Gender-Based Differences in Medical Student Self-Ratings of Clinical Performance.

INTRODUCTION: While prior literature demonstrates gender-based differences in surgical residents' self-assessments, limited data exist examining these effects at the medical student level. This study aimed to understand how self-ratings of clinical performance differ across genders for clerkship students. METHODS: This was a retrospective study examining the results of an institutional Clinical Performance Examination administered at the end of the clerkship year. Students were tasked with obtaining a history and physical examination and developing an assessment and plan based on standardized patient cases. After the examination, students were asked to estimate the percentile rating of their performance. Female and male students' true scores, self-rated percentiles, and differences between true and self-rated percentiles were compared. RESULTS: One hundred twenty three male and 113 female medical students were included in the analysis. Female medical students performed statistically significantly better overall (79.65% versus 78.23%, P = 0.0039), in history skills (76.90% versus 75.19%, P = 0.012), and in communication skills (94.05% versus 92.58%, P = 0.0085). No statistically significant differences were seen between self-rated percentiles between male and female students. However, when comparing the difference between self-rated and true percentile scores (Δ = self-rated - true percentile), male students were more likely to rate themselves higher than their true percentile on history (male students Δ = 12.26 versus female students Δ = -1.24, P = 0.00076) and communication metrics (male students Δ = 14.12 versus female students Δ = 6.05, P = 0.037). CONCLUSIONS: Despite higher performance, female students rate themselves similarly to male medical students, suggesting a pattern of underestimation. Faculty must recognize that gender-based differences in self-evaluations begin at the medical student level, potentially impacting future trainee development.

Analysis of a Near Peer Tutoring Program to Improve Medical Students' Note Writing Skills.

Problem: The ability to document a patient encounter is integral for any physician. Previous studies indicate that medical students' note writing skills are poor due to a lack of formal clinical documentation instruction. Barriers to formally teaching students how to write patient notes include the significant time burden and variability in faculty feedback. Implementing a near-peer teaching program to teach students how to write a patient note can overcome these barriers and fill this curricular gap. Intervention: Fourth year medical students who completed a Teaching in Medicine elective course were trained to provide individual feedback to 1st and 2nd year students on note writing as a part of their Introduction to Clinical Medicine course. In order to determine the effect of this two year, near-peer feedback program on note writing skills, we analyzed students' scores on the note writing portion of two Objective Structured Clinical Exams that took place at the end of the 2nd and 3rd years of medical school. Context: The near-peer feedback sessions were implemented in the Fall of 2013 during the preclinical years of the medical school curriculum. Data from students who received near-peer feedback (N = 112) were compared to a historical control group who did not receive near-peer feedback on their note writing (N = 110). Objective Structured Clinical Exam scores that were specific to note writing skills, including the history, physical exam, and differential diagnosis subscales were examined. Impact: The near-peer feedback had a positive impact on the quality of patient notes. On the end of the 2nd year Objective Structured Clinical Exam, the near-peer feedback intervention group outperformed the no feedback group on the history and physical exam subscale scores but not on the differential diagnosis subscale score. One year later, the near-peer feedback intervention group continued to outperform the no feedback group on the physical exam subscale score, but not the history or the differential diagnosis subscale scores. Lessons Learned: Near-peer teaching improves student documentation of the history and physical exam, however only the effects on the physical exam portion persist into the clinical years of training. Writing up a differential diagnosis is a skill that develops through the clerkship experience regardless of exposure to feedback in the preclinical years. Implementing near-peer teaching in the medical school setting is feasible and can provide students with valuable learning experiences without relying on clinical faculty.

Faculty development on professionalism and medical ethics: the design, development and implementation of Objective Structured Teaching Exercises (OSTEs).

BACKGROUND: As students are expected to develop competency in professionalism and medical ethics, faculty are also expected to facilitate medical students' learning and understanding of these areas. One of the main challenges to success in this domain has been uncertainty of whether or not faculty know the content and the methods to teach and assess these competencies. AIM: We used the Objective Structured Teaching Exercise (OSTE) format as a faculty development tool to train and evaluate faculty on how to teach professionalism and medical ethics to students in clinical settings. METHODS: The process for the design, development and implementation of OSTEs consisted of five phases: (1) performing a literature review and student needs assessment, (2) developing the OSTE cases and performance checklists, (3) recruiting and training of standardized students, (4) conducting a mock training session and (5) organizing faculty development workshops using OSTEs. RESULTS: Twenty clinical faculty members participated in one of three half-day OSTE workshops offered. Faculty confidence and attitudes about teaching professionalism increased significantly (p < 0.05) from before participating in the workshop to afterwards. CONCLUSIONS: Faculty feedback were positive stating that the OSTE scenarios were reflective of issues they generally encounter while teaching medical students, the information and skills they learned from the workshop are important to them as clinical educators, and that the information and skills will likely have an impact on the way they teach professionalism and ethics in the future.

Early Refill of an Opioid Medication: Recognizing Personal Biases Through Clinical Vignettes and OSCEs.

Introduction: Efforts to improve pain education and knowledge about prescription opioid misuse and opioid/substance use disorder in undergraduate medical education continue to be inadequate. To advance educational practices and address training needs to counter the opioid epidemic, we created a longitudinal pain and addiction curriculum that includes three patient vignettes in which the patient requests an early refill of opioid medication. The goal was to introduce students to the potential impact of personal biases on health care delivery and medical decision-making with patients who have pain and/or substance use disorders. Methods: Three clinical vignettes were presented to early matriculating medical students (MS 1s) using a progressive case disclosure approach in the format of a PowerPoint presentation with embedded audio interactions and follow-up audience response system questions. The same vignettes were converted into OSCEs for early clinical clerkship students (MS 3s). Results: A total of 180 MS 1s participated in the case presentations, and 124 MS 3s participated in the OSCE session. There was a significant difference between students' level of comfort and individual patient requests for early prescription refills in both student cohorts. MS 1s were significantly more likely to provide the early refill to the elderly female patient compared to the two middle-age male patients, whereas a majority of MS 3s wanted more information. Discussion: This module can be presented to medical students who have little clinical exposure and to health care trainees at other levels of clinical exposure.

Using Motivational Interviewing to Address Tobacco Cessation: Two Standardized Patient Cases for Pediatric Residents.

Introduction: Motivational interviewing (MI) is a well-established evidence-based method of working with patients to promote health behavior change. Standardized patient (SP) simulation allows trainees to practice and receive feedback on clinical and communication skills and may be useful in applying MI techniques to address tobacco use and exposure. Methods: We developed two SP cases for pediatric residents to practice addressing tobacco use with parents of their patients. Results: Thirty-six residents participated, 26 of whom had prior MI training. Resident postencounter self-reflection identified MI-specific skills, including eliciting the SP's view on positive/negative aspects of smoking, identifying stressors/triggers associated with smoking, eliciting reasons for smoking, asking about motivation/willingness to quit, eliciting benefits of quitting smoking, letting the SP do the talking, and guiding the SP in making a quit plan. On paired-samples t tests, resident self-evaluation checklist scores averaged 6.79 out of 8.00 (SD = 1.018, SEM = 0.165), compared with SP checklist scores, which averaged 7.08 out of 8.00 (SD = 1.217, SEM = 0.197). Discussion: These two SP cases were useful in many ways, allowing residents with prior MI training the opportunity for practice/feedback on skills learned and introducing residents with no prior MI training to MI concepts through experience/feedback. Residents consistently identified using MI concepts on postencounter self-reflection; resident self-evaluation and SP evaluation of residents showed agreement. These sessions could be utilized within a communication/MI curriculum or as stand-alone sessions to introduce MI concepts/techniques for addressing tobacco cessation in the pediatric setting.

Creation and implementation of a pressure ulcer prevention bundle improves patient outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Increased pressure ulcer prevalence and incidence rates led to the development of a pressure ulcer prevention program. OBJECTIVES: To decrease pressure ulcer rates below national levels by implementing strategies to improve patient outcomes. METHODS: Patients admitted to the Stony Brook University Medical Center (SBUMC) are assessed for placement in the pressure ulcer prevention program. The central element of the program is an evidence-based Pressure Ulcer Prevention Bundle using the "Bundle" concept from the Institute for Healthcare Improvement. RESULTS: The March 2006 Prevalence and Incidence Benchmarking Study demonstrates not only a decrease in institutional prevalence and incidence rates but also places SBUMC rates below last year's national benchmark rates. CONCLUSION: The implementation of a pressure ulcer prevention program has decreased prevalence and incidence rates at SBUMC and improved the quality of patient care.