Percutaneous Electrical Nerve Field Stimulation in Children and Adolescents With Functional Dyspepsia-Integrating a Behavioral Intervention.

OBJECTIVES: Functional dyspepsia (FD) includes postprandial distress and epigastric pain syndrome. Percutaneous electrical nerve field stimulation (PENFS) in addition to behavioral interventions (BI) has shown benefits in children with functional abdominal pain but not specifically in FD. We aimed to assess the efficacy of PENFS for treating FD and compare the outcomes with those who received the combination of PENFS + BI. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Charts of patients with FD who completed four weeks of PENFS were evaluated. A subset of patients received concurrent BI. Demographic data, medical history, and symptoms were documented. Outcomes at different time points included subjective symptom responses and validated questionnaires collected clinically (Abdominal Pain Index [API], Nausea Severity Scale [NSS], Functional Disability Inventory [FDI], Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index [PSQI], Children's Somatic Symptoms Inventory [CSSI], Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information Systems [PROMIS] Pediatric Anxiety and Depression scales). RESULT: Of 84 patients, 61% received PENFS + BI, and 39% received PENFS alone. In the entire cohort, API (p < 0.0001), NSS (p = 0.001), FDI (p = 0.001), CSSI (p < 0.0001), PSQI (p = 0.01), PROMIS anxiety (p = 0.02), and depression (p = 0.01) scores improved from baseline to three weeks and at three months. Subjective responses showed nausea improvement (p = 0.01) and a trend for improvement in abdominal pain (p = 0.07) at week three. Abdominal pain subjectively improved at week three and three months (p = 0.003 and 0.02, respectively), nausea at week three and three months (p = 0.01 and 0.04, respectively), and a trend for improvement in sleep disturbances at week three and three months (p = 0.08 and p = 0.07, respectively) in the PENFS + BI group vs PENFS alone. CONCLUSION: Abdominal pain, nausea, functioning, somatization, sleep disturbances, anxiety, and depression improved at three weeks and three months after PENFS in pediatric FD. Subjective pain and nausea improvement were greater in the PENFS + BI group than in the group with PENFS alone, suggesting an additive effect of psychologic therapy.

The Effects of Multi-Day vs. Single Pre-exercise Nitrate Supplement Dosing on Simulated Cycling Time Trial Performance and Skeletal Muscle Oxygenation.

Jo, E, Fischer, M, Auslander, AT, Beigarten, A, Daggy, B, Hansen, K, Kessler, L, Osmond, A, Wang, H, and Wes, R. The effects of multiday vs. single pre-exercise nitrate supplement dosing on simulated cycling time trial performance and skeletal muscle oxygenation. J Strength Cond Res 33(1): 217-224, 2019-A transient augmentation in the metabolic efficiency of skeletal muscle is the purported basis for dietary nitrate supplementation amongst competitive and recreational athletes alike. Previous studies support the ergogenic effects of nitrate supplementation, as findings indicated improved microvascular blood flow, exercise economy, and performance with relatively short-term supplementation. As with most ergogenic aids, the optimum duration of supplementation before performance or competition, i.e., loading phase, is a critical determinant for efficacy. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of long-term vs. single dosing nitrate supplementation on skeletal muscle oxygenation and cycling performance. In a randomized, placebo controlled, double blind, parallel design study, healthy, recreationally active men (n = 15) and women (n = 14) subjects (age = 18-29 years) completed an 8 km (5 mi) simulated cycling time trial before and after a 14-day supplementation period with either a nitrate supplement (Multi-Day Dosing Group) (n = 14) or placebo (Single Pre-Exercise Dosing Group; SD) (n = 15). Both groups consumed a single dose of the nitrate supplement 2 hours before the post-treatment time trial. In addition, skeletal muscle oxygenation was measured via near-infrared spectroscopy during each time trial. Multiday nitrate supplementation significantly decreased time to completion (p = 0.01) and increased average power (p = 0.04) and speed (p = 0.02) from pre-to post-treatment, while a single dosing produced no significant changes to these measures. There were no significant differences over time and across treatments for any other measures including muscle oxygenation variables. Overall, long-term nitrate supplementation appears to have an advantage over a single pre-exercise dosing on cycling performance and metabolic efficiency as indicated by an increase in power output with no change in oxygenation.