Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 12 de 12
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Arch Ital Urol Androl ; 83(3): 163-5, 2011 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22184842

RESUMEN

A 78-year-old Caucasian man was referred to our department because of an incidental unilateral mass involving the right renal sinus. As the patient showed no urological disease at flexible ureterorenoscopy, a subsequent percutaneous CT-targeted biopsy was mandatory, confirming an aggressive non-Hodgkin disease involving the renal pelvis that is, to the best of our knowledge, the second reported case in literature. A whole body FDG-PET excluded multiple expression of this disease, and the patient underwent a chemotherapeutic scheme resulting in a stable marked reduction in tumor volume. To the date, the available experience on the management and outcome of such cases is extremely lean. In this scenario, our case can contribute to shorten the time-to-diagnosis by reporting a complete images overview comprising abdominal CT scan, MRI and FDG-PET-CT, hence making this clinical entity easier presumable in clinical daily practice and offering a possible suggestion for an effective treatment.


Asunto(s)
Carcinoma de Células Transicionales/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Renales/diagnóstico , Pelvis Renal/diagnóstico por imagen , Linfoma no Hodgkin/diagnóstico , Anciano , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Errores Diagnósticos , Fluorodesoxiglucosa F18 , Humanos , Hallazgos Incidentales , Linfoma no Hodgkin/patología , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética , Masculino , Invasividad Neoplásica , Tomografía de Emisión de Positrones/métodos , Radiofármacos , Riesgo , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X , Resultado del Tratamiento
2.
Crit Rev Oncol Hematol ; 66(2): 163-70, 2008 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18243726

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To evaluate management and outcome of patients >or=70 years admitted to our Medical Oncology ward and evaluated by Multidimensional Geriatric Assessment before treatment with standard or "elderly-friendly" chemotherapy regimens, a list of which was developed within our Geriatric Oncology Program based on published clinical trials and personal experience. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Charts of patients treated from January 2004 to January 2006 were reviewed for choice of treatment, tumor response, toxicities and survival. RESULTS: 117 patients (median age 75 years) were divided into Frail (F) (34.2%) and Not-Frail patients (NF: 33.3% Fit plus 32.5% Vulnerable). The two groups did not differ according to the use of "elderly-friendly"chemotherapy regimens (40% of F pts and 39% of NF pts), dose reductions >or=25% (37.5% vs. 31.2%) and grade 3-4 toxicities (52.5% vs. 58.4%). Early interruption of treatment due to toxicity or patient's refusal (42.5 vs. 15.6, p=0.001) and deaths within 30 days from last chemotherapy administration (22.5% vs. 3.9%, p=0.003) were significantly different. F patients showed clinical or radiological response in 21.2% of cases, and subjective improvement in 22.6%. After a median follow-up of 19 months, median survival of F patients (6.4 months) is shorter compared to NF group (16.9 months, p=0.012). CONCLUSIONS: The use of "elderly-friendly"chemotherapy regimens was limited to less than a half of cases. F patients may respond to chemotherapy but display higher rates of premature withdrawal and early deaths compared to NF patients, with a shorter survival. Clinical trials particularly aimed at frail patients are urgently needed.


Asunto(s)
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Anciano Frágil , Evaluación Geriátrica , Servicios de Salud para Ancianos , Oncología Médica , Neoplasias/tratamiento farmacológico , Evaluación de Procesos y Resultados en Atención de Salud , Selección de Paciente , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efectos adversos , Femenino , Hospitales , Humanos , Italia , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier , Masculino , Neoplasias/mortalidad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento
3.
Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol ; 18(10): 1065-70, 2006 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16957512

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorders represent an increasingly important complication of organ transplantation. Although the majority of the post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder are etiologically related to Epstein-Barr virus infection other factors may play a role. Hepatitis C virus may induce clonal expansion of B-lymphocytes and has been associated with extrahepatic lymphoproliferative disorders. OBJECTIVES: In this study, we have evaluated: (i) the prevalence of post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder; (ii) presence of Epstein-Barr virus in post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder tissue; and (iii) the potential association between post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder development and hepatitis C virus infection in a large cohort of adult solid organ transplant recipients. METHODS: The study involved 1011 liver, heart and kidney-transplanted patients. Different immunosuppression therapy was recorded from all patients, all were screened for hepatitis C virus infection. When post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder developed, Epstein-Barr virus encoded RNA by in-situ hybridization and EBNA-1 and gp220 by polymerase chain reaction was assessed in tissue samples. RESULTS: The overall prevalence of post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder was 1.4% (2.5% in heart, 0.9% in liver and 0.8% in kidney-transplanted patients) and significantly higher in hepatitis C virus positive than in hepatitis C virus negative patients (3.6 % vs 1.2 %; P=0.04). Epstein-Barr virus was present in 10 (77%) out of 13 tumors tested. Two out of three Epstein-Barr virus-negative post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder developed in hepatitis C virus-positive patients. Thirteen out of 15 (86%) post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder patients had undergone antithymocyte globulin/OKT3 induction therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Epstein-Barr virus, induction immunosuppression, rejection therapy and also hepatitis C virus infection may play a role in the multifactorial pathogenesis of post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder.


Asunto(s)
Hepatitis C/complicaciones , Linfoma/virología , Trasplante de Órganos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/virología , Adulto , Anciano , Métodos Epidemiológicos , Infecciones por Virus de Epstein-Barr/complicaciones , Femenino , Rechazo de Injerto/tratamiento farmacológico , Trasplante de Corazón , Enfermedad de Hodgkin/virología , Humanos , Terapia de Inmunosupresión/métodos , Trasplante de Riñón , Trasplante de Hígado , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad
4.
Crit Rev Oncol Hematol ; 53(3): 253-65, 2005 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15718150

RESUMEN

Although Kaposi's sarcoma (KS) has decreased in countries where the highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) regimen is available, however it remains, after non-Hodgkin's lymphomas, the most common malignancy in HIV+ patients. Advances in the treatment of AIDS-KS have been achieved, even though a gold standard therapy has not been yet defined. With the availability of HAART, a dramatic KS clinical response has been documented, making HAART essential in all patients. In case of aggressive and/or life threatening KS, more complex therapeutic schedules have to be taken into account, including chemotherapy and/or immunotherapy. Liposomal anthracyclines and paclitaxel have been approved by FDA as first line and second line mono-therapy, respectively. Interferon-alpha (INF-alpha) is the only immunomodulant agent to have shown a therapeutic effect. Among the new drugs, many antiangiogenetic agents have produced encouraging responses. Finally, the identification of the HHV-8 as a causative agent and new metalloproteinase inhibitors may offer promising targets for the KS treatment.


Asunto(s)
Síndrome de Inmunodeficiencia Adquirida/complicaciones , Sarcoma de Kaposi/terapia , Algoritmos , Inhibidores de la Angiogénesis/uso terapéutico , Antivirales/uso terapéutico , Manejo de la Enfermedad , Humanos , Sarcoma de Kaposi/etiología
5.
Int J Oncol ; 27(3): 779-85, 2005 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16077928

RESUMEN

The long-term impact of highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) in AIDS patients with Kaposi's sarcoma (KS) was evaluated in 22 consecutive, HAART-naïve KS patients attending a single Italian referral centre for HIV/AIDS. Clinical, virologic and immunologic responses to HAART were assessed at baseline and every three months during the follow-up. Peripheral blood mononuclear cell (PBMC)-associated human herpesvirus 8 (HHV-8) load was also evaluated by real-time PCR in 13 patients with durable clinical KS complete response (CR). In a median follow-up of 40 months (range 17-78), the KS overall clinical response rate was 91%: 18 complete and 2 partial responses were achieved, and two patients experienced disease progression. CR persisted in all 18 patients, including the 5 poor-risk KS patients in whom CR lasted for > 60 months, and was significantly linked to an increase in CD4+ cell counts and a drop in HIV-1-RNA copies. Compared to baseline levels, a decrease in PBMC HHV-8 load was observed at CR, and a significant further reduction was found at the end of follow-up. In this monocentric study, AIDS-KS patients treated with HAART showed high clinical response rate. Patients with CR showed a prolonged remission, lasting more than 5 years in a group of poor-risk patients, and a persistent reduction in circulating HHV-8-infected cells. These findings highlight that HAART deeply modifies the natural history of this tumour in AIDS patients, and that this long-lasting approach may be considered a first-line treatment for the majority of HIV-1-infected patients developing KS.


Asunto(s)
Infecciones Oportunistas Relacionadas con el SIDA/tratamiento farmacológico , Fármacos Anti-VIH/uso terapéutico , Terapia Antirretroviral Altamente Activa , Sarcoma de Kaposi/tratamiento farmacológico , Adulto , Recuento de Linfocito CD4 , ADN Viral/sangre , Estudios de Seguimiento , VIH-1/efectos de los fármacos , VIH-1/genética , Herpesvirus Humano 8/efectos de los fármacos , Herpesvirus Humano 8/genética , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , ARN Viral/sangre , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento
6.
Expert Opin Investig Drugs ; 13(5): 501-13, 2004 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15155125

RESUMEN

Kaposi's sarcoma (KS) is the most common cancer associated with AIDS. KS aetiology and pathogenesis are still poorly defined and no definitive treatment has yet been identified. However, the introduction in 1996 of highly active antiretroviral therapy as a standard of care for those infected with HIV-1 determined a strong protection against the development of opportunistic infections, as well as a remission of pre-existing complications, including KS. Under highly active antiretroviral therapy, KS in particular has shown the highest clinical response rate reported to date among AIDS patients. Furthermore, recent insights into the pathogenetic mechanisms involved in KS development have provided new hope for a response and improved survival in patients with AIDS-related KS. This paper presents an overview of the current knowledge concerning pharmacological approaches to treating this disease. Newer treatments such as PEGylated liposomal anthracyclin, paclitaxel and pathogenesis-based strategies are also discussed.


Asunto(s)
Infecciones Oportunistas Relacionadas con el SIDA/tratamiento farmacológico , Sarcoma de Kaposi/tratamiento farmacológico , Fármacos Anti-VIH/uso terapéutico , Antineoplásicos/uso terapéutico , Terapia Antirretroviral Altamente Activa/métodos , Terapia Antirretroviral Altamente Activa/tendencias , Ensayos Clínicos Fase II como Asunto , Ensayos Clínicos Fase III como Asunto , Método Doble Ciego , Humanos , Estudios Multicéntricos como Asunto , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Estudios Retrospectivos
8.
Crit Rev Oncol Hematol ; 79(2): 127-34, 2011 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20696592

RESUMEN

Central Nervous System (CNS) involvement in lymphoma can occur whether at diagnosis or, more often, at the progression or recurrence of disease and the most frequent clinical manifestation is lymphomatous meningitis (LM). The first risk factor for LM development is the histotype, with the highest incidence for highly aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphomas (NHL) such as Burkitt's lymphoma (BL) and lymphoblastic lymphoma/acute lymphoblastic leukemia (LBL/ALL) and the lowest for indolent NHL. LM prophylaxis in aggressive NHL (other than BL and LBL/ALL) is a much debated question, because the identification of specific risk factors remains controversial. Moreover, there is not a consensus if the LM prophylaxis should consist of systemic chemotherapy (CT), intrathecal (i.t.) CT or both. In case of LM, the i.t. CT has a key role, but there is not a consensus on treatment schedule. Newer intensified regimens and rituximab lead to reconsider the whole approach to LM.


Asunto(s)
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/administración & dosificación , Inyecciones Espinales/métodos , Linfoma no Hodgkin/tratamiento farmacológico , Meninges/patología , Leucemia-Linfoma Linfoblástico de Células Precursoras/tratamiento farmacológico , Anticuerpos Monoclonales de Origen Murino/administración & dosificación , Neoplasias del Sistema Nervioso Central/secundario , Ciclofosfamida/administración & dosificación , Doxorrubicina/administración & dosificación , Esquema de Medicación , Humanos , Inmunocompetencia , Huésped Inmunocomprometido , Infiltración Leucémica , Linfoma no Hodgkin/diagnóstico , Linfoma no Hodgkin/inmunología , Linfoma no Hodgkin/patología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Leucemia-Linfoma Linfoblástico de Células Precursoras/diagnóstico , Leucemia-Linfoma Linfoblástico de Células Precursoras/inmunología , Leucemia-Linfoma Linfoblástico de Células Precursoras/patología , Prednisona/administración & dosificación , Recurrencia , Factores de Riesgo , Rituximab , Vincristina/administración & dosificación
9.
Int J Hematol ; 94(5): 461-2, 2011 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21993875

RESUMEN

A 63-year-old man was admitted to our Oncology department for management of a follicular non-Hodgkin lymphoma, stage IV A FLIPI 5. The patient entered chemotherapy following the R-CHOP schedule, and a PET scan after three cycles showed partial remission. One week later he was admitted to our hospital after developing serious pain in his left arm resulting in an impaired function, right facial hemiplegia, and ophthalmoplegia. Neuroimaging studies and laboratory features were negative. Given his symptoms, we suspected Miller Fisher syndrome and the patient was administered high dose immunoglobulin, but showed no improvement. Finally, chemotherapy with methotrexate 3 g/mq was initiated, but his condition progressively worsened and the patient died 2 months later. We suggest that any patient with neurological symptoms who has received rituximab should undergo PCR analysis for all neurotropic viruses together with neurophysiological and neuroimaging studies.


Asunto(s)
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efectos adversos , Linfoma no Hodgkin/tratamiento farmacológico , Enfermedades del Sistema Nervioso/etiología , Anticuerpos Monoclonales de Origen Murino/administración & dosificación , Anticuerpos Monoclonales de Origen Murino/efectos adversos , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/administración & dosificación , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Ciclofosfamida/administración & dosificación , Ciclofosfamida/efectos adversos , Doxorrubicina/administración & dosificación , Doxorrubicina/efectos adversos , Resultado Fatal , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Prednisona/administración & dosificación , Prednisona/efectos adversos , Rituximab , Síndrome , Vincristina/administración & dosificación , Vincristina/efectos adversos
10.
Oncologist ; 12(1): 79-89, 2007 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17227903

RESUMEN

The hypothesis that increasing cytotoxic dose intensity will improve cancer cure rates is compelling. Although supporting evidence for this hypothesis has accrued for several tumor types, including lymphomas, breast cancer, and testicular cancers, it remains unproven. Small-cell lung cancer is extremely chemo- and radiosensitive, with a response rate of 80% achieved routinely, but few patients are cured by chemoradiotherapy. In this setting, increased cytotoxic dose intensity might improve cure rates. The finding that response rates in small-cell lung cancer correlate with received cytotoxic dose intensity merely confirms that "less is worse" and "more is better." Within conventional ranges, dose intensity can be increased with the support of hematopoietic growth factors and/or by shortening treatments intervals; however, dose intensity could be increased by only 20%-30%, and a survival advantage has not been clearly demonstrated. Given its high chemosensitivity, small-cell lung cancer was one of the first malignancies deemed suitable for increasing dose intensity and even for the use of a megadose with the support of autologous bone marrow transplantation. Some interest is emerging again due to improvements in supportive care, such as the availability of hematopoietic growth factors and peripheral blood progenitor cells.


Asunto(s)
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/administración & dosificación , Carcinoma de Células Pequeñas/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Pulmonares/tratamiento farmacológico , Antineoplásicos/administración & dosificación , Carcinoma de Células Pequeñas/epidemiología , Relación Dosis-Respuesta a Droga , Esquema de Medicación , Factores de Crecimiento de Célula Hematopoyética/administración & dosificación , Humanos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/epidemiología , Resultado del Tratamiento
11.
Scand J Infect Dis ; 36(2): 155-7, 2004.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15061675
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA