Vigilance Data in Organ Donation and Solid Organ Transplantation in Germany: Six Years of Experience 2016-2022.

The reporting of serious adverse events (SAE) and serious adverse reactions (SAR) is an essential part of an effective vigilance and surveillance system (V&S) in organ donation and transplantation. All SAE and SAR reported to the German organ procurement organization (DSO) between 2016 and 2022 were analyzed. In case of a possible transmission of a disease to one or more recipients, an assessment of imputability was done according to the grading system of the US Disease Transmission Advisory Committee (DTAC). 543 SAE and SAR cases were reported to the DSO and analyzed in detail. 53 of the 543 reports (9.8%) were proven or probable (P/P) transmissions of infectious diseases, malignancies or other diseases to 75 recipients. Infections were the most frequently reported P/P disease transmission occurrences (30/53, 57%). In case of disease transmission, the mortality of the recipients was high (17/75, 23%), especially when a malignant disease was transmitted (11/22, 50 %). Donor-Derived disease transmission is a rare event (53/8,519; 0.6 %), but when it occurs can lead to significant morbidity and mortality.

[Anaesthesiological management of postmortem organ donors - What Evidence is Out There?] / Anästhesiologisches Management von postmortalen Organspendern.

The transplantation of organs from postmortem organ donors has been a lifesaving and quality-of-life-improving therapy for patients with irreversible organ failure for many years. In Germany, however, there has been an imbalance between the number of organs donated postmortem and the number of patients on the waiting list for years. The anesthesiological management of multiple organ harvesting (MOE) in postmortem organ donors is not an everyday challenge for various reasons: A lack of practical expertise due to the small number of MOE, even at university hospitals (usually < 20 per year), complex pathophysiological changes in the cardiovascular system and other organ functions of the postmortem organ donor and the lack of guidelines complicate anesthesiological management. This paper compiles the existing literature and reviews whether evidence-based recommendations can be derived for anesthesiologic management for MOE.

[Intensive care treatment for neuroleptic malignant syndrome]. / Intensivmedizinisches Management des malignen neuroleptischen Syndroms. Literaturübersicht mit Fallbeispiel.

We report a case of severe neuroleptic malignant syndrome developing in a 28-year-old female patient following deliberate self-poisoning with atypical antipsychotic drugs and serotonin reuptake inhibitors. Because of an increasing loss of consciousness she was rapidly transferred to an Intensive Care Unit. Following this, she became progressively febrile associated with rhabdomyolysis and life-threatening organ dysfunctions. Due to fast diagnosis and immediate therapy the patient was treated successfully. This article describes etiology, pathophysiology and symptoms of neuroleptic malignant syndrome. In addition therapeutic options are discussed.

Organ-Protective Intensive Care in Organ Donors.

BACKGROUND: The ascertainment of brain death (the irreversible, total loss of brain function) gives the physician the opportunity to limit or stop further treatment. Alternatively, if the brain-dead individual is an organ donor, the mode of treatment can be changed from patient-centered to donationcentered. Consensus-derived recommendations for the organ-protective treatment of brain-dead organ donors are not yet available in Germany. METHODS: This review is based on pertinent publications retrieved by a selective search in PubMed, and on the authors' clinical experience. RESULTS: Brain death causes major pathophysiological changes, including an increase in catecholamine levels and a sudden drop in the concentration of multiple hormones, among them antidiuretic hormone, cortisol, insulin, and triand tetraiodothyronine. These changes affect the function of all organ systems, as well as the hemodynamic state and the regulation of body temperature. The use of standardized donor management protocols might well increase the rate of transplanted organs per donor and improve the quality of the transplanted organs. In addition, the administration of methylprednisolone, desmopressin, and vasopressin could be a useful supplement to treatment in some cases. Randomized controlled trials have not yet demonstrated either improved organ function or prolonged survival of the transplant recipients. CONCLUSION: The evidence base for organ-protective intensive care is weak; most of the available evidence is on the level of expert opinion. There is good reason to believe, however, that the continuation of intensive care, in the sense of early donor management, can make organ transplantation more successful both by increasing the number of transplantable organs and by improving organ quality.