Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio predicts anastomotic dehiscence.

BACKGROUND: Anastomotic dehiscence (AD) is the most feared complication following colonic and rectal anastomosis. Multiple attempts have been made to correlate the levels of biomarkers to the risk of AD. This study attempts to compare C-reactive protein (CRP), procalcitonin (PCT) and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) as predictors of AD. METHOD: This case-controlled study collected data on patients undergoing colonic and rectal anastomosis over an 18-month period. Levels of CRP, PCT and NLR were recorded daily for the first 5 days post-operatively. These results were then compared between those who developed AD and those who did not. RESULTS: A total of 136 patients were included; 11 (8.1%) patients developed AD. CRP and NLR were useful predictors of AD with an area under the curve of 0.81 and 0.78 on post-operative day 4. PCT was not found to be raised significantly higher in patients who developed AD compared to those who did not. CONCLUSION: CRP and NLR are useful predictors of AD. PCT is not a useful predictor of AD.

Emergency left colonic resections on an acute surgical unit: does subspecialization improve outcomes?

BACKGROUND: Left-sided colonic pathologies requiring emergency resection are commonly encountered on an acute surgical unit. Subspecialist colorectal (CR) management of these patients may result in decreased morbidity, mortality and stoma rates. This study is the first of its kind comparing outcomes between CR surgeons and general surgeons on an acute surgical unit. METHODS: This is a retrospective review of 196 consecutive patients who underwent emergency left colonic resection on an acute surgical unit between January 2009 and July 2014. Patients were divided into two groups dependent on whether their surgery was managed by a CR specialist or general surgeon. Primary outcome measures were 30-day mortality, rate of primary anastomosis and overall stoma rate. RESULTS: Patients in the two groups were comparable for age, sex, American Society for Anesthesiologists score as well as CR POSSUM scores. Rates of primary anastomosis were significantly higher in the CR group compared with the acute surgical unit group (85.5 versus 28.7%, P ≤ 0.001). Overall stoma rates were significantly lower in the CR group (40.4 versus 88.8%, P = 0.0001). Thirty-day mortality was similar in both groups. Other secondary markers of morbidity including length of stay, return to theatre, anastomotic leak rate, wound problems and systemic complications had no significant difference between the two groups. CONCLUSION: Subspecialist CR management of patients undergoing emergency left-sided colonic resection on an acute surgical unit is associated with a similar level of morbidity and mortality while safely achieving significantly higher rates of primary anastomosis and lower stoma rates.

Anal incontinence.

Anal incontinence is a life restricting condition that is sometimes challenging to treat. There is an equal gender prevalence, however women are more likely to present particularly early in life, as a result of obstetric injury. This is still one of the leading causes of anal incontinence and sphincter tears can be missed at the time of delivery. As a result, there is a heightened awareness for sphincter injury based on risk assessment, digital rectal examination and an endo-anal ultrasound. Surgical repair is still invaluable in the presence of disruption and salvage procedures for severe refractory incontinence such as the dynamic gracilloplasty and the artificial bowel sphincter continue to be perfected. Mini invasive procedures such as rectal irrigation and sacral neuromodulaton have had a successful outcome and we have had to depend less on the more invasive treatments. Above all there is a growing need to protect not only the baby but also the pelvic floor and anal sphincter from traumatic deliveries, through early risk assessment and research.

Hemorrhoids and fissure in ano.

Hemorrhoids and anal fissures are common benign anorectal conditions that form a significant part of a colorectal surgeon's workload. This review summarizes and evaluates the current techniques available in their management.

Management of anal canal cancer.

PURPOSE: Chemoradiotherapy has replaced radical surgery as the initial treatment of choice for anal canal cancer. The roles of these therapeutic modalities are discussed and recommendations on management of anal canal cancer are made based on currently available evidence. Areas for further studies also are identified. METHODS: Literature on management of anal canal cancer from January 1970 to July 2003 obtained via MEDLINE was reviewed. Reports on anal margin cancers were excluded. RESULTS: Randomized, prospective, Phase 3 trials in Europe and the United States showed that chemoradiotherapy with 5-fluorouracil and mitomycin C was superior in local control, colostomy-free rate, progression-free survival, and cancer-specific survival compared with radiation alone. In larger tumors, the addition of mitomycin C to radiotherapy and 5-fluorouracil improves local control, colostomy-free, and disease-free survival but is associated with more acute hematologic toxicity. Chemoradiotherapy, including Cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil, appeared to be equal or superior to surgery as salvage therapy in patients with residual disease six weeks after initial nonsurgical treatment. CONCLUSIONS: To improve treatment outcomes and reduce treatment-related toxicities, further studies are required to elucidate the optimal drug combination and doses, optimal radiation field, total dose, and fraction sizes. Randomized, multicenter trials are needed to define the treatment protocol that provides the highest rate of sphincter preservation with acceptable toxicity. Few studies addressed the treatment of metastatic disease, which remains a major cause of mortality.

Outcome of anterior sphincter repair for obstetric injury: comparison of early and late results.

INTRODUCTION: Fecal incontinence is commonly caused by structural sphincter damage secondary to obstetric trauma. Anterior sphincter repair achieves reasonable early improvement rates of between 69 and 97 percent. Few series have reported long-term results. This study was designed to evaluate the long-term outcome and examine whether there are any predictive factors that could refine patient selection and predict long-term outcome. METHODS: The case records of all patients who underwent anterior sphincter repair between January 1991 and December 1999 were studied. The patients were sent a questionnaire that asked about preoperative and postoperative and current bowel function, with questions about quality of life and overall satisfaction with the outcome of the procedure. The late outcome after a mean period of 70 months from the operation was compared with the early clinical results. All the preoperative and operative variables were studied to ascertain their significance in predicting success. RESULTS: Ninety-three patients were admitted to the study. Anterior sphincter repair was successful in improving continence in 73 percent of patients. Long-term results were obtained for 62 patients. Seventy percent had objective clinical improvement based on the questionnaire, but only 55 percent considered their bowel control had improved and only 45 percent were satisfied by the operation. Urgency was the most important symptom in determining patient satisfaction; 24 of 26 patients in whom urgency had improved were happy with their outcome. None of the preoperative and operative variables predicted the outcome. CONCLUSIONS: Patients should be warned that complete continence is difficult to achieve and that symptoms tend to deteriorate with time.

Toward lowering morbidity, mortality, and stoma formation in emergency colorectal surgery: the role of specialization.

INTRODUCTION: Surgical management of left-sided large bowel emergencies has been evolving toward single-staged procedures. Selection for single or staged resection remains the most controversial issue. METHODS: The results from a series of 336 emergency colorectal procedures performed between January 1990 and December 2000 for cancer and diverticular disease by two different surgical units in one hospital are reported: one with a specific interest in colorectal surgery, and one specialized in upper gastrointestinal surgery. RESULTS: A primary anastomosis was performed in 142 (64.3 percent) patients by colorectal surgeons and in 42 (36.5 percent) by noncolorectal surgeons (P < 0.0001). The overall morbidity and mortality rates were lower for colon and rectal surgeons (14.5 vs. 24.3 percent and 10.4 vs. 17.4 percent, respectively). Trainees were more likely to perform anastomoses when assisted by colorectal consultants (72.1 percent of cases) than when a noncolorectal consultant was present (47.5 percent of cases; P < 0.05). The 30-day mortality for patients with primary anastomosis was 6 percent, and anastomotic dehiscence occurred in nine (4.9 percent) patients. The mortality for patients undergoing staged resections (21.1 percent) was significantly higher than those who had primary resections performed (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Primary anastomosis for left-sided colorectal diseases can be performed with low morbidity and mortality in selected patients. Specialization increased anastomotic rates and reduced morbidity. This study suggests that colon and rectal surgeons should manage colorectal emergencies, and trainees should not be left unsupervised.

Patterns and clinical outcomes associated with routine intravenous sodium and fluid administration after colorectal resection.

Excess intravenous water and sodium may be associated with postoperative complications and an adverse outcome. However, the effect of the magnitude of the surgery on such a relation has not been studied. This study assesses current practice in intravenous fluid and sodium administration after colonic and rectal resection and its relation to the postoperative outcome. A series of 100 consecutive patients undergoing elective colonic (n = 44) or rectal resection (n = 56) were included in a retrospective case-cohort study. The volumes of water and sodium from intravenous fluid and antibiotic administration on the day of surgery and the next 5 days were recorded together with the clinical outcome. The mean +/- SEM fluid and sodium administration on the day of operation was greater after rectal than colonic resection (4.6 +/- 0.2 vs. 3.6 +/- 0.2 liters and 507 +/- 34 vs. 389 +/- 22 mmol, respectively (p < 0.05). The mean +/- SEM rate of daily fluid and sodium administration for the 5 subsequent days was greater following rectal than colonic resection (2.1 +/- 0.1 vs. 1.8 +/- 0.1 L/day and 155 +/- 8.7 vs. 128 +/- 8.0 mmol/day; p < 0.05). For all resections, there were no differences in fluid and sodium administration on the day of surgery in patients with or without postoperative complications. During the subsequent 5 days, patients with complications after colonic resection had a higher postoperative mean rate of intravenous sodium administration than those who did not (149 +/- 12 vs. 115 +/- 10 mmol; p < 0.05). A similar pattern was not observed following rectal resection. Current postoperative intravenous fluid prescription delivers approximately 2 liters of fluid and 140 mmol of sodium per day. Complications after colonic, but not rectal, resection are associated with more early postoperative daily intravenous sodium administration. Because colonic resection poses less of a physiologic insult than rectal resection, the overall outcome in the former group may be more sensitive to the interplay between fluid and sodium overload and patient co-morbidity.