Toxicological screening in the Amsterdam acute setting becomes more relevant if the standard panel of the drugs-of-abuse point-of-care test is expanded with GHB and ketamine.

OBJECTIVE: For diagnosis and treatment in the acute setting, it is crucial to know whether the clinical status of patients might be explained by the effects of drugs.The objective of this study was to determine how many drugs were detected by comprehensive toxicological screening, that could not be detected with a routine drugs-of-abuse point-of-care test (DOA-POCT) and which drugs of abuse (DOA) were relevant. A secondary objective was to determine in how many patients comprehensive toxicological screening provided additional clinically relevant information. METHODS: In this prospective study, patients were included in whom a DOA-POCT was performed and residual urine and serum samples were available.DOA-POCT were performed using the Triage® TOX Drug Screen. Comprehensive toxicological screening was performed using 1) the Toxtyper™ LC-MSN method and 2) two GC-FID methods for alcohols and GHB respectively.The clinical relevance of the comprehensive toxicological screening results regarding diagnosis and patient management was quantified. RESULTS: A total of 100 patients were included. In 91 of these patients, comprehensive toxicological screening identified 234 drugs that were not identified by DOA-POCT. However, DOA-POCT identified 34 DOA that were not identified by comprehensive toxicological screening.Seven percent of comprehensive toxicological screening results were found to be clinically relevant, all with regard to diagnosis. GHB and ketamine were the drugs involved. Another 38 % strengthened confidence in diagnosis and patient care decisions. CONCLUSION: GHB and ketamine should be added to the panel of drugs we screen at the point of care in the Amsterdam acute setting.

Clinical value of drugs of abuse point of care testing in an emergency department setting.

OBJECTIVE: Toxicology screening tests for drugs-of-abuse and therapeutic drugs in urine (TST-U) are often used to assess whether a patient's clinical condition can be explained by the use of drugs-of-abuse (DOA) and/or therapeutic drugs. TST-U have clinical value when they support clinical decision making by influencing diagnosis and patient care. We aim to quantify the influence of TST-U results on diagnosis and patient care in an emergency department. Our secondary objective is to identify specific patients for which a TST-U is most warranted or mostly unhelpful. METHODS: This prospective observational study was performed at the emergency department of a middle-sized urban teaching hospital. A point of care TST-U has been used in this department for three years. When a TST-U is considered indicated by a physician, the influence of the TST-U result on diagnosis and patient care is quantified before and after the test results are available, by means of a questionnaire. Urgency and complaints upon admission have also been registered. RESULTS: Of 100 TST-U results 37% were reported having a substantial influence on diagnosis and 25% on patient care. TST-U had a substantial influence on diagnosis in 48% of patients with decreased consciousness, 47% of patients with psychiatric symptoms and in 47% of patients with "other" complaints. In this last category patients with neurological symptoms benefited most. In patients who were already suspected to be intoxicated, only 18% of the TST-U results had substantial influence on diagnosis. CONCLUSIONS: The use of point of care TST-U in an Emergency Department helps physicians to understand the clinical condition of a patient. They influence the way a patient is treated to a lesser extent. These tests are most helpful in patients with decreased consciousness, psychiatric or neurological symptoms and mostly unhelpful in patients who, upon admission, are already known to be intoxicated.

[Automutilation after consumption of hallucinogenic mushrooms]. / Automutilatie na gebruik van hallucinogene paddenstoelen.

Two young men, 25 and 32 years old, presented with severe automutilation by knife wounds after consumption of hallucinogenic mushrooms. The first patient had also used cocaine, cannabis and alcohol, while the second patient had only used the hallucinogenic mushrooms. Both patients were treated symptomatically and survived despite their severe stab wounds. Psilocybin-containing mushrooms are used as mind-altering drugs. These drugs may sometimes induce 'bad trips', a psychotic reaction accompanied by fear, panic, and dangerous behaviour, especially when used in combination with other drugs and alcohol or by psychiatrically unstable patients. During a bad trip, patients may hurt themselves. Because the duration of the psychotic and sympathicomimetic effects of psilocybin after ingestion of mushrooms is short (up to 6 h), and since psilocin itself causes no permanent organ toxicity, the treatment of psilocybin intoxication is only symptomatic. The diagnosis ofpsilocybin intoxication is hampered by the lack of routinely available, rapid and sensitive, analytical methods for the quantification ofpsilocybin and its active metabolite psilocin.