Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
Tipo del documento
Asunto de la revista
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
J Pediatr Surg ; : 161897, 2024 Sep 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39349345

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Pediatric melanoma is the most common skin cancer in children. Achieving surgical margins recommended by the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) for wide local excision (WLE) is challenging in children with less body domain. This study investigated whether surgical margin impacted postoperative clinical outcomes following WLE for melanoma in children and adolescents. METHODS: All patients ≤21 years undergoing WLE between 2007 and 2023 were analyzed. Patients were categorized in groups of surgical margin <2 cm vs. ≥2 cm. The chi-square test/Fisher's exact test and Mann-Whitney U test were used to analyze categorical and continuous variables between groups. Multivariate logistic regression was used to determine the association of age and tumor location with surgical margin group and whether NCCN guidelines for WLE were met. RESULTS: Of the 59 patients included, 61% had WLE with <2 cm margins. Head/neck melanomas were less likely to have margins ≥2 cm (OR = 0.121, 95% CI 0.022-0.648, p = 0.014) and margins that met the NCCN guidelines (OR = 0.002, 95% CI 0.003-0.215, p < 0.001) when compared to trunk/extremity primaries. There was no difference in the rate of postoperative complications or need for intervention for complications between patients with margins <2 cm and those with ≥2 cm. No patients experienced local recurrence with a median follow-up of 52 months (IQR: 16 to 93). CONCLUSION: Pediatric head/neck melanomas undergoing WLE were likelier to have narrow margins <2 cm and less likely to meet NCCN criteria. Narrow margins may achieve excellent results for pediatric melanoma patients. TYPE OF STUDY: This is a treatment study. LEVELS OF EVIDENCE: This is a Level III retrospective comparative study.

2.
Am Surg ; 89(6): 2820-2823, 2023 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34797195

RESUMEN

Development of a post-esophagectomy hiatal hernia (PEHH) is a rare, but problematic, sequela with the current reported prevalence ranging up to 20%. To determine the incidence rate of PEHH at our institution, a retrospective review of all transhiatal esophagectomies performed from 2012 to 2020 was conducted. Demographic, operative, and oncologic data were collected, rates of PEHH were calculated, and characteristics of subsequent repair were reviewed and analyzed. A total of 160 transhiatal esophagectomies were included, of which four patients (2.5%) developed a PEHH at a mean of 12 months postoperatively (range: 3-28 months) with symptomatology driving the diagnosis for three patients. The limited size of our study does not allow for statistically significant determinations regarding risk factors or method of repair. The true prevalence of a hiatal defect is likely higher than reported, as clinically asymptomatic patients are not captured in our current literature.


Asunto(s)
Hernia Hiatal , Laparoscopía , Humanos , Hernia Hiatal/diagnóstico , Esofagectomía/efectos adversos , Esofagectomía/métodos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Incidencia , Laparoscopía/efectos adversos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Herniorrafia/métodos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA