Long-term Outcomes Are Poor in Intravenous Drug Users Following Infective Endocarditis, Even After Surgery.

BACKGROUND: Previous studies of outcomes in people who inject drugs (PWID) with infective endocarditis (IE) have often been retrospective, have had small sample sizes, and the duration of follow-up has been short and limited to patients who were operated on. METHODS: PWID treated for IE between 1 January 2006 and 31 December 2016 were identified from a prospectively collected database. PWID hospitalized with other infections acted as a novel comparison group. Outcomes were all-cause mortality, cause of death, relapse, recurrence, and reoperation. RESULTS: There were 105 episodes of IE in 92 PWID and 112 episodes of other infections in 107 PWID in whom IE was suspected but rejected. Survival at 30 days for the IE group was 85%, and 30-day survival following surgery was 96%. The most common pathogens were Staphylococcus species (60%) and Streptococcus species (30%). The surgical intervention rate was 47%. Survival for the IE group at 1, 3, 5, and 10 years was 74%, 63%, 58%, and 44%, respectively. This was significantly lower compared with the comparator group of other infections in PWID (P = .0002). Mortality was higher in patients who required surgery compared with those who did not (hazard ratio, 1.8 [95% confidence interval, .95-3.3]). The commonest cause of death was infection (66%), usually a further episode of IE (55%). CONCLUSIONS: Although early survival was good, long-term life expectancy was low. This was attributable to ongoing infection risk, rather than other factors known to affect prognosis in PWID. Surgery conferred no long-term survival advantage. More efforts are needed to reduce reinfection risk following an episode of IE in PWID.While early survival for people who inject drugs (PWID) with infective endocarditis is good, long-term survival is poor due to ongoing infection risk. Surgery conferred no long-term survival advantage, so more efforts are needed to reduce reinfection risks for PWID.

Surgical Techniques and Outcomes in Patients With Intra-Cardiac Abscesses Complicating Infective Endocarditis.

Background: An intra-cardiac abscess is a serious complication of both native (NV-IE) and prosthetic valve infective endocarditis (PV-IE). Despite being an accepted indication for surgery, controversies remain regarding the optimal timing and type of operation. We aimed to report the outcomes of patients managed for intra-cardiac abscesses over more than a decade. Methods: Patients aged ≥18 years managed for intra-cardiac abscess between 1 January 2005 and 31 December 2017 were identified from a prospectively collected IE database. The primary outcome was 30-day mortality in operated patients and secondary outcomes were freedom from re-infection, re-operation and long-term mortality comparing those patients with aortic root abscess who underwent aortic valve replacement (AVR) and those who received aortic root replacement (ARR). Results: Fifty-nine patients developed an intra-cardiac abscess, and their median age was 55 (43-71) years; among them, 44 (75%) were men, and 10 (17%) were persons who injected drugs. Infection with beta-haemolytic streptococci was associated with NV-IE (p = 0.009) and coagulase-negative staphylococci with PV-IE (p = 0.005). Forty-four (75%) underwent an operation, and among those with aortic root abscess, 27 underwent AVR and 12 ARR. Thirty-day mortality was associated with infection with S. aureus (p = 0.006) but not the type or timing of the operation. Survival in operated patients was 66% at 1 year and 59% at 5 years. In operated patients, none had a relapse, although six developed late recurrence. Freedom from infection, re-operation and long-term mortality were similar in patients undergoing AVR compared to ARR. Conclusion: Patients diagnosed with intra-cardiac abscess who were not operated on had very poor survival. In those who underwent an operation, either by AVR or ARR based upon patient factors, imaging and intra-operative findings outcomes were similar.

Impact of the duration of antibiotic therapy on relapse and survival following surgery for active infective endocarditis.

OBJECTIVES: Surgery is often required for acute infective endocarditis (IE) to repair or replace damaged heart valves. Traditionally, long courses of antibiotic treatment have been prescribed after surgery for active IE for fear of infecting newly implanted/repaired valves, but the need for this, in the present era of enhanced antimicrobial stewardship, has been questioned. In our institution, the choice and duration of antimicrobial therapy is tailored to individual patients by a multidisciplinary team with an interest in IE. The influence of the duration of postoperative antibiotic therapy on outcomes was studied in patients requiring surgery prior to the completion of a planned course of antibiotic therapy. METHODS: This was a retrospective observational study on patients with acute IE requiring surgery between January 2004 and December 2015. The primary outcome was relapse. Secondary outcomes were early reoperation and 1-year mortality. RESULTS: In total, 182 IE episodes were included in the final analysis. The median duration of postoperative antibiotic therapy was 23.5 days (interquartile range 12-40 days) and decreased significantly during the period of study (P < 0.001). There were 2 relapses (1.1%) and 18 (9.9%) postoperative deaths within 1 year. Nine (5%) patients underwent early reoperation. The duration of postoperative antibiotic therapy did not affect either the primary or the secondary outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: This work supports previous findings that selected patients who require surgery during active IE can be safely given shorter courses of postoperative antibiotics without an impact on relapse of infection or survival.