Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
1.
Lancet ; 386(10008): 2069-2077, 2015 Nov 21.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26388532

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Intravascular-catheter-related infections are frequent life-threatening events in health care, but incidence can be decreased by improvements in the quality of care. Optimisation of skin antisepsis is essential to prevent short-term catheter-related infections. We hypothesised that chlorhexidine-alcohol would be more effective than povidone iodine-alcohol as a skin antiseptic to prevent intravascular-catheter-related infections. METHODS: In this open-label, randomised controlled trial with a two-by-two factorial design, we enrolled consecutive adults (age ≥18 years) admitted to one of 11 French intensive-care units and requiring at least one of central-venous, haemodialysis, or arterial catheters. Before catheter insertion, we randomly assigned (1:1:1:1) patients via a secure web-based random-number generator (permuted blocks of eight, stratified by centre) to have all intravascular catheters prepared with 2% chlorhexidine-70% isopropyl alcohol (chlorhexidine-alcohol) or 5% povidone iodine-69% ethanol (povidone iodine-alcohol), with or without scrubbing of the skin with detergent before antiseptic application. Physicians and nurses were not masked to group assignment but microbiologists and outcome assessors were. The primary outcome was the incidence of catheter-related infections with chlorhexidine-alcohol versus povidone iodine-alcohol in the intention-to-treat population. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01629550 and is closed to new participants. FINDINGS: Between Oct 26, 2012, and Feb 12, 2014, 2546 patients were eligible to participate in the study. We randomly assigned 1181 patients (2547 catheters) to chlorhexidine-alcohol (594 patients with scrubbing, 587 without) and 1168 (2612 catheters) to povidone iodine-alcohol (580 patients with scrubbing, 588 without). Chlorhexidine-alcohol was associated with lower incidence of catheter-related infections (0·28 vs 1·77 per 1000 catheter-days with povidone iodine-alcohol; hazard ratio 0·15, 95% CI 0·05-0·41; p=0·0002). Scrubbing was not associated with a significant difference in catheter colonisation (p=0·3877). No systemic adverse events were reported, but severe skin reactions occurred more frequently in those assigned to chlorhexidine-alcohol (27 [3%] patients vs seven [1%] with povidone iodine-alcohol; p=0·0017) and led to chlorhexidine discontinuation in two patients. INTERPRETATION: For skin antisepsis, chlorhexidine-alcohol provides greater protection against short-term catheter-related infections than does povidone iodine-alcohol and should be included in all bundles for prevention of intravascular catheter-related infections. FUNDING: University Hospital of Poitiers, CareFusion.


Asunto(s)
Antiinfecciosos Locales/uso terapéutico , Antisepsia/métodos , Infecciones Relacionadas con Catéteres/prevención & control , Clorhexidina/uso terapéutico , Etanol/uso terapéutico , Povidona Yodada/uso terapéutico , Dispositivos de Acceso Vascular , Anciano , Cateterismo Venoso Central/métodos , Cateterismo Periférico/métodos , Catéteres de Permanencia , Quimioterapia Combinada , Femenino , Humanos , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Resultado del Tratamiento
2.
BMJ Open ; 8(10): e021488, 2018 10 18.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30341115

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) is the first cause of healthcare-associated infections in intensive care units (ICUs) and brain injury is one of the main risk factors for early-onset VAP. Antibiotic prophylaxis has been reported to decrease their occurrence in brain-injured patients, but a lack of controlled randomised trials and the risk of induction of bacterial resistance explain the low level of recommendations. The goal of this study is to determine whether a single dose of ceftriaxone within the 12 hours postintubation after severe brain injury can decrease the risk of early-onset VAP. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The PROPHY-VAP is a French multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, clinical trial. Adult brain-injured patients (n=320) with a Glasgow Coma Scale ≤12, requiring mechanical ventilation for more than 48 hours, are randomised to receive either a single dose of ceftriaxone 2 g or a placebo within the 12 hours after tracheal intubation. The primary endpoint is the proportion of patients developing VAP from the 2nd to the 7th day after mechanical ventilation. Secondary endpoints include the proportion of patients developing late VAP (>7 days after tracheal intubation), the number of ventilator-free days, VAP-free days and antibiotic-free days, length of stay in the ICU, proportion of patients with ventilator-associated events and mortality during their ICU stay. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The initial research project was approved by the Institutional Review Board of OUEST III (France) on 20 October 2014 (registration No 2014-001668-36) and carried out according to the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki and the Clinical Trials Directive 2001/20/EC of the European Parliament relating to the Good Clinical Practice guidelines. The results of this study will be presented in national and international meetings and published in an international peer-reviewed journal. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02265406; Pre-results.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Ceftriaxona/uso terapéutico , Protocolos de Ensayos Clínicos como Asunto , Coma Postraumatismo Craneoencefálico/complicaciones , Neumonía Asociada al Ventilador/tratamiento farmacológico , Neumonía Asociada al Ventilador/etiología , Adulto , Anciano , Método Doble Ciego , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neumonía Asociada al Ventilador/prevención & control , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto
3.
Trials ; 14: 114, 2013 Apr 27.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23782845

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Catheter-related infection is the third cause of infections in intensive care units (ICU), increasing the length of stay in ICU and hospital, mortality, and costs. Skin antisepsis is one of the most prevalent preventive measures. In this respect, it would appear preferable to recommend the use of alcoholic povidone iodine or chlorhexidine rather than aqueous povidone iodine. However, the data comparing chlorhexidine to povidone-iodine, both of them in alcoholic solutions, remain limited. Moreover, the benefits of enhanced cleaning prior to disinfection of skin that is not visibly soiled have yet to be confirmed in a randomized study. METHODS: A prospective multicenter, 2 × 2 factorial, randomized-controlled, assessor-blind trial will be conducted in 11 intensive care units in six French hospitals. All adult patients aged over 18 years requiring the insertion of at least one peripheral arterial catheter and/or a non-tunneled central venous catheter and/or a hemodialysis catheter and/or an arterial pulmonary catheter will be randomly assigned to have all their catheters cared with one of four skin preparation strategies (2% chlorhexidine/70% isopropyl alcohol or 5% povidone iodine/69% ethanol with or without prior skin scrubbing). At catheter removal, catheter tips will be quantitatively cultured. Sets of aerobic and anaerobic blood cultures will be routinely obtained when a patient has fever, hypothermia, or other indications. In case of suspected catheter-related infection the patient's form will be reviewed by an independent adjudication committee. We plan to enroll 2,400 patients (4,800 catheters). The main objective is to demonstrate that use of 2% alcoholic chlorhexidine compared to 5% alcoholic povidone iodine in skin preparation lowers the rate of catheter-related infection. The second endpoint is to demonstrate that enhanced skin cleaning prior to disinfection of skin that is not visibly soiled does not reduce catheter colonization. Other outcomes include comparison of skin colonization at catheter insertion site, comparison of catheter colonization and catheter-related bacteremia taking place during implementation of the four strategies of skin preparation, and cutaneous tolerance, length of hospitalization, mortality, and costs. DISCUSSION: This study will help to update recommendations on the choice of an antiseptic agent to use in skin preparation prior to insertion of a vascular catheter and, by extension, of an epidural catheter and it will likewise help to update recommendations on the usefulness of skin scrubbing prior to disinfection when the skin is not visibly soiled. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov number NCT01629550.


Asunto(s)
Antiinfecciosos Locales/administración & dosificación , Antisepsia , Infecciones Relacionadas con Catéteres/prevención & control , Cateterismo Venoso Central/efectos adversos , Cateterismo Periférico/efectos adversos , Control de Infecciones/métodos , Proyectos de Investigación , Piel/microbiología , Dispositivos de Acceso Vascular/efectos adversos , 2-Propanol/administración & dosificación , Administración Cutánea , Técnicas Bacteriológicas , Infecciones Relacionadas con Catéteres/diagnóstico , Infecciones Relacionadas con Catéteres/microbiología , Cateterismo Venoso Central/instrumentación , Cateterismo Periférico/instrumentación , Cateterismo de Swan-Ganz/efectos adversos , Cateterismo de Swan-Ganz/instrumentación , Catéteres Venosos Centrales/efectos adversos , Catéteres Venosos Centrales/microbiología , Clorhexidina/administración & dosificación , Protocolos Clínicos , Etanol/administración & dosificación , Francia , Humanos , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos , Povidona Yodada/administración & dosificación , Estudios Prospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Dispositivos de Acceso Vascular/microbiología
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA