RESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: The optimization of intensive care unit (ICU) care impacts clinical outcomes and resource utilization. In 2017, our surgical ICU (SICU) adopted a "closed-collaborative" model. The aim of this study is to compare patient outcomes in the closed-collaborative model versus the previous open model in a cohort of trauma surgical patients admitted to our adult level 1 trauma center. METHODS: A retrospective review of trauma patients in the SICU from August 1, 2015 to July 31, 2019 was performed. Patients were divided into those admitted prior to August 1, 2017 (the "open" cohort) and those admitted after August 1, 2017 (the "closed-collaborative" cohort). Demographic variables and clinical outcomes were analyzed. Trauma severity was assessed using injury severity score (ISS). RESULTS: We identified 1669 patients (O: 895; C: 774). While no differences in demographics were observed, the closed-collaborative cohort had a higher overall ISS (O: 21.5 ± 12.14; C: 25.10 ± 2.72; P < 0.0001). There were no significant differences between the two cohorts in the incidence of strokes (O: 1.90%; C: 2.58%, P = 0.3435), pulmonary embolism (O: 0.78%; C: 0.65%; P = 0.7427), sepsis (O: 5.25%; C: 7.49%; P = 0.0599), median ICU charges (O: $7784.50; C: $8986.53; P = 0.5286), mortality (O: 11.40%; C: 13.18%; P = 0.2678), or ICU length of stay (LOS) (O: 4.85 ± 6.23; C: 4.37 ± 4.94; P = 0.0795). CONCLUSIONS: Patients in the closed-collaborative cohort had similar clinical outcomes despite having a sicker cohort of patients. We hypothesize that the closed-collaborative ICU model was able to maintain equivalent outcomes due to the dedicated multidisciplinary critical care team caring for these patients. Further research is warranted to determine the optimal model of ICU care for trauma patients.