Wound infection following implant removal of foot, ankle, lower leg or patella; a protocol for a multicenter randomized controlled trial investigating the (cost-)effectiveness of 2 g of prophylactic cefazolin compared to placebo (WIFI-2 trial).

BACKGROUND: Elective implant removal (IR) after fracture fixation is one of the most common procedures within (orthopedic) trauma surgery. The rate of surgical site infections (SSIs) in this procedure is quite high, especially below the level of the knee. Antibiotic prophylaxis is not routinely prescribed, even though it has proved to lower SSI rates in other (orthopedic) trauma surgical procedures. The primary objective is to study the effectiveness of a single intravenous dose of 2 g of cefazolin on SSIs after IR following fixation of foot, ankle and/or lower leg fractures. METHODS: This is a multicenter, double-blind placebo controlled trial with a superiority design, including adult patients undergoing elective implant removal after fixation of a fracture of foot, ankle, lower leg or patella. Exclusion criteria are: an active infection, current antibiotic treatment, or a medical condition contraindicating prophylaxis with cefazolin including allergy. Patients are randomized to receive a single preoperative intravenous dose of either 2 g of cefazolin or a placebo (NaCl). The primary analysis will be an intention-to-treat comparison of the proportion of patients with a SSI at 90 days after IR in both groups. DISCUSSION: If 2 g of prophylactic cefazolin proves to be both effective and cost-effective in preventing SSI, this would have implications for current guidelines. Combined with the high infection rate of IR which previous studies have shown, it would be sufficiently substantiated for guidelines to suggest protocolled use of prophylactic antibiotics in IR of foot, ankle, lower leg or patella. Trial registration Nederlands Trial Register (NTR): NL8284, registered on 9th of January 2020, https://www.trialregister.nl/trial/8284.

A systematic review and meta-analysis of the sinus tarsi and extended lateral approach in the operative treatment of displaced intra-articular calcaneal fractures.

BACKGROUND: The optimal surgical approach for displaced intra-articular calcaneal fractures (DIACF) is subject of debate. The primary aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to assess wound-healing complications following the sinus tarsi approach (STA) compared to the extended lateral approach (ELA). Secondary aims were to assess time to surgery, operative time, calcaneal anatomy restoration, functional outcome, implant removal and injury to the peroneal tendons and sural nerve. METHODS: MEDLINE, EMBASE and Cochrane databases were searched for clinical studies comparing the STA and the ELA (until September 2017). RESULTS: Nine studies were included (two randomized controlled trials; seven comparative studies). 326 patients (331 fractures) were treated by the STA and 383 patients (390 fractures) by ELA. Ninety-nine per cent were Sanders type II/III fractures. Wound healing complications in the STA and ELA occurred in 11/331 and 82/390 fractures, respectively. Weighted means were 4.9% and 24.9%, respectively. Meta-analysis showed significantly less wound healing complications in the STA compared to ELA (risk ratio 0.20; 95% CI 0.11-0.36; P<0.00001; I2=0%). In general, time to surgery and operative time were shorter in the STA. Meta-analysis was not possible due to heterogeneity between studies. No differences were found in remaining secondary outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: The STA is associated with significantly less wound healing complications. With similar functional outcome and calcaneal anatomy restoration, the STA may be the preferred approach in the operative treatment of Sanders type II/III DIACF.

Correction to: Functional outcome following a locked fracture-dislocation of the calcaneus.

The published online version contains a mistake in the author list for the name of the author "J. Carel Goslings" was incorrectly presented in the HTML version.

Prophylactic negative pressure wound therapy after lower extremity fracture surgery: a pilot study.

PURPOSE: Infectious complications following lower extremity fracture surgery are a major concern and account for a substantial socio-economic burden to society. The aim of this pilot study was to investigate the feasibility of a new portable single-use negative pressure wound therapy device in patients undergoing major foot ankle surgery. METHODS: Patients undergoing major foot ankle fracture surgery at a single level 1 trauma centre were eligible for this prospective case series. Patient characteristics were collected, as were fracture and surgical characteristics. Primary outcome was surgical site infection within 30 days as classified by the criteria from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Patients in the prospective cohort were case-matched with a historical cohort from the same institution. RESULTS: Sixty patients were included. In seven patients, the NPWT failed and treatment was ceased. Mean age was 44 years and 85% was ASA 1; 43% of the patients were actively smoking. Indications for surgery were midfoot, calcaneal, talar, and ankle fractures. In 53 patients, four (7.5%) surgical site infections occurred, two superficial (3.3%) and two (3.3%) deep infections. For 47 patients, a match was available. The incidence of surgical site infection did not statistically significantly differ between the prospective cohort and retrospective matched cohort (4.3 versus 14.9%, p = 0.29, respectively). This was also the case when looking at superficial and deep surgical site infections separately (0 versus 8.5%, p = 0.08, and 4.3 versus 6.4%, respectively). CONCLUSION: We have observed surgical site infections in 7.5% of the patients with the use of prophylactic negative pressure wound therapy. The incidence of surgical site infections was not statistically significantly lower compared to a matched historical cohort.

Correction to: Prophylactic negative pressure wound therapy after lower extremity fracture surgery: a pilot study.

The published online version contain mistake in the author list for the name of the author "J. Carel Goslings" was incorrectly presented in the HTML version.

Determination of Pathogens in Postoperative Wound Infection After Surgically Reduced Calcaneal Fractures and Implications for Prophylaxis and Treatment.

High rates of postoperative wound infection (POWI) have been reported after surgery for calcaneal fractures. This is a retrospective cohort study to determine the causative pathogens of these infections and subsequent treatment strategies. In addition, microbacterial growth from superficial wound swabs and deep fluid or tissue cultures were compared. Patients with a unilateral surgically treated calcaneal fracture during a 15-year period were included. Patient, fracture, and surgical characteristics were collected from the electronic medical records. An infection was categorized as deep or superficial using the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention criteria. Secondary outcomes were wound edge necrosis and wound dehiscence. The collection of culture swabs, their results, and treatment strategies were documented. Of 357 patients, 92 (26%) developed a POWI; 55 (60%) deep and 37 (40%) superficial. The most frequent causative pathogens were Enterobacteriaceae and Staphylococcus aureus. Of the 55 patients with deep infection, 31 (56%) were treated with intravenous antibiotics and surgical debridement, 2 (4%) with intravenous antibiotics, and 22 (40%) with implant removal. In 33 of 92 patients (36%) with a POWI, both superficial and deep cultures were obtained, with a microorganism not cultured from the superficial swab 13 (39%) times. In conclusion, we found that one quarter of patients with operative calcaneal fracture treatment developed a POWI, mainly caused by Enterobacteriaceae or S. aureus. Physicians should not rely on the results of superficially obtained cultures for adequate treatment of deep infection. Because the spectrum of sensitivity profiles varies greatly between hospitals and countries, we recommend empiric antibiotic treatment of both gram-positive and gram-negative microorganisms on suspicion of deep infection.

Effect of Antibiotic Prophylaxis on Surgical Site Infections Following Removal of Orthopedic Implants Used for Treatment of Foot, Ankle, and Lower Leg Fractures: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Importance: Following clean (class I, not contaminated) surgical procedures, the rate of surgical site infection (SSI) should be less than approximately 2%. However, an infection rate of 12.2% has been reported following removal of orthopedic implants used for treatment of fractures below the knee. Objective: To evaluate the effect of a single dose of preoperative antibiotic prophylaxis on the incidence of SSIs following removal of orthopedic implants used for treatment of fractures below the knee. Design, Setting, and Participants: Multicenter, double-blind, randomized clinical trial including 500 patients aged 18 to 75 years with previous surgical treatment for fractures below the knee who were undergoing removal of orthopedic implants from 19 hospitals (17 teaching and 2 academic) in the Netherlands (November 2014-September 2016), with a follow-up of 6 months (final follow-up, March 28, 2017). Exclusion criteria were an active infection or fistula, antibiotic treatment, reimplantation of osteosynthesis material in the same session, allergy for cephalosporins, known kidney disease, immunosuppressant use, or pregnancy. Interventions: A single preoperative intravenous dose of 1000 mg of cefazolin (cefazolin group, n = 228) or sodium chloride (0.9%; saline group, n = 242). Main Outcomes and Measures: Primary outcome was SSI within 30 days as measured by the criteria from the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Secondary outcome measures were functional outcome, health-related quality of life, and patient satisfaction. Results: Among 477 randomized patients (mean age, 44 years [SD, 15]; women, 274 [57%]; median time from orthopedic implant placement, 11 months [interquartile range, 7-16]), 470 patients completed the study. Sixty-six patients developed an SSI (14.0%): 30 patients (13.2%) in the cefazolin group vs 36 in the saline group (14.9%) (absolute risk difference, -1.7 [95% CI, -8.0 to 4.6], P = .60). Conclusions and Relevance: Among patients undergoing surgery for removal of orthopedic implants used for treatment of fractures below the knee, a single preoperative dose of intravenous cefazolin compared with saline did not reduce the risk of surgical site infection within 30 days following implant removal. Trial Registration: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT02225821.

Predicting loss of height in surgically treated displaced intra-articular fractures of the calcaneus.

PURPOSE: The goal of calcaneal fracture surgery is to restore its anatomy and good foot function. However, loss of height of the subtalar joint can occur post-operatively, as expressed by a decrease in Böhler's angle (BA). The aim of this study was to identify potential factors associated with a post-operative decrease in BA. METHODS: All consecutive adult patients treated with open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) by an extended lateral approach (ELA) between 2000 and 2013 were retrospectively included. Primary outcome was the occurrence of a calcaneal collapse, defined as a postoperative decrease of ≥10° in BA. The BA was measured pre-operatively, directly following surgery and at one year follow-up. Patient characteristics (body mass index, diabetes mellitus, smoking/alcohol/substance abuse, American Society of Anaesthesiologist classification), fracture classification and treatment characteristics: per-operative increase in BA and occurrence of post-operative wound infection (POWI) were collected. RESULTS: A total of 262 patients with 276 calcaneal fractures were included. A calcaneal collapse occurred in 46 cases (17%). The median preoperative BA, per-operative increase in BA and post-operative decrease in BA were, respectively, 2°, 27° and 4°. A calcaneal collapse was seen more often following a per-operative increase of >25° in BA, but no significant association was found (p = 0.056). Uni- and multivariate analysis showed that patients with substance abuse and those with POWI had significantly more calcaneal collapse (p < 0.05). No association was found between substance abuse and the occurrence of POWI (p = 0.293). CONCLUSIONS: In nearly one in six patients with an intra-articular calcaneal fracture treated with ORIF by an ELA, a post-operative collapse of ≥10° was found during follow-up. Calcaneal collapse was correlated with the occurrence of a POWI and substance abuse.

Post-traumatic subtalar osteoarthritis: which grading system should we use?

PURPOSE: To assess and compare post-traumatic osteoarthritis following intra-articular calcaneal fractures, one must have a reliable grading system that consistently grades the post-traumatic changes of the joint. A reliable grading system aids in the communication between treating physicians and improves the interpretation of research. To date, there is no consensus on what grading system to use in the evaluation of post-traumatic subtalar osteoarthritis. The objective of this study was to determine and compare the inter- and intra-rater reliability of two grading systems for post-traumatic subtalar osteoarthritis. METHODS: Four observers evaluated 50 calcaneal fractures at least one year after trauma on conventional oblique lateral, internally and externally rotated views, and graded post-traumatic subtalar osteoarthritis using the Kellgren and Lawrence Grading Scale (KLGS) and the Paley Grading System (PGS). Inter- and intra-rater reliability were calculated and compared. RESULTS: The inter-rater reliability showed an intra-class correlation (ICC) of 0.54 (95 % CI 0.40-0.67) for the KLGS and an ICC of 0.41 (95 % CI 0.26 - 0.57) for the PGS. This difference was not statistically significant. The intra-rater reliability showed a mean weighted kappa of 0.62 for both the KLGS and the PGS. CONCLUSION: There is no statistically significant difference in reliability between the Kellgren and Lawrence Grading System (KLGS) and the Paley Grading System (PGS). The PGS allows for an easy two-step approach making it easy for everyday clinical purposes. For research purposes however, the more detailed and widely used KLGS seems preferable.

Complications of Kirschner Wire Use in Open Reduction and Internal Fixation of Calcaneal Fractures.

The most important goal of surgical management of displaced intra-articular calcaneal fractures is anatomic correction. This reduction is usually stabilized using plate and screw osteosynthesis. In addition, Kirschner wires (K-wires) can be used to maintain the surgical reduction or stability of the construct. In the present study, we evaluated the frequency and type of use of additional K-wires and subsequent migration in the surgical management of displaced intra-articular calcaneal fractures. The data from 279 patients treated surgically from January 1, 2000 to December 31, 2014 in a level 1 trauma center using an extended lateral approach were analyzed after 1 year of follow-up. All postoperative radiographic images were reviewed to identify the cases in which K-wires were used. Data on the number and type of K-wires used, K-wire location, and K-wire migration found on follow-up imaging studies were collected. Of the 279 patients, 69 K-wires had been used in 49 (18%) patients. A total of 25 (36%) lost (buried), 38 (55%) bent, and 6 (9%) unmodified straight K-wires had been placed. Overall, in 4 (5.8%) of 69 K-wires, secondary dislocation was seen. One (4%) of the lost, 3 (50%) of the unmodified, and none of the bent K-wires showed secondary dislocation. K-wire migration was seen in 5.8% of the cases. None of the bent K-wires and only 1 of the lost K-wires had migrated in the present study. These 2 techniques are preferred when using K-wire fixation in the treatment of displaced intra-articular calcaneal fractures. The use of unmodified straight K-wires should be discouraged.

Wound Infections Following Implant removal below the knee: the effect of antibiotic prophylaxis; the WIFI-trial, a multi-centre randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: In the Netherlands about 18,000 procedures with implant removal are performed annually following open or closed reduction and fixation of fractures, of which 30-80% concern the foot, ankle and lower leg region. For clean surgical procedures, the rate of postoperative wound infections (POWI) should be less than ~2%. However, rates of 10-12% following implant removal have been reported, specifically after foot, ankle and lower leg fractures. Currently, surgeons individually decide if antibiotics prophylaxis is given, since no guideline exists. This leads to undesirable practice variation. The aim of the study is to assess the (cost-)effectiveness of a single intravenous gift of Cefazolin prior to implant removal following surgical fixation of foot, ankle and/or lower leg fractures. METHODS: This is a double-blind randomized controlled trial in patients scheduled for implant removal following a foot, ankle or lower leg fracture. Primary outcome is a POWI within 30 days after implant removal. Secondary outcomes are quality of life, functional outcome and costs at 30 days and 6 months after implant removal. With 2 x 250 patients a decrease in POWI rate from 10% to 3.3% (expected rate in clean-contaminated elective orthopaedic trauma procedures) can be detected (Power = 80%, 2-sided alpha = 5%, including 15% lost to follow up). DISCUSSION: If administration of prophylactic antibiotics prior to implant removal reduces the infectious complication rate, this will offer a strong argument to adopt this as standard practice of care. This will consequently lead to less physical and social disabilities and health care use. A preliminary, conservative estimation suggests yearly cost savings in the Netherlands of € 3.5 million per year. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This study is registered at Clinicaltrials.gov ( NCT02225821 ) and the Netherlands Trial Register ( NTR4393 ) and was granted permission by the Medical Ethical Review Committee of the Academic Medical Centre on October 7 2014.

Erratum to: The effect of postoperative wound infections on functional outcome following intra-articular calcaneal fractures.

Erratum to: Arch Orthop Trauma Surg DOI 10.1007/s00402-015-2219-5. The original version of this article unfortunately contained a mistake and has been corrected. The fourth author J. Carel Goslings' family name has been published incorrectly. The correct family name should be Goslings.

The effect of postoperative wound infections on functional outcome following intra-articular calcaneal fractures.

INTRODUCTION: High rates of postoperative wound infections (POWI) are reported following the operative treatment of calcaneal fractures. This leads to additional therapy, prolonged hospital stay, burden for patients and increased costs. The primary aim of this study is to evaluate the effect of POWI following the extended lateral approach of displaced intra-articular calcaneal fractures on functional outcome. Secondary aims are assessment of health-related quality of life and patient satisfaction. PATIENTS AND METHODS: All consecutive adult patients with a calcaneal fracture treated between 2000 and 2011 with open reduction and internal fixation through an extended lateral approach were retrospectively included and sent a questionnaire. Functional outcome was measured using the Foot Function Index (FFI, best score 0 points) and the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS, best score 100 points) hindfoot score. The EuroQOL-5D was used for quality of life (QOL) and a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS, best score 10 points) for overall patients satisfaction. RESULTS: Of 135 eligible patients, 94 returned the questionnaire (response rate 70 %). The median FFI was 12 points (IQR 3-33) and AOFAS 79 points (IQR 61-90). The FFI and AOFAS were, respectively, 17 and 9 points higher in favour of patients without POWI (n = 69) compared to patients with POWI (n = 25). Albeit large differences, they were not statistically significant given the current number of patients. Patients without POWI scored better on all health-related aspects of QOL in the EQ-5D, but this did not reach statistical significance. However, the VAS on overall patient satisfaction did show a statistically significant difference of 1.3 points (9.0 vs 7.7; p = 0.01) in favour of patients without POWI. Importantly, a clinically relevant difference was found with the FFI as the estimated minimal clinical important difference of the FFI is 10 points. CONCLUSION: Our results implicate that postoperative wound infection leads lower functional outcome scores following calcaneal fracture surgery, but no statistical significance was reached. In addition, patients do not report significant worse QOL or physical impairment. Overall patient satisfaction measured by a VAS was significantly lower in case of a POWI, reflecting the burden caused by a wound complication.

Wound infections following open reduction and internal fixation of calcaneal fractures with an extended lateral approach.

PURPOSE: Post-operative wound infections (PWI) following calcaneal fracture surgery can lead to prolonged hospital stay and additional treatment with antibiotics, surgical debridement or implant removal. Our aim was to determine the incidence of superficial and deep PWI and to identify risk factors (RF). METHODS: This study is a retrospective case series. All consecutive patients from 2000 to 2010 with a closed unilateral calcaneal fracture treated with open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) by an extended lateral approach were included. Patient, fracture, trauma and peri-operative characteristics were collected, including RF such as smoking, diabetes mellitus, time to operation, pre-operative in- or outpatient management and wound closure technique. The primary end point was a PWI as defined by the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. RESULTS: A total of 191 patients were included of which 47 patients (24.6%) had a PWI; 21 (11.0%) and 26 (13.6%) patients had a superficial and deep wound infection, respectively. American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification higher than ASA 1 was associated with an increased risk. Placement of a closed suction drain at the end of surgery was associated with less PWI (35% vs 15%, p = 0.002). In this study, none of the previously reported RF were associated with an increased risk for PWI. CONCLUSIONS: ORIF of displaced calcaneal fractures is associated with a high rate of PWI of 25%. Factors that were associated with an increased risk were ASA classification other than 1 and absence of a closed suction drain placement. A closed suction drain may be a protective measure to avoid wound complications.

Functional outcome following a locked fracture-dislocation of the calcaneus.

PURPOSE: Locked fracture-dislocations of the calcaneus are uncommon, and a substantial number of these injuries is not recognised or is misdiagnosed at first presentation. The primary aim of this study was to evaluate the long-term outcome in patients with this injury. METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study of adult patients who sustained a uni- or bilateral calcaneal fracturedislocation. Outcome was measured using validated questionnaires, including the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society Hindfoot score (AOFAS), Foot Function Index (FFI) and a visual analogue scale (VAS). RESULTS: During the 12-year study period a total of 16 patients with 17 locked fracture-dislocations were identified. This represented 6 % of all surgically treated calcaneal fractures (17 of 279). The median follow-up was 48 months. All patients were treated using an extended lateral approach and plate fixation. In one patient with a delayed presentation a primary arthrodesis was performed. The functional outcome scores were available for 14 patients with 14 fractures. The median AOFAS was 74 [interquartile range (IQR) 47­86], the median FFI was 18 (IQR 6­37) and the median VAS for overall satisfactionwas 8.2 (IQR 5.5­9.4). A secondary fusion was deemed necessary in three cases. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that, with surgical treatment via an extended lateral approach, the outcome in patients with a locked fracture-dislocation of the calcaneus is similar to the outcome of other displaced intra-articular calcaneal fracture types. However, a higher rate of secondary subtalar fusion can be expected.

Diagnosing Hirschsprung Disease in Children Younger than 6 Months of Age: Insights in Incidence of Complications of Rectal Suction Biopsy and Other Final Diagnoses.

BACKGROUND: The gold standard for diagnosing Hirschsprung disease (HD) in patients younger than 6 months is pathological examination of rectal suction biopsy (RSB). The aim of this study was to gain insight into the following: (1) complications following RSB, (2) final diagnosis of patients referred for RSB, and (3) factors associated with HD. METHODS: Patients suspected of HD referred for RSB at our center were analyzed retrospectively. Severity of complications of RSB was assessed using Clavien-Dindo (CD) grading. Factors associated with HD were tested using multivariate logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: From 2000 to 2021, 371 patients underwent RSB because of infrequent defecation, at a median age of 44 days. Three patients developed ongoing rectal bleeding (0.8%) graded CD1. Most frequent final diagnoses were: HD (n = 151, 40.7%), functional constipation (n = 113, 31%), idiopathic meconium ileus (n = 11, 3%), and food intolerance (n = 11, 3%). Associated factors for HD were male sex (odds ratio [OR], 3.19; confidence interval [CI], 1.56-6.53), presence of syndrome (OR, 7.18; CI, 1.63-31.69), younger age at time of RSB (OR, 0.98; CI, 0.85-0.98), meconium passage for more than 48 hours (OR, 3.15; CI, 1.51-6.56), distended abdomen (OR, 2.09; CI, 1.07-4.07), bilious vomiting (OR, 6.39; CI, 3.28-12.47), and failure to thrive (OR, 8.46; CI, 2.11-34.02) (model R 2 = 0.566). CONCLUSION: RSB is a safe procedure with few and only minor complications. In the majority of patients referred for RSB under the age of 6 months, HD was found followed by a functional cause for the defecation problems. RSB should be obtained on a low threshold in all patients under the age of 6 months with the suspicion of HD.

Determining the Correct Resection Level in Patients with Hirschsprung Disease Using Contrast Enema and Full Thickness Biopsies: Can the Diagnostic Accuracy be Improved by Examining Submucosal Nerve Fiber Thickness?

BACKGROUND: Intraoperative resection level in patients with Hirschsprung disease (HD) is determined by contrast enema, surgeon's intraoperative judgement and full thickness biopsy (FTB) identifying ganglia. This study aims to evaluate diagnostic accuracy of contrast enema and FTB in determination of resection level and whether this can be improved by measuring submucosal nerve fiber diameter. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed contrast enema and intraoperative FTBs obtained in our center, determining diagnostic accuracy for level of resection. Gold standard was pathological examination of resection specimen. Secondly, we matched transition zone pull-through (TZPT) patients with non-TZPT patients, based on age and length of resected bowel, to blindly compare nerve fibers diameters between two groups using group comparison. RESULTS: From 2000-2021, 209 patients underwent HD surgery of whom 180 patients (138 males; median age at surgery: 13 weeks) with 18 TZPTs (10%) were included. Positive predictive value of contrast enema was 65.1%. No caliber change was found in patients with total colon aganglionosis (TCA). Negative predictive value of surgeon's intraoperative judgement and FTB in determining resection level was 79.0% and 90.0% (91.2% single-stage, 84.4% two-stage surgery) respectively. Mean nerve fiber diameter in TZPT was 25.01 µm (SD= 5.63) and in non-TZPT 24.35 µm (SD= 6.75) (p = 0.813). CONCLUSION: Determination of resection level with combination of contrast enema, surgeon's intraoperative judgement and FTB results in sufficient diagnostic accuracy in patients with HD. If no caliber change is seen with contrast enema, TCA should be considered. Resection level or transition zone cannot be determined by assessment of submucosal nerve fiber diameter in FTB. TYPE OF STUDY: clinical research paper.

Risk factors for short-term complications graded by Clavien-Dindo after transanal endorectal pull-through in patients with Hirschsprung disease.

BACKGROUND: Transanal endorectal pull-through (TERPT) is a common surgical procedure in Hirschsprung disease (HD). Aim of this study was to gain insight in the prevalence and severity of postoperative complications within 30-days after TERPT and to identify patient and perioperative characteristics, associated with the development of short-term postoperative complications. METHODS: This study retrospectively analyzed data of children with HD and treated with TERPT in our center between 2005 and 2020. Complications emerging within 30-days after surgery were assessed using Clavien-Dindo (CD). Patient and perioperative characteristic as predictor of a complication were tested using (multivariable) logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: Twenty-two of 106 (21%) included patients (17 transanal only; 77 laparoscopic-assisted; 12 laparotomy-assisted) developed 35 complications, including two patients (1.8%) that deceased. We suspect postoperative rectal irrigation leading to perforation as cause of death in both patients. Six patients (6%) had a minor (CD<3) and 16 patients (15%) a major (CD≥3) complication. Anastomotic leakage (n = 4, 11%), abdominal abscess (n = 3, 9%) and anastomotic stricture (n = 3,9%) occurred most frequently. Predictive factors for developing a complication were older age at time of surgery (OR 1.03 1.00-1.01, p = 0.041), laparotomy-assisted surgery (OR 12.65, CI 1.712-93.07, p = 0.013) and long-segment HD (OR 4.09 CI 1.09-15.39, p = 0.037). CONCLUSIONS: We found a CD-graded short-term postoperative complication rate of 21% following TERPT, reporting anastomotic complications most frequently. In patients at risk a diverting stoma should be considered. We suspect postoperative rectal irrigation being the cause of two lethal perforations. Therefore, we recommend to place a rectal transanastomotic tube in all patients receiving TERPT. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

Treatment of jejunoileal atresia by primary anastomosis or enterostomy: Double the operations, double the risk of complications.

PURPOSE: No study has evaluated complication rates of the combined operations needed for temporary Enterostomy compared to primary anastomosis in the treatment of Jejunoileal Atresia. Therefore the aim of this study is: 1) to compare the occurrence of severe postoperative complications (defined as Clavien-Dindo ≥III within 30 days) and 2) to compare the occurrence of different short- and long-term complications following treatment for Jejunoileal atresia either by primary anastomosis or the combined Enterostomy procedures. METHODS: All consecutive neonates treated for Jejunoileal Atresias between January 1998 and February 2021 at our tertiary academic centres were retrospectively included. Perioperative characteristics and severity of postoperative complications (Clavien-Dindo) were extracted and evaluated, using chi-squared statistics, following each operation per treatment. RESULTS: Eighty patients were included of whom 48 (60%) received a primary anastomosis and 32 (40%) an Enterostomy. Perioperative baseline characteristics were comparable, apart from significantly more patients with a gastroschisis and significantly less patients with jejunum atresia in the Enterostomy group. Our results showed that 1) significantly (p ≤ 0.01) more CD ≥III occur following treatment by Enterostomy. 2) Both short-term (surgical site infection, wound dehiscence) and long-term (short bowel syndrome, adhesive bowel obstruction) complications occurred significantly more in those treated by Enterostomy. We showed no significant difference in anastomotic leakage/stenosis and mortality rates between both treatment strategies. CONCLUSION: Although perioperative factors might necessitate an Enterostomy, we advise a low threshold for performing a primary anastomosis when in doubt, taking into account the double risk of major complications found in patients treated with a temporary Enterostomy.