Femoral nerve block with selective tibial nerve block provides effective analgesia without foot drop after total knee arthroplasty: a prospective, randomized, observer-blinded study.

BACKGROUND: Sciatic nerve block when combined with femoral nerve block for total knee arthroplasty may provide superior analgesia but can produce footdrop, which may mask surgically induced peroneal nerve injury. In this prospective, randomized, observer-blinded study, we evaluated whether performing a selective tibial nerve block in the popliteal fossa would avoid complete peroneal motor block. METHODS: Eighty patients scheduled for primary total knee arthroplasty were randomized to receive either a tibial nerve block in the popliteal fossa or a sciatic nerve block proximal to its bifurcation in combination with femoral nerve block as part of a multimodal analgesia regimen. Local anesthetic solution of sufficient volume to encircle the target nerve was administered for the block, up to a maximum of 20 mL. General anesthesia was administered for surgery. After emergence from anesthesia, in the recovery room, the presence or absence of peroneal sensory and motor block was noted. Pain scores and opioid consumption were recorded for 24 hours after surgery. RESULTS: The tibial nerve block and sciatic nerve block were performed 1.7 cm (99% CI, 1.3 to 2.1) and 9.4 cm (99% CI, 8.3 to 10.5) proximal to the popliteal crease, respectively (99% CI for difference between means: 6.4 to 9.0; P < 0.001). A lower volume of ropivacaine 0.5% was used for the tibial nerve block, 8.7 mL (99% CI, 7.9 to 9.4) versus 15.2 mL (99% CI, 14.9 to 15.5), respectively (99% CI for difference between means, 5.6 to 7.3; P < 0.001). No patient receiving a tibial nerve block developed complete peroneal motor block compared to 82.5% of patients with sciatic nerve block (P < 0.001). There were no significant differences in the pain scores and opioid consumption between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: Tibial nerve block performed in the popliteal fossa in close proximity to the popliteal crease avoided complete peroneal motor block and provided similar postoperative analgesia compared to sciatic nerve block when combined with femoral nerve block for patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty.

Decreasing the local anesthetic volume from 20 to 10 mL for ultrasound-guided interscalene block at the cricoid level does not reduce the incidence of hemidiaphragmatic paresis.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: This prospective, randomized, double blind study was designed to determine whether reduction in volume from 20 to 10 mL of ropivacaine 0.5% for ultrasound-guided interscalene block might decrease the incidence of diaphragmatic paresis and preserve pulmonary function. METHOD: Thirty patients scheduled for arthroscopic shoulder surgery were randomized to receive either 10 or 20 mL of ropivacaine 0.5% for interscalene block at the level of the cricoid cartilage. General anesthesia was administered for surgery, and the surgeon infiltrated lidocaine at the port sites. Hemidiaphragmatic excursion and pulmonary function tests were measured before block, 15 mins after block, and at the time of discharge from recovery room. Onset and duration of sensory dermatomal spread, motor block, pain scores, and analgesic consumption were recorded. RESULTS: Hemidiaphragmatic paresis occurred 15 mins after block performance in 14 of 15 patients in each group. At postanesthesia care unit discharge, 13 of 15 patients in each group continued to demonstrate hemidiaphragmatic paresis. Significant reduction of spirometric values(forced vital capacity, forced expiratory volume at 1 sec, and peak expiratory flow) occurred to a similar degree in both groups after block.Sensory dermatomal spread, motor block, pain scores, and analgesic consumption were not significantly different between groups. CONCLUSIONS: Decreasing the volume for interscalene block from 20 to 10 mL did not reduce the incidence of hemidiaphragmatic paresis or impairment in pulmonary function, which persisted at discharge from recovery room. No significant differences in quality or duration of analgesia were observed.