Pediatric Presentation of Antiphospholipid Syndrome: A Review of Recent Literature With Estimation of Local Prevalence.

We aimed to investigate the epidemiology, the clinical and laboratory characteristics of the pediatric involvement of antiphospholipid syndrome (APS), by performing a review of the current evidence and reviewing local experience in the Northwest Italy. To achieve this, we performed a detailed literature search to identify articles describing clinical and laboratory characteristics of pediatric APS. In concomitance, we conducted a registry-based study collecting data from the Piedmont and Aosta Valley Rare Disease Registry including pediatric patients diagnosed with APS in the last 11 years. The literature review led to inclusion of six articles with a total of 386 pediatric patients (65% females, 50% with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) as concomitant diagnosis). Rates of venous and arterial thrombosis were 57 and 35%, respectively. "Extra-criteria manifestations" included mostly hematologic and neurologic involvement. Almost one-quarter of patients (19%) reported recurrent events and 13% manifested as catastrophic APS. A total of 17 pediatric patients (mean age 15.1 ± 2.8, 76% female) developed APS in the Northwest of Italy. In 29% of cases, SLE was a concomitant diagnosis. Deep vein thrombosis was the most frequent manifestation (28%) followed by catastrophic APS (6%). The estimated prevalence of pediatric APS in Piedmont and Aosta Valley Region is 2.5/100,000 people, whereas the estimated annual incidence is 0.2/100,000 inhabitants. In conclusion, clinical manifestations of pediatric APS seem to be more severe and with a high prevalence of noncriteria manifestations. International efforts are needed to better characterize this condition and to develop new specific diagnostic criteria to avoid missed/delayed diagnosis in children with APS.

2023 ACR/EULAR classification criteria in existing research cohorts: an international study.

OBJECTIVE: Assessing the impact of the updated ACR/EULAR APS classification criteria to our research cohort. METHODS: Consecutive patients who tested persistently positive for at least one aPL in the last three years were enrolled. The first APS Sydney index event was considered and computed for the comparison between Sydney and 2023 APS criteria. When computing the 2023 APS criteria, additional manifestations were also considered. RESULTS: The cohort comprised 249 patients (185 with APS and 64 aPL carriers according to Sydney criteria). The 185 patients had as first index event VT in 55 cases (29.8%) AT in 63 (34%) and PM in 67 (36.2%). When applying the updated criteria, 90 subjects (48.7%) failed to reach the composite score of the new criteria. The percentage of thrombotic APS per Sydney criteria decreased from 47.3% to 34.9% because of high cardiovascular risk in 23 cases, IgM aPL profile in 6 cases and in 2 patients for both reasons. Patients with PM decreased from 26.9-3.2% (39 cases of recurrent early pregnancy loss and 20 of fetal losses). Consequently, the percentage of aPL carriers increased from 26% to 61%. When looking at the disease evolution at follow-up, 32 additional patients out of 90 (35.6%) fulfilled the new APS criteria, after developing additional clinical manifestation following index event. CONCLUSION: When applying the new APS criteria to our research cohort, not negligible differences exist in patients' classification. A multidisciplinary approach will be mandatory to assess the impact into research and, ultimately, patient's care of new criteria.

Thrombosis and APS: Lessons Learned from Another Black Swan Tale.

Antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is a chronic systemic autoimmune disease characterized by venous, arterial, and microvascular thromboses and/or recurrent pregnancy morbidity, that occur in the persistent presence of antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL). APS can present with a wide range of clinical manifestations often reffered as "extra-criteria". These features, although apparently less common, can severely impact patients' outcome. Here, we report the case of a patient with a newly diagnosed APS. He previously experienced a recurrence of venous thrombosis after discontinuation of anticoagulant therapy in association with cutaneous ulcerations as presenting symptoms. Interestingly, skin lesions did not improve with full anticoagulant treatment. Due to concomitant presence of thrombotic and microvascular involvement, immunomodulatory therapy with steroid pulses followed by intravenous injections of belimumab was started, with progressive and significant amelioration, leading to complete recovery. Following the presentation of the current case report, we highlight the importance of suspecting APS in young patients experiencing unprovoked thrombosis. We also emphasized the critical issue of testing aPL during anticoagulant treatment and focused on the need of aPL retesting in patients with positivity at high titers. We also highlight the double nature of aPL-mediated clinical manifestations. While most patients presented with pure thrombotic complications, one should always remember that APS is an autoimmune-mediated disease, which can benefit from alternative therapeutic approaches beyond anticoagulation.

Open-label, prospective, phase II descriptive pilot trial of belimumab therapy for refractory and/or non-criteria manifestations of antiphospholipid syndrome: study protocol.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the safety and tolerability of belimumab given for 24 months in patients persistently positive for antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL) with clinical features attributable to aPL [refractory and/or non-criteria manifestations of the antiphospholipid syndrome (APS)]. METHODS: In this investigator-initiated, single-centre, open-label, prospective, phase II descriptive pilot trial, belimumab will be administered in 15 patients attending San Giovanni Bosco Hospital (Turin) showing refractory and/or non-criteria manifestations of APS. Subjects will receive belimumab 10 mg/kg intravenously (in addition to their ongoing APS treatment) with regimen at 0, 2, 4 weeks and every 4 weeks thereafter (up to week 104). Study endpoints determined at 4, 16, 24, 36, 52 and 104 weeks will include: primary (safety and adverse events) and secondary outcomes, such as changes in clinical outcomes (recurrent thromboses, thrombocytopenia, haemolytic anaemia, cardiovascular events, skin ulcer, aPL-related nephropathy and cognitive dysfunction), laboratory outcomes (routine tests, aPL, ENA and anti-dsDNA tests, thrombin generation assay, interferon-signature analysis, lymphocytes immunophenotyping, BLyS determination) and QoL evaluation. RESULTS: Study endpoints determined at 4, 16, 24, 36, 52 and 104 weeks will include: primary (safety and adverse events) and secondary outcomes, such as changes in clinical outcomes (recurrent thromboses, thrombocytopenia, haemolytic anaemia, cardiovascular events, skin ulcer, aPL-related nephropathy and cognitive dysfunction), laboratory outcomes (routine tests, aPL, ENA and anti-dsDNA tests, thrombin generation assay, interferon-signature analysis, lymphocytes immunophenotyping, BLyS determination) and QoL evaluation. CONCLUSIONS: Targeting B-cells is emerging as an appealing strategy for patients with APS. Preliminary observations showed aPL negativisation after starting therapy with belimumab. The clinical relevance of these findings will be investigated in this prospective study. If confirmed, the current 'anti-thrombotic' approach to APS patients could be complemented, at least in selected cases, with an 'immunomodulatory' strategy.

Finding the Needle in the Haystack: Serological and Urinary Biomarkers in Behçet's Disease: A Systematic Review.

Urinary and serological markers play an essential role in the diagnostic process of autoimmune diseases. However, to date, specific and reliable biomarkers for diagnosing Behçet's disease (BD) are still lacking, negatively affecting the management of these patients. To analyze the currently available literature on serological and urinary BD biomarkers investigated in the last 25 years, we performed a systematic literature review using the Population, Intervention, Comparison, and Outcomes (PICO) strategy. One hundred eleven studies met the eligibility criteria (6301 BD patients, 5163 controls). Most of them were retrospective, while five (5%) were prospective. One hundred ten studies (99%) investigated serological biomarkers and only two (2%) focused on urinary biomarkers. One hundred three studies (93%) explored the diagnostic potential of the biomolecules, whereas sixty-two (56%) tested their effect on disease activity monitoring. Most articles reported an increase in inflammatory markers and pro-oxidant molecules, with a decrease in antioxidants. Promising results have been shown by the omics sciences, offering a more holistic approach. Despite the vast number of investigated markers, existing evidence indicates a persistent gap in BD diagnostic/prognostic indices. While new steps have been taken in the direction of pathogenesis and disease monitoring, international efforts for the search of a diagnostic marker for BD are still needed.

Disease evolution in a long-term follow-up of 104 undifferentiated connective tissue disease patients.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the rate of disease evolution in a cohort of patients with undifferentiated connective tissue disease (UCTD) and to determine clinical and immunological features more frequently associated with disease progression. METHODS: This retrospective single-centre long-term follow-up cohort study included patients with UCTD diagnosis, ANA positive, with a follow-up of at least 2 years. RESULTS: A total of 100 UCTD patients were recruited. During the follow-up (6.2±2.1 years), 44 patients (44%) developed novel clinical and/or laboratory features (rate of development patient/year of 7%), and 21 patients (21%) evolved into a definite connective tissue disease (CTD) after a mean time of 7±5.5 years with a rate of disease evolution (patient/year) of 3%. New clinical manifestations (39 patients) included: joints (36%), haematological (30%), cutaneous (13%), pulmonary (10%) and renal (10%) involvement. New laboratory findings (17 patients (17%)) included: 2 anti-ENA positivity, 3 anti-dsDNA antibodies positivity and 6 low complement levels. At follow-up, 13 patients (61.9%) met the classification criteria for systemic lupus erythematosus, 1 patient (4.8%) for mixed CTD, 5 patients (23.8%) for systemic sclerosis and 2 patients (9.5%) for Sjögren's syndrome. Patients evolving towards a new diagnosis had longer disease duration (15.2±9.7 years vs. 10±5.8 years; respectively, p<0.005), had a higher prevalence of anti-Ro/SSA antibodies (63.2% vs. 28.4%; respectively, p<0.05) and anti-RNP antibodies (21.1% vs. 7.4%; respectively, p<0.05). The statistical difference was also confirmed after the multivariate analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Up to 45% of UCTD patients might develop novel clinical and/or laboratory features during the follow-up, leading to evolution into a definite CTD in 1 out 5 cases.

Serum Biomarkers of Renal Fibrosis: A Systematic Review.

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is a widely diffuse pathological condition which deeply impacts upon an affected patient's quality of life and its worldwide rate is predicted to further rise. The main biological mechanism underlying CKD is renal fibrosis, a non-reversible process representing, for the affected system, a point of no return of tissue damage and dysfunction, deeply reducing the possible therapeutic strategies at the disposal of physicians. The best tool clinicians can use to address the extent of renal fibrosis at any level (glomeruli, tubule-interstitium, vasculature) is kidney biopsy that, despite its overall safety, remains an invasive procedure showing some shortcomings. Thus, the identification of novel non-invasive renal fibrosis biomarkers would be of fundamental importance. Here, when systematically reviewing the available evidence on serological biomarkers associated with renal fibrosis evaluated in patients suffering from CKD in the last five years, we found that despite the presence of several promising biomarkers, the level of observed evidence is still very scattered. Probably, the use of multiple measures capable of addressing different aspects involved in this condition would be the most suitable way to capture the high complexity characterizing the renal fibrotic process, having consequently a great impact on clinical practice by maximizing prevention, diagnosis, and management.

Renal Fibrosis in Lupus Nephritis.

Fibrosis can be defined as a pathological process in which deposition of connective tissue replaces normal parenchyma. The kidney, like any organ or tissue, can be impacted by this maladaptive reaction, resulting in persistent inflammation or long-lasting injury. While glomerular injury has traditionally been regarded as the primary focus for classification and prognosis of lupus nephritis (LN), increasing attention has been placed on interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy as markers of injury severity, predictors of therapeutic response, and prognostic factors of renal outcome in recent years. This review will discuss the fibrogenesis in LN and known mechanisms of renal fibrosis. The importance of the chronicity index, which was recently added to the histological categorization of LN, and its role in predicting treatment response and renal prognosis for patients with LN, will be explored. A better understanding of cellular and molecular pathways involved in fibrosis in LN could enable the identification of individuals at higher risk of progression to chronic kidney disease and end-stage renal disease, and the development of new therapeutic strategies for lupus patients.

Prognostic and Diagnostic Values of Novel Serum and Urine Biomarkers in Lupus Nephritis: A Systematic Review.

INTRODUCTION: While renal biopsy remains the gold standard for diagnosing lupus nephritis (LN), the prognostic and diagnostic role of non-invasive biomarkers for LN is currently debated. METHODS: Available studies published in last 5 years (2015-2020) assessing the diagnostic and prognostic value of urinary and/or serological biomarkers in subjects with LN were analyzed in this systematic review. RESULTS: Eighty-five studies were included (comprehending 13,496 patients with systemic lupus erythematosus [SLE], 8,872 LN, 487 pediatric LN, 3,977 SLE but no LN, 160 pediatric SLE but no LN and 7,679 controls). Most of the studies were cross-sectional (62; 73%), while 14 (17%) were prospective. In sixty studies (71%), the diagnosis of LN was biopsy-confirmed. Forty-four out of 85 (52%) investigated only serological biomarkers, 29 studies (34%) tested their population only with urinary biomarkers, and 12 (14%) investigated the presence of both. Outcome measures to assess the clinical utility of the analyzed biomarkers were heterogeneous, including up to 21 different activity scores, with the SLEDAI (in 60%) being the most used. Despite some heterogeneity, promising results have been shown for biomarkers such as urinary monocyte chemoattractant protein, urinary adiponectin, and urinary vascular cell adhesion protein 1. DISCUSSION/CONCLUSION: While serum and urine biomarkers have the potential to improve diagnostic and prognostic pathways in patients with LN, the vast heterogeneity across studies severely limits their applicability in current clinical practice. With the kidney biopsy still representing the gold standard, future efforts should focus on harmonizing study inclusion criteria and outcomes, particularly in clinical trials, in order to improve comparability and facilitate the implementations of available biomarkers into the daily practice.

Clinical manifestations in patients with antiphospholipid antibodies: Beyond thrombosis and pregnancy loss.

The clinical spectrum of the antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) encompasses additional manifestations other than thrombosis and pregnancy morbidity, which may potentially affect every organ and system. The pathophysiology of APS indeed cannot be explained exclusively by a prothrombotic state and the "extra-criteria" manifestations of the syndrome should be attributed to other mechanisms, such as inflammation, complement and platelet activation. In this case-series, we report patients with uncommon clinical APS presentations, to highlight relevant peculiarities of the syndrome, potentially paving the way for a further update of clinical as well as laboratory manifestations of this complex immunological condition.

Treatment of antiphospholipid syndrome.

Antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is the most common acquired thrombophilia. The clinical manifestations of APS are mainly vascular thrombosis (venous and/or arterial) and/or recurrent pregnancy morbidity with the concomitant persistent presence of antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL). Therefore, the goals of the treatment of patients with APS are reducing the pregnancy morbidity and/or the prevention of thrombotic events during the follow-up. Optimal treatment of APS has long been discussed, due to the heterogeneity of the clinical manifestations and the consequent plurality in the medical specialties involved in managing this condition. This review summarizes the available evidence on primary thromboprophylaxis in aPL-positive individuals with no prior thrombotic events, secondary prophylaxis in patients with positive history for thrombotic events, the management of refractory or difficult cases and the current strategies for the management of APS during pregnancy.

Genetic Factors in Antiphospholipid Syndrome: Preliminary Experience with Whole Exome Sequencing.

As in many autoimmune diseases, the pathogenesis of the antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is the result of a complex interplay between predisposing genes and triggering environmental factors, leading to a loss of self-tolerance and immune-mediated tissue damage. While the first genetic studies in APS focused primarily on the human leukocytes antigen system (HLA) region, more recent data highlighted the role of other genes in APS susceptibility, including those involved in the immune response and in the hemostatic process. In order to join this intriguing debate, we analyzed the single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) derived from the whole exome sequencing (WES) of two siblings affected by APS and compared our findings with the available literature. We identified genes encoding proteins involved in the hemostatic process, the immune response, and the phospholipid metabolism (PLA2G6, HSPG2, BCL3, ZFAT, ATP2B2, CRTC3, and ADCY3) of potential interest when debating the pathogenesis of the syndrome. The study of the selected SNPs in a larger cohort of APS patients and the integration of WES results with the network-based approaches will help decipher the genetic risk factors involved in the diverse clinical features of APS.

Assessing the steroid-sparing effect of biological agents in randomized controlled trials for lupus: a scoping review.

Prompt disease control of flares in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a priority in treatment strategy planning. However, the long-term dosage-related collateral effects of glucocorticoids (GCs) have pushed researchers towards the identification and utilization of novel biological agents that could both induce and maintain low disease activity and remission, especially in the context of lupus nephritis (LN). This scoping review aims at assessing the current evidence of the potential steroid-sparing effect of biologic therapies by reviewing phase II and phase III randomized, placebo-controlled trials involving SLE/LN patients. A scoping review of the literature was carried out in accordance with PRISMA-ScR recommendations. Risk of bias was assessed through the utilization of the Cochrane Collaboration's tool for randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Eight RCTs met the inclusion criteria and were included in this analysis (treatment drug, 7 belimumab; 1 anifrolumab). Four studies showed a definite steroid-sparing effect (treatment drug, 3 belimumab; 1 anifrolumab), while in the remaining four RCTs, the steroid-sparing effect was not observed. When focusing on phase III trials, the overall quality of the studies resulted fair or good considering the risk of bias. However, a degree of heterogeneity of steroid regimen protocol (considering initial dosage, tapering and rescue treatment allowance) was observed. While a growing body of evidence is supporting the safety and efficacy of biological treatment in SLE, the evidence on their steroid-sparing effect remains scattered. Future research needs to pursue the identification of precise SLE clusters of patients who would benefit most from a specific treatment protocol with a definite steroid-sparing effect.

Type I interferon pathway activation across the antiphospholipid syndrome spectrum: associations with disease subsets and systemic antiphospholipid syndrome presentation.

Introduction: While the type I interferon (IFN-I) pathway is crucial in autoimmunity, its role in antiphospholipid antibody (aPL)-positive subjects, including aPL carriers and antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) patients, is poorly understood. This study aims at characterizing IFN-I pathway activation within the spectrum of aPL-positive subsets. Methods: A total of 112 patients [29 aPL carriers, 31 primary APS (PAPS), 25 secondary APS (SAPS), 27 systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) patients without aPL, and 44 healthy controls (HCs)] were recruited. IFI6, IFI44, IFI44L, MX1, IFI27, OAS1, and RSAD2 gene expression was evaluated in whole blood, and a composite index (IFN score) was calculated. Results: An overall activation of the IFN-I pathway was observed across the entire APS spectrum, with differences among genes based on the specific disease subset. The composite score revealed quantitative differences across subsets, being elevated in aPL carriers and PAPS patients compared to HCs (both p < 0.050) and increasing in SAPS (p < 0.010) and SLE patients (p < 0.001). An unsupervised cluster analysis identified three clusters, and correspondence analyses revealed differences in clusters usage across APS subsets (p < 0.001). A network analysis revealed different patterns characterizing different subsets. The associations between IFN-I pathway activation and clinical outcomes differed across APS subsets. Although no differences in gene expression were observed in systemic APS, the network analyses revealed specific gene-gene patterns, and a distinct distribution of the clusters previously identified was noted (p = 0.002). Conclusion: IFN-I pathway activation is a common hallmark among aPL-positive individuals. Qualitative and quantitative differences across the APS spectrum can be identified, leading to the identification of distinct IFN-I signatures with different clinical values beyond traditional categorization.

"How we treat" clinical dilemmas in antiphospholipid syndrome: A case-based approach.

Antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is an autoimmune condition characterized by thrombosis (arterial, venous, and microvascular) and/or pregnancy morbidity occurring in subjects persistently positive for antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL). While the APS classification criteria are being currently updated to improve homogeneity in clinical research, patients who seek medical treatment often have a variety of laboratory and clinical characteristics that may not completely fulfill the classification criteria for overt APS. Those cases might represent a challenge in terms of treatment and overall management. We aim to present a collection of challenging scenarios of patients who tested positive for aPL and to discuss available literature to guide the therapeutic strategies.

Thrombin generation assay and lupus anticoagulant synergically distinguish populations of patients with antiphospholipid antibodies.

AIM: To apply thrombin generation assay (TGA) in a large cohort of antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL)-positive patients. MATERIAL AND METHODS: 108 patients were tested with TGA and lupus anticoagulant (LA) testing and divided according to their aPL profile. Briefly, 21 patients were positive for anti-phosphatidylserine (aPS)/prothrombin (PT) IgG/IgM (group1), 29 for anti-ß2-glycoprotein-I (aß2GPI) and anti-cardiolipin (aCL) IgG/IgM (group2), 31 for aPS/PT, aß2GPI and aCL IgG/IgM (group3), 27 for aPS/PT and/or aß2GPI+aCL IgM at low-titres (group4). 31 healthy donors (HDs) and 24 controls treated with vitamin K antagonists (VKA) were included. RESULTS: The most deranged TGA and LA profiles were observed in tetra-positive patients (group3) that differed significantly to the other groups, thus those with isolated, double or triple aPL-positivity. Moreover, when comparing the TGA profile of all antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) patients, aPL-carriers, HDs and VKA controls, we observed that the aPL+ patients (especially APS) showed a distinctive profile that allowed to distinguish them from the other groups with significantly higher tLag and tPeak, and lower Peak and area under the curve.When focusing on APS clinical manifestations, patients with a high-risk profile (group3) showed significant differences from those presenting low-titres aPL (group 4) regarding the number of venous events (p=0.04), recurrence of any thrombotic event (p=0.01), of arterial events (5 vs 0, p=0.02), the occurrence of TIA (p=0.04), DVT (p=0.02) and, when analysing extracriteria manifestations, of peripheral artery disease (p=0.04). CONCLUSIONS: TGA seems a valuable approach to stratify aPL+ patients according to their risk profile. The differences among different populations of autoantibodies specificities could be considered a translational validation of the increased thrombotic risk of patients with triple or tetra aPL-positivity.

New Frontiers in Autoimmune Diagnostics: A Systematic Review on Saliva Testing.

(1) Background: Immunological laboratory testing is known to be complex, and it is usually performed in tertiary referral centers. Many criticalities affect diagnostic immunological testing, such as limited availability, the need for specifically trained laboratory staff, and potential difficulties in collecting blood samples, especially in the most vulnerable patients, i.e., the elderly and children. For this reason, the identification of a new feasible and reliable methodology for autoantibody detection is urgently needed. (2) Methods: We designed a systematic review to investigate the available literature on the utilization of saliva samples for immunological testing. (3) Results: A total of 170 articles were identified. Eighteen studies met the inclusion criteria, accounting for 1059 patients and 671 controls. The saliva collection method was mostly represented by passive drooling (11/18, 61%), and the most frequently described methodology for antibody detection was ELISA (12/18, 67%). The analysis included 392 patients with rheumatoid arthritis, 161 with systemic lupus erythematosus, 131 with type 1 diabetes mellitus, 116 with primary biliary cholangitis, 100 with pemphigus vulgaris, 50 with bullous pemphigoids, 49 with Sjogren syndrome, 39 with celiac disease, 10 with primary antiphospholipid syndromes, 8 with undifferentiated connective tissue disease, 2 with systemic sclerosis, and 1 with autoimmune thyroiditis. The majority of the reviewed studies involved adequate controls, and saliva testing allowed for a clear distinction of patients (10/12 studies, 83%). More than half of the papers showed a correlation between saliva and serum results (10/18, 55%) for autoantibody detection, with varying rates of correlation, sensitivity, and specificity. Interestingly, many papers showed a correlation between saliva antibody results and clinical manifestations. (4) Conclusions: Saliva testing might represent an appealing alternative to serum-based testing for autoantibody detection, considering the correspondence with serum testing results and the correlation with clinical manifestations. Nonetheless, standardization of sample collection processing, maintenance, and detection methodology has yet to be fully addressed.

Safety and efficacy of pre-exposure prophylaxis with tixagevimab/cilgavimab (Evusheld) in patients with glomerular diseases who received rituximab.

Background: Patients on B-cell-depleting agents may have a suboptimal response to vaccination, placing them at a higher risk of contracting severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) or suffering from a more severe prognosis. Indeed, available data on pre-exposure prophylaxis with tixagevimab/cilgavimab (Evusheld) in subjects with glomerular diseases (GDs) who received rituximab are limited. Methods: We conducted a prospective study analysing the safety and efficacy of tixagevimab/cilgavimab for pre-exposure prophylaxis in patients with GDs who received rituximab in the previous 12 months. The rates of symptomatic infections and hospitalizations were compared with those for patients with GD treated with rituximab who refused to receive tixagevimab/cilgavimab. Results: Tixagevimab/cilgavimab was administered to 22 patients (12 females, mean age 58.4 ± 19.6 years) with GD diagnoses including membranous nephropathy, lupus nephritis, anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibody-associated vasculitis and focal segmental glomerulosclerosis. No patient treated with tixagevimab/cilgavimab experienced symptomatic infection with SARS-CoV-2 during the follow-up (mean observation time of follow-up was 112 ± 23 days), while 11 of 28 controls (39.3%) reported a symptomatic infection (P = .0001), requiring hospitalization in 2 cases. Reported adverse events were mild, namely self-limiting headache [4], discomfort at the injection site [3], flu-like symptoms/myalgia [3] and fever [1]. No serious adverse events (e.g. cardiac events, anaphylaxis) were reported. Conclusion: Pre-exposure prophylaxis with tixagevimab/cilgavimab seems safe and lowered the risk of symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection by ≈40% in vaccinated subjects with GD who received anti-CD20 therapy. Possible applications in the subset of patients who need immunosuppressive therapy, especially with rituximab, in a pandemic setting might be envisaged.

Genetic Testing for a Patient with Suspected 3 Beta-Hydroxysteroid Dehydrogenase Deficiency: A Case of Unreported Genetic Variants.

3beta-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase type II deficiency (HSD3B2 deficiency), a rare form of congenital adrenal hyperplasia (CAH), is characterized by varying degrees of salt loss and incomplete masculinization in males and mild virilization or normal external genitalia in females. We report the case of a patient (46XY) showing salt loss and incomplete masculinization, markedly elevated levels of 17OHP (17 hydroxyprogesterone), ACTH (Adreno Cortico Tropic Hormone), testosterone and delta4androstenedione (delta4A), low levels of cortisol and absence of bone skeletal alterations that frequently characterize POR (Cytochrome P450 oxidoreductase) deficiency. Mutation analysis by Sanger sequencing of the HSD3B2 gene showed that the patient presented with a compound heterozygote for two novel variants c.370A>G p.Ser124Gly and c.308-6 G>A. The two HSD3B2 gene variants were also present in the patient's older brother showing only incomplete masculinization. The in silico analysis revealed a probable damaging effect of c.370A>G p.Ser124Gly: residue p.Ser124 is highly conserved among species and seems to be located in the catalytic site of the enzyme, playing a pivotal role in NAD(H) binding to its substrate. Intronic c.308-6G>A variant is predicted to be likely pathogenic; the substitution seems to cause a change in the splice acceptor site located 6bp downstream of the variant. The two siblings seem to be affected by 3ß-HSD2 deficiency; nevertheless, the two novel variants are likely to cause variable expressivity of the disease.