Progestogen only contraception in women with congenital heart disease.

BACKGROUND: There is little information of progestogen-only contraceptives in patients with congenital heart disease (CHD) on the long-term. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the use of contraception in patients with CHD. We studied both short-acting reversible contraceptives (SARCs), oral progestin-only pills (POPs) and long-acting reversible contraceptives (LARCs): intrauterine devices (IUD-IPs) and subdermal implants both impregnated with progestogens (SI-IPs). STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective study of all women attending the preconception clinic. Contraceptive methods were classified in three TIERs of effectiveness before and after consultation. ESC classification regarding pregnancy risk, WHOMEC classification for combined oral contraceptive safety was collected. RESULTS: Six hundred and fifty-three patients. A significant proportion of them switched from TIER 3 to TIER 2 or 1 (p < .001) after consultation. One hundred and ninety-nine patients used POPs, 53 underwent IUD-IPs implantation and 36 SI-IPs, mean duration was 58 ± 8, 59 ± 8 and 53 ± 38 months, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Because of their safety and efficacy, IUD-IPs and SI-IPs should be considered as first-line contraception in patients with CHD.

We looked at the use of progestogen-only contraceptives in women with congenital heart disease (CHD) over a long period and determine how safe and effective these contraceptives are for such patients. We considered two types of contraceptives: short-acting ones like progestin-only pills (POPs) and long-acting ones like intrauterine devices and subdermal implants that release progestogens.We gathered information from 653 women and assessed how women's contraceptive choices changed before and after they had a consultation with us.After consulting with our clinic, a significant number of women switched from less effective contraceptives to more effective ones. Among the women who used POPs, most of them followed the prescribed regimen quite well. Additionally, 89 women used long-acting contraceptives, without failure of method.In conclusion, our findings suggest that long-acting progestogen-only contraceptives are safe and effective choices for contraception in women with CHD. Therefore, these options should be considered as the first choice.

Usefulness of progesterone-only components for contraception in patients with congenital heart disease.

The objective of the study is to report the contraceptive methods used by patients with congenital heart disease (CHD) before referral to a specific preconception clinic and evaluate safety and treatment adherence of the alternative contraception method, progesterone-only component (PC), offered. Contraceptive methods in the CHD population reported included estrogen-progesterone combined contraceptives (EPCC), despite the potential risk for thromboembolism. PC has been suggested as an alternative, but, no information on its use has been reported. Retrospective analysis was performed of all patients (n = 237) referred to the preconception clinic of an adult CHD center. Thirty-three percent of patients had used EPCC in the past; 3.8% had had thromboembolic events during its use. Current contraception consisted of barrier methods in 58% of patients, EPCC in 18%, and PC in 1.3%; 21.7% of patients were not using any contraception. PC was offered as an alternative in 146 patients; 73% of patients agreed to start the treatment. At a median follow-up of 1 year, 73% of patients who started PC maintained the treatment. Gynecologic side effects were reported in 25% of patients, with no cardiovascular effects. In conclusion, a significant proportion of patients with CHD were former users of EPCC, although some had formal contraindications, and the rate of PC use before referral to the preconception clinic was low. After being offered as an alternative treatment, the use of PC in its various forms was extensive, with no thrombogenic side effects and an acceptable rate of gynecologic side effects being reported.