Use of the Quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment Score for Prediction of Intensive Care Unit Admission Due to Septic Shock after Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy: A Multicenter Study.

PURPOSE: Recent studies have demonstrated that quick sequential organ failure assessment criteria may be more accurate than systemic inflammatory response syndrome criteria to predict postoperative sepsis. In this study we evaluated the ability of these 2 criteria to predict septic shock after percutaneous nephrolithotomy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a retrospective multicenter study in 320 patients who underwent percutaneous nephrolithotomy at a total of 8 institutions. The criteria for quick sequential organ failure assessment and systemic inflammatory response syndrome were collected 24 hours postoperatively. The study primary outcome was postoperative septic shock. Secondary outcomes included 30 and 90-day emergency department visits, and the hospital readmission rate. RESULTS: Three of the 320 patients (0.9%) met the criteria for postoperative septic shock. These 3 patients had positive criteria for quick sequential organ failure assessment and systemic inflammatory response syndrome. Of the entire cohort 23 patients (7%) met quick sequential organ failure assessment criteria and 103 (32%) met systemic inflammatory response syndrome criteria. Specificity for postoperative sepsis was significantly higher for quick sequential organ failure assessment than for systemic inflammatory response syndrome (93.3% vs 68.4%, McNemar test p <0.001). The positive predictive value was 13% for quick sequential organ failure assessment criteria and 2.9% for systemic inflammatory response syndrome criteria. On multivariate logistic regression systemic inflammatory response syndrome criteria significantly predicted an increased probability of the patient receiving a transfusion (ß = 1.234, p <0.001). Positive quick sequential organ failure assessment criteria significantly predicted an increased probability of an emergency department visit within 30 days (ß = 1.495, p <0.05), operative complications (ß = 1.811, p <0.001) and transfusions (p <0.001). The main limitation of the study is that it was retrospective. CONCLUSIONS: Quick sequential organ failure assessment criteria were superior to systemic inflammatory response syndrome criteria to predict infectious complications after percutaneous nephrolithotomy.

Patient Demand for Urologists in the United States: A Google Trends Analysis.

INTRODUCTION: We sought to quantify patient demand for urologists on a state-by-state basis in the United States. METHODS: Google Trends data were analyzed from 2004-2019 to determine average relative search volume for the term "urologist" in each state. The 2019 American Urological Association Census was used to determine the number of practicing urologists per state. A per capita concentration of urologists was calculated by dividing the number of providers by the estimated population in each state as reported by the 2019 Census Bureau. Relative search volume values were then divided by the concentration of urologists to estimate a physician demand index for each state scaled 0-100. RESULTS: The physician demand index was highest in Mississippi (100), Nevada (89), New Mexico (87), Texas (82), and Oklahoma (78). The concentration of urologists per 10,000 people was greatest in New Hampshire (0.537), New York (0.529), and Massachusetts (0.514), and lowest in Utah (0.268), New Mexico (0.248), and Nevada (0.234). Relative search volume was highest in New Jersey (100.00), Louisiana (91.67), and Alabama (87.67), and lowest in Wisconsin (31.17), Oregon (29.17), and North Dakota (28.50). CONCLUSIONS: The findings of this study suggest that demand is greatest in the Southern and Intermountain regions of the United States. Facing a shortage in the urology workforce, these data may aid physicians and policy makers in focusing interventions. These findings may further aid in future job allocation and practice distribution.

Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy in Horseshoe Kidneys: Results of a Multicentric Study.

Objective: To report the outcomes of percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) in horseshoe kidneys (HSK) in 12 institutions worldwide and evaluate the impact of patient position during operation. Methods: We carried out a retrospective analysis of PCNL procedures performed between 2008 and 2018 in patients with HSK. Pre-, peri-, and postoperative data were collected, and a subgroup analysis was performed according to patient position. Success was defined as an absence of >4-mm fragments. Values of p < 0.05 were considered significant. Results: We analyzed 106 procedures. The transfusion, complication, and immediate success rates (ISRs) were 3.8%, 17.5%, and 54.7%, respectively. The final success rate (FSR) increased to 72.4% after a mean of 0.24 secondary procedures. Logistic regression showed that higher body mass index (BMI) and stone size were significantly associated with residual fragments ≥4 mm. Sixty-seven patients (63.2%) were treated in prone and 39 (36.8%) in supine position. The prone group had a significantly higher BMI than the supine group (30.1 vs 27.7, p = 0.024). The transfusion, complication, and ISRs between the prone and supine groups were 4.5% vs 2.6% (p = 0.99), 16.9% vs 18.4% (p = 0.99), and 52.5% vs 69.2% (p = 0.151), respectively. Surgical time was significantly longer in the prone group (126.5 vs 100 minutes, p = 0.04). Upper pole was the preferred access in 80.3% of the prone group and 43.6% of the supine group (p < 0.001). The prone group had significantly more Clavien 2 complications than the supine (p = 0.013). The FSR in the prone and supine groups increased to 66.1% and 82.1% after 0.26 and 0.21 secondary procedures, respectively. No complications higher than Clavien 3 occurred. Conclusion: PCNL in patients with HSK is safe and effective with a low complication rate. Higher BMI and stone size negatively impacted outcomes. Supine PCNL may be an option for treating kidney stones in patients with HSK.

Improvements in Ureteroscopy Efficiency When Performed at an Ambulatory Surgery Center.

INTRODUCTION: We compared the perioperative efficiency and outcomes of ureteroscopy performed at an ambulatory surgery center versus a tertiary care academic medical center. METHODS: With institutional review board approval de-identified records were obtained for ureteroscopies performed by a single surgeon from April 2016 to June 2017 at an ambulatory surgery center and tertiary care academic medical center for patients who were American Society of Anesthesiologists® class 1 or 2. Controlling for patient, stone and case order characteristics, multiple linear regressions were used to evaluate differences in total, preoperative, operative, postoperative, delay and operating room turnaround times between the 2 facility types. Emergency department visits within 30 days were also assessed. RESULTS: All mean times were shorter at the ambulatory surgery center compared to the tertiary care academic medical center, including operative time (25 vs 36 minutes, p <0.001), postoperative time (42 vs 103 minutes, p <0.001) and operating room turnaround time (17 vs 58 minutes, p <0.001). On average, patients spent 147 fewer minutes in facility (p <0.001). On multiple linear regression adjusting for covariates significant on univariate analysis, all times were significantly shorter at the ambulatory surgery center than at the tertiary care academic medical center. There was no difference in 30-day emergency department visits (p=0.818). CONCLUSIONS: For the same procedure by the same surgeon, patients spent on average 2.5 hours less in facility if the procedure was performed at an ambulatory surgery center compared to an academic medical center. This difference was driven primarily by perioperative care.

Are Emergently Placed Nephrostomy Tubes Suitable for Subsequent Percutaneous Endoscopic Renal Surgery?

OBJECTIVE: To determine the percentage of emergently placed nephrostomy tubes (NT) that were subsequently deemed usable for definitive percutaneous nephrolithotomy or percutaneous antegrade ureteroscopy in patients presenting with nephrolithiasis. METHODS: A multi-institutional retrospective database review was completed to identify patients who underwent emergent NT placement and then subsequent percutaneous nephrolithotomy or percutaneous antegrade ureteroscopy. Demographic, operative, and postoperative data were collected. Complications were classified using the Clavien-Dindo system. RESULTS: A total of 36 patients with 41 NTs met inclusion criteria. Indications for emergent NT placement were: obstruction with evidence of urinary tract infection/pyelonephritis (61%) and obstruction with acute kidney injury (39%). After recovery from the acute event and NT placement and during subsequent percutaneous surgical procedures, 9 NTs (22%) were sufficient without need for additional percutaneous access, 2 NTs (5%) were partially sufficient and were used in conjunction with an additional percutaneous access tract, and 30 NTs (73%) were unusable. CONCLUSION: In this multi-institutional review, only 22% of NTs placed for emergent indications were sufficient for subsequent percutaneous surgery without the creation of additional percutaneous tracts. Urologists should be prepared to obtain additional access during definitive percutaneous renal surgery in patients who have had a tube placed under emergent conditions.