RESUMEN
IMPORTANCE: Antibiotic-resistant bacteria are associated with increased patient morbidity and mortality. It is unknown whether wearing gloves and gowns for all patient contact in the intensive care unit (ICU) decreases acquisition of antibiotic-resistant bacteria. OBJECTIVE: To assess whether wearing gloves and gowns for all patient contact in the ICU decreases acquisition of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) or vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus (VRE) compared with usual care. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Cluster-randomized trial in 20 medical and surgical ICUs in 20 US hospitals from January 4, 2012, to October 4, 2012. INTERVENTIONS: In the intervention ICUs, all health care workers were required to wear gloves and gowns for all patient contact and when entering any patient room. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The primary outcome was acquisition of MRSA or VRE based on surveillance cultures collected on admission and discharge from the ICU. Secondary outcomes included individual VRE acquisition, MRSA acquisition, frequency of health care worker visits, hand hygiene compliance, health careassociated infections, and adverse events. RESULTS: From the 26,180 patients included, 92,241 swabs were collected for the primary outcome. Intervention ICUs had a decrease in the primary outcome of MRSA or VRE from 21.35 acquisitions per 1000 patient-days (95% CI, 17.57 to 25.94) in the baseline period to 16.91 acquisitions per 1000 patient-days (95% CI, 14.09 to 20.28) in the study period, whereas control ICUs had a decrease in MRSA or VRE from 19.02 acquisitions per 1000 patient-days (95% CI, 14.20 to 25.49) in the baseline period to 16.29 acquisitions per 1000 patient-days (95% CI, 13.48 to 19.68) in the study period, a difference in changes that was not statistically significant (difference, −1.71 acquisitions per 1000 person-days, 95% CI, −6.15 to 2.73; P = .57). For key secondary outcomes, there was no difference in VRE acquisition with the intervention (difference, 0.89 acquisitions per 1000 person-days; 95% CI, −4.27 to 6.04, P = .70), whereas for MRSA, there were fewer acquisitions with the intervention (difference, −2.98 acquisitions per 1000 person-days; 95% CI, −5.58 to −0.38; P = .046). Universal glove and gown use also decreased health care worker room entry (4.28 vs 5.24 entries per hour, difference, −0.96; 95% CI, −1.71 to −0.21, P = .02), increased room-exit hand hygiene compliance (78.3% vs 62.9%, difference, 15.4%; 95% CI, 8.99% to 21.8%; P = .02) and had no statistically significant effect on rates of adverse events (58.7 events per 1000 patient days vs 74.4 events per 1000 patient days; difference, −15.7; 95% CI, −40.7 to 9.2, P = .24). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: The use of gloves and gowns for all patient contact compared with usual care among patients in medical and surgical ICUs did not result in a difference in the primary outcome of acquisition of MRSA or VRE. Although there was a lower risk of MRSA acquisition alone and no difference in adverse events, these secondary outcomes require replication before reaching definitive conclusions. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT0131821.
Asunto(s)
Infección Hospitalaria/prevención & control , Guantes Protectores , Infecciones por Bacterias Grampositivas/prevención & control , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos/normas , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/prevención & control , Vestimenta Quirúrgica , Anciano , Enterococcus , Femenino , Adhesión a Directriz , Desinfección de las Manos , Humanos , Control de Infecciones/métodos , Masculino , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente a Meticilina , Persona de Mediana Edad , Personal de Hospital , Resistencia a la VancomicinaRESUMEN
This study determined the survivability of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) for extended periods of time and temperatures using a standard swab for assessment. Our study showed that transportation in Liquid Amies medium could be performed at room temperature or 4°C for up to 14 days without a decrease in recovery of MRSA or VRE.
Asunto(s)
Técnicas Bacteriológicas/métodos , Enterococcus/fisiología , Infecciones por Bacterias Grampositivas/diagnóstico , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente a Meticilina/fisiología , Viabilidad Microbiana , Manejo de Especímenes/métodos , Resistencia a la Vancomicina , Medios de Cultivo/química , Enterococcus/efectos de los fármacos , Enterococcus/aislamiento & purificación , Enterococcus/efectos de la radiación , Infecciones por Bacterias Grampositivas/microbiología , Humanos , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente a Meticilina/aislamiento & purificación , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente a Meticilina/efectos de la radiación , Temperatura , Factores de TiempoRESUMEN
IMPORTANCE: Feasibility, effectiveness, and sustainability of large-scale readmission reduction efforts are uncertain. The Greater New Haven Coalition for Safe Transitions and Readmission Reductions was funded by the Center for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) to reduce readmissions among all discharged Medicare fee-for-service (FFS) patients. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether overall Medicare FFS readmissions were reduced through an intervention applied to high-risk discharge patients. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This quasi-experimental evaluation took place at an urban academic medical center. Target discharge patients were older than 64 years with Medicare FFS insurance, residing in nearby zip codes, and discharged alive to home or facility and not against medical advice or to hospice; control discharge patients were older than 54 years with the same zip codes and discharge disposition but without Medicare FFS insurance if older than 64 years. High-risk target discharge patients were selectively enrolled in the program. INTERVENTIONS: Personalized transitional care, including education, medication reconciliation, follow-up telephone calls, and linkage to community resources. MEASUREMENTS: We measured the 30-day unplanned same-hospital readmission rates in the baseline period (May 1, 2011, through April 30, 2012) and intervention period (October 1, 2012, through May 31, 2014). RESULTS: We enrolled 10â¯621 (58.3%) of 18â¯223 target discharge patients (73.9% of discharge patients screened as high risk) and included all target discharge patients in the analysis. The mean (SD) age of the target discharge patients was 79.7 (8.8) years. The adjusted readmission rate decreased from 21.5% to 19.5% in the target population and from 21.1% to 21.0% in the control population, a relative reduction of 9.3%. The number needed to treat to avoid 1 readmission was 50. In a difference-in-differences analysis using a logistic regression model, the odds of readmission in the target population decreased significantly more than that of the control population in the intervention period (odds ratio, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.83-0.99; P = .03). In a comparative interrupted time series analysis of the difference in monthly adjusted admission rates, the target population decreased an absolute -3.09 (95% CI, -6.47 to 0.29; P = .07) relative to the control population, a similar but nonsignificant effect. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: This large-scale readmission reduction program reduced readmissions by 9.3% among the full population targeted by the CMS despite being delivered only to high-risk patients. However, it did not achieve the goal reduction set by the CMS.
Asunto(s)
Medicaid/estadística & datos numéricos , Medicare/estadística & datos numéricos , Conciliación de Medicamentos/estadística & datos numéricos , Alta del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Readmisión del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Población Urbana/estadística & datos numéricos , Centros Médicos Académicos , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Estudios de Factibilidad , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Masculino , Educación del Paciente como Asunto , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
We report the results of a subgroup analysis of the Benefits of Universal Glove and Gown trial. In 20 intensive care units, the reduction in acquisition of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus observed in this trial was observed in units also using chlorhexidine bathing and in those that previously performed active surveillance.
Asunto(s)
Baños/métodos , Clorhexidina/uso terapéutico , Infección Hospitalaria , Infecciones por Bacterias Grampositivas , Control de Infecciones , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente a Meticilina , Ropa de Protección , Enterococos Resistentes a la Vancomicina , Infección Hospitalaria/microbiología , Infección Hospitalaria/prevención & control , Desinfectantes/uso terapéutico , Infecciones por Bacterias Grampositivas/microbiología , Infecciones por Bacterias Grampositivas/prevención & control , Humanos , Control de Infecciones/métodos , Control de Infecciones/estadística & datos numéricos , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos/estadística & datos numéricos , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente a Meticilina/efectos de los fármacos , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente a Meticilina/aislamiento & purificación , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud , Enterococos Resistentes a la Vancomicina/efectos de los fármacos , Enterococos Resistentes a la Vancomicina/aislamiento & purificaciónRESUMEN
Growing evidence reveals the importance of improving safety culture in efforts to eliminate health care-associated infections. This multisite, cross-sectional survey examined the association between professional role and health care experience on infection prevention safety culture at 5 hospitals. The findings suggest that frontline health care technicians are less directly engaged in improvement efforts and safety education than other staff and that infection prevention safety culture varies more by hospital than by staff position and experience.
Asunto(s)
Actitud del Personal de Salud , Infección Hospitalaria/prevención & control , Control de Infecciones/métodos , Cuerpo Médico de Hospitales/organización & administración , Cultura Organizacional , Rol Profesional , Administración de la Seguridad/métodos , Estudios Transversales , Humanos , Cuerpo Médico de Hospitales/psicología , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Although e-mail may be an efficient clinician-patient communication tool, standard e-mail is not adequately secure to meet Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) guidelines. For this reason, firewall-secured electronic messaging systems have been developed for use in health care. Impact and usability of these secure systems have not been broadly assessed. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the impact of a secure electronic messaging system implemented for a pediatric subspecialty clinic. METHODS: This study was performed in an outpatient, academic pediatric respiratory clinic in spring 2009 in New Haven, Connecticut. Patients were surveyed prior to implementation regarding internet usage. The Kryptiq messaging system was implemented and messages were monitored continuously and tracked. Open-ended qualitative interviews with 28 users and nonusers were conducted, and we described the process of implementation. RESULTS: All of the 127 patients/families surveyed expressed interest in using the Internet to contact their clinic providers, and they all reported having the ability to access the Internet. In the 8 months after implementation, only 5 messages were initiated by patients in contrast to 2363 phone calls. Themes emerged from the open-ended interviews that indicated promoters, barriers, and potential uses. Prominent barriers included the lack of convenience and personal touch and being technically difficult to use. CONCLUSIONS: Although these patients/families expressed strong interest in e-mailing, secure Web messaging was less convenient than using the phone, too technically cumbersome, lacked a personal touch, and was used only by a handful of patients.
Asunto(s)
Seguridad Computacional/normas , Confidencialidad/normas , Correo Electrónico/normas , Servicio Ambulatorio en Hospital/normas , Relaciones Médico-Paciente , Niño , Enfermedad Crónica , Seguridad Computacional/ética , Confidencialidad/ética , Recolección de Datos/métodos , Correo Electrónico/ética , Humanos , Internet/ética , Internet/normas , Servicio Ambulatorio en Hospital/ética , Relaciones Médico-Paciente/ética , Factores de TiempoRESUMEN
A Web-based training course with embedded video clips for reducing central line-associated bloodstream infections (CLABSIs) was evaluated and shown to improve clinician knowledge and retention of knowledge over time. To our knowledge, this is the first study to evaluate Web-based CLABSI training as a stand-alone intervention.