Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
1.
J Med Assoc Thai ; 90(11): 2271-6, 2007 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18181306

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The medical students' knowledge about basic medical neuroscience in the preclinical level may be fragmented and incomplete. OBJECTIVE: Evaluate the knowledge of students prior to a lecture on epilepsy in clinical level. MATERIAL AND METHOD: One hundred ten fourth-year medical students' knowledge was accessed by a self-administered questionnaire. RESULTS: The presented results revealed that 91.8% of respondents knew that epilepsy arose from a transient dysfunction in the brain. Generalized tonic-clonic seizures (GTCs) were the most common type (91.5%) they knew and absence seizures were the least common type (33.6%) they knew. All of them knew that eating pork and punishment of gods did not cause epilepsy. However 50% thought that genetics was a cause and 80.3% did not know that stroke and sleep deprivation (92.7%) cause epilepsy. About treatment and prognosis, only 28.2% of respondents thought epilepsy can be cured and patients should take antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) for seizure free 2-5 years (48.2%), life long (33.6%). They knew that the patients should be prohibited from driving (80%), working on machinery (74.5%), and (27.3%) avoid drinking. However, they knew that the patients could marry (100%), get pregnant (98.2%), and lactate (91.9%). Regarding the first aid management, 50.9% of them recommended that placing a piece of wood between the teeth during a seizure and perform chest compressions (20.0%). Means knowledge scores is about 60%, the highest score is the definition of epilepsy (90.2%) and the lowest is type of seizure (43%). CONCLUSION: The findings indicated that lecturers should review aspects ofpathophysiology and emphasize on type of seizure, cause, consequences, and prognosis including first-aid management.


Asunto(s)
Educación de Pregrado en Medicina , Epilepsia/fisiopatología , Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , Estudiantes de Medicina , Adulto , Actitud del Personal de Salud , Recolección de Datos , Epilepsia/tratamiento farmacológico , Epilepsia/etiología , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Pronóstico , Factores de Riesgo , Autoevaluación (Psicología) , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
2.
J Med Assoc Thai ; 90(12): 2597-600, 2007 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18386708

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Refractory status epilepticus (RSE), defined as status epilepticus that fails to respond to first, second and third-line therapy. The RSE is associated with high morbidity and mortality. Treatment guidelines of RSE give a spectrum of options, such as, continuous intravenous (i.v.) midazolam (MDL), or continuous i.v. propofol (PRO) as alternatives to phenobarbital (PB) or continuous i.v. pentobarbital (PTB). OBJECTIVE: To study the efficacy of very-high-dose phenobarbital (VHDPB) for treatment RSE. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective study MATERIAL AND METHOD: The authors collected and analyzed data from adult patients who were diagnosed with RSE. RESULTS: The authors present 10 patients with RSE who were treated with VHDPB. All of them were generalized convulsive status epilepticus (GCSE). Ages ranged from 16-86 years old (mean.: 43 years). PB dosage ranged 40-140 mg/kg/day (mean: 70 mg/kg/day). The duration of status epilepticus (SE) varied widely, ranged 1-44 days (mean: 7 days). PB level ranged 35.29-218.34 ug/mL (mean 88.1 ug/mL). RSE was controlled by VHDPB 70%, 30% were not controlled. CONCLUSION: VHDPB were considered as alternative treatment for RSE.


Asunto(s)
Anticonvulsivantes/uso terapéutico , Fenobarbital/uso terapéutico , Estado Epiléptico/tratamiento farmacológico , Insuficiencia del Tratamiento , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Anticonvulsivantes/administración & dosificación , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Fenobarbital/administración & dosificación , Recurrencia , Estudios Retrospectivos
3.
J Neurol Sci ; 285(1-2): 59-61, 2009 Oct 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19520389

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: The clinical risk factors for seizure-related injuries (SRI) in adult persons with epilepsy (PWE) were studied and analyzed to develop a predictive model. METHODS: We enrolled 300 consecutive cases from three epilepsy clinics in Northeast, Thailand. Subjects were eligible if reported to have at least one seizure attack during the past 12 months. Face-to-face questionnaire was used to evaluate SRI, baseline characteristics and other seizure-related variables. RESULTS: There were 247 and 91 PWE who met a criterion and had SRI, respectively. By multivariate logistic regression method, GTC seizure type, having history of seizure attacks at least 12 times/year, and daytime seizure were significant risk factors of having SRI with odds ratio of 2.376, 2.460, and 3.562, respectively. We developed the predictive model for having SRI in PWE and it gave 90.3% sensitivity and 46.7% specificity on the occurrence of SRI. The estimated probability of SRI can be found online at http://sribykku.webs.com/. CONCLUSIONS: The significant predictive factors for SRI in PWE were the occurrence of GTCs, seizures at least 12 times/year or daytime seizures. Clinicians or PWE can easily evaluate the risk of having SRI in individuals by the online predictive model.


Asunto(s)
Epilepsia/diagnóstico , Modelos Estadísticos , Convulsiones/diagnóstico , Heridas y Lesiones/diagnóstico , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anticonvulsivantes/uso terapéutico , Epilepsia/tratamiento farmacológico , Epilepsia/epidemiología , Femenino , Humanos , Internet , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Fotoperiodo , Factores de Riesgo , Convulsiones/tratamiento farmacológico , Convulsiones/epidemiología , Sensibilidad y Especificidad , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Factores de Tiempo , Heridas y Lesiones/epidemiología , Heridas y Lesiones/prevención & control , Adulto Joven
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA