ISS, and greater hospital length of stay. There was only 1 missed injury that required surgical intervention, and the remainder were treated conservatively. The initial evaluation of the trauma patient is able to detect life-threatening injuries, but the tertiary survey remains an important part of patient care to detect missed injuries. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.