Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 11 de 11
Filtrar
1.
Int Orthop ; 47(5): 1361-1372, 2023 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36847800

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Re-implantation of the tumor bearing autograft following extracorporeal radiation therapy (ECRT) has been established as an oncologically safe biological reconstruction technique following resection of bone sarcomas. However, factors affecting the ECRT graft-host bone incorporation have not been fully investigated. An insight into the factors that influence graft incorporation can circumvent the complications and increase graft survival. METHODS: A total of 96 osteotomies in 48 patients with intercalary resections of primary extremity bone sarcomas (mean age 15.8 years, mean follow-up 42.1 months) were analyzed retrospectively for factors ECRT autograft-host bone union. RESULTS: On univariate analysis, age < 20 years, metaphyseal osteotomy site, V-shaped diaphyseal osteotomy, and use of additional plate at diaphyseal osteotomy had a significantly faster time to union, while gender, tumour type, bone involved, resection length, chemotherapy, type of fixation, and use of intra-medullary fibula did not influence union time. In multivariate analysis, V-shaped diaphyseal osteotomy and use of additional plate at diaphyseal ostetomy were the independent factors with favourable time to union. None of the analyzed factors was found to have a significant effect on the union rate. The major complications were non-union in 11.4% patients, graft failure in 2.1%, infection in 12.5%, and soft tissue local recurrences in 14.5% patients. CONCLUSION: Modified diaphyseal osteotomy and augmentation of the stability of the reconstruction using additional small plates enhance the incorporation of ECRT autograft.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Óseas , Osteosarcoma , Humanos , Adolescente , Adulto Joven , Adulto , Estudios Retrospectivos , Autoinjertos , Centros de Atención Terciaria , Resultado del Tratamiento , Trasplante Óseo/efectos adversos , Trasplante Óseo/métodos , Neoplasias Óseas/radioterapia , Neoplasias Óseas/cirugía , Neoplasias Óseas/patología , Osteosarcoma/radioterapia , Osteosarcoma/cirugía , Peroné/trasplante
2.
J Surg Oncol ; 125(2): 246-255, 2022 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34599761

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Reconstruction following resection of sarcomas of the upper extremity with methods described in the prevalent literature may not be possible in few selected cases. We describe surgical phocomelia or phoco-reduction as a method of limb salvage in such cases of extensive sarcomas of the upper limb with its functional and oncological outcomes. METHODS: Evaluation of functional and oncological outcomes was performed for 11 patients who underwent surgical phocomelia or phoco-reduction for extensive sarcomas of the upper limb between 2010 and 2019. RESULTS: The mean follow-up period in the study was 27.8 months. Five patients required a segmental resection including the entire humerus while six patients underwent segmental resection around the elbow with a mean resection length of 21.5 cm. Mean Musculoskeletal Tumor Society 93 score was 22 depicting a good functional outcome. Mean handgrip strength on the operated side was 62% of the contralateral side with preservation of useful hand function. Meantime to humeroulnar union was 6.7 months. Radial nerve palsy and implant failure occurred in one patient each. No patient developed local recurrence while three patients died of metastasis. CONCLUSION: Surgical phocomelia is a prudent alternative to severely incapacitating amputations in situations where other reconstruction methods are not feasible.


Asunto(s)
Recuperación del Miembro/métodos , Sarcoma/cirugía , Extremidad Superior/cirugía , Adolescente , Adulto , Amputación Quirúrgica , Niño , Femenino , Fuerza de la Mano , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Sarcoma/fisiopatología , Extremidad Superior/fisiopatología , Adulto Joven
3.
J Surg Oncol ; 125(6): 1032-1041, 2022 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35099828

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Conventional periacetabular pelvic resections are associated with poor functional outcomes. Resections through surgical corridors beyond the conventional margins may be helpful in retaining greater function without compromising the oncological margins. METHODS: The study included a retrospective review of 82 cases of pelvic resections for pelvic tumors. Outcomes of acetabulum preservation (Group A) were compared with complete acetabular resection (Group B). Also, we compared outcomes of Type I + half resections (Group 1) with Type I + II resections (Group 2), and Type III + half resections (Group 3) with Type II + III resections (Group 4). RESULTS: Group A (n = 44) had significantly better functional outcome than Group B (n = 38) with average MSTS93 score 22.3 versus 20.1 and average HHS 91.3 versus 82.5 (p < 0.001). Group 1 (n = 14) and Group 2 (n = 12) had similar functional outcomes (mean MSTS93 score 22.07 vs. 21.58 [p = 0.597] and mean HHS 90.37 vs. 86.51 [p = 0.205]). Group 3 (n = 11) had significantly better functional outcome than Group 4 (n = 17), with mean MSTS93 score 22.8 versus 19.7 (p < 0.001) and mean HHS 92.3 versus 80.1 (p < 0.001). Oncological outcomes were similar among the groups. CONCLUSION: Transacetabular pelvic resections provide functional benefit over conventional resections without compromising oncological margins. There is a need to revisit and revise the pelvic resection planes.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Óseas , Neoplasias Pélvicas , Acetábulo/patología , Acetábulo/cirugía , Neoplasias Óseas/patología , Humanos , Márgenes de Escisión , Neoplasias Pélvicas/patología , Neoplasias Pélvicas/cirugía , Estudios Retrospectivos , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X , Resultado del Tratamiento
4.
J Hand Surg Am ; 2022 Jul 13.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35842330

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Wrist reconstruction after distal radial tumor resection poses a challenge to the orthopedic oncologist. We evaluated the functional outcomes of centralization of the ulna with ulnocarpal arthrodesis as a method of reconstruction following resection of distal radius tumors, using impairment measures and patient-reported outcomes. METHODS: Evaluation of functional outcome was performed using the Musculoskeletal Tumor Society 93 scoring system and Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand questionnaire. We also determined hand grip strength on the affected side, time to radiologic union at the ulnocarpal junction and reduction in wrist circumference. Local complications and oncologic outcomes were recorded. RESULTS: The study included 26 patients with Campanacci grade 3 giant cell tumor of the distal radius. Mean follow-up period in the study was 32.8 ± 12 months. Mean resection length was 10.3 ± 2.5 cm. Radiologic union at the ulnocarpal junction was achieved in 38.5%, 77% and 96% of the patients by 4, 5, and 6 months respectively. Mean hand grip strength was 74 ± 3.9% of the contralateral side whereas mean reduction in wrist circumference was 16.9 ± 6.4%. A good functional outcome with a mean the Musculoskeletal Tumor Society 93 score of 26 ± 1.4 and mean Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand score of 10.5 ± 6.3 was observed. Fracture of the ulna, hardware loosening, and reflex sympathetic dystrophy were each noted in 1 patient, with an overall complication rate of 10.7% (3/28). No patient had nonunion, infection, or local recurrence. CONCLUSIONS: This is a simple and effective modality of reconstruction after resection of distal radial tumors. It provides good functional outcome and preservation of good hand grip strength, with low complication rates. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic IV.

5.
J Surg Oncol ; 122(5): 825-830, 2020 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32662084

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) lockdown has presented a unique challenge for sarcoma care. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the early results and feasibility of surgeries for bone sarcomas during the COVID-19 lockdown. METHODS: Our prospectively collected orthopaedic oncological database was reviewed to include two groups of patients- those who underwent surgery in the immediate 4 weeks before lockdown (non-lockdown group) and those operated in the first 4 weeks of lockdown (lockdown group). All patients were followed-up clinically and telephonically to collect the outcome data. RESULTS: Out of the 91 patients who qualified for inclusion, fifty were classified into the non-lockdown group while 41 patients formed the lockdown group. Both the groups were comparable with respect to baseline demographic parameters. However, during the lockdown period 37 patients (90%) had undergone a major surgical intervention as against 24 patients (48%) in the non-lockdown group (P < .001). There was no significant difference in type of anaesthesia, median estimated blood loss and procedure duration. None of the patients/health care workers had evidence of severe acute respiratory syndrome-coronavirus 2 infection at 15 days follow-up. CONCLUSION: Our study results suggest that appendicular bone tumours can be safely operated with adequate precautions during the lockdown period.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Óseas/cirugía , COVID-19/epidemiología , Sarcoma/cirugía , Adulto , Neoplasias Óseas/patología , COVID-19/diagnóstico , COVID-19/transmisión , Condrosarcoma/patología , Condrosarcoma/cirugía , Estudios de Factibilidad , Femenino , Humanos , India/epidemiología , Transmisión de Enfermedad Infecciosa de Paciente a Profesional/prevención & control , Recuperación del Miembro/métodos , Recuperación del Miembro/normas , Masculino , Procedimientos Ortopédicos/métodos , Procedimientos Ortopédicos/normas , Osteosarcoma/patología , Osteosarcoma/cirugía , Pandemias , Sarcoma/patología , Sarcoma de Ewing/patología , Sarcoma de Ewing/cirugía , Centros de Atención Terciaria , Adulto Joven
6.
Cureus ; 14(5): e25245, 2022 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35755501

RESUMEN

The COVID-19 pandemic caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has drastically affected healthcare delivery to cancer patients, including those with malignant bone tumors, worldwide. Such cancer patients are more susceptible to COVID-19 infection and risk contracting the severe disease, but their holistic tumor management has also suffered a significant impact. Because of the acute shortage of healthcare resources due to their diversion in COVID management, substantial changes are needed in various aspects of management for high-grade tumor patients, particularly in developing countries and population-dense regions, so that their evidence-based appropriate treatment is ensured. Owing to a lack of consensus regarding the ideal course of action for the management of malignant bone tumors in the current situation, many such patients often get neglected, leading to loss of life/limb. This review elaborates on various guidelines proposed by different healthcare organizations and institutes regarding the modified care pathways for malignant bone neoplasms in the current coronavirus pandemic. The early published results of these modified care pathways and the changes in the oncology practice brought about by the pandemic are also discussed.

7.
J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong) ; 29(2): 23094990211007565, 2021.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34231432

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: Both Zoledronic acid and denosumab have been utilized in neo-adjuvant setting for facilitating surgery and downsizing the lesion in Giant cell tumor (GCT). This study is aimed at comparing Zoledronic acid and Denosumab, when used in neo-adjuvant setting, in terms of radiological and clinical outcomes in GCT undergoing surgical intervention. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients undergoing surgical intervention for GCT who received either denosumab or Zoledronic acid as neoadjuvant agents were retrospectively analyzed for reduction in tumor load radiologically, change in surgical plan after therapy, facilitation of surgery, therapy related complications, cost of treatment, rate of local recurrence and clinical outcomes. RESULTS: Twenty patients received denosumab and 19 patients received Zoledronic acid as neoadjuvant agent. There was no significant difference in radiological outcomes, facilitation of surgery and clinical outcomes at end of follow-up. Zoledronic acid group had lower number of recurrences, however, not statistically significant. Therapy with Zoledronic acid was significantly cheaper (p = 0.001). CONCLUSION: Zoledronic acid is a cheaper alternative to denosumab in terms of solidification of lesion, reducing recurrence rates and improving clinical outcomes. Larger prospective studies required to further delineate this outcome with Zoledronic acid.


Asunto(s)
Conservadores de la Densidad Ósea , Neoplasias Óseas , Tumor Óseo de Células Gigantes , Conservadores de la Densidad Ósea/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias Óseas/tratamiento farmacológico , Denosumab/uso terapéutico , Tumor Óseo de Células Gigantes/diagnóstico por imagen , Tumor Óseo de Células Gigantes/tratamiento farmacológico , Tumor Óseo de Células Gigantes/cirugía , Humanos , Terapia Neoadyuvante , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia , Estudios Prospectivos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Ácido Zoledrónico/uso terapéutico
8.
J Orthop Case Rep ; 11(2): 19-23, 2021 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34141663

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: The WHO defines giant cell tumor as a benign locally aggressive neoplasm with metastasizing capacity and aggressive behavior. Very rarely, these tumors are seen fungating, mostly when neglected. But when they do, the treatment option commonly conferred is amputation of the limb which is disabling and traumatizing. CASE REPORT: We report three cases of fungating limb masses (proximal tibia, distal fibula, and distal radius) diagnosed with giant cell tumor histologically, undergoing limb saving surgeries with various reconstruction techniques to endorse a good quality of life and functioning limb. CONCLUSION: Our study is one of the earliest to report medium-term follow-up after such limb salvage procedure. We recommend that salvage procedures should be considered in giant cell tumors even in the presence of fungation if there is no neurovascular encasement.

9.
J Clin Orthop Trauma ; 16: 195-201, 2021 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33717957

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Adequate reconstruction of the soft tissue defect following resection of bone tumors is challenging. Prolene mesh, despite being a useful tool, is not widely used due to the fear of deep infection. The aim of this study was to evaluate the functional outcome and complications of using a Prolene mesh in oncological reconstructions. METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted in bone tumor patients with soft tissue reconstruction using Prolene mesh between January 2017 and June 2019. Functional evaluation was done using MSTS 93 score. Complications were recorded and were classified as mechanical (dislocation and extension lag) or biological failure (wound problems and deep infection). Comparison was performed between groups with and without biological failure to identify predictive variables. RESULTS: Of 116 patients, 68 were males and 48 were females, with median age of 22.5 years. Thirty nine patients had tumors of proximal tibia, 23 of proximal femur, 25 of proximal humerus, 24 of pelvis, and five tumors at other sites. Approximately two-thirds (62.9%) of our patients underwent endoprosthetic reconstruction while the rest underwent either biological or cement spacer reconstructions. Excellent or good functional outcomes were reported in 98.3% patients as per MSTS 93 scoring. Complications were noted in 22 patients (18.9%), of which 16 had biological failure, with four patients requiring debridement and mesh removal. Dislocation of prosthesis occurred in 2 patients of proximal femur replacement. Overall re-surgery rate was 5.1% (6 patients). There was no statistically significant difference between the groups with or without biological failure with respect to demographics, site of tumor, type of procedure, blood loss, duration of surgery and history of chemotherapy. CONCLUSION: Prolene mesh is a useful tool to reconstruct the soft tissue defects following bone tumor resections. It is readily available, reliable and provides reproducible results, with no added risk of wound complications.

10.
J Clin Orthop Trauma ; 14: 162-166, 2021 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33680822

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: It has been indicated in several instances that tall stature is also an important risk factor in the development of osteosarcoma. This relationship between height and osteosarcoma is substantiated even more by the increasing evidences being put forth in the recent literature on dependence of certain tumors on the growth factors and their receptors, acting through autocrine or paracrine mechanisms. There has been no study on the Indian population that attempts to define such a relationship. PURPOSE: The primary objective of this study was to define relationship between height of patients and osteosarcoma at the time of diagnosis in the Indian population. MATERIALS/METHODS: Retrospective data was collected from the old hospital records. Height of patients at the time of diagnosis was compared with expected height of patients of the same age with reference to the standardized growth charts provided by the Indian Academy of Paediatrics. RESULTS: Out of 98 patients, there were 65 male and 33 female patients with M: F ratio being 1.97:1. The mean age at diagnosis was 17 (SD = 8) years with range of 5-55 years (median = 17 years). Height of the patients at the time of diagnosis was 155.18 (SD = 15.47) cm with range of 115 cm-184 cm (median = 159 cm). Overall, patients with Osteosarcoma were found to be shorter than the expected height deduced from the national growth charts. When patients were divided into two groups of those who were of growing age and those who had completed growth, results were similar. CONCLUSION: The observation that majority of patients with osteosarcoma in our study were stunted, is an important finding. It could be deduced from this observation that these patients are unable to mount the usual biological response to the overstimulated growth as part of tumorigenesis in osteosarcoma. This could point to a different scenario in the Indian population and more studies need to be carried out with larger number of patients to further elaborate on this observation.

11.
BMJ Case Rep ; 12(12)2019 Dec 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31826902

RESUMEN

Conjoined twins are a rare outcome of conception associated with numerous anomalies involving multiple organ systems. Musculoskeletal abnormalities like vertebral anomalies, sacral agenesis, foot deformities and hip dysplasia have been described in literature. We describe two cases of pyopagus twins with congenital talipes equinovarus and congenital vertical talus deformity which have not been described previously in this type of conjoined twins. The orthopaedist should look actively for such deformities in this patient population and be wary of the difficulties associated with their management.


Asunto(s)
Deformidades Congénitas del Pie/terapia , Manipulación Ortopédica/instrumentación , Gemelos Siameses , Moldes Quirúrgicos , Femenino , Deformidades Congénitas del Pie/fisiopatología , Humanos , Lactante , Manipulación Ortopédica/métodos , Resultado del Tratamiento
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA